A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: DHS Ammo Purchases: Gun
Control by Another Name?
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
DHS Ammo Purchases: Gun
Control by Another Name?

Breitbart´s Big Government, by AWR Hawkins

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 2/10/2013 8:29:45 PM

According to reports, the Department of Homeland Security has stockpiled over 1.6 billion rounds of ammo for its various agencies, and one of the worst side effects of this appears to be a shortage of ammo for private gun owners. The question is--what if the shortage is intentional? Bear with me here. I am not a "conspiracy theorist" nor do I believe that DHS is stockpiling bullets in order to wage war on Americans, as some commentators have suggested. However, I do believe they know these massive ammo purchases are driving supply

Comments:
When I read articles like this I can´t help but think of the chilling article posted the other day from Canada Free Press. This isn´t the country I used to know. It´s getting to the point where sometimes I wonder if I would be better off not being so well informed in knowing about things like this. It´s certainly not good for your peace of mind.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: stencil, 2/10/2013 8:35:15 PM     (No. 9169335)

Since about the third time I heard of these buys, it occurred to me that they were restricting the supply.


Reply 2 - Posted by: vesicant, 2/10/2013 8:38:48 PM     (No. 9169338)

Gun forums noticed this weeks ago. I thought about the gun control possibility back then, but .40 and 9mm are handgun rounds. If non-DOD departments were buying .223 (the "evil assault weapon" ammo), then we should really worry. Although I suppose it could be a ploy to shift production away from .223. Or, they know the government is about to go after ammo makers in some way.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 2/10/2013 8:39:13 PM     (No. 9169341)

The answer(s) can be found in a book called:

"They Fired the First Shot"

Can´t recommend it enough.

There are no devils left in hell. They are here.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Pam, 2/10/2013 8:50:03 PM     (No. 9169358)

Like anything big government does, the inventory will shrink over time and guarantee the ´misplaced´ ammo won´t go to the good guys.


Reply 5 - Posted by: cjjeepercreeper, 2/10/2013 8:50:34 PM     (No. 9169360)

My sons and I both noticed this several days ago. We are having a heck of a time getting ammo for our 9mm´s and .40 cals. Both calibers are what the gov is buying up, and they are the 2 most popular handgun calibers. IT IS gun control, you know it, I know it.


Reply 6 - Posted by: trappedinmn, 2/10/2013 9:13:34 PM     (No. 9169381)

Probably trying to dry up the supply until they get all those strict laws passed- then it won´t matter. Who is going to buy a gun if they can´t get ammo? Also, the ammo won´t be there when the government makes it´s move after the collapse.


Reply 7 - Posted by: chicodon, 2/10/2013 9:23:04 PM     (No. 9169392)

Let´s use logic. Confiscate millions of weapons or regulate and control ammo purchases? The answer is obvious. The feds can do the latter with a stroke of the pen. The upside (for them) are no 2nd Amendment entanglements.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: CleanhouseinDc, 2/10/2013 9:24:23 PM     (No. 9169394)

It´s not like the repubs are shutting down their funding.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Vivi, 2/10/2013 9:28:28 PM     (No. 9169400)

Ummmm... how foes DHS have the funds in their budget to do this? The House needs to investigate this ptonto for many reasons. Calling my guy tomorrow. DHS doesn´t need and can´t afford this ammunition. Enough.

The Senate should investigate this is well, but if there´s a more useless layabout won´t -even -write -a -budget pointless ridiculous legislative body on the planet I´d like to know where.


Reply 10 - Posted by: nashville, 2/10/2013 9:50:29 PM     (No. 9169418)

I think this would be pointless as a way to keep ammo out of our hands. The ammo guys are still going to make it and I don´t think the government could buy 5 billion rounds per year, after year...

Ammo is very hard to find in stores right now, but a little computer time and you will find it online (buklammo.com etc...) I´ve bought some 40SW in the last week from two of them, with shipping came to about $0.45 per round. That is about .10 more per round than a year ago. I now don´t have to worry about going to the range twice a month for the next year and putting a dent in my ´stock´.


Reply 11 - Posted by: mustang flyer, 2/10/2013 11:03:40 PM     (No. 9169468)

I contacted my Congressman Ralph Hall and Senator John Cornyn (Texas) with the 1.6 BILLION round purchase...their answer´s so far is that the figures are "exaggerated"...so I asked if that is so then what are the right figures..."less than 300,000" is what I´m being told... now, has my Government lied to me before??? Now where do you suppose the bullets have gone to???


Reply 12 - Posted by: Crosscut, 2/10/2013 11:56:32 PM     (No. 9169504)

The DHS is not a friend or protector of American citizens. Quite the opposite. It has been greatly subverted from it´s original mission to guard the nation from Islamic attacks. Now it appears to be being honed into a paramilitary force. Prepared to be used against any group or anyone who rebels against the current administration´s agenda. It is still in it´s early stages of formation and can be stopped. Let´s pray that it is.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Mickturn, 2/11/2013 12:17:18 AM     (No. 9169515)

Ammo makers just need to tell DHS that purchases over a fixed amount per year will not be allowed!


Reply 14 - Posted by: geoman, 2/11/2013 12:22:29 AM     (No. 9169520)

With the rash of .40 and 9mm orders by the government, the manufacturers may understandably be unwilling to invest in physical plant and new employees to open new production lines. Government purchases of this magnitude are an anomaly and not indicative of the market, thus not sustainable over time from a manufacturing perspecitve. Some manufacturers also appear to be producing less .380, .38 special, .45 auto, and .357 rounds at the same time the citizenry´s demand across the board for any caliber of ammo has skyrocketed. Government intervention has tightened the supply such that the majority of ammo available for purchase has gone up in price, often in orders of magnitude with the net effect of "taxing" those who can still find readily available supplies. OMB has rules regarding this type of government acquisition relative to its market impact. A heavy political hand is behind this procurement ploy that reeks of abuse of the public treasury for surreptitious policy making purposes.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Safari Man, 2/11/2013 1:46:24 AM     (No. 9169538)

I wonder if someone made/sold a weapon based on laser technology if the government could prevent its distribution. It would be very difficult to limit the supply of photons. Its just a thought, but I am getting the sense we need to outsmart them.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Trigger2, 2/11/2013 4:06:30 AM     (No. 9169571)

Restrict supply only? Then why all those FEMA camps? Why are the military practicing maneuvers in cities? Why is military equipment being embedded in state and local police departments?


Reply 17 - Posted by: Spidey, 2/11/2013 4:42:38 AM     (No. 9169578)

I know this sounds crazy right now but keep an eye out for Obama dismissing troops that aren´t willing to fire on American citizens.The person who leaked this info is a well respected world humanitarian and not the left wing phony variety.

I don´t know wy the ammo makers are giving government orders a priority or at least rationing what they can produce so everybody gets a "fir shot" at renewing their supply.

FEMA is part of homeland security. They didn´t have the funds to respond to Sandy but they have plenty of money to buy ammo to use on their own citizens?
We have the military to protect us from foreign invaders so why does HS need millions of bullets?

Obama openly bragged about creating and funding a domestic army.He´s also said blacks and latinos are the future workforce in this country,put 2 and 2 together.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: drkillj0y, 2/11/2013 3:43:35 PM     (No. 9170630)

The last round of bid request doesn´t make any sense to me.

It´s filed under "Ammunition, over 30mm up to 75mm" and "Ammunition (except Small Arms) Manufacturing".

What ?

It´s asking for
Pistol Cartridge .40 caliber 165 Grain, jacketed Hollow point(Jhp) p/n P40HSTS3G OR EQUAL. BRASS CASING 100,000 ROUNDS PRICE PER 1000 ROUNDS WILL INCLUDE DELIVERY. QTY-100, UNIT-MX

9MM 115 GRAIN JACKETED HOLLOW POINT P/N 9BP-115 GRAIN JHP OR EQUAL BRASS CASING 100,000 ROUNDS PRICE PER 1000 ROUNDS WILL INCLUDE DELIVERY. QTY-100, UNIT-MX

PISTOL CARTIDGE 9MM BALL 124 GRAIN P/N AE9AP OR EQUAL BRASS CASING 40,000 ROUNDS PRICE PER 1000 ROUNDS WILL INCLUDE DELIVEY. QTY-40, UNIT-MX


As far as I can tell, they are looking for 240,000 rounds of pistol ammo - not 21 million.

Maybe someone who has a FedBid decoder ring can read the bid request for us.

https://marketplace.fedbid.com/fbweb/fbobuyDetails.do?token===wBKxmaVGYR9Kcq5Ajq%2BRH6QAAAAAHeAAgAgTFCGg/FzzqQbJAAyVXBA0Or


Reply 19 - Posted by: vesicant, 2/14/2013 7:44:11 PM     (No. 9177035)

Thanks for the link, #18. It´s a request for vendors to quote on a commercial (readily available, not needing any R&D) item using simplified procedures. It´s a 100% set-aside for small businesses, which means the expected price is between $3K and $100K (or maybe $250K). A small business typically has less than 500 employees and $5 million in revenue (meaning companies like Winchester and Remington probably aren´t elegible). The quantity is for 100,000 rounds of .40 JHP, 100,000 rounds of 9mm JHP, and 40,000 rounds of 9mm ball. All of this isn´t being purchased at once; the government intends to issue periodic purchase orders for smaller increments until the 100K or 40K base is exhausted. The "MX" units means 1000, so if the QTY is 100, that´s 100,000. So, 240K is the correct total. Somebody probably multiplied the QTY in column 22 by the schedule in column 20, but that´s wrong. Of course, there could be other RFQs out there.



Post Reply   Close thread 722895




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Fox News Will Defend Reporter
Against ´Co-Conspirator´ Charge
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:05:36 PM     Post Reply
The Justice Department, already under fire for seizing AP phone records, also viewed e-mails of Fox News chief Washington correspondent James Rosen, calling him a criminal ´co-conspirator´ for his reporting. Fox News´ executive vice president of news, Michael Clemente, released a statement defending Rosen. The statement issued Monday afternoon is below: "We are outraged to learn today that James Rosen was named a criminal co-conspirator for simply doing his job as a reporter," Clemente said. "In fact, it is downright chilling. We will unequivocally

Former Counterterrorism Head:
FBI Never Called Ft. Hood
´Workplace Violence´
Breitbart´s Big Peace, by Kerry Picket    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 2:49:11 PM     Post Reply
Michael Steinbach, former head of the FBI’s counterterrorism division and now special agent in charge of Miami, told over 30 congressional staffers in March of 2012 that, contrary to the White House´s classification, the bureau does not refer to the Fort Hood shooting as "workplace violence." As head of the FBI counterterrorism division, Steinbach oversaw the investigation into the mass murder at Texas Army base. Steinbach made this claim during an unclassified counterterrorism briefing on Capitol Hill. “Do you guys teach your agents that Fort Hood was workplace violence?” one staffer asked.

   

 



 
‘Co-Conspirator’: Fox News Reporter
James Rosen’s Private Emails Given
To Justice Dept. By Google
Mediaite, by Noah Rothman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 2:35:31 PM     Post Reply
As a result of Fox News Channel’s State Department reporter James Rosen’s 2009 investigation into the government’s response to North Korea’s repeated provocations, it was reported on Monday that the Department of Justice tracked Rosen’s movements as well as subpoenaed telephone and email records. According to the DoJ’s subpoena, Google surrendered Rosen’s emails, who is described as “an aider and abettor and/or co-conspirator,” to the government. “Rosen was not charged with any crime, but it is unprecedented for the government, in an official court document, to accuse a reporter of breaking the law for conducting the

Senate Finance Committee issues
request for detailed information on
IRS targeting scandal by May 31st
Hot Air, by Ed Morrissey    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 2:25:18 PM     Post Reply
The House has already begun its investigation of the IRS scandal, with Friday’s hearing in the House Ways and Means Committee. The Senate Finance Committee will follow in short order, and it has already issued a “request” for detailed information from the agency about its targeting of conservative groups over the last three years. Ironically, it looks a lot like the kind of request that the agency sent out to those groups, with 41 demands and just 11 days to respond. The letter, provided by a source on Capitol Hill, shows that the questioning is likely to feel a lot like an audit:

Marco Rubio Reacts to Report Fox
News Reporters Were Targeted by DOJ
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 2:12:58 PM     Post Reply
U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) issued the following statement after a report was released claiming that the Obama Administration targeted a FOX News reporter during a leak investigation: “I am very concerned by reports the Obama Administration targeted a FOX News reporter for possible criminal prosecution for doing what appears to be normal news-gathering protected by the First Amendment. The sort of reporting by James Rosen detailed in the report is the same sort of reporting that helped Mr. Rosen aggressively pursue questions about the Administration’s handling of Benghazi.

Megyn Kelly Calls Out DOJ
for Tracking Movements of
Fox News Reporter
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 2:07:56 PM     Post Reply
After another troubling report about the Justice Department´s crackdown on media leaks, Megyn asks, "how many times has this happened?" We´re learning more by the minute following an explosive report by the Washington Post about the Justice Department monitoring the movements of Fox News Chief Washington Correspondent James Rosen. The DOJ was reportedly looking into Rosen´s visits to the State Department, via his security badge, in addition to obtaining search warrants for his personal phone and emails. It all stemmed from a leak by someone in the State

Bill Kristol: Obama ‘Did Not Behave’
The Way A President Should
On Night Of Benghazi Attack
Mediaite, by Noah Rothman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:41:51 PM     Post Reply
In an appearance on C-SPAN on Monday, Bill Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, scolded President Barack Obama for what reports suggest was his hands-off approach to the ongoing crisis in Benghazi on the night of an attack on that city’s American consulate. “I am willing to say that he did not behave as a President of the United States should have behaved that night,” Kristol said. A C-SPAN caller asked Kristol about the second phase of the Benghazi attack, in which militants laid siege to an annex for several hours. The caller asked about the



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

59 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

59 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

Camelot Is Burning
47 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

42 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

   

Post Reply   Close thread 722895





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~