|
|
| |
Topic: Chicago Police Want 12% Raise |
Chicago Police Want 12% Raise
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Rebel Pundit
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 2/9/2013 9:52:57 PM
|
| Days after the Chicago Police Department announced it will no longer respond to 911 calls for criminal damage to property, vehicle thefts, garage burglaries, or other crimes in which the suspect is no longer on the scene, the Fraternal Order of Police (Chicago police union) is demanding a 12 percent raise. In addition to the 12 percent increase over the next two years, the union is also seeking a $3,000 annual stipend for being required to live within the city, pay less for health insurance, and reach the top pay scale of
|
Comments: I can´t think of a police force more deserving of such a raise. They have done such a stellar job in fighting crime in Chicago. Heavy s/o
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
otronome, 2/9/2013 10:02:29 PM (No. 9168021)
It´s the gubbermint. Give them 6% more and call it a 6% cut givent they wanted more.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
jl80863, 2/9/2013 10:03:05 PM (No. 9168022)
Murder capitol of the US. The Dems and the cops are doing a hell of a job. s/o
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
yo-yo, 2/9/2013 10:04:34 PM (No. 9168023)
I know I would want more than that to clean up an 0bama organized community!
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
provide, 2/9/2013 10:09:09 PM (No. 9168031)
Does that include that useless Police Commissioner too?
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
GreatGreyhounds, 2/9/2013 10:09:34 PM (No. 9168032)
Just imagine how much they would ask for if Chicago want the murder capital of the world...
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Blackeagle, 2/9/2013 10:36:34 PM (No. 9168056)
The kick backs from the drug gangs and their drug trafficking isn´t enough?! OK, I get it - those payoffs go only to the Vice Squad members and the upper brass. And have you seen the price of a box of doughnuts lately?
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
MDConservative, 2/9/2013 10:52:37 PM (No. 9168067)
To Collect and to Serve, somewhat.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
BaseballFan, 2/9/2013 11:06:28 PM (No. 9168077)
STRIKE! STRIKE! STRIKE!
/s off/
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Grace Veritas, 2/9/2013 11:12:54 PM (No. 9168080)
Yeah, me too. Who doesn´t want a 12% increase?
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 2/9/2013 11:42:13 PM (No. 9168099)
The city would be safer without the FOP and much wealthier. There is nothing so endearing as being extorted by your own corrupt police department.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Axeman, 2/9/2013 11:52:29 PM (No. 9168107)
I want 20%!!!
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Nevadadad46, 2/10/2013 12:20:04 AM (No. 9168120)
For What?
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 2/10/2013 12:28:12 AM (No. 9168126)
They want 12%, but they´ll take 6%.
Compared to what everyone else in the Obama economy is getting, they´ll still be way ahead.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
veritas, 2/10/2013 12:54:59 AM (No. 9168137)
FTA: Days after the Chicago Police Department announced it will no longer respond to 911 calls for criminal damage to property, vehicle thefts, garage burglaries, or other crimes in which the suspect is no longer on the scene
Why not just give us the list of 2 or 3 things that will bring a police response to a 9-1-1 call? [Really -- how many times is the perp just hanging around?]
Clearly, the right answer to this extortion is Reagan´s PATCO action. Too bad it´s tougher to bring about with a city police force -- and impossible to produce under Rahm and his pal, Stinky.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Grumpy Yee, 2/10/2013 1:07:24 AM (No. 9168142)
Deduct one hour´s wage for each failed 911 response when assigned to a specific district..
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
MtGardenerview, 2/10/2013 1:29:05 AM (No. 9168149)
Days after the Chicago Police Department announced it will no longer respond to 911 calls for criminal damage to property, vehicle thefts, garage burglaries, or other crimes in which the suspect is no longer on the scene.
Is he telling his citizens that the police will not respond to armed robberies, assaults with weapons, homicides where the suspect is no longer at the scene of the crime. Not responding indicates it was not reported What a novel way to reduce the crime statistics
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
belwhatter, 2/10/2013 2:45:52 AM (No. 9168171)
I thought Illinois was broke - perhaps the inner circle of shake down land in Chicago isn´t yet quite as broke.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
billa, 2/10/2013 2:56:09 AM (No. 9168174)
Please explain this logic to me...the police will not respond to a 911 call to a crime where the suspect is no longer on the scene.
I do not know what news reports this union and politicians are following, but I would guess that probably 95% or more crimes that are committed, the suspect has already fled the scene. And seriously, the only realistic way, a suspect would still be at the scene of the crime, is if the victim had some way to restrain the suspect of a crime in progress. How? Usually with a gun. Or a crime in progress like a high speed chase or hostage situation (which are very rare).
So the way I read this as the way it has been reported by the CPD, is that any 911 calls involving a property crime or any other crime where the suspect is not at the scene of the crime, the CPD will not respond.
With this logic, since so few actual 911 calls will require a response, it would then follow that the CPD needs to drastically reduce its force as they would not need as many officers.
Can you even imagine how many home invasions are going to soar because criminals will know not only are the home owners unarmed, but also the police are not going come.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
LanieLou, 2/10/2013 5:18:21 AM (No. 9168219)
The police union is just following their local teachers unions. Over the past year, each school district has taken it´s turn to strike for hire pay & after a few days they win, then next district strikes for a couple days. Cops want their pc of the unending pie, too.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam, 2/10/2013 7:02:03 AM (No. 9168279)
Well, they appear to be doing such a good job....
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
franq, 2/10/2013 7:16:01 AM (No. 9168289)
How many of us demand a raise from our boss?
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
strike3, 2/10/2013 7:28:59 AM (No. 9168311)
Translation: We aren´t going to do our jobs any more but we want more money. In the real world they would all be fired. The gangs conrol the streets anyway, what would change?
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
ROLFnader, 2/10/2013 10:23:06 AM (No. 9168539)
I remember laughing when first told the union motto: "If you give me a raise, I promise to work harder".
It was ever thus.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
tanker, 2/10/2013 8:28:40 PM (No. 9169327)
Based on what they won"t do, they should disband the police department as there is no need for "dead horses".Offer the vacant jobs to career criminals as that would lower the crime rate.Unfortunately most of the crooks are in uniform.Apologies to the few honest ones.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Colorado sheriffs seek to block new gun restrictions, file lawsuit against state
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations
|
´We could lose everything´: Tea Party groups prepare to sue IRS
|
|
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.
|
First Lady Expands Anti- Obesity Campaign to Museums
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community
|
Congressman: IRS asked pro- life group about ´the content of their prayers´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although
|
Treasury Knew of I.R.S. Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
|
|
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,
|
HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t Employees More Time for ´Planning and Preparing Healthy Meals´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.
|
Will real villains in IRS scandal ever be punished?
|
|
Fox News, by Juan Williams
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|