A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Why conservatives should
back immigration reform
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Why conservatives should
back immigration reform

Politico, by Al Cardenas

Original Article

Posted By:Pluperfect, 2/7/2013 5:54:53 PM

I am pleased that the conversation on immigration reform started in earnest last week after a bipartisan group of senators unveiled a set of principles that will guide the debate moving forward. Despite Senator Marco Rubio’s interviews with Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity and Mark Levin, a number of my colleagues in the conservative movement remain skeptical. That is understandable given Congress’s history. In 1986, President Ronald Reagan championed amnesty for over one million unauthorized immigrants in exchange for significant reform — which would have included a thoughtful process moving forward that would restrain, if not completely stop,

Comments:
Please note the writer´s conservative credentials.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: civilservant, 2/7/2013 6:16:18 PM     (No. 9164485)

And Reagan regretted being rolled by the Left on that one.

Mr. Cardenas, we need murder reform. No one follows that law either. So, if you´ve murdered and gotten away with it for 2 years, we give you amnesty.

Hey, what´s the rule of law if only applied to specific instances?

Lack of enforcement does not equal the need for reform.

And no, I am not equating murder with illegal immigration.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Patchy Groundfog, 2/7/2013 6:25:12 PM     (No. 9164501)

Doctors talking about preventing household accidents is all well and good but when you have an open wound the ER docs don´t bother about the lectures and instead focus on stopping the bleeding.

I don´t care what side of this issue you fall on - as long as the border chaos continues then any ´reform´ is pointless because of the moving target.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: bob913, 2/7/2013 6:34:29 PM     (No. 9164522)

Marco Rubio appears on Time magazine cover. That should tell you the liberals are using him and he is undermining America to get Mexicans by the 10´s of millions into this country to vote him the next president.


Reply 4 - Posted by: alloysteel, 2/7/2013 6:36:34 PM     (No. 9164528)

I am all in favor of immigration reform.

First, we go back to the Immigration and Nationality Services Act of 1965, Hart-Seller, passed in the fever days of the Great Society. Repeal it forthwith, and substitute a bill that FAVORS the immigration of successful and accomplished people, and requiring some accountability for maintaining contact with those resident aliens who came here on visas. No overstays, and no sneaking in a whole family under a "compassionate" clause. The applicants have to be able to support themselves once they arrive in this country, without resorting to any of the welfare programs. Their only "welfare" in that instance is to be given a one-way ticket back to their place of origin. While here, the resident alien is expected to comply with the law as any citizen would, and would be subject to legal action if extenuating circumstances could not be demonstrated. The alien is a GUEST, and is accorded only the rights extended to guests, which are vastly more limited than rights extended to citizens.


Reply 5 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 2/7/2013 6:38:11 PM     (No. 9164531)

Bunch of verbs here used to say nothing. The salient point here is that we DO NOT have de facto amnesty, because illegals cannot vote. Secondly, the fact that the real unemployment rate is around 15% yet illegal guests comprise 5% of the US work force ought to tell you everything you need to know about the "jobs Americans won´t do" shinola.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Bpl40, 2/7/2013 7:27:45 PM     (No. 9164588)

Notice how the ´Rats are steadfastly opposing every proposal of sealing the border first. They DON´T want immigration reform. Uncontrolled influx and a straight road to citizenship through amnesty to dilute the patriotic vote is the clear goal.


Reply 7 - Posted by: tnorling, 2/7/2013 7:36:06 PM     (No. 9164598)

At the risk of repetition, illegals in addition to taking jobs from Americans also depress wages. Any amnesty will attract more, and, quite frankly, are YOU going to pay for their social security and medicare? They can´t, because they haven´t and never will pay anything significant into the system if they were made legal.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: saguni, 2/7/2013 7:44:42 PM     (No. 9164606)

Lot of words, but no mention of why we should even listen to him.

Why is it that every other crime on the books, when caught, the criminal isn´t allowed to profit from his crimes.

Yet for criminal alien invaders who trespass into this country, commit identity theft to have papers in order to work, often smuggle (guns, drugs, sex slaves) when entering this country, often commit crimes/drive under the influence of drugs &/or alcohol, etc. etc. etc. then get rewarded with a "path to citizenship" for themselves and instant benefits for their children.

Where is the justice or "fairness" in this?..they get to line-jump ahead of all the millions of legal immigrants from every nation in the world who are following the rules.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Japanorama, 2/7/2013 8:24:01 PM     (No. 9164634)

"reform" hell
This is expunging the criminal records of every illegal immigrant.
Result.
Millions more illegal immigrants who will seek reform.
Result.
No more America.


Reply 10 - Posted by: KTWO, 2/7/2013 8:27:46 PM     (No. 9164639)

"Reform", in this case, is happy talk. A device to achieve nothing while saying you have fixed a problem.

It doesn´t matter what the immigration laws say if they are not or cannot be enforced.

Obama won´t enforce any provisions he dislikes. And the Democrats see millions of new voters.

Which means state voter registration laws have to be neutered too. So Holder´s DOJ attacks every single attempt to enforce them.

No improvement will be made while Obama is in office. Only the wording of the deceptions will mutate.


Reply 11 - Posted by: 6ironejd, 2/7/2013 9:02:58 PM     (No. 9164676)

This is just another piece of "Amnesty is inevitable" tripe from the political press. Most illegals are not interested in a path to citizenship but rather a path to benefits. There is a big difference. Think of 30 million illegals eligible for ObamaCare.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Don´s Thought, 2/7/2013 9:04:14 PM     (No. 9164678)

#4 Well said.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 2/7/2013 11:30:17 PM     (No. 9164836)

No thanks.


Reply 14 - Posted by: bighambone, 2/8/2013 12:16:41 AM     (No. 9164866)

I disagree. The vast majority of illegal aliens are poor generally uneducated people who earn low wages and have big families. With human nature being what it is, once legalized they will access every safety net social welfare program that they possibly can to survive here.

Right now as illegal aliens, being ineligible to access most social welfare programs, they have little choice but to accept any job offered to them at whatever wage the employer wishes to pay them. Once legalized they will no longer have to accept those hard jobs and many will not. Employers won´t care because they will just hire from the new crop of illegal aliens who are sure to appear encouraged to come here because of the amnesty.

Common sense dictates that the vast majority of those people, when they are given US voting rights will vote for the liberal Democrats, who promise them complete access to social welfare programs and other rights, rather then vote for Republicans who want to downsize those programs and limit the legalized aliens access because of the huge costs that the government is sure to incur.


Reply 15 - Posted by: suedotsue, 2/8/2013 2:43:37 AM     (No. 9164925)

If one hasn´t researched this author one might assume he´s a so-called conservative. I see him as someone who needs to move off the public would-be conservative stage. People like him are worse than democrats.


Reply 16 - Posted by: ROLFnader, 2/8/2013 10:33:10 AM     (No. 9165521)

Well, I´m such a die-hard conservative that I´m ticked off about Rubio´s multi-lingual response to the SOTU. First, the obvious- it´s pandering, pure and simple. Second, I don´t like the idea that there are enough people comfortably living in this country that still appreciate hearing it in Spanish.



Post Reply   Close thread 722543




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"



CIA Honored Benghazi
Chief in Secret Ceremony
Daily Beast, by Eli Lake    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/21/2013 6:28:18 AM     Post Reply
At a secret February ceremony at CIA headquarters in Langley, Va., the chief of the CIA’s base in Benghazi the night of the 9/11 anniversary attacks there was awarded one of the agency’s highest intelligence medals, according to U.S. military and intelligence officials.The honor given behind closed doors to “Bob,” the officer who was in charge of the Benghazi intelligence annex and CIA base that was attacked in the early morning of September 12, 2012 and then abandoned for nearly three weeks, illustrates the murky lines of command that preceded the attack, and helped make it a politically volatile issue.

Congress likely to reduce food
stamp funding in new farm bill
Washington Examiner, by Susan Ferrechio    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/21/2013 5:53:57 AM     Post Reply
The Senate on Monday opened debate on a $955 billion farm bill that would reduce federal spending by as much as $23 billion over the next 10 years by cutting funding for food stamps and eliminating some farm-support programs. "This legislation will create jobs, cut taxpayer subsidies and reduce the deficit," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday. The White House offered only conditional support for the bill, an indication that lawmakers will need to make changes to win the president´s signature. The Obama administration in April called for a 3 percent reduction in the nation´s crop insurance program,

The Most Chilling Details From
The Kafkaesque Search Warrant
That Went After A Fox News Reporter
Business Insider, by Grace Wyler    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/21/2013 5:43:48 AM     Post Reply
Journalists are understandably alarmed by the revelation that President Barack Obama´s Justice Department targeted Fox News reporter James Rosen during a leak investigation of a State Department employee. The news, reported by the Washington Post late Sunday night, reveals that the Obama administration will apparently stop at nothing to track down whistle-blowers who leak classified information. In Rosen´s case, that included implicating him as a "criminal co-conspirator" whose actions were punishable with up to 10 years in prison. While it is not uncommon for the government to investigate leaks, it is unprecedented for a journalist

How the Obama Administration
Talks to Black America
Atlantic, by Ta-Nehisi Coates    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/21/2013 5:25:05 AM     Post Reply
The first lady went to Bowie State and addressed the graduating class. Her speech was a mix of black history and a salute to the graduates. (Snip) It takes a man of particular vision to know, as Obama did, that the country really was ready to send an African American to the White House. But I also think that some day historians will pore over his many speeches to black audiences. They will see a president who sought to hold black people accountable for their communities, but was disdainful of those who looked at him and sought the same.

There’s no way Obama is
telling the truth about when
he learned of the IRS scandal
Daily Caller, by Jim Treacher    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/20/2013 11:17:14 AM     Post Reply
And yes, I realize that headline is eight words too long. Peter Nicholas at the WSJ: The White House’s chief lawyer learned weeks ago that an audit of the Internal Revenue Service likely would show that agency employees inappropriately targeted conservative groups, a senior White House official said Sunday. That disclosure has prompted a debate over whether the president should have been notified at that time. In the week of April 22, the Office of the White House Counsel and its head, Kathryn Ruemmler, were told by Treasury Department attorneys

   

 



 
Washington bureaucrats use
force to suffocate liberty
Washington Examiner, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/20/2013 5:50:08 AM     Post Reply
Remember Armand Armendariz, the Environmental Protection Agency regional administrator who resigned after regaling an audience of Big Green activists with a history lesson to illustrate his agency´s approach to critics of the EPA´s harshest policies? When the Romans conquered a new province, he said, they would "... find the first five guys they saw and they´d crucify them ..." to make the province "really easy to manage for the next few years." The EPA, he continued, also makes "examples of people who are not complying with the law, you make examples out of them,

Reactionaries in New York
Time, by Joe Klein    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 8:27:40 AM     Post Reply
The Democratic candidates for mayor in New York are campaigning to win the support of the teachers union. They threaten to return the city to the horrors of the David Dinkins era. Back at the turn of the 1990s, New York City was a mess. Crime was rampant. The schools were dreadful. Children in foster care were brutalized because–as the head of the Child Welfare Agency said–”oversight is racist.” The mayor was an incompetent. And, above all, the city was run for the benefit of its employees rather than its citizens. What followed was 20 years of governance



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

Democratic Senator uses Okla.
tornado for anti-GOP rant
over global warming

39 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM     Post Reply
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care

   

Post Reply   Close thread 722543





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~