|
|
| |
Topic: Universal background checks would end father-child gun gifts |
Universal background checks would end father-child gun gifts
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 2/7/2013 12:28:17 PM
|
| It´s a long tradition in America: A father buys a gun for his son or daughter to practice with at a range and eventually take hunting. It´s one so rich in American life that many states are encouraging it by adding youth-only hunting seasons and urging parents to bring their children to hunter safety courses. But universal background check proposals being considered in Washington and in some states are threatening to end that by criminalizing gun gifts, neighbor-to-neighbor sales or even inheritances where the one receiving the gun doesn´t first pass a background check. "They could very well make
|
Comments: The last paragraph is a real shocker. In the 80´s fathers were prosecuted for giving guns to their children without forcing their children to undergo background checks? And we didn´t have a regime like we do now. What a disaster this would be.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Attila DiMedici, 2/7/2013 12:35:38 PM (No. 9163826)
This is the thing that people who want "universal background checks" don´t understand, the overwhelming majority of gun sales that occur now without a background check are either already illegal (in which case changes to the law will have no impact) or they are between people who know more about each other than a background check would reveal. And in the vast majority of those latter sales the person making the sale would not even consider it if the person were someone who has much chance of ever being a mass shooter.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
columba, 2/7/2013 12:38:18 PM (No. 9163832)
In a country that kills its children and denigrates fathers, what difference would this make?
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
ScarletPimpernel, 2/7/2013 12:41:38 PM (No. 9163844)
Exactly, #1. Also, if you´re living in a state that doesn´t do background checks (but only police checks when you buy at a gun show or a gun dealer) nor register firearms to begin with, how would anyone know if you made a transaction?? If you already have (unregistered) firearms that you may have inherited, for example, without registration or background checks, how is anyone going to know about these transactions, which have been going on for years?
My husband and a friend plan to do work for a gentleman in exchange for firearms. This older man used to own a gun store and has a house literally full of guns. He cannot afford to pay for the work but is willing to exchange his inventory for work on his house. Providentially, my husband and his friend met this gentleman at a local shooting range. It´s a win win transaction, IMO
Universal background checks means universal registration and then confiscation. No thanks!!
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
strike3, 2/7/2013 12:43:54 PM (No. 9163852)
Most people will not comply with this lunacy. Besides being unconstitutional, it intrudes into people´s lives in a way that would cause them to disrespect and foster contempt for the government. Rightfully so.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
mitzi, 2/7/2013 12:47:15 PM (No. 9163872)
Too bad that doesn´t apply to Obama´s "sons."
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
antiquegolf, 2/7/2013 12:54:00 PM (No. 9163891)
It is scary that the GOP might cave in and agree to universal background checks, which, as poster 3 implied is a dangerous step toward universal registration. It´s likely that big brother already has the technology to survey residences and locate guns. That is also scary. Who´s to say a corrupt regime like Obama´s won´t use drones to identify gun owners then follow up wih a phone call or knock in your door if you refuse to voluntarily register?
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Patriot Forever, 2/7/2013 1:08:12 PM (No. 9163932)
Those who are pushing to close the "gun show loophole" don´t have a clue.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
PChristopher, 2/7/2013 1:08:29 PM (No. 9163934)
Simple...don´t abide by it.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
dvc, 2/7/2013 1:21:15 PM (No. 9163967)
In travels in the former Soviet states, I learned that the police WANTED laws that were impossible to live with, and never really enforced and widely ignored. This gave them the ability to arrest ANYONE for something, since EVERYONE broke some laws. If you were not causing them any problem - like maybe organising a political group - no arrest. As soon as you became an irritation - off to the gulag.
This about universal gun registration AND the ability to put away those that fail to comply, any time they choose to do it.
It will have ZERO effect on crime.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 2/7/2013 1:25:37 PM (No. 9163976)
#9, you are exactly right. Big cities have laws against almost everything. Many are not enforced unless you do something to disturb the powers-that-be. This allows the administration/police to control the population.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
woodsto sea, 2/7/2013 1:30:43 PM (No. 9163990)
Any vote for universal background checks is a vote for gun registration. People know this and those who don´t will by the time the election comes around. It will be the kiss of death to all from consevative areas that voted for it.
Compliance with registration has always been low where ever its tried. Look at the data from NY and NJ. Even AU. has admitted compliance was less than 25% to their gun ban. Look what happen in Canada with their long gun registration.
Why lose their job by voting for a bill that the majority will ignore? As been pointed out most states do not have any form of gun registration and the Federal Government is not allowed to compile a list of those who go through the instant check by Law. Universal background check would be meaningless. Use the 4473 form? Heck I sold that gun, it was stolen, lost it in a boating accident, freak outhouse fire ect.
The only reason to pass a universal background check would be to make outlaws out of the majority of gun owners.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
artman1746, 2/7/2013 1:53:01 PM (No. 9164026)
Simple. Don´t obey the law. I´ll still give guns to my grandsons when they get old enough. I have a black powder rifle, two shotguns and a hand gun. I´ll be sure they get proper instructions on handling a gun and they get practice. I don´t care what liberals think. Our traditions will continue in spite of any law a liberal thinks he can pass to control us.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
bugboy, 2/7/2013 1:56:26 PM (No. 9164030)
The issue is keeping guns out of the hands of criminals, terrorist and the mentally ill. Neither criminals not terrorist will be using the system since it is only pointed at the law abiding.
Without full medical history no background check is going to catch a nut job.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw, 2/7/2013 2:33:57 PM (No. 9164100)
Lost them all when the boat capsized.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
kanphil, 2/7/2013 2:34:34 PM (No. 9164101)
It won´t work, but that such a story gains any credence testifies to the fact that people are more in fear of their government than at any point in my pretty long lifetime. I visited my local Cabela´s yesterday. The ammo shelves are virtually empty except for shotgun shells which are still abundant. Sales of ammo and guns are driven wholly by fear.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Bobn.T, 2/7/2013 2:38:32 PM (No. 9164107)
#2 - and a country that is now killing citizens via drones.
Will drones be used within the national boundaries against anyone the govt suspects or doesn´t like, like the NRA leaders?
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
FunOne, 2/7/2013 3:25:20 PM (No. 9164194)
Register VOTERS--not gun owners.
The democrats have no interest in an orderly, verifiable voter registration system or the validity of the voter.
On the flip side, American patriots have no interest in participating in unconstitutional background checks and gun registration.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
ROLFnader, 2/7/2013 3:38:15 PM (No. 9164230)
I had this one gun this one time that I loaned to an ex brother- in- law ( now deceased) who claimed to have traded it for a dog from this one guy whose name I never heard.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
RoseOfTexas, 2/7/2013 7:02:57 PM (No. 9164562)
It´s not as simple as just not complying. If this gets passed into law, millions will immediately become law-breakers & when the moment comes that requires the use of the weapon, they will be burdened by the knowledge that they may be forfeiting their freedom in order to save their own or loved ones lives. If given a choice between being killed by some crackhead or having the spend years in prison with a bunch of crackheads, that´d be a tough decision for some of us.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
AG Holder Tied to Indicted Ga. Abortionist
|
|
National Review Online, by Ian Tuttle
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 10:12:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Pro-life groups argue that Attorney General Eric Holder’s Justice Department has been assiduous in its efforts to prosecute pro-life advocates who (legally) counsel women outside of abortion clinics, but considerably less dogged in prosecuting the abortionists inside — and they are pointing to a recent revelation as a possible reason why. Watchdog.org reports: In October, Watchdog.org published Fulton County tax records showing Holder’s wife, Dr. Sharon Malone Holder – an obstetric and gynecological doctor at Foxhall OB/GYN in Washington, D.C. – and her sister, Margie Malone Tuckson,
|
MSNBC Panel Suggests Racist Motivation by Pro-lifers, Goal of ´Reproducing Whiteness´
|
|
NewsBusters, by Brad Wilmouth
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 9:55:57 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Saturday´s Melissa Harris-Perry on MSNBC, substitute anchor Ari Melber hosted a panel of liberals fretting over Republican efforts to restrict abortion, with one guest even theorizing that Republicans are motivated by a racist desire to prevent white women from having abortions as a way of "reproducing whiteness, white supremacy, white privilege." Melber seemed quite accepting of University of Pennsylvania Assistant Professor Salamisha Tillet´s preposterous idea of pro-lifers being motivated by racism as he responded: And you´re talking not only then about a potentially religious view about
|
| |
|
GOP Rep. Tears Apart Rubio On Immigration, Says Boehner ‘Should Be Removed As Speaker’ If He Backs
|
|
Mediaite, by Josh Feldman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 9:41:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In the midst of all the big debates happening in Washington right now, one that’s getting less media attention is the immigration reform being taken up by Congress. The bill has divided Republicans and conservative commentators, with some of the latter offering dire warnings for the party’s future if it happens. California congressman Rana Rohrabacher is none too happy with his party taking up this mantle, saying on Wo*****Daily Radio that Marco Rubio and other immigration backers are using “weasel words” to deceive the public, and declaring that if House Speaker John Boehner allows the vote, then
|
Senate insiders see Rand Paul, Marco Rubio or Rick Perry leading 2016 GOP ticket
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 9:34:30 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who stumbled out of the GOP presidential primary gates in 2012, appears poised for a revival in the upcoming 2016 primaries, according to key congressional aides and members who are already sizing up the Republican field. Perry joins Sens. Rand Paul and Marco Rubio as the Republicans most likely to win the nomination, according to the aides, several of whom were involved in the past two presidential elections, and a handful of members including a key Senate conservative. Missing from the list: New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who the insiders said is too blunt
|
|
Hold on New START
|
|
Washington Free Beacon, by Bill Gertz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 9:28:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The House last week voted to restrict implementation of the 2010 New START arms treaty with Russia until the Obama administration outlines its plans for nuclear cuts. The restriction is contained in the fiscal 2014 defense authorization bill that passed the House on Friday by a vote of 315 to 107. Section 1052 of the bill limits the Pentagon and Energy Department from spending any funds on nuclear forces reduction until two conditions are met. The limits would be lifted only after the Pentagon submits a plan required in law that outlines strategic nuclear cuts under New START.
|
Muslim Lawyers Association calls for Obama’s arrest during trip to S. Africa
|
|
Washington Times, by Jessica Chasmar
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 9:17:34 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Muslim Lawyers Association in Johannesburg has called for the arrest and prosecution of President Obama for war crimes when he arrives in South Africa on June 29, the nonprofit said in a statement. The MLA has submitted a 600-plus-page request to the Office of the National Director of Public Prosecution to arrest the U.S. president, the South African daily newspaper The Times reported. According to the report, the MLA mainly objects to Mr. Obama’s drone program, which it says unfairly targets Muslim civilians. “The complaint, dubbed the ‘Obama Docket’ encourages South Africa to take seriously its
|
First lady Michelle Obama claims ritzy digs during Irish visit
|
|
Washington Times, by Dave Boyer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 9:10:29 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First lady Michelle Obama is sparing no expense on her trip to Ireland, staying at a $3,300-per-night hotel suite in Dublin. Irish press reports Monday said Mrs. Obama and her entourage have booked 30 rooms in the five-star Shelbourne hotel. The first lady is said to be staying in the Princess Grace Suite, named for the Hollywood film star and princess who had an attachment to the room. The suite has two guest bedrooms, a living room and a dining area, according to the hotel’s website. There are four phones, three large
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
New State Department scandal: Whistleblower accuses consul general of trysts with subordinates and hookers
|
|
New York Post, by KATE BRIQUELET
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 6/16/2013 10:53:38 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the latest black eye for the scandal-ridden State Department, a whistleblower claims she was run out of the foreign service after complaining about a consul general’s alleged office trysts with subordinates and hookers.Kerry Howard says she was bullied, harassed and forced to resign after she exposed US Consul General Donald Moore’s alleged security-threatening shenanigans in the Naples, Italy, office. As the post’s community-liaison officer, Howard was charged with keeping workplace peace and advising higher-ups on the state of morale, but when she revealed allegations about her boss, State Department officials swept it under the rug,
|
Who is he? Obama keeps allies, enemies guessing in second term
|
|
The Hill, by Justin Sink
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ketchuplover- 6/17/2013 6:31:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Five months into his second term, allies and enemies are as confounded as ever about who President Obama really is. Is he the dyed-in-the-wool liberal that his biggest supporters and critics suggest? Or is he a pragmatic, even cynical, politician who cares more for his popularity than taking risks for his ideological goals or living up to his rhetoric? Even in the short period since his reelection, Obama has provided evidence to support conflicting interpretations. His efforts to pass immigration reform, the unsuccessful push for stricter gun controls and tax hikes on high earners buttress the case for Obama-as-ideologue.
|
Jeb Bush labels conservative critics ‘the chirpers’
|
|
Washington Post, by Aaron Blake
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 1:22:30 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Jeb Bush says he’s not worried that his work toward comprehensive immigration reform and his ties to the GOP establishment will alienate conservatives and negatively impact a potential 2016 presidential campaign, referring to critics as “the chirpers.” “If I decide to run for office again, it will be based on what I believe, and it will be based on my record,” the former Florida governor said in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody. “And that record was one of solving problems completely from a conservative prospective.” Bush (R) pointed to his conservative
|
Barbara Walters Defends Maher Calling Trig Palin Retarded: ‘I Don´t Think He Intended it to be Mean-Spirited’
|
|
Newsbusters, by John Nolte
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/17/2013 5:19:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As NewsBusters reported last week, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called out vulgarian comedian Bill Maher for referring to her Down Syndrome son Trig as "retarded." On ABC´s The View Monday, co-host Barbara Walters astonishingly defended Maher saying, "I don´t think he intended it to be mean-spirited" (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: At a recent standup show in Las Vegas, comedian Bill Maher apparently called Sarah Palin’s five-year-old developmentally-challenged son Trig retarded. And Sarah blasted him on Twitter as a bully. Is that, is it, is he a bully? Is he a bad, what is he?
|
Melendez warns without legal status ´there will never be road to White House for GOP´
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/16/2013 2:41:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Gang of Eight member Bob Menendez advised Republicans to accept legalization status for current illegal immigrants if they ever want to see another president from their party. “I would tell my Republican colleagues — both in the House and the Senate — that the road to the White House comes through a road with a pathway to legalization,” the New Jersey senator said on State of the Union this morning. “Without it, there’ll never be a road to the White House for the Republican party.” Menendez also warned of triggers on border security
|
Rubio Aide: ‘There Are American Workers Who, For Lack of a Better Term, Can’t Cut It’
|
|
National Review Online, by Rich Lowry
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: trapper- 6/16/2013 11:18:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Politico’s Playbook has an excerpt from a new Ryan Lizza piece from the New Yorker that is not yet online. It contains a passage on the back-and-forth between labor and the Chamber that has a quote from a Rubio staffer that is going to raise eyebrows, to say the least: “There are American workers who, for lack of a better term, can’t cut it. There shouldn’t be a presumption that every American worker is a star performer. There are people who just can’t get it, can’t do it, don’t want to do it. And so you can’t obviously discuss that publicly.” Here is the entire context:
|
Threats made to figures at center of IRS controversy: sources
|
|
Reuters, by Patrick Temple-West and Karl Plume
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 6/16/2013 6:48:57 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A current and a former top tax official have been physically threatened in recent weeks as the scandal over Internal Revenue Service targeting of Tea Party and other conservative groups has gathered steam, people familiar with their situation say.Ousted IRS acting commissioner, Steven Miller, has received such threats, according to a source familiar with his situation. The source declined to elaborate on the nature or the source of the threats.
|
| | |
|
|