The former U.S ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton had some rare praise for President Obama, and specifically for his expansive drone war. Via Mediaite: “It seems to me that the approach that the Obama administration is following is consistent with and really derived from the Bush administration approach to the War on Terror,” Bolton told [Fox News] host Jenna Lee. “And I think it is entirely sensible. Whether it is foreign citizens who are involved with Al Qaeda or American citizens, we are in a war. They have attacked us. We have a congressional authorization
Bolton is smart like a fox. Nothing will raise the hackles of the Obamatrons quicker than high praise from someone like him. It´ll make their heads explode as they try to process it. Now, if Dick Cheney were to publicly agree, it will be great fun watching the One´s media lackeys twisting themselves into knots trying to cover.
Disappointed to hear him say this. Using drones on the battlefield is one thing but using them over American soil is disturbing. Isn´t it the FBI´s job to hunt down the bad guys at home? It is just unsettling to give this kind of power to the government when it can so easily and quickly become abusive. The government truly is becoming a menace.
I usually enjoy the brilliant conservative insights of the Yale (summa cum laude) educated former ambassador with the "Yosemite Sam" mustache...This time, however, I think he may have wandered outside the park.
John Bolton is correct. This is the natural/logical consequence of the Patriot Act. So is the unrestricted monitoring of phone calls, e-mails and other electronic abilities. So are the ideas of monitoring people´s travel habits and gas consumption, flying over their properties with drone cameras, and pulling them over on the freeway for TSA type searches.
Are these things constitutional? No. Would George W. Bush have done them? Probably not. But, as many of us pointed out when Homeland Security and the Patriot Act were being established, George W. Bush was not going to be President forever. And that is the problem with starting a small ball rolling in an unconstitutional direction. Someone is going to come along and roll it a little faster and a little bigger.
"Whether it is foreign citizens who are involved with Al Qaeda or American citizens, we are in a war. They have attacked us. "
I agree with Mr. Bolton up to a point, and that is the point at which these drones begin to be deployed in American cities. While it may be proper to use whatever force is necessary against a terrorist, I am concerned about such weapons under the control of a government that has begun to consider Christians, conservatives, veterans, and gun-owners as potential terrorists.
You may need to fight the war on terror via unconventional means like drones, and you may have to kill american citizens who are fighting against our country, but that does NOT mean that you have to discard constitutional protections to do so. Due process is a constitutionally protected right and there´s no reason that it couldn´t be used in these cases!
obama has contempt for the Constitution. His ruthlessness is unconstrained by it. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe obama has no qualms about the use of drones to spy on domestic political enemies which include people who own firearms. I don´t understand Republicans who understate how dangerous, radical and untrustworthy the obama regime is.
Drone air attacks with deadly force ordered unilaterally by Resident Obozo against a sovereign nation; such as Yemen on their soil, with which we are not at war and pose no immediate threat to America is the act of a war criminal and in the case of the 16 year old American nonTerriost, a murderer... Immediate threat requires use of the war powers act and congress approval .. notice Obozo does it only to nations that cannot fight back... The act of a bully... try that in China or Russia ... any technically competent country can make drones and do that to Obozo... Would drone attacks be an act of war against America... you betcha
Before I condemn the former Ambassador, I would like to know how he feels about that DHS report that was released regarding the subject of who they consider to be domestic terrorists. Because he certainly would fit into at least one category neatly. No question about it, this WH has no problems with using these drones over US soil on American citizens.
And is Bolton ok with actual terrorists using these drones in an attack on the Capitol building or the WH? Now that the drone home base is revealed to be in Saudi territory, it will only be a matter of time.
With all due respect, Amb. Bolton, (and I do have great respect for you), just how does Obama´s death-by-drone policy comport with the silly rules of engagement imposed on our military. We have imposed more constraints on our military than the Knapp Commission imposed on the NYPD. Meanwhile, the approximately 2500 drone attacks have caused considerable collateral damage and casualties to innocent people. Second, at just what point in time will Obama deem the Tea Party to be a subversive, terrorist leaning organization, and deploy drones? Do we have any faith at all that Obama won´t use drones to quell opposition, increase or retain political power, assert uncontitutional authority over the American citizenry?
#4, you might look in the constitution and its amendments for the clause giving the federal gov authority to have an FBI. I can´t find it in my copy. Generally, the states would be better at that anyway if their citizen´s income wasn´t stolen by the feds for ´redistributing´.
Overseas, this policy is fine. When I was in Iraq nearly 10 years ago, if crap happened, I wasn´t going to ask the person shooting at me for a passport to check their nationality before I fired back.
These terrorists have declared war on us many times here and abroad. They have declared ALL Americans combatants. This includes young, old, males, females, everyone, not just the military. So if you are in a location of known terrorists, you are a target. If civilians get hurt in the attack, I am not going to shed a tear.
Terrorists are not legal combatants. They have no rights under conventions or laws or war. If captured, we have to right under the above to execute them on the spot. I don´t favor that, but holding them in proper minimal conditions until the terrorists as a whole give up. No more catch and release. We hold you until the war is over, period. We never need to hold any trial
Now if such is done here, the reason had better be beyond all debate or there will be heck to pay. And if used against groups other than islamic terrorists such as the TEA Party, the Usurper and his Corrupt Party will face even larger heck. Much larger heck.
I am confused by many of the above posters. It´s OK for a citizen to shoot and kill a home-invader who may want to murder your Family without *due process*, but not OK to shoot and kill an American Terrorist who has sworn, and is working, to murder ALL our Families!
#22, It is okay to shoot a home invader when he is invading your home. It is not okay to shoot someone that you think might be a home invader because he is standing on the sidewalk looking at your home.
There are two problems here. One is that we don´t know what the rules of engagement are for using drones on Americans because those are secret. (Nothing to worry about there as long as you trust your government.) Two, our government has already listed as potential American terrorists: People who are strongly anti-abortion or have other deeply held religious convictions, people who defend the Constitution over the federal government or the UN, people who are of an individualistic nature, and returning veterans to name a few.
I have no problem with shooting and killing an American terrorist who has sworn, and is working, to murder our families. It´s some of the other possibilities that give me pause.
Does anyone remember a few years ago the report on Fox about a new underground bunker being built close to the WH? It was not reported on any newspaper or any MSM program. Also remember the Homeland Security purchasing great amounts of hollow nose bullits. Thoughts about what might happen are chilling! God will not put up with this crap - we better turn this ship around & soon or we are gone. II Chronicles 7:14
I haven’t completely made up my mind about it. So I’m just going to think out-loud for a moment. As Christmas presents go, it’s certainly closer to a really sturdy pair of socks than it is to a new bike. And that raises the first point I think people should keep in mind: If you’re of a mind to oppose it, fine. If you’re inclined to support it, fine. But can we please dispense with the overheated rhetoric about it? It is neither a triumph nor an abject surrender. Attempts to turn it into the Defining Issue of Our Generation (until the next one at least), do not help the GOP or the cause in any meaningful way I can see.
Let me add a word to my comments from Tuesday night supporting the budget deal. I continue to believe that, as a matter of policy, the defense increase—which at least begins to undo the very considerable damage from a wildly and disproportionately anti-defense sequester—swamps in importance everything else in the deal. Everything else is basically a wash. The defense increase is a real plus. I continue to believe that, as a matter of politics, the deal is very good for Republicans. If passed, it takes another government shutdown off the table, and allows Republicans to focus on fighting President Obama rather
It was a short sound bite but it was replayed endlessly yesterday, angering some conservatives and leaving liberals chortling. When House Speaker John Boehner was asked during a press conference with other Republican leaders about criticisms from conservative activist groups of the budget deal struck by Budget Committee Chair Paul Ryan, he exploded: REPORTER: Mr. Speaking, most major conservative groups have put out statements blasting this deal. Are you – BOEHNER: You mean the groups that came out and opposed it before they ever saw it? REPORTER: Are you worried – BOEHNER: They are using our members and they are using the American people
MISSOULA, Mont. - A Montana woman on trial for killing her newlywed husband at Glacier National Park told the FBI "I pushed him and I took off." The statement by 22-year-old Jordan Graham was heard on Wednesday, the third day of her trial. She is charged with first-degree murder and second-degree murder in the July 7 death of Cody Johnson, 25. Flathead County Deputy Coroner Richard Sine testified that Johnson had an 8-inch fracture on his forehead and was not wearing a wedding ring when his body was found. Jordan Graham´s statement was in a recoding made by an FBI
Planned Parenthood’s 2012-2013 annual report is out, and a pro-life group has already found that the pro-abortion group received nearly $1.5 million a day in government funding over the year. “We are the nation’s leading reproductive health care provider and advocate, with more than 700 health centers across the country that will see nearly three million patients this year,” reads the report’s introductory message from Planned Parenthood chair, Alexis McGIll Johnson and president Cecile Richards. The report looks at Planned Parenthood’s impact, health services and financial situation.
I’m in a tough spot. Paul Ryan is one of the brightest stars in the Republican Party. He is a true fiscal (and social) conservative, and I cheered when Mitt Romney selected him as his running mate (although I wished Ryan rather than Romney were the presidential candidate, and I still hope he will be in the future). Ryan towers, literally and figuratively, over his Democratic opposition-turned-collaborators.(Snip)Some are arguing that no deal would be better than this deal; it is a refrain that you will hear from both the right and the left in coming hours and days. And in a
Following the release of the budget deal Paul Ryan agreed to with Patty Murray, there will be talk of a shift in Ryan’s political principles. The deal is being framed by its authors as a model of pragmatism, which is a good indication that it will conform to the belief that a fair deal is one from which both sides come away equally unhappy.(Snip)The truth is, most of Ryan’s career suggests he wants the gavel, not the veto pen. Such a career path, by definition, requires staying put. So the clearest evidence of Ryan’s aspirations was when he passed on
New York — The anchor who might beat Bill O’Reilly gets her eyelash extensions applied one at a time, with tweezers and dabs of glue, about 90 minutes before showtime, right after a motorized gun sprays foundation over her face, neck, shoulders, collarbone and sternum, wiping out a galaxy of light freckles that spreads across her — Let me stop you right there. Photos of the day Uruguay legalizes marijuana, Kiev police pull back from protesters, aging U.S. prison population and more. Tuesday´s Photos of the day Would you write this way about a man? About O’Reilly himself? At least that’s what Megyn Kelly might ask at
When I was a kid, I knew two different Santa Clauses. The first had a fat belly, rosy cheeks, a long white beard, and skin as pink as bubble gum. He was omnipresent, visiting my pre-school and the local mall, visible in all of my favorite Christmas specials. Then there was the Santa in my family’s household, in the form of ornaments, cards, and holiday figurines. A near-carbon copy of the first one—big belly, rosy cheeks, long white beard: check, check, check. But his skin was as dark as mine. Seeing two different Santas was bewildering. Eventually I asked my father what
In August 2013 I became very sick with what I thought was a cold. After a few days I lost vision in my left eye and I checked into the hospital. I soon found out that what I thought was a summer cold was actually Strep bacteria poisoning my blood stream. The bacteria blinded my left eye, ate a hole through my heart, caused five strokes on both sides of my brain and forced the removal of my prosthetic left knee. Dr. Lee was the surgeon assigned to perform open heart surgery. What was originally scheduled to last four hours ended
US President Barack Obama may have moved the masses attending Nelson Mandela’s memorial service with his stirring eulogy, but it was his grinning "selfie" with the Danish and British premiers that set social networks abuzz. In a candid moment captured by a photographer, Denmark’s Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt can be seen holding up her smartphone, with Obama lending a helping hand, as they pose for a picture with David Cameron, all three of them smiling broadly in their seats at Soweto’s World Cup stadium.(Snip)Mashable, the news and technology website, ran the photograph under the headline: ‘‘Dear Obama: Funerals are no place
Johannesburg - A man who provided sign language interpretation on stage for Nelson Mandela´s memorial service, attended by scores of heads of state, was a "fake," the national director of the Deaf Federation of South Africa said on Tuesday. Asked about the claim by The Associated Press, South Africa´s government said it was preparing a statement. Three sign language experts said the man was not signing in South African or American sign languages. South African sign language covers all of the country´s 11 official languages, according to the federation. It wasn´t immediately clear if the unidentified man was using a
The health director who approved the release of President Obama’s birth certificate has died in a plane crash, Hawaiian officials said Thursday. Loretta Fuddy died after the Cessna Grand Caravan aircraft she was travelling on went down shortly after leaving Kalaupapa Airport at around 3:15 p.m. local time (10:15 a.m. ET) on Wednesday. The other eight people on board were rescued, Richard Schuman, president of Makani Kai Air, told NBC News early Thursday, adding that that there was no indication as to why the plane had crashed. Fuddy hit the headlines two years ago when she approved a waiver request allowing Obama to
House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) snapped at conservative groups that have come out in opposition to the budget deal reached Wednesday between Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.). "They´re using the American people for their own purposes. This is ridiculous," Boehner said at a press conference with other members of House Republican leadership on Wednesday. Over the past few days, a number of conservative groups have blasted the deal because it sets discretionary spending levels in the budget higher than previous levels under sequestration. In the past three days, the influential Heritage Action, Club for Growth, Americans