A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Congress — not email —
destroyed the Postal Service
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Congress — not email —
destroyed the Postal Service

Salon, by John Tierney

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 2/7/2013 5:10:30 AM

You know that feeling of pleasure you get when you see someone stand up to a bullying, incompetent boss? It’s viscerally satisfying, isn’t it? That’s the way I felt this morning when I heard Postmaster General Patrick Donahue announce that the U.S. Postal Service intended to move forward with a plan to stop Saturday delivery of mail, effective sometime in August. In doing so, Donahue stuck his thumb in the eye of the U.S. Congress, the mail agency’s ultimate boss. Bravo, Mr. Donahue. You may think I have incorrectly identified the incompetent party here.

Comments:
Our US Postal Service is the best in the world. Anyone who has traveled knows that. But, I don´t know if the finances can be easily fixed.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Spidey, 2/7/2013 5:34:48 AM     (No. 9162977)

The finances can´t be fixed because of te over the top pension plans which they´re dancing around.

Their solution on saturady deliveries shows why they´re so damn incompetent and in the red.

They´ll continue Saturday deliveries in some circumstances like prescriptions.So what are they going to do,sort through mail looking for drug stores? Are you going to call in a delivery person if there´s only one prescription to be delivered? It´ll cost more money to figure out who gets a delivery than just keeping Saturdays running.

This is all a bluff for a bailout anyway and they´ll get one before August.

Last week they had a story about a black woman standing to lose her job and life is she gets laid off. This storyline will be a prop for a bailout.Blacks hardest hit by postal layoffs.


Reply 2 - Posted by: krause, 2/7/2013 5:41:27 AM     (No. 9162978)

I can´t believe congress hasn´t found a way to get their hands on that pre-funded pension money. You know, for more windmills and such.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: mws50, 2/7/2013 6:14:16 AM     (No. 9162993)

Yawn... No Saturday deliveries? No problem.

Cannot get your pills via mail on Saturday? Order them a day earlier.

This is not complicated.


Reply 4 - Posted by: ROLFnader, 2/7/2013 6:24:05 AM     (No. 9162998)

I think that mail should be delivered once per week . For me, the best day would be Friday since that is the day our garbage is picked up. That way , I could ask the mailman to just put the mail right in the garbage can - saving me six days of having to do it myself.


Reply 5 - Posted by: LouD, 2/7/2013 6:25:00 AM     (No. 9162999)

Gee, #3, my wife ordered a prescription back on January 10th. It is now February 7th, and last we heard the pills were languishing in Springfield, Ma, and we are in Florida. Just how early are we supposed to order with this postal "service"?
The post office is the poorest excuse for a business, and any civilian business would have been gone years ago. It´s long past time to privatize them, and let the private sector run it right. Then maybe my wife could get her meds.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Crosscut, 2/7/2013 7:34:04 AM     (No. 9163084)

Congress or Obama will not allow this to happen. Watch them step in. The USPS should be privatized and where feasible any other government agency or service.


Reply 7 - Posted by: youngtexan, 2/7/2013 7:38:28 AM     (No. 9163092)

Tricare is now offering mail ordered meds. No thanks. I´ll just pick them up instead of going through problems waiting for the mailman to deliver it to me.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: edgar, 2/7/2013 7:44:58 AM     (No. 9163108)

Isn´t Congress now in charge of our healthcare system, too?


Reply 9 - Posted by: nonsense, 2/7/2013 7:50:35 AM     (No. 9163117)

Is Salon trying to say that Big Government is the problem?


Reply 10 - Posted by: Attercliffe, 2/7/2013 7:57:42 AM     (No. 9163135)

The mail service began to go bad (in our experience) back in the sixties, at least in larger cities, not just since Congress made it a quango (quasi-independent government organization) in the seventies. After experiencing mail service in eight states over the years we´ve moved mostly to e-mail. To be honest, had mail service been better I don´t think we would have moved to e-mail for personal mail (or UPS or FedEx or in-store delivery).

And I did think the former Royal Mail (now Post Office) was much better than USPS. That may have changed in the last decade but service was above and beyond before that. It certainly didn´t take three days (or more) to send a letter across town. In fact, when the UK Post Office had twice-daily deliveries (until 2004), a letter could be received the very same day it was mailed! Union-organized strikes helped to change things--one lasting two months.

As for the USPS, I´m afraid I won´t miss it if it goes completely. I refuse to go to the post offices near us because of their surly and inefficient service. (Funny how they´ve never lost a delivery of postage stamps by USPS.) I might try the new system of postal service desks in some retail establishments--but will never go back to sending personal mail by USPS and will continue to use a more reliable bank transfer instead of checks by mail.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Mr. Know-It-All, 2/7/2013 8:37:35 AM     (No. 9163218)

This example (the postal service) is a succinct illustration of why just about anything run by govt. is doomed to high costs and inefficiency.

Any federal program, and many state run programs that run on "federal" money, are subject to meddling from any member of congress, the POTUS, and any number of cabinet members. Remember the old cliche about too many chefs.

So why any nitwit could argue that we´ll be better off with our entire health care system being run in a similar manner is beyond my paltry abilities to understand.


Reply 12 - Posted by: MOBeef4u, 2/7/2013 8:41:26 AM     (No. 9163226)

The USPS has been very good in my experience. Parcels are delivered as quickly as UPS or Fedex. First-class mail arrives at its destination within three days on average, oftentimes sooner.
We live in a rural area and get our newspaper by mail except on Sun. Losing Sat. delivery would be a pain. But what´s worse is that there would be all those 3-day week-ends with no delivery or pick-up. If they have to pick an extra non-delivery day, mid-week would be better.
By ignoring the 800 pound gorilla which is the pension funding, the USPS problem will never be solved.
Gov. is the only entity that believes that worse and more expensive service will generate more business.
To those who say it doesn´t affect them, I say: one day it will be your ox getting gored and there won´t be anyone there to defend you.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: JAN, 2/7/2013 8:52:15 AM     (No. 9163250)

Yes, they are deliverig more packages because the carriers that Amazon uses hands their packages off to the post office nearest your home.

Just about all of our Amazon purchases are delivered by UPS or Fed Ex to our local post office.


Reply 14 - Posted by: southernboy, 2/7/2013 10:07:30 AM     (No. 9163427)

Does anyone else remember that the post office used to deliver day-old baby chickens back in the ’40’s?

Minimum order 25…shipped in boxes sized to hold 100 in four compartments. Ordered from Sears and Montgomery Ward catalogs!

How far they have fallen!!


Reply 15 - Posted by: Attila DiMedici, 2/7/2013 10:11:38 AM     (No. 9163439)

Right now the main problem that the USPS has is that Congress mandated that they fund their pension plan at something like three times the level of that required of any private company with similar plans.


Reply 16 - Posted by: enuf8, 2/7/2013 10:43:09 AM     (No. 9163509)

USPS - Union! That is the reason for it´s decline, plain and simple!


Reply 17 - Posted by: SouthSanAntonio, 2/7/2013 10:55:53 AM     (No. 9163534)

Unions, and affirmative action taken to ridiculous extremes, are what destroyed the USPS.

Just a few decades ago, the USPS was an efficient organization that did it´s job -- it delivered mail. It did so cheaply, efficiently, and still managed to make profits. Like most companies back then, you saw mostly clean cut, hard working, white males working there back then.

Then the unions went insane, and started hiring only incompetent and unqualified individuals based solely on their gender and race. They now lose billions of dollars every year, and we all have horror stories of bad service, rude and incompetent employees, lost or damaged mail, and prices that seem to go up every few months these days. Coincedently, I honestly can´t remember the last time I saw a white male in a USPS uniform. I guess they are all working for FEDEX or UPS now.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: SouthSanAntonio, 2/7/2013 11:15:19 AM     (No. 9163578)

Don´t get me wrong. For the two or three times a year that I actually still mail something, it´s not a bad deal. $0.46 to mail a letter across the country isn´t bad. I have a reasonable confidence that it will get there most of the time within a few days.

But the hypocrisy of the USPS is what cost them most of my business. A few years ago, the USPS decided to call those stamps with the pictures of Mary and the baby Jesus that they come out with every fall as “Holiday” stamps.

Of course the Hanukah stamp was still called the Hanukah stamp, and the Eid al-Fatr stamp was still called the Eid al-Fatr stamp. But I guess the word “Christmas” was just too “offensive” for them to take that chance.

At that point, I wrote the USPS to ask why, and they didn’t give me so much as a courtesy reply. So we stopped mailing Christmas cards. We just hand-deliver them today.


Reply 19 - Posted by: rockymtnhigh, 2/7/2013 12:06:53 PM     (No. 9163751)

We have six day of delivery now, let´s keep six days, but on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday deliver to my house and Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday deliver to your house and cut the number of employes in half.


Reply 20 - Posted by: marthaville, 2/7/2013 6:22:04 PM     (No. 9164494)

The article is inaccurate as it pertains to funding future health care costs. There is accounting treatment determined on an actuarial basis. This is different from the actual funding, also done on an actuarial basis. The funding is based on the life expectancy of actual current employees. Post office wants to pay based on actual out of pocket expenditures.

This ain´t Social Security. The article is postal union propaganda.

All that aside, it is essential that we have a reliable national postal system. Everything cannot be sent electronically.


Reply 21 - Posted by: anotherctyankee, 2/7/2013 11:27:42 PM     (No. 9164832)

Don´t remember the chicks from the catalogs, but the radio always advertised your chicks from Del Rio, Texas.


Reply 22 - Posted by: StyxMaker, 2/8/2013 12:51:28 AM     (No. 9164881)

Postal service is, after all, a constitutionally mandated responsibility of the Federal Government.


   

 



 

Post Reply   Close thread 722444




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Despite the WaPost, Benghazi
Is a Major Scandal
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:16:56 AM     Post Reply
There’s a huge red flag in the Benghazi mess, but conservatives are letting the media get away with using a red herring to avoid it. Give the establishment media credit for obstinacy: Once it settles on a standard narrative or explanation for a particular subject, it shows remarkable discipline in explaining away any evidence that contradicts its own approved spin. So it has been with the media’s 250-day old determination to downplay the scandalous nature of the Obama administration’s treatment of its outpost in Benghazi before, during, and after the terrorist attack there that took four American lives.

Role of Health-Law
´Navigators´ Under Fire
Wall Street Journal, by Louise Radnofsky    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:14:03 AM     Post Reply
Lawmakers across the country are tussling over the Obama administration´s plans to create a small army of assistants to guide millions of Americans as they sign up for new health-insurance options available this fall. Backers of the health-care overhaul face an uphill battle to spread the word about the law, in the face of consumer research that suggests most uninsured people know little about it and are skeptical about the value of health insurance generally. Some Democrats have openly worried that the administration is doing too little to make sure the enrollment process goes smoothly. That is where the "patient navigators"

Labor unions break ranks with
White House on ObamaCare
The Hill [DC], by Kevin Bogardus    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:04:54 AM     Post Reply
Labor unions are breaking with President Obama on ObamaCare. Months after the president’s reelection, a variety of unions are publicly balking at how the administration plans to implement the landmark law. They warn that unless there are changes, the results could be catastrophic. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president — is very worried about how the reform law will affect its members’ healthcare plans. Last month, the president of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers released a statement calling “for repeal

Issa Warns Hillary
National Review Online, by Jonathan Strong    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:36:12 AM     Post Reply
Since Hillary Clinton last came up to Capitol Hill, we’ve learned senior State Department officials sought to scrub references to terrorism from the infamous Benghazi talking points to insulate Foggy Bottom from political criticism — citing concerns of their “building’s leadership” to justify the demands. The rising temperature of the scandal means it’s possible that Hillary could be asked to return and testify again. If she comes back, she had better be prepared, says House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa. “We are interviewing lots of people, most of them under oath,” Issa says, describing the “methodical” approach his committee

Billy Sol: Now That Was a Scandal
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:32:49 AM     Post Reply
We hear a lot, these days, about how President Obama is not like Lyndon Johnson and thanks be to heaven for that small mercy. The point seems to be that the president doesn´t know how to arm twist, sweet talk, bribe, and emasculate both friend and enemy (of which he truly had neither) in order to further his agenda. Since many among the chattering class believe, still, in that agenda, his is generally regarded as an excellent presidency. Never mind that more than half a century after Johnson declared war on poverty ...

How Hope and Change Gave
Way To Spying on the Press
Daily Beast, by Kirsten Powers    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:11:50 AM     Post Reply
First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out – because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out – because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a You Tube video, and – okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?Turns out, it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization, to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen,

Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi
Whistleblowers with Info
Devastating to Clinton and Obama
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:02:13 AM     Post Reply
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon. These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law. According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

Democratic Senator uses Okla.
tornado for anti-GOP rant
over global warming

39 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM     Post Reply
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care

   

Post Reply   Close thread 722444





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~