On one level, there were not too many surprises in the newly disclosed “white paper” offering a legal reasoning behind the claim that President Obama has the power to order the killing of American citizens who are believed to be part of Al Qaeda. We knew Mr. Obama and his lawyers believed he has that power under the Constitution and federal law. We also knew that he utterly rejects the idea that Congress or the courts have any right to review such a decision in advance, or even after the fact.
Comments: The Times had to insert George W. Bush, but he never ordered something like this.
dear NY slimes, your chickens are coming home to roost, you created this monster and I hope he eats the ones that built him before he comes after the rest of us who are trying to expose him for what he is, the exact opposite of the fairy tale you obtuse media cronies created.
Initially I had no problem with taking Al Awaki out by drone. Of course I assumed there was ample evidence to support that he was a terrorist and dangerous to the US interests.
However, this rationale terrifies me. There are no standards necessary to justify the action. No evidence required to support murdering an American citizen, just a baseball card for our dear leader. Under this policy, he can decide to take out anyone he wants. Scary.
How convenient. No more will ATF agents have to wait for a tank to ram firebombs through a window to get rid of Americans deemed to be troublesome like they did in Waco. Now some faceless beaurocrat can decide you´re a threat, and bam, you´re gone.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Fiesta del sol, 2/6/2013 8:17:23 AM (No. 9161220)
#5, the EPA already has surveillance drones above the midwest, targeting farmers. No one knows how many drones, what data they are collecting, etc. http://latham.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=299185
Liberal trick: Dumb down the definition of "citizen" to be anything that slinks across the border, or with ideological desires to overthrow the Constitution and establish a caliphate, thereby making "citizens" in the US and abroad criminal, and guilty until proven innocent. Never mind that the ATF/FBI/DOJ are constantly hitting the wrong house in a raid.
Wow, after reading the comments after the editorial, all those liberal, smart, enlightened NYT readers have changed their minds about the use of force against terrorists. Now they seem to think that it´s all right and the ALCU should butt out of obama´s business. What an amazing turnaround.
A terrorist is a terrorist, no matter where he is from. If he is threatening the lives of Americans, he has waived ´´due process.´´
Police snipers (and other law enforcement types) kill Americans all the time when they threaten hostages in a shopping mall, or elsewhere. Heck, even a private citizen can kill a person who is threatening the life of another person. An American who threatens the lives of other innocent Americans, by joining or actively supporting terrorists, deserves to die at the earliest possible moment.
Am I just paranoid? ...because all of this makes me think twice about communicating via email with likeminded conservatives...also about posting to sites like this one, which I love by the way. Helps me keep my sanity.
Bogus claim: It had the air of a legal justification written after the fact for a policy decision that had already been made, and it brought back unwelcome memories of memos written for President George W. Bush to justify illegal wiretapping, indefinite detention, kidnapping, abuse and torture.
Bush would get legal opinions before making decisions. He would then inform Congress according to law. When information was leaked to the press, they would disagree with the decisions. But Bush followed the law. Obama doesn´t bother to get legal opinions up front. When forced, he will have someone craft an opinion after the fact. These nearly always sloppy and ill thought out.
And just wait until Obama´s "Superdrone" video game expands its activities from foreign soil to U.S. territory, and its target list from Al Qaeda terrorists to "domestic terrorists", like say, the Tea Party, hmmmm? I know, I know, paranoia -- it will never happen.
The horse has already left the barn. He has all the essential ingredients for complete domination; the media, academia, no opposing political party to speak of, and an overwhelmingly ignorant and apathetic population. He is now unstoppable, and he knows it!
Obama´s only mistake was not allowing the NYT to get in on the drafting of the document; then they´d be okay with it, but not being part of the decision causes them to wonder if they aren´t at the table of power like they thought they´d be. It´s a pure power discussion with liberals, nothing to do with constitutional questions.
Refresher course: From the Washington Times, 2009 "Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Wednesday that she was briefed before the release of a controversial intelligence assessment and that she stands by the report, which lists returning veterans among terrorist risks to the U.S".
There is a big distinction between requiring prior legislative briefings and/or civilian judicial approval of targeted killing of Americans engaged in overseas combat operations against the U.S., and requiring after-action reviews.
A mandatory after-action review of every targeted killing of an American enemy combatant is appropriate and should be written into law immediately. However, it would be a serious national security mistake to treat overseas American enemy combatants as domestic criminals.
In situations where domestic criminals pose an immediate threat to innocent life, the legal authority to use lethal force can range from a citizen acting in self-defense, to cop on the scene or a law-enforcement SWAT commander.
There are very good reasons why enemy combatants are treated differently from domestic criminals. Enemy combatants—U.S. citizens or not—engaged in or planning violent acts against the U.S. itself outside its borders are committing extraterritorial acts of war. For this reason, the authority to use lethal force ultimately resides in our Commander-in-Chief—whoever may be in office at the time.
If extraterritorial American enemy combatants are given immunity from lethal strikes without prior due process in civilian courts, we should expect a continuous flow of damaging national security leaks and a dramatic rise in the recruitment of American citizens for foreign operations by organizations like al-Qaeda.
None of you can tell anyone what to do now. It is over. We are never going to have freedom again. We will forevermore be a socialist country. We will have someone telling us how we live, how we eat, how we dress, what we drive, and on and on, and there is nothing we can do about it.
For the life of me I just don´t understand. According to the President and his Justice Department, the foreign planners and executors of the 9.11 attacks should not be rushed to judgement but should enjoy the same defense court privileges reserved for American citizens but American citizens accused of encouraging similar acts aren´t entitled to the same court privileges but rather should be ´eliminated´. It´s not that I believe that American citizens threatening to do us harm should not be dealt with harshly, it´s just that I can´t grasp the rationale of the President making distinctions between terrorists and granting foreign terrorists greater protections.
The U.S. isn´t called "America the Beautiful" for nothing. Each year, millions of tourists come from home and abroad to see the country´s majestic landscape and iconic sites, from the Grand Canyon to the Statue of Liberty. But there are also cool, quirky attractions, like Vermont´s Ben & Jerry´s Factory and Tennessee´s Graceland, the former home of Rock and Roll King Elvis Presley. From California to New York and everywhere in between, the country is chock-full of incredible attractions that keep luring in visitors. Here are the best tourist attractions in every state.
Would a free society be a crime-free society? We have good reason to anticipate it. Don’t accuse me of utopianism. I don’t foresee a future of new human beings who consistently respect the rights of others. Rather, I’m drawing attention to the distinction between crime and tort — between offenses against the state (or society) and offenses against individual persons or their justly held property. We’re so used to this distinction, and the priority of the criminal law over tort law, that most of us don’t realize that things used to be different. At one time, an “offense” that was
Under most circumstances, a falling unemployment rate would be cause for great cheer. These are not most circumstances. America is now a country where the official count of joblessness is dropping largely because so many people have stopped looking for work. Under the government’s statistical rules, those who have thrown in the towel are no longer counted as unemployed. Perversely, this drives the rate down. Combined with weak job growth, the trend produced happy-sounding 7% unemployment, the lowest rate in five years. In fact, though, the labor force participation rate, a solid measure of the country’s connection to paychecks,
Call me Grinch, call me Scrooge. Call me Lord Voldemort of the Yuletide. None could be worse than sending me a holiday card with glossy photographs of your lovely, smiling family. My wife, Emily, and I place your cards like trophies on our shelves, continuing an old-school practice that began about 175 years ago as a way of maintaining relationships as families and friends moved far and wide. Today’s cards may appear more personalized — with photos of spouses, kids and pets, and distribution lists much smaller than a sprawling collection of Facebook friends. But when I flip over the photo
There is a way that one expects visits with jailed criminals to go: typically, there´s guilt, contrition, the accepting of responsibility. Not so with Bernie Madoff, serving 150 years, the executor of the world´s most famous Ponzi scheme. As the five-year anniversary of the discovery of his crime approaches — is that even something worth keeping an anniversary for? — The Wall Street Journal´s Sital Patel sought out comment from the convicted fraudster. What she found over a two-hour sitdown at a comfy Butner, N.C. prison was a man who basically pointed fingers while raising other fingers, to boot. Haters, it
The Navy recently christened the USS Gerald Ford in Newport News, Virginia, with considerable fanfare and the traditional smashing of a bottle of champagne across the bow of the ship — the most technologically advanced aircraft carrier the United States has built. The fancy new ship cost taxpayers $13 billion, including a shameful $2.5 billion cost overrun! That’s an overrun of almost 20%, hardly a rounding error. Really? A $2.5 billion overrun. I’m sure taxpayers are scratching their heads wondering who will pay that outrageous tab. Well, since the carrier is being built under a cost-plus, incentive-fee contract , the Navy pays
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, a 2008 GOP presidential candidate turned media personality, is looking at another bid for the presidency, this time backed by ministers eager to put an evangelical into the White House. Huckabee will test the waters when he returns home to Little Rock, Ark., December 12-13 to address the Arkansas Renewal Project, part of evangelical organizer David Lane´s American Renewal Project. Huckabee had the support of pastors in his 2008 fight against eventual winner Sen. John McCain. Among the potential candidates looking at a GOP bid, Huckabee is closest to the pastors. He is a social conservative who
The question all week long was this: Who are you going to believe, an illegal alien or the president of the United States of America? Obviously, if it’s a president who once went by an alias, Barry Soetoro, you go with Uncle Omar, 100 percent, no questions asked. And so it was that the White House finally admitted to another, uh, misstatement — despite previous denials, Barack/Barry did sleep on his beloved Uncle Omar’s couch in Cambridge when he first moved here to attend Harvard Law School (speaking of which, we’re still waiting to see the president’s grades and his LSAT scores). But the
More young men in California rise in pitch at the end of their sentences when talking, new research shows. This process is known as "uptalk" or "valleygirl speak" and has in the past been associated with young females, typically from California or Australia.But now a team says that this way of speaking is becoming more frequent among men.The findings were presented at the Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America in California. "We found use of uptalk in all of our speakers, despite their diverse backgrounds in socioeconomic status, ethnicity, bilingualism and gender," said Amanda Ritchart, a linguist at the University of
How do you get your arms around the catastrophe known as Obamacare? Is it even possible? At this point, I’m not sure it is. The list of individual disasters which threaten to ruin one-sixth of the U.S. economy and what has been, up until now, the best healthcare system in the world is exhaustive, and exhausting. The examples I will identify here barely scratch the surface. First but by no means foremost, we have the supposedly new and improved HealthCare.gov. Except it’s not, even the visible part. Stories still abound of people still failing to get in or to get through the enrollment
DAVID CORN: I saw a president who remains frustrated with the political-media culture that he has to work within, and that he´s looking to rally people, students here, and supporters, and people within the media. CHRIS MATTHEWS: But David Corn, you skeptic. He came to us today. He came amongst us. CORN: He´s trying to rally people behind this vision that he´s been promoting for a couple years. FINEMAN: By the way, he did it the end here, today, Chris, not by defending specifics, but by explaining why he´s in the game to begin with. And I don´t know about you, he´s
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has announced a new five-year strategic plan to improve safety for elderly drivers and passengers. Although they are statistically among the safest on the road, the number of older drivers is increasing dramatically — and with it, that group´s numbers of injuries and deaths. Since 2003, the population of older adults, defined as age 65 and older, has increased by 20% and the number of licensed older drivers increased by 21% to 35 million in 2012, according to NHTSA. Last year, NHTSA reported that 5,560 people older than 65 died and 214,000 were injured
The most curious thing of all about the November jobs report released on Friday was the huge drop in the unemployment rate — and the fact that the Labor Department chose not to disclose that the data going into that figure are under investigation for falsification. On Nov. 19, I broke the news in my column that the Census Bureau, which collects data that goes into the jobless rate on behalf of Labor, had caught one of its enumerators fabricating interviews in 2010. The culprit said back then (and to me during an interview) that he was told to do so by
7. On the U.S. war with Iraq: “If there is a country that has committed unspeakable atrocities in the world, it is the United States of America. They don’t care for human beings.” Via cbsnews.com 6. On Israel: “Israel should withdraw from all the areas which it won from the Arabs in 1967, and in particular Israel should withdraw completely from the Golan Heights, from south Lebanon and from the West Bank.” Via jweekly.com 5. On the U.S. war with Iraq: “All that (Mr. Bush) wants is Iraqi oil.” Via cbsnews.com 4. Mandela on Castro and the Cuban revolution: “From its earliest days, the Cuban Revolution has also been a