Bull. She´s independent because the Dems are too right wing for her.

If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, looks like a duck ... it´s a Democrat "Wise Latina" Supreme Court Justice.

She´s a libtard who has decided to call herself ´not-a-democrat´.

Maybe she´s a:
demonrat
demoncrap

demorat
democrap

All demonrats are socialists - - but not all socialists are demonrats.

So, yes - - she has credibility.

Colbert had it right, Barack Obama has not and will never appoint someone to an administration office unless that person has stellar liberal credentials. Even Hagel votes left of center most of the time.

Right. You look more like a lap dog.

She is an enemy of the Constitution. Don´t care what color.

Bingo..."enemy of the constitution"

She is all LaRaza...so a socialist or a communist...intent on disabling America and her constitution...with diversity punishments...God help us...the LoVo´s gave us a Manchurian with Obama

I saw her appearance and it was so scripted (on her part) and rehearsed she sounded like a robot. I believe NOTHING liberals say, so it makes more sense for her to say she´s NOT a dimocrat, since lying is what they do.

She´s a liar. Ergo she´s a ´RAT.

She is a Latina. Enough said!

Don´t agree with any of the above. What Sotomayor says of herself is just how she always looked to me - serenely independent. I don´t think Obama understood her. I think he goes by stereotypes, especially where women are concerned.

Wouldn´t it funny if she actually did believe in the Constitution?

I am supremely skeptical, and like that butthead Colbert, I think that the fact that Zero appointed her is nearly ironclad proof that she will be a reliable, intellectually dishonest, leftist.

But, wouldn´t it be hilarious if she actually does secretly believe that the Constitution means what it says?

Not impossible, just very highly improbable. OTOH, Zero IS delusional and not particularly bright.

Actually, none of the Democrats are Democrats, since they all think independently and don´t base their pro-socialist policies on a destructively neurotic anti-Americanism and the emotional immaturity of pre-adolescents. They all just want to help people and are so concerned about stuff, like helping people!

And the sky is green. Sotomayor isn´t very good at pretending, apparently.

No, seriously...I always thought she was a bit of an independent because, even though she leans somewhat far left on certain issues, she has not been as hard left and robot-like in agreement with the party line as I expected. I don´t think she is a Republican by any means...but she might not be a Dem either. She has not always voted or had an opinion that was lock-step with the left. I always thought there was a little hope for her.

Why in the wide world of sports is a Supreme Court justice appearing on television to push a book, especially a joke show such as “The Colbert Report?”

If Saddlebags believes in the constitution, then how come she voted that BarryCare was constitutional?

What she´ll do is cast meaningless votes which favor the right once in a while to prove her independence but when it comes down to a hardcore liberal issue,she´ll fall in line.I´d actually like to see her be independent but it just won´t happen.

But kagan is the bigger joke by a long stretch.Kagan called Obama her hero after he won the Chicago senate seat.That should have disqualified her from the court.

#13, Your lips, God´s ears. Be about darn time we had a lefty turn right on the USSC.

But I will seriously look at ocean front property in Iowa if it should happen.

By lying you just proved you are a Lib Dim.