Sounds like a warning from a scolding mom to the kidz. What a pathetic excuse of a "justice" tacky, low class, and dismissive.

You are one person. Supreme court appointees CAN be impeached so go for it and let´s see if we have a country left.

The communists have breached the main gate.

We have sunk so low that supreme court justices now appear on "comedy" shows. No class, no dignity, no respect for the office.

FTA: ´´...if she believed in the Second Amendment and the right for American citizens to own “whatever weapon we want.”

Ignorant question from an ignorant buffoon. I want a fully automatic .50 cal. machine gun and five Bazookas. Oh yeah, a few Stinger missiles, too.

Liberals and their anti-freedom thoughts disgust me.

She has to believe in the 2nd Amendment because it is a part of the Constitution, which she has sworn to uphold. This implied idea that any Supreme Court justice can pick and choose which part of the Constitution they support drives me crazy! If you don´t believe in the Constitution you should step down or be impeached!

Sounds a bit like a threat to me. Just sayin´.

Totally inappropriate for her to appear and be questioned in this way, let alone make this impertinent comment.

Beneath the dignity of the position----although apparently not beneath the dignity of an Obama appointee.

These people are disgusting. I grieve for my country. Since the election I have hardly watched the news (even Fox,at which I am particularly perturbed), but only scan the news from Lucianne and Drudge.

I think we already know this "wise Latina´s" views on gun rights ... or most rights that are reserved to the people.

She´s for federal government controls rights. But only when she and her henchmen are in charge.

If the Republicans held a 2/3 majority in both the house and senate (a dream), I still wonder if they would have the courage to impeach Obama and his SCOTUS appointments (Sotamayor and Kagan). There may be grounds for impeaching Kagan (lying about her involvement in Obamacar). Not sure about Sotamayor, unless incompetence counts.

Who cares what her opinion is?

The only thing that matters is what the Constitution says and what the original authors meant when they said it.

UNLESS, the anti-Republic anti-Americans are in charge... Hmmmmmmmmm

Actually, #8 to me it sounds like Sodapopmajor; without reading the briefs, knowing the facts of the case, or hearing the arguments of each side´s counsel, she has PREJUDGED AN UNKNOWN CASE.

A HUGE breach of Judicial Ethics.
An impeachable breach of Judicial Ethics.

Is anyone surprised that an Uhhhbama appointee has no ethics, though?

Her opinion is irrelevant. She is sworn to uphold the Constitution.

What a quaint old-fashioned idea.

I´m with #5.

If Obama can appear on parody of a investigated news show such as 60 Minutes why can´t Sotomayor appear on a fake news show? As CBS´ Steve Kroft made clear about his synophantic interview of Obama, "We don´t ask him gotcha questions".

Should be "sycophantic interview of Obama"

Apologies.

But Harriet Myers wasn´t qualified. Is there a word that is ten times stronger than disdain but means the same thing?

Waiting with bated breath for the next "Moses at Mount Sinai" pronouncement from the Bronx´s world renowned "Wise Latina Lady."

We already know what you "think" about everything. Agenda over law.

OMG! A SCOTUS justice on the Comedy Channel? We´ve sunk lower than Sodom & Gommorah.

Before the case has even been brought before her, she has already rendered a verdict! This is true judicial corruption.

Remember Lexington and Concord when you go after the firearms, your evil, corrupt monsters.

2009: Sotomayor joined an opinion (Maloney v. Cuomo) with the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that Second Amendment rights do not apply to the states. She echoed that position in the McDonald v. Chicago supreme court decision in 2010, losing 5-4.

I think we pretty much know.

Sotomayor takes orders from the White House. ValJar, probably.

What case is she referring to? Is she just showing she is not Justice material by prejudging like liberals always do? A liberal can never make a good judge; they never set their racist and other sick ideas aside as is required.