A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: To Be or Not To Be Hagel
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
To Be or Not To Be Hagel
National Review Online, by Victor Davis Hanson

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 2/3/2013 5:41:34 AM

Four years ago, Barack Obama’s widely praised retention of Republican Bob Gates was done to reassure Washington of a bipartisan and competent continuity at Defense in difficult times. In contrast, the deliberately provocative nomination of Republican Chuck Hagel is meant to remind Washington that no longer will there be either bipartisanship or continuity, but rather a radically new direction at Defense. Senator Hagel in his testimony at times seemed genuinely befuddled and sorely confused about his own past contradictory statements, his current incoherent beliefs, and the very policy of the administration he is to serve. In political terms,

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: planetgeo, 2/3/2013 5:51:51 AM     (No. 9155304)

FTA: The result is that with Kerry, Brennan, and Hagel we have a much different national-security trinity from Clinton, Petraeus, and Panetta — though one far closer to the now unbound second-term visions of Barack Obama.

There you go. The complete explanation for why we´re seeing these absurd nominations of mind-numbing incompetents. It´s because they echo or reinforce the now unbound second-term visions of Barack Obama. Revenge.


Reply 2 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 2/3/2013 5:59:20 AM     (No. 9155309)

Maybe the GOP should just merge with Lukid and be done with it. VDH usually has intelligent things to say, but this time he´s joined the hound dogs in the treeing of a raccoon. Bunch of idiotic barking ensues. Rock bottom for the GOP still not in sight.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: rolfnader, 2/3/2013 6:45:06 AM     (No. 9155335)

By all means-the Senate MUST vote for whatever is best for Barky. Weir sew scrood.


Reply 4 - Posted by: privateer, 2/3/2013 6:52:00 AM     (No. 9155338)

Take needed medication.


Reply 5 - Posted by: planetgeo, 2/3/2013 7:11:39 AM     (No. 9155353)

#2, I´m assuming you mean Likud, not (Lonely at the Top) Lukid. I know. Being a troll means never having to say you´re sorry for spelling...or logic for that matter.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Pearson365, 2/3/2013 8:31:04 AM     (No. 9155443)

Hagel will only be a figurehead if he is confirmed. He´ll assume Hillary´s role of wasting massive amounts of Air Force jet fuel by flying to an endless number of countries for reasons never quite clear. If an actual crisis occurs, Obama will dispatch a more trusted "regional specialist" to the area.

Hagel´s real role will be as the Republican who stripped our military of men, weapons, especially our ever smaller nuclear deterrent, and bases. Won´t be Obama´s fault, but the Republicans.


Reply 7 - Posted by: lawabidingcitizen, 2/3/2013 8:38:39 AM     (No. 9155452)

#6 It´s long past fault finding now. The victors write the history books and in a few years all us geezers who remember when the U.S. stood for liberty and justice will be dead. The past will be altered to show how vile America was and why we had to be reduced to third world status and our progeny won´t even know what hit them.

Bread and circuses then / cell phones and video games now. Same difference, same result -- going from a Republic to a Dictatorship.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: KanCreeper, 2/3/2013 8:47:30 AM     (No. 9155468)

For me the most troubling part of Hagel´s pathetic show before the Senate Committee was his statement about not being named Secretary; and establishing Pentagon policy.
Apparently, and admission that he was to simply forward on WH Policies and not originate the same.

It is scary that a numb-nutz would be steering our Military establishment in precarious times, while working with reduced budgets.
Already, the Pentagon has cut our Service Personnel in the field back to TWO hot meals a day while in Combat Zones. Two of the most important things a Soldier wants is a Hot Meal and Mail. (Next is a RTD to get back home.)
Not important objectives to Zippy who gets all he wants and is catered to his every whim; to the admitted cost of $1.4 BILLION
BUCKS a year!


Reply 9 - Posted by: Farmwife1, 2/3/2013 9:00:33 AM     (No. 9155512)

Like I said yesterday: he´s rubbing our noses in it. What a bunch of junior-high punks.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Grambo, 2/3/2013 9:10:49 AM     (No. 9155530)

If you are determined to incapacitate a powerful military, the simplest way is to put it under the command of a fool.


Reply 11 - Posted by: knarfski, 2/3/2013 9:16:48 AM     (No. 9155538)

All of the above appear to be variably on target..like target practice.


Reply 12 - Posted by: rsgonner, 2/3/2013 10:22:37 AM     (No. 9155641)

The republicans in the senate finally have a chance to stand on principle and vote against this moron. I´m turning blue from holding my breath.

Perhaps the state of testosterone challenge in the GOP is the reason behind Bozo getting a second term? Nah, not sophisticated enough in its optics.....


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: krause, 2/3/2013 10:26:05 AM     (No. 9155645)

Hagel represents the quality level of the Obama administration. All the dems think he´s great, and will vote for him.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Butch59, 2/3/2013 10:28:46 AM     (No. 9155650)

On top of everything else, I hear or read the other day that the Republican Senators probably won´t attempt to fillibuster Hagel´s nomination. For fear of something, I can´t remember what. Gutless as always. We know darn well if the tables were turned, the dims would fillibuster in a heartbeat.


Reply 15 - Posted by: jfodoch, 2/3/2013 11:12:19 AM     (No. 9155721)

You have it, #10. As I´ve said before, this braying jack-ass is laughing at us with his every breath.


Reply 16 - Posted by: grampstosix, 2/3/2013 11:41:34 AM     (No. 9155760)

And where is there at least the one pub senator to filibuster this appointment?


Reply 17 - Posted by: bighambone, 2/3/2013 12:41:09 PM     (No. 9155869)

Hagel will be Obama´s yes man at the Pentagon, as Obama sets out on a progressive plan to transform the DOD to the point where the USA will no longer have the strategic military expeditionary capabilities to get involved in future foreign wars. That is not good at a time that potential adversaries are modernizing their military capabilities.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: gesundheit, 2/3/2013 6:54:05 PM     (No. 9156357)

The British Empire almost destroyed itself and much of the rest of the world when its prime minister Neville Chamberlain adopted a policy of appeasement toward Hitler in the 1930s.

Now the leader of the American Empire has adopted a similar weak and self-destructive policy, as the appointment of Chuck Hagel officially demonstrates.

However, this time other countries, particularly Israel and France, have decided not to stand by and let themselves be destroyed also, and have begun to take action against al-Qaeda and Syria.

This means America is becoming so irrelevant it hardly makes any difference anymore who our Secretaries of Defense and State are.

So let the photo ops of Barack Obama, John Kerry and Chuck Hagel meeting with Mr. Ahmadinajad and the Iranian mullahs go forward. And let them announce ´´Peace in Our Time.´´ But no matter what they might say, if Israel decides it doesn´t want Iran to have nuclear bombs, it won´t have them.


Reply 19 - Posted by: tipover, 2/3/2013 7:02:57 PM     (No. 9156367)

Watching Hagel during the hearing made me think he is on Statins and is have serious problems with short term memory and decision making.


Reply 20 - Posted by: TruthAndJustice, 2/3/2013 7:34:52 PM     (No. 9156390)

Alicia Keyes covered it at Obama´s Coronation..er, His Inaugural ...as she sang this song she wrote for the occasion...about our Monarch King Obama...and his plans to "burn it down" destroy America on behalf of the real racists like Keyes, Beyonce and her hate spewing husband...who will stop this evil? Who will stand up to him and call him out...His Attorney General drank of the same poison...

Below are a portion of the lyrics to the song which Alicia Keyes sang for Obama and guests at his Inaugural:

He’s got both feet on the ground / and he’s burning it down/
got his head in the clouds and he’s not backing down/

Obama’s on fire / Obama’s on fire / He’s walking on fire / Obama’s on fire / Everybody stares as he goes by / Because they can see the flames in his eyes / Watch him as he lights up the night / Everybody knows that Michelle is his girl / Together they run the world / And we gon’ let it burn, baby, burn, baby…

Charming....Communists at play.



Post Reply   Close thread 721821




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



It’s.The.Law
American Spectator, by Ross Kaminsky    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 6:17:17 AM     Post Reply
Last Thursday, Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) started a Twitter prairie fire with his call for people to describe #ObamacareInThreeWords. (My contribution was “Sorry, Doctor retired.”) (Snip) The White House, never shy to jump into social media, responded with a flurry of tweets, including “It’s. The. Law.” which smacked, more than anything, of typical Obama chest-thumping. Is the administration sure they want to aggressively take credit for a law which, for almost the entire three years since its passage, has had more Americans supporting its repeal than supporting the law itself and which, according to Rasmussen Reports

   

 



 
Tooth and Nail: Fluoride
Fight Cracks Portland´s Left
Wall Street Journal, by Joel Millman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:57:35 AM     Post Reply
PORTLAND, Ore.—In the 1950s, after health authorities began fluoridating U.S. water supplies, they faced opposition from groups like the John Birch Society, which called it "an unconstitutional mass medication of the public." Sixty years later, the fight over fluoridation has erupted in Portland, where the battle has drawn in the city´s craft-beer brewers, organic-food purveyors and environmentalists. Even some of the city´s famed indie-rock musicians are taking sides. The debate has prompted something of an existential crisis in this self-consciously liberal city, which votes Tuesday on whether to overturn the city council´s 2012 decision to fluoridate.

What Angelina Jolie
forgot to mention
CNN, by H. Gilbert Welch    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:54:23 AM     Post Reply
I first saw the headline early Tuesday on Real Clear Politics, a political news site where I generally start my morning. It´s not where I expect to see a story on breast cancer. Then I checked my e-mail messages -- they all seemed to be about Angelina Jolie´s op-ed. Students in my undergraduate class wanted to discuss it in our next session. Colleagues expressed concern and wondered what the right response was. People I don´t even know sent e-mails. One, from a research fellow at the International Agency for Research on Cancer, nicely summed up the general concern:

Three Signs There’s a Cover-Up
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:46:03 AM     Post Reply
The late columnist William Safire once said that a good clue that someone in Washington was engaged in “an artful dodge,” i.e., a cover-up, was that they used the phrase “mistakes were made.” Safire defined it as a “passive-evasive way of acknowledging error while distancing the speaker from responsibility for it.” The phrase became infamous when both Richard Nixon and Ron Ziegler, his press secretary, deployed it to explain away Watergate without explaining who did what and when or whether any ill motive was involved. Astonishingly, the Internal Revenue Service resurrected the Nixonian expression within hours

Deval as Holder’s fill-in?
That just wouldn’t be just
Boston Herald, by Holly Robichaud    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:27:24 AM     Post Reply
Just when you think the news surrounding Obamagate cannot get any worse, it does. Some say U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s days on the job are numbered and that it’s just a matter of when he’ll be forced to resign. While I’ll not shed a tear over Holder’s departure, one of the replacement names being floated has me reaching for tissues: Gov. Deval Patrick. Patrick has denied he’s interested — but the job isn’t on offer yet. If it is, President Obama should not select him nor should he be confirmed by the Senate for a plethora of reasons.

How the white hat got stained
New York Daily News, by Jim Geraghty    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:20:32 AM     Post Reply
Don’t let anyone fool you: Everyone in politics is tempted to believe that their noble ends could justify unethical and illegal means. Those who had hoped that President Obama would usher in a new era of higher standards in Washington must be shell-shocked by last week’s revelations: -The Internal Revenue Service admitted to delaying conservative organizations’ tax-exempt status while quickly approving groups that had liberal or progressive orientations. The IRS asked these groups all sorts of invasive questions, including what kind of books they read, and leaked some information to the media. -The Department of Justice secretly obtained

The Arab collapse
New York Post, by Ralph Peters    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:15:02 AM     Post Reply
The Arab Spring has unleashed the Arab Collapse. Everybody still standing in the region is picking the flesh of the helpless. The Islamist cancer proved more virulent than Arabs themselves expected, while dying regimes behave with unrestrained ruthlessness. And our diplomats still think everyone can be cajoled into harmony. We’re witnessing a titanic event, the crack-up of a long-tottering civilization. Arab societies grew so corrupt and stagnant that violent upheaval became inevitable. That’s what we’re seeing in Syria and Iraq — two names, one struggle — and will find elsewhere tomorrow.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

59 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

59 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

Camelot Is Burning
47 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

43 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

43 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

   

Post Reply   Close thread 721821





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~