A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Why Limbaugh is gushing
over Marco Rubio
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Why Limbaugh is gushing
over Marco Rubio

CNN, by Ruben Navarrette

Original Article

Posted By:jackson, 2/1/2013 8:59:55 AM

The phrase: "President Marco Rubio" is music to the ears of conservatives who are eager to prove they are not anti-Hispanic while still supporting one of their own: a solid conservative. And so it is that, as the immigration debate reignites, the Florida senator´s star power is winning over the world of conservative talk radio. Whether it´s the radio shows hosted by Mark Levin or Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh, Rubio´s appearances are being met with gushing accolades. The talkers are not sold on everything he says about

Comments:
I remember Rush gushing over W. the first go around when some questioned his conservative bona fides. Rush was fooled (and so were we.) But the Rubio love-fest sickens me. I´ve switched off the radio with disgust more this month then ever before.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: WAN2, 2/1/2013 9:08:44 AM     (No. 9152061)

I got as far as "CNN" and stopped reading.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 2/1/2013 9:10:57 AM     (No. 9152064)

Rush is to Rubio what Ann Coulter is to Christie - - completely blinded by false perception.

"Azucar" Rubio is nothing more than a sock puppet for the Big Lobbies who lust after government subsidies provided with money stolen from us.

Anyone who thinks Azucar will serve any interests but his own - - is a fool and a chump.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: mws50, 2/1/2013 9:11:00 AM     (No. 9152065)

Rubio is OK, but Ted Cruz is well above him.

I want to see our new US Senator serve for 6-12 years then be our next US Supreme Court Chief Justice, IF he continues doing what he is doing.


Reply 4 - Posted by: donnaclaire, 2/1/2013 9:12:46 AM     (No. 9152068)

Exactly, #1. I wouldn´t waste my time and attention on ´whatever CNN has to say´.


Reply 5 - Posted by: StormCnter, 2/1/2013 9:13:37 AM     (No. 9152072)

Rush Limbaugh´s political loyalties are only as solid as the fluctuation of his ratings. When Rubio is no longer useful, Limbaugh will turn.

The major block in the immigration ideas put forth so far (excepting Obama´s "outline") is that the unions are prepared to kill any semblance of a guest worker program. It´s not about jobs, it´s about organization. The unions cannot organize guest workers, but they are looking forward to organizing the new citizens or the ones who can legally take jobs in the US. Barack Obama actively helped the unions kill any previous such efforts to incorporate the vital guest worker part of a plan. You will notice Obama made no mention of guest workers in his big immigration rollout. Without the guest worker segment, Republicans will absolutely not support a plan.


Reply 6 - Posted by: HotRodLincoln, 2/1/2013 9:15:29 AM     (No. 9152079)

I call BS. Rush addressed this the other day. He stated he was opposed to the Amnesty Bill but was impressed with Rubio´s articulate manner in which he presented his case. He understood that no progress would be made with Republican support until the border was sealed. CNN is trying to make a wedge issue out of this. Don´t buy into it.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Vivi, 2/1/2013 9:16:03 AM     (No. 9152080)

I will forever think W was a great President OP. After 911 I remember believing there was no way he could prevent another similar terrorist attack. Still a proud thirty percenter. That´s right up there in my book with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War.

Rubio is a powerful fiscal conservative, he´s leading on immigration instead of playing defense, the left is scared of him, and he´s in for four years of the media wing of the Democrat party like CNN going after him.

I´d have voted for him in ´12.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: spahrkl, 2/1/2013 9:16:36 AM     (No. 9152081)

Are they still around?


Reply 9 - Posted by: lilo, 2/1/2013 9:19:01 AM     (No. 9152087)

CNN, not a reliable news source.


Reply 10 - Posted by: artman1746, 2/1/2013 9:23:01 AM     (No. 9152097)

Notice that it blows right by this author that it may be that those listening to talk radio might have no interest whether he is Hispanic or if he can get that vote. It might be that conservatives want someone who will FOLLOW THE U.S. CONSTITUTION!

Republicans must always be painted as having ulterior motives that have a desire to stop the Democrat attempts to do "good".


Reply 11 - Posted by: rollingcow, 2/1/2013 9:28:49 AM     (No. 9152109)

I´m not six years old and I don´t need someone to explain things to me. I like Rush and respect his opinion, but I do my own thinking, thank you, nor do I put all my political eggs in one basket. I may like what someone is saying at the moment, I just want to see if they stick to it over time or change their minds to get votes when the time comes.
Mrs. Cow


Reply 12 - Posted by: bubby, 2/1/2013 9:32:00 AM     (No. 9152119)

Well we will see what Rubio does when he can´t get border security first. Schumer and Obama have already said securing the border will come later (that means never in Democratic speak). If Rubio caves and buys into securing the border later then all this "gushing" will end. If that happens then he is just another potential presidential candidate like Jeb Bush. The Tea Party will walk away from him if they haven´t already started. I´m against amnesty but if it happens I don´t believe any illegal should get the right to vote ever in IMHO!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: TheMotherCO, 2/1/2013 9:33:42 AM     (No. 9152121)

I totally agree with No. 7. I saw him interviewed and he was articulate and very much a right thinker. I do not listen to limbaugh any more, tired of him years ago.


Reply 14 - Posted by: kate318, 2/1/2013 9:40:09 AM     (No. 9152136)

"...conservatives who are eager to prove they are not anti-Hispanic while still supporting one of their own." Classic liberal projection. This does not describe conservative motivation, but is, in fact, why Barak Hussein Obama is president of the United States of America. Liberals disgust me.


Reply 15 - Posted by: bighambone, 2/1/2013 9:48:44 AM     (No. 9152160)

Rubio is an inexperienced US Senator and Republicans have to oppose any deal that he comes up with that would affectively turn the illegal alien population into new Democrat voters like any special path to citizenship amnesty, no matter what they call it. Nobody knows how many illegal aliens are here, Obama´s water carriers in the liberal media have been stuck on claiming the figure of 11 million now for sometime, but in actuality there could be 20 million or more illegal aliens here now.

If such a Obama special path to citizenship amnesty comes about, you can bet that through their political allies the many very liberal ethnic and immigrant activist groups who operate in immigrant communities, the liberal Democrats with organize just about all the legalized aliens into what amounts to a future liberal Democrat voting bloc before the Republicans even realize what is happening.

If the Republicans back such an amnesty, maybe their share of the so-called Hispanic vote will go up from about 27% to about 33%, but the Democrats will have gained 10 million or more new voters out of the legalized former illegal alien population group.

If that happens it will be long-term political suicide for the Republicans who will no longer have any chance to win future national elections, when the Democrats politically flip States like Arizona, Florida, and Texas to what California is today politically speaking.


Reply 16 - Posted by: nonsense, 2/1/2013 9:49:15 AM     (No. 9152162)

Good Grief, it was just a phone interview. The Left will tell me what to think, the Left will tell me how to interpret the interview. The Left really does think that Americans are stupid and not able to think and decide for themselves.

The Left firmly believes that all Propaganda works, prove them wrong.


Reply 17 - Posted by: killerbee, 2/1/2013 9:49:44 AM     (No. 9152164)

Yep, without actually listening to Rush´s "gushing" I´m going to freak out because CNN tells me to. s/


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: fritzilou, 2/1/2013 9:58:12 AM     (No. 9152173)

I have heard Rubio on Levin and Rush; in both cases Rubio said that without a secure border, he won´t vote for the bill. He also makes it very difficult to attain citizenship with a go to the back of the line order, which could take up to fifteen years. So far, there is nothing but talk.....we shall see if there is a bill at all.


Reply 19 - Posted by: bella, 2/1/2013 10:07:57 AM     (No. 9152198)

Ditto #9


Reply 20 - Posted by: bigken2, 2/1/2013 10:18:41 AM     (No. 9152223)

cnn commie news network all you need to know


Reply 21 - Posted by: Rotten In Denmark, 2/1/2013 10:20:03 AM     (No. 9152229)

Don´t fall for Marco, too hard. Just because the LSM FAILED to vet bammy´s natural born citizenry status don´t be so naive to believe they will free-poass MR on his problem, a Constitutional one to my undersdtanding. How can slam the media and the RATS for allowing an ILLEGAL usurper to become prez when we, or at least some, want the same just because he is an R??? C´mon now ppl.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Mysterylover, 2/1/2013 10:20:23 AM     (No. 9152230)

Ye gods. The Left, and that includes CNN, are afraid of Rubio and they despise Rush. Their campaign to rid the world of Conservative Republicans and talk radio is in full attack mode. I heard the show and Rubio was remarkable in expressing his goals and Conservative beliefs. It was refreshing and a delight to hear. He is an impressive man and I´m not falling for the snarky misinformation from the Progrssive media. They want to eliminate any and every Conservative they fear as a ´contender´.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 2/1/2013 10:21:04 AM     (No. 9152234)

I heard the Rush/Rubio interview. Rush was friendly and respectful. He did not "gush". Perhaps Rush has learned something. namely that a Republican he has opposed and damaged might become the nominee.

After Rubio hung up, Rush was more candid. Though still careful and respectful, he let us know that he is skeptical about Rubio´s plan.

I can´t understand how this interview became "gush" unless a listener is not satisfied unless Rush is on the attack.


Reply 24 - Posted by: STLstudent, 2/1/2013 10:21:45 AM     (No. 9152237)

Stupid policy advanced by a Democrat or a stupid policy advanced by a Republican. It doesn´t matter -- it´s still stupid.

One thing about the Republican Party is consistency. It is stupid.


Reply 25 - Posted by: msjena, 2/1/2013 10:25:05 AM     (No. 9152250)

I wasn´t fooled by W. He was conservative enough for me. We had 4% unemployment during his administration. I have no doubt that if he were still President, we would be long over the current economic situation just like we recovered from the hit after 9/11. It is really the fault of some conservatives who turned against W that O got elected. When W´s approval ratings fell well below the usual Republican percentage, it made him an easy target for the Democrats. A house divided against itself cannot stand.


Reply 26 - Posted by: connor, 2/1/2013 10:26:03 AM     (No. 9152253)

Please explain in detail what you see as a negative about Rubio other than his youth. I truly do not understand the negative remarks, but admit I have gone into mourning since the election and have not been paying attention to the news.


Reply 27 - Posted by: lalo, 2/1/2013 10:36:11 AM     (No. 9152288)

I´m with 7, 13, and 25. W was a great president, though I´m still ambivalent about Iraq, and, in my book, Rubio is the only plausible candidate on the horizon, and certainly the most impressive. Cruz appears to be a fantastic senator but is too hard-core to get elected as president.

Happy to hear Rush is liking Rubio, too, not that I´m a dittohead.


Reply 28 - Posted by: octrojan, 2/1/2013 11:33:34 AM     (No. 9152452)

Here we go again. "Conservatives" whining about Rubio because they don´t agree 100% on every issue. I guess they forgot that the original signer of Amnesty was Reagan--the same guy that raised taxes (although not as much as he lowered them), signed the first abortion bill as Governor and made any number of deals with Tip O. to get more important stuff passed.

Are we in for another round of whatever the Rubio version of "mittens" and "willard" and the other insightful comments we had to hear about Romney?


Reply 29 - Posted by: harleynyc, 2/1/2013 11:58:45 AM     (No. 9152511)

All Rush said is that he admired the fact that Rubio had the cajones to openly criticize obama, like other pols fail to do. I´m sure that Rush as also pleased to have Rubio on the show, especially when he criticized obama.


Reply 30 - Posted by: redink, 2/1/2013 12:14:46 PM     (No. 9152549)

Codswallop News Network is at it again. Rush did not "gush".
And anyone who reads his website or listens to the program knows it.

He encourages anyone who stands up to Obama...THAT is what he applauded Rubio for.
He absolutely did not sign on to any form of amnesty whatsoever...and he never will.


Reply 31 - Posted by: dman, 2/1/2013 12:15:09 PM     (No. 9152550)

So now we must prove we are not anti-Hispanic? Like we had to prove we are not racist? Enough already! Go to hell. Just go to hell.


Reply 32 - Posted by: Starlady, 2/1/2013 12:26:26 PM     (No. 9152569)

Reagan signed the "amnesty" bill because he was assured that the border would be closed, just like the Dems would like everyone to believe they will do it THIS time.
Rush does not believe that will happen because Obama ignores laws he doesn´t agree with. Rush likes Rubio´s passion about conservative principles, but he is very skeptical that immigration reform can/ will happen. I listen to Rush every day. I like hearing his opinions just like I enjoy reading the various opinions in the articles posted on this site. I consider myself more informed about Rush than anyone in the LSM.


Reply 33 - Posted by: tomishere, 2/1/2013 12:57:28 PM     (No. 9152620)

Yes #28 we must destroy anyone we don´t agree 100%, and then wonder why we lose elections. To disagree is fine, but to make everyone we have a disagreement with a monster is a sign of a very immature mind. BTY I am skeptical about the plan.


Reply 34 - Posted by: Malia2012, 2/1/2013 3:34:44 PM     (No. 9152849)

#28, I sure hope not. Once was more than enough of the name
calling among "fellow" conservatives. #34, I couldn´t agree more..


Reply 35 - Posted by: JoElla Bee, 2/1/2013 4:09:26 PM     (No. 9152885)


What Rush had to say about the misrepresentation of his position on immigration:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/01/31/correcting_the_record_on_the_rubio_interview_and_my_position_on_immigration


Reply 36 - Posted by: bob913, 2/1/2013 4:23:22 PM     (No. 9152903)

I am against anyone for amnesty!
That 8 or 11 million has been thrown around since the 80´s. In 2007 it was 20 million

We know it is much higher plus they would be allowed to bring in 5 dependents. 100,000,000 Mexicans.

No to amnesty and no to Marco Rubio!!
What an incredible idiot to align yourself with the democrats. No democrat has the best interest of the country in mind and Marco Rubio wants to president.


Reply 37 - Posted by: Muguy, 2/1/2013 5:14:39 PM     (No. 9152973)

Interesting take from Navarrette who is usually race blinded to the extreme.

My money is on Ted Cruz though. Rubio has already made too many strange bedfellows!


Reply 38 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 2/1/2013 11:20:56 PM     (No. 9153445)

Marco talks a good game, but I don´t trust him. He was pushed ahead for the Latino vote.



Post Reply   Close thread 721595




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "jackson"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "jackson"



Hard of hearings
New York Times, by Gail Collins    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/18/2013 8:09:16 AM     Post Reply
Before Congress is finished with the Internal Revenue Service, there’s a serious danger some of us are going to wind up feeling sorry for the auditors.And, honestly, that is not the way we were planning on spending the spring. Especially since it appears that there are people making decisions at the I.R.S. who have the intelligence of a wet Frisbee. But, so far, the Congressional hearings of outrage have been even less sympathetic. Perhaps you didn’t have time to spend much of your Friday watching the House Ways and Means Committee grill Steven Miller

On the Plus Side ...
New York Times, by Gail Collins    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/16/2013 8:34:41 AM     Post Reply
Let’s try to come up with some positive thoughts about the recent political fortunes of the Obama White House: • Economy’s getting a little better. Deficit’s dropping. • Bill Clinton had a really terrible second term and look how well things turned out for him. • Nobody in the administration has been caught driving to Canada with Bo the dog strapped to the car roof. It’s been quite a week, what with the I.R.S. scandal, the Benghazi controversy and revelations about the Justice Department’s sweep of The Associated Press’s phone records.

The Heretic at Heritage
Human Events, by Patrick J. Buchanan    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/15/2013 7:44:42 AM     Post Reply
Jason Richwine, the young conservative scholar who co-authored the Heritage Foundation report on the long-term costs of the amnesty bill backed by the “Gang of Eight,” is gone from Heritage. He was purged after The Washington Post unearthed his doctoral dissertation at the JFK School of Government. Richwine’s thesis: IQ tests fairly measure mental ability. The average IQ of immigrants is well below that of white Americans. This difference in IQ is likely to persist through several generations. And the potential consequences of this? “A lack of socioeconomic assimilation among low IQ immigrant groups

New Orleans Mother´s Day parade
shooting suspect possibly caught
on video
USA Today, by Doug Stanglin    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/13/2013 10:51:51 AM     Post Reply
New Orleans police have released a video that shows a possible suspect in the shooting that wounded 19 people at a Mother´s Day parade. The surveillance video shows the crowd dispersing and some falling to the ground before one person in a white T-shirt and dark pants flees. The image of the man isn´t clear but police say they hope someone will recognize him. The wounded included 10 adult men and seven women as well as a boy and a girl, both 10. Remi Braden, director of public affairs for the New Orleans Police

Leave Hillary Alone! Bill Kristol Says
Republicans Should Stop Running
‘Ridiculous’ Ads On Benghazi
Mediaite, by Tommy Christopher    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/13/2013 9:49:01 AM     Post Reply
On Fox News Sunday this morning, Weekly Standard editor William Kristol defended former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from partisan political attacks over the tragedy in Benghazi, while also urging non-partisan investigations into that incident and the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups during the 2012 election. Kristol denounced American Crossroads’ anti-Hillary ads, asking “What is the point of that?” and calling them “ridiculous.” “There’s no campaign going on,”Kristol continued, adding “Let’s pull the partisanship back. It’s genuine outrage. There should be bipartisan committees investigating both from Congress. So I wish the Republicans would just be quiet,

Daniel Snyder says Redskins
will never change name
USA Today, by Erik Brady    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/10/2013 9:15:48 AM     Post Reply
Daniel Snyder is owner of the Washington pro football team he grew up adoring. Would he ever consider changing the team name that many American Indians and others believe is a racial slur? "We will never change the name of the team," Snyder told USA TODAY Sports this week. "As a lifelong Redskins fan, and I think that the Redskins fans understand the great tradition and what it´s all about and what it means, so we feel pretty fortunate to be just working on next season." What if his football team loses an ongoing federal trademark lawsuit?

The Benghazi beat
New York Post, by Editors    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/9/2013 8:24:43 AM     Post Reply
In the run-up to yesterday’s House hearings on Benghazi, we were struck by a column by The New York Times’ public editor. It was written in response to readers angry that the paper was not giving the Benghazi hearings the coverage they merited. After suggesting that such criticism was politically motivated and “fomented by Fox News,” the editor offered an interesting conclusion. “The Times,” she wrote, “has had a tendency to both play down the subject, which has significant news value, and to pursue it most aggressively as a story about political divisiveness rather than one about national security



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

55 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

44 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

39 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.


Post Reply   Close thread 721595





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~