A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: IRS: Cheapest Obamacare Plan
Will Be $20,000 Per Family
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
IRS: Cheapest Obamacare Plan
Will Be $20,000 Per Family

Cybercast News Service, by Matt Cover

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/31/2013 7:06:54 PM

In a final regulation issued Wednesday, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) assumed that under Obamacare the cheapest health insurance plan available in 2016 for a family will cost $20,000 for the year. Under Obamacare, Americans will be required to buy health insurance or pay a penalty to the IRS. The IRS´s assumption that the cheapest plan for family will cost $20,000 per year is found in examples the IRS gives to help people understand how to calculate the penalty they will need to pay the government if they do not buy a mandated health plan.

Comments:
So when will the 0bamabots start their revolt? They´re all so stupid they have no idea what they voted into office. Someone wake me up from this nightmare.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: mythman, 1/31/2013 7:10:10 PM     (No. 9151282)

Not to worry! The Supreme Court will rule that poor people don´t have to pay - the rest of us will have to do it for them!


Reply 2 - Posted by: drkillj0y, 1/31/2013 7:11:39 PM     (No. 9151284)

$5000+ per head ´living tax´, just for being alive in the US.

What a scam.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Scribelus, 1/31/2013 7:11:39 PM     (No. 9151285)

Do they get fries with that?


Reply 4 - Posted by: ronbet, 1/31/2013 7:15:30 PM     (No. 9151290)

Obama and the Democrats are one phucked up bunch of lunatics.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Scottyboy, 1/31/2013 7:16:25 PM     (No. 9151293)

Hell, at that cost I might as well get sick.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Hugh Akston, 1/31/2013 7:26:53 PM     (No. 9151307)

This is insanity. I went 3 years without health insurance and the wife and I (late 50´s - 60) combined spent less than $2500, doc visits, prescriptions, etc., instead of being out $18,000 just for the premiums. I wonder what I get for my $500/mo as it is...without even setting foot inside a doctor´s office. Now we will pay triple that? And go into a healthcare system with fewer docs in 2016? What a country.


Reply 7 - Posted by: sillykay, 1/31/2013 7:30:49 PM     (No. 9151318)

Shared responsibility


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: pearlyjo, 1/31/2013 7:30:52 PM     (No. 9151319)

So, you mean, all those evil nay-sayers were correct when they said Obamacare wouldn´t lower your premiums? Imagine that.


Reply 9 - Posted by: TruthAndJustice, 1/31/2013 7:35:13 PM     (No. 9151329)

Kill this beast...ACA doesn´t give people healthcare....it´s legalised rape of the taxpayer


Reply 10 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 1/31/2013 7:35:38 PM     (No. 9151331)

Obamacare will bankrupt the country which, besides control over citizens, might be a hidden motivation for it by zippy and the liberal democrats. obamacare was slammed down the throats of Americans by a criminal traitorous regime. The USA may skip the decline and go straight to a free fall.


Reply 11 - Posted by: crimea river, 1/31/2013 7:35:42 PM     (No. 9151332)

I think I´ll start calling it RobertsCare in honor of our Chief Just-us.


Reply 12 - Posted by: My 2 Cents, 1/31/2013 7:37:38 PM     (No. 9151335)

Pass the Excedrin, please.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: KTWO, 1/31/2013 7:38:32 PM     (No. 9151337)

Government estimates tend to be crap. But family medical plans are very expensive.

People will pay the $600 fine yearly for not being insured. And unless you must file FIT can the IRS know you aren´t insured?

How will they collect from people who are nearly broke?

Unless you have considerable assets why buy the insurance? You are guaranteed coverage if you develop the need. And you are guaranteed emergency care at medical facilities for sudden medical problems.

And if you are unemployed and very poor the government is going to pay your premiums.

The more I hear the crazier it seems. It doesn´t seem much better for those who aren´t insured already and hurts those who are.

Guess I will have to read it to find out.


Reply 14 - Posted by: 6079 Smith, W, 1/31/2013 7:41:44 PM     (No. 9151347)

Today I learned that FREE = $20,000.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Fiesta del sol, 1/31/2013 7:47:02 PM     (No. 9151356)

I am so glad John Roberts outfoxed the Obama administration.


Reply 16 - Posted by: CEP, 1/31/2013 7:48:35 PM     (No. 9151360)

Just remember if you can´t afford all this you will be fined.


Reply 17 - Posted by: reilly, 1/31/2013 7:48:39 PM     (No. 9151361)


IRS types are going to hate the Second Amendment.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: raphaela, 1/31/2013 7:55:22 PM     (No. 9151368)

This is just a way to bankrupt the middle-class. They will just take your property - no need for eminent domain.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 1/31/2013 8:00:59 PM     (No. 9151376)

I too have been uninsured for over 2 years. I see only the best BP doctor (cardiac surgeon) in Las Vegas, who is cash-only BY HIS CHOICE. I pay him $50 per office visit every 3 months, and log my BP on his website. He checks it during each OV and refills the scrip for me. Wal-Mart fills 3 months´ worth for $10.

That´s it. That´s all I´ve spent in the 2 years I´ve needed it. And you know what? It has tended to make me more careful when driving (more careful all the time!), and get myself healthier, because I know any medical care I might need comes outta my pocket. I´ve lost 30 pounds for that reason - it hasn´t quite lowered the BP but I feel a whole lot better at age 60 than I did at age 55.

But now I´m forced to buy this crap ´´healthcare´´, which it most certainly is not, whether I want it or not, and whether I´ll like it or not.

I´m keeping my cash-only BP doc, and staying as healthy as I can get. But it´ll now cost me not just the $240 a year, but $1600 or more. Greeaaaaaaat.......

Might as well go back to eating crap, and dying while I´m still young and gorgeous.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 1/31/2013 8:03:02 PM     (No. 9151380)

Uh, that would be $1600 more PER MONTH, plus the $240 per year it has cost me the last two years.

I should really work on proofreading BEFORE clicking Submit. Sorry.......


Reply 21 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 1/31/2013 8:20:36 PM     (No. 9151396)

The icing on the cake is that ´´Cadillac´´ health insurance plans will be taxed too. You will not only pay a fortune for the insurance, but the value of the plan could be considered taxable income to boot!


Reply 22 - Posted by: Wendybird, 1/31/2013 8:25:47 PM     (No. 9151401)

Don’t forget, this estimate is for 2016. This is only 2013. In Three years, at the present rate of unemployment progression, the average family income will be about $20,000. Not much left over for gasoline, groceries, and private school for the kiddies. But great health care is certainly worth the price!


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: nascarfan, 1/31/2013 8:29:38 PM     (No. 9151408)

Talk with the Canadians, the people that benefit most from their system are immigrants or the poor. And those two groups take advantage of the system and clog it up for everyone.


Reply 24 - Posted by: ScarletPimpernel, 1/31/2013 8:32:17 PM     (No. 9151410)

We´re going to pay for all this, and I guarantee that we won´t get what we paid for. Did your kidneys fail? Sorry, we´re not going to pay for a kidney transplant. Did you break a hip? Sorry, you´re too old for a replacement. It´s a defective product. Have cancer? Sorry, we´re not going to approve the treatment. You want to be a woman instead of a man? No problem -- "sex-change" operations are fully covered! That´s where we´re headed.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Attercliffe, 1/31/2013 8:34:20 PM     (No. 9151412)

#13 and others who wonder how the IRS will collect fines from those who are nearly broke--the same way they do now. Understand that under the law:

1. The IRS can clean out your bank account(s) without notice, no matter how little you have.

2. The IRS can place a lien on your paychecks without notice. It takes seconds to process the notice to your employer, at least six weeks to get it removed.

3. The IRS can put liens on your house or car or other valuable assets. If the amount is considerable, I suspect they may have the power to seize and sell those assets.

If you have ever had insufficient tax taken from your paycheck and paid with a check, your bank account info will be on file. (I always send a money order.) A notice will be sent to your bank putting liens on any acount you have with that institution.

This all happened to me about 30 years ago. Data--and debt--collection has greatly improved since then. Think ahead. You might request that your paycheck be sent to your home so that you can avoid losing an automatic deposit. Sometimes it takes around a week or so to get a cancellation into the system.

Are you now beginning to understand why the IRS is involved in Ocare? No other federal agency, as far as I know, has the power of the IRS to suddenly and without notice take your money and property.

It´s probably illegal for me to suggest ways to safeguard yourself so think very carefully about how to manage this situation. Surely there´s a how-to online by now.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 1/31/2013 8:50:15 PM     (No. 9151430)

I´m sure you know the IRS is hiring thousands of agents and the IRS is ordering firearms for its agents.

Why does the IRS need firearms? I can imagine. I can also imagine IRS with firearms. I can also imagine IRS agents opening fire on the US populace too.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Pros7767, 1/31/2013 8:56:46 PM     (No. 9151443)

Surprise,surprise, surprise !

Gomer Pyle


Reply 28 - Posted by: Coy860, 1/31/2013 8:59:58 PM     (No. 9151449)

#25..my spouse died on the 27th of the month..soc. sec. took back the payment direct deposited on the 3rd, right out of the bank. (He was considered dead for the entire month!)
ditto military retirement, ditto his pension (which was taken over by the gov´t when the company went under)..it took 3 months for me to see a payment again.
The fact is, when we arrange for direct deposits, we give permission for the gov´t to go into our account and take money back.


Reply 29 - Posted by: KTWO, 1/31/2013 9:17:57 PM     (No. 9151465)

Second post. In #13 I was wondering more about how to collect from those who have virtually no assets.

And America is creating and importing them by the millions. But I didn´t phrase it that way.

I can only suppose that if you take any of a hundred entitlements such as food stamps, or even draw unemployment, you will have to prove you and your dependents are insured.

Or will you automatically be given free insurance when you apply for an entitlement?

The complexities seem likely to build bureaucracy to a level never seen before.


Reply 30 - Posted by: jeffkinnh, 1/31/2013 9:21:04 PM     (No. 9151470)

So the reality of this is that no sane person is going to buy a health plan for $20K when they can just use BOCare for coverage and pay a small fraction of that $20K cost in a "penalty" tax. Say a person makes $100k (and probably has health coverage from his employer but ignore that for now) the 2.5% cap of income would limit his payment to $2500, less than half the cost of him buying a policy.

That means that no one will buy policies and everyone will be on BOCare that they will only pay far, far less than half of. Guess who foots the remainder of the bill? The taxpayer in general but there is no plan or budget for this massive expense.

In a few years this mess is all going to collapse in a disastrous heap.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Hermoine, 1/31/2013 9:21:49 PM     (No. 9151471)

R.E.V.O.L.T

It´s time.


Reply 32 - Posted by: TruthAndJustice, 1/31/2013 9:30:27 PM     (No. 9151484)

#28, I am so sorry for your loss


Reply 33 - Posted by: Trigger2, 2/1/2013 5:40:13 AM     (No. 9151789)

The highest union cost for health benefits paid by a company is $20,000. Isn´t it ironic that the IRS magically comes up with the same $20,000?



Post Reply   Close thread 721514




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Rubio Flips Again, Helps Sink
Biometric Visa Tracking Amendment
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Kerry Picket    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 9:56:38 PM     Post Reply
The Senate voted down an amendment to the upper chamber´s immigration bill proposed by Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) that would require a full biometric visa tracking system placed at every land, sea, and air port of entry in the United States before legalized immigrants could receive green cards. The measure, which was also called for by the 9/11 Commission in the wake of the 2001 terrorist attacks, would establish a biometric exit-entry system. Gang of Eight member Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) told Breitbart News last week

Immigration Reform Would Boost
Economy, CBO Report Finds
ABC News, by Jim Avila & Serena Marshall    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 9:43:07 PM     Post Reply
The immigration reform bill drawn up by the Senate Gang of 8 would boost the economy and lower the deficit, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office says in a report out today. The newly released, and highly anticipated, report from the government’s nonpartisan bookkeeper comes as the Senate debates the bipartisan immigration legislation offered by the Gang of 8 and the House moves forward on a more piecemeal approach. The report, “The Economic Impact of S. 744, the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act,” says overall the legislation

Civil rights groups sue
NYPD over Muslim spying
Associated Press, by Adam Goldman*    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 9:13:51 PM     Post Reply
NEW YORK — The New York Police Department´s widespread spying programs directed at Muslims have undermined free worship by innocent people and should be declared unconstitutional, religious leaders and civil rights advocates said Tuesday after the filing of a federal lawsuit. "Our mosque should be an open, religious and spiritual sanctuary, but NYPD spying has turned it into a place of suspicion and censorship," Hamid Hassan Raza, an imam named as a plaintiff, told a rally outside police headquarters shortly after the suit was filed in federal court in Brooklyn.

Justice, State Departments Hosting
Gay Pride Events This Week
U.S. News & World Report, by Elizabeth Flock    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 9:06:14 PM     Post Reply
The departments of Justice and State this week are holding back-to-back LGBT events in honor of gay pride month, and as the Supreme Court prepares to deliver two landmark decisions on same-sex marriage. On Tuesday, the Justice Department celebrated pride with speeches from Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., the first openly gay member of the Senate, singer-songwriter and gay and lesbian activist Melissa Etheridge, and Attorney General Eric Holder, all on the theme "A Year of Firsts," according to DOJPride.com, the official site for LGBT Employees at the department. And on Wednesday, the State Department will follow

Distrust Growing: 70% Believe IRS
Decision to Target Conservatives
Was Made in DC
Rasmussen Reports, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 9:01:06 PM     Post Reply
While the controversy over the National Security Agency surveillance program has dominated the news recently, concern about the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of Tea Party groups and other conservative organizations remains high and is inching up. Despite the large number of controversies engulfing official Washington, the number of people following the IRS scandal has actually increased in recent weeks. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 82% of voters nationwide are now following the IRS targeting story, including 44% who are following the story

Conservatives more racist than
liberals, says government-funded study
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 8:54:16 PM     Post Reply
Mixed-race people are more likely to be considered black by conservatives, who are subconsciously attempting to “justify racial divisions,” said the authors of a new government-funded study. The report, originally released earlier this month, has begun attracting criticism from those who see political bias in the results. The study was conducted by graduate students and faculty in the psychology department of New York University. Researchers asked participants to look at pictures of mixed-race people and say whether they

Hillary 2016 — What
difference does it make?
Washington Times, by Charles Hurt    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 8:42:41 PM     Post Reply
The Clintons are getting the old band back together again for one last geriatric tour. Hillary 2016. Because 22 years of Clintons dominating the Beltway isn’t enough. Her campaign slogan: “Vote for me. I am a woman. What difference does it make?” The Draft Hillary movement is really taking off. There hasn’t been this much excitement behind a Draft Hillary movement since, well, the last time there was a Draft Hillary movement. Remember that? Back in 2008? When she was the “inevitable nominee?” She was the “most electable” Democrat running? She was the only one who



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Edward Snowden Is In The
Process Of Destroying Any Support
And Sympathy He Has Built Up

48 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM     Post Reply
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information

Barbara Walters Defends Maher
Calling Trig Palin Retarded:
‘I Don´t Think He Intended
it to be Mean-Spirited’

45 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by John Nolte    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/17/2013 5:19:02 PM     Post Reply
As NewsBusters reported last week, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called out vulgarian comedian Bill Maher for referring to her Down Syndrome son Trig as "retarded." On ABC´s The View Monday, co-host Barbara Walters astonishingly defended Maher saying, "I don´t think he intended it to be mean-spirited" (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: At a recent standup show in Las Vegas, comedian Bill Maher apparently called Sarah Palin’s five-year-old developmentally-challenged son Trig retarded. And Sarah blasted him on Twitter as a bully. Is that, is it, is he a bully? Is he a bad, what is he?

Who is he? Obama keeps allies,
enemies guessing in second term

44 replie(s)
The Hill, by Justin Sink    Original Article
Posted By: ketchuplover- 6/17/2013 6:31:12 AM     Post Reply
Five months into his second term, allies and enemies are as confounded as ever about who President Obama really is. Is he the dyed-in-the-wool liberal that his biggest supporters and critics suggest? Or is he a pragmatic, even cynical, politician who cares more for his popularity than taking risks for his ideological goals or living up to his rhetoric? Even in the short period since his reelection, Obama has provided evidence to support conflicting interpretations. His efforts to pass immigration reform, the unsuccessful push for stricter gun controls and tax hikes on high earners buttress the case for Obama-as-ideologue.

Jeb Bush labels conservative
critics ‘the chirpers’

44 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Aaron Blake    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 1:22:30 PM     Post Reply
Jeb Bush says he’s not worried that his work toward comprehensive immigration reform and his ties to the GOP establishment will alienate conservatives and negatively impact a potential 2016 presidential campaign, referring to critics as “the chirpers.” “If I decide to run for office again, it will be based on what I believe, and it will be based on my record,” the former Florida governor said in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody. “And that record was one of solving problems completely from a conservative prospective.” Bush (R) pointed to his conservative

Marco Rubio doesn´t
know if ´he´s getting
played´ by Democrats

38 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/17/2013 6:42:44 AM     Post Reply
Is Marco Rubio, R-Fla., getting played by Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.? During his interview with ABC’s Jonathan Karl this morning, Rubio didn’t even seem to understand what that meant. “Are you being played by the Democrats?” asked Karl. “Is Chuck Schumer playing you?” “I don’t — I quite frankly, I don’t even know what that means,” Rubio replied. “Is he using you?” Karl continued. “Is he using you to try to accomplish something that the Democrats want and is not — not a conservative bill?” Rubio responded that immigration reform was a bi-partisan issue that “all Americans

Obama: You Can´t Fathom
´Complexities´ of Syria
Policy ´If You Haven´t Been
in Situation Room´

36 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/18/2013 5:30:04 PM     Post Reply
Charlie Rose last night asked President Obama his new Syria policy. The president first objected to it being called a new policy. "I´m not sure you can characterize this as a new policy. This is consistent with the policy that I´ve had throughout," he said. Obama then explained the goal is regional stability, and especially in Syria. "Really, what we´re trying to do is take sides against extremists of all sorts and in favor of people who are in favor of moderation, tolerance, representative government, and over the long-term, stability and prosperity for the people of Syria," said Obama.

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal
35 replie(s)
American Spectator, by Jeffrey Lord    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 10:37:24 AM     Post Reply
Marco Rubio. Paul Ryan. The IRS. Illegal immigration. And fraud to the tune of billions.. Now there’s a combustible mix. Let’s start with the IRS, illegal immigration and fraud. We’ll come back in a minute to Senator Rubio and Congressman Ryan. For those who came in late, a year before the IRS scandals burst onto the scene in early May of 2013, an alert investigative reporter for WTHR-Indianapolis (Channel 13), Bob Segall by name, produced a stunning piece of journalism. Segall’s video report is found here and we will quote from his story for the basics.


Post Reply   Close thread 721514





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~