A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Rubio’s amnesty: A path to
oblivion for the GOP
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Rubio’s amnesty: A path to
oblivion for the GOP

Daily Caller, by Ann Coulter

Original Article

Posted By:jackson, 1/31/2013 8:59:03 AM

Apart from finding out that Barack Obama did far worse in his re-election than nearly any other incumbent who won re-election, the only thing that perked me up after Nov. 6 was coming across a Time magazine published after the 2004 election, when George W. Bush won a second term. In the mirror image of all the 2012 post-election analyses, the Democrats were said to be finished, out of ideas, hopelessly unpopular. It’s like watching MSNBC, with the word “Democrats” replaced with “Republicans.” Democrats had thrown everything they had into beating Bush, crushing the Howard Dean wing

Comments:
Ann tears Boy Rubio´s argument to shreads. Go girl!!

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: WAN2, 1/31/2013 9:19:56 AM     (No. 9150185)

The laws of physics are set--there is no dislodging the fat kid on our teeter-totter.


Reply 2 - Posted by: JAN, 1/31/2013 9:33:25 AM     (No. 9150212)

Since Ann´s love affair with Christie she has no credibility at all. NONE


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Alpha91c, 1/31/2013 9:37:40 AM     (No. 9150230)

I have to agree with Anne on this one. She hit the nail on the head. Come down to Texas and live along, or near the border. That will open your eyes.


Reply 4 - Posted by: William1, 1/31/2013 9:38:48 AM     (No. 9150235)

And tell me again, why is it necessary to bestow American citizenship on "people who are seeking a better life"? If we were to rely on self-deportation by the use of IRS punishment of employers who hire illegals, that would be a huge first step. No automatic citizenship to those born in the US, another great step.

With the residue, give ´em work permits, if you wish. But citizenship? I´m a Missouri resident who commutes to Illinois to work, but is there some magicel impulse I feel to become an Illinois citizen? No.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 1/31/2013 10:26:09 AM     (No. 9150340)

Hey Annie, honey, baby - - how´s that Christie thing working out for you?


Reply 6 - Posted by: Rotten In Denmark, 1/31/2013 10:26:41 AM     (No. 9150342)

Perhaps, just perhaps, if our political masters had to live like we do and not like the aristocrats of old that they believe they are, they would see how unchecked immigration, primarily ILLEGAL, has destroyed OUR America, not theirs, natch!

Before they self-elevated to near sainthood and omniscience, we kept our borders relatively well. Thanks to the mistake from Hyannisport, Fat Ted, we reversed the immigration policies of earlier that worked and allowed if not invited the un-washed ILLEGALS USERS from Mexico.


Reply 7 - Posted by: djcdjc, 1/31/2013 10:30:20 AM     (No. 9150356)

I want to leeve in Amerika........


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Felixcat, 1/31/2013 10:51:05 AM     (No. 9150410)

For those of us who are first or second generation born Americans of European immigrants -are we obsessed with the immigration laws that affect our parents or granparents former fellow citizens in the home country?

And I´ll go ahed and make a blanket and sweepng statement (and I have lived on the Texas/Mexico border and grew up in South Florida) - most Heespanics from Mexico, Cental and South America come here for the freebies or low skill work opportunities - not to become Americans.


Reply 9 - Posted by: fritzilou, 1/31/2013 10:57:46 AM     (No. 9150424)

Ann Coulter is not doing us a good service by tearing up Rubio. He, Rubio, is at this point just attempting to find a solution to the problem of illegal immigration. There is no bill to sign. Is Ann just doing some early intervention for her favorite, Chris Christie? Why do Republicans do this to each other, which is to kill of the good guys before there is even something to criticize (a bill for example). Why couldn´t she just call him on the telephone and have a discussion with him and voice her opinion privately. Everyone wants to be noticed, I guess, and she knows how to get noticed. She isn´t helpful though by publicly impugning a Republican, who at this point has nothing to impugn.


Reply 10 - Posted by: comstock, 1/31/2013 11:10:39 AM     (No. 9150469)

Rubio is a good salesman, and his proposal may sound reasonable, but it falls apart when the "what ifs" rubber meets the road:

What if the border isn´t secured?
What if some liberal court overturns the welfare ban?
What if the background check turns up negative? Deportation?
What if they don´t pay the fine and the back taxes?
What if they don´t meet the Green Card requirements? Mass Waivers? Mass deportations?
What if?
What if?


Reply 11 - Posted by: Rotten In Denmark, 1/31/2013 11:11:02 AM     (No. 9150470)

A non-solution or a dangerous "solution" to a major problem, whether privately held or stated in public is still the same.

SEAL the borders first, then come talk to us later. Bammy won´t deal? TeeEss, the answer is NO! Nothing until then.


Reply 12 - Posted by: hisself, 1/31/2013 11:20:17 AM     (No. 9150494)

Rubio voted to confirm Kerry!

He is no longer suitable for any public office!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: msjena, 1/31/2013 11:21:42 AM     (No. 9150501)

Just because Ann was wrong on Christie doesn´t mean she is always wrong. But if she continues to support him, I will have to question her bona fides as a conservative...


Reply 14 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 1/31/2013 11:22:17 AM     (No. 9150503)

Ann, hasn´t Rubio´s people got to you yet?
He´s got Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, and Drudge under his wing. I applaud you, Ms. Daggert.


Reply 15 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 1/31/2013 11:27:17 AM     (No. 9150516)

Rubio is the problem, not the solution. His plan will destroy the GOP. Ann is trying to speak some common sense to the sheep following this career politician called Rubio. How can so many be so blind? Stop with the cult worship of the Cuban guy in the suit. Ideas matter. His ideas are political suicide.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Rotten In Denmark, 1/31/2013 11:40:00 AM     (No. 9150539)

And he´s in the same "boat" as the Kenyan, not eligible. Would everyone be paying attention to him if he was from the Mid-West with a Northern European heritage? Methinks not.


Reply 17 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 1/31/2013 11:48:50 AM     (No. 9150557)

Taggart. Ms. Ann Coulter Taggart. The last man standing in the GOP in 2013. Appologies to Rush...


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: god of irony, 1/31/2013 12:01:35 PM     (No. 9150599)

I guess Coulter is still working on that op ed piece on Christie te RINO. Maybe Rubio should tell her that he is a northeastern Ivy League grad then she would change her mind and swoon all over him.


Reply 19 - Posted by: KimoSaavy, 1/31/2013 12:11:47 PM     (No. 9150624)

I have always contended that we are not sending 20 million back to wherever. Having said that, we are failing to seize the moment and get these people to see the err of the marxist way as they will become dems voter.

They will not if properly educated on democracy and capitalism and the party which best facilitates those endeavors. So we give up. Let the dems have them?


Reply 20 - Posted by: bob913, 1/31/2013 2:27:40 PM     (No. 9150866)

This is only good for Marco Rubio. He wants to be president.


Reply 21 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/31/2013 8:34:47 PM     (No. 9151413)

There is no reason to confer a special path to citizenship on the 11 to 20 million illegal aliens who are here now. Rubio is an inexperienced US Senator and the Republicans should think twice before following him off a cliff and committing long-term political suicide.

Vicente Fox, former President of Mexico during the G.W. Bush era used to advise all the time, that the vast majority of Mexicans who live and work illegally are proud of being Mexicans, just want to be able to stay here indefinitely, to work here with dignity, and be able to travel to and from the USA as they wish. Most Mexican illegal aliens would be happy to accept such a conditional immigration status if it was offered.

Then if they individually wished to go on to permanent residence (a green card) in the future, they could individually qualify for an immigrant visa and apply for permanent residence just as all legal immigrants must do. Then after five years as a permanent resident, if they wished, they could individually apply for naturalized US citizenship.

Obama does not want any debate on the ramifications of granting US citizenship to untold millions of illegal aliens, because he and the liberal Democrats recognize that about 80% of those aliens who would gain US voting rights would be liberal Democrat voters. With that many new voters, the Democrats could send the Republicans into long-term political oblivion. The Republicans would have to be crazy to go along with Obama´s plan.



Post Reply   Close thread 721417




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "jackson"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "jackson"



Hard of hearings
New York Times, by Gail Collins    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/18/2013 8:09:16 AM     Post Reply
Before Congress is finished with the Internal Revenue Service, there’s a serious danger some of us are going to wind up feeling sorry for the auditors.And, honestly, that is not the way we were planning on spending the spring. Especially since it appears that there are people making decisions at the I.R.S. who have the intelligence of a wet Frisbee. But, so far, the Congressional hearings of outrage have been even less sympathetic. Perhaps you didn’t have time to spend much of your Friday watching the House Ways and Means Committee grill Steven Miller

On the Plus Side ...
New York Times, by Gail Collins    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/16/2013 8:34:41 AM     Post Reply
Let’s try to come up with some positive thoughts about the recent political fortunes of the Obama White House: • Economy’s getting a little better. Deficit’s dropping. • Bill Clinton had a really terrible second term and look how well things turned out for him. • Nobody in the administration has been caught driving to Canada with Bo the dog strapped to the car roof. It’s been quite a week, what with the I.R.S. scandal, the Benghazi controversy and revelations about the Justice Department’s sweep of The Associated Press’s phone records.

The Heretic at Heritage
Human Events, by Patrick J. Buchanan    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/15/2013 7:44:42 AM     Post Reply
Jason Richwine, the young conservative scholar who co-authored the Heritage Foundation report on the long-term costs of the amnesty bill backed by the “Gang of Eight,” is gone from Heritage. He was purged after The Washington Post unearthed his doctoral dissertation at the JFK School of Government. Richwine’s thesis: IQ tests fairly measure mental ability. The average IQ of immigrants is well below that of white Americans. This difference in IQ is likely to persist through several generations. And the potential consequences of this? “A lack of socioeconomic assimilation among low IQ immigrant groups

New Orleans Mother´s Day parade
shooting suspect possibly caught
on video
USA Today, by Doug Stanglin    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/13/2013 10:51:51 AM     Post Reply
New Orleans police have released a video that shows a possible suspect in the shooting that wounded 19 people at a Mother´s Day parade. The surveillance video shows the crowd dispersing and some falling to the ground before one person in a white T-shirt and dark pants flees. The image of the man isn´t clear but police say they hope someone will recognize him. The wounded included 10 adult men and seven women as well as a boy and a girl, both 10. Remi Braden, director of public affairs for the New Orleans Police

Leave Hillary Alone! Bill Kristol Says
Republicans Should Stop Running
‘Ridiculous’ Ads On Benghazi
Mediaite, by Tommy Christopher    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/13/2013 9:49:01 AM     Post Reply
On Fox News Sunday this morning, Weekly Standard editor William Kristol defended former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from partisan political attacks over the tragedy in Benghazi, while also urging non-partisan investigations into that incident and the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups during the 2012 election. Kristol denounced American Crossroads’ anti-Hillary ads, asking “What is the point of that?” and calling them “ridiculous.” “There’s no campaign going on,”Kristol continued, adding “Let’s pull the partisanship back. It’s genuine outrage. There should be bipartisan committees investigating both from Congress. So I wish the Republicans would just be quiet,

Daniel Snyder says Redskins
will never change name
USA Today, by Erik Brady    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/10/2013 9:15:48 AM     Post Reply
Daniel Snyder is owner of the Washington pro football team he grew up adoring. Would he ever consider changing the team name that many American Indians and others believe is a racial slur? "We will never change the name of the team," Snyder told USA TODAY Sports this week. "As a lifelong Redskins fan, and I think that the Redskins fans understand the great tradition and what it´s all about and what it means, so we feel pretty fortunate to be just working on next season." What if his football team loses an ongoing federal trademark lawsuit?

The Benghazi beat
New York Post, by Editors    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/9/2013 8:24:43 AM     Post Reply
In the run-up to yesterday’s House hearings on Benghazi, we were struck by a column by The New York Times’ public editor. It was written in response to readers angry that the paper was not giving the Benghazi hearings the coverage they merited. After suggesting that such criticism was politically motivated and “fomented by Fox News,” the editor offered an interesting conclusion. “The Times,” she wrote, “has had a tendency to both play down the subject, which has significant news value, and to pursue it most aggressively as a story about political divisiveness rather than one about national security



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

60 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement


Post Reply   Close thread 721417





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~