|
|
| |
Topic: Marco Rubio’s Charm Offensive |
Marco Rubio’s Charm Offensive
National Review Online, by Robert Costa
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:johngalt1, 1/30/2013 4:47:52 PM
|
| It’s 4:20 p.m. on a dreary Monday and Marco Rubio is pacing beside his desk, a black handset pressed to his ear. He’s on the phone with conservative talk-radio host Michael Medved. A few minutes earlier, he was on an online radio program. After he finishes with Medved, he’ll call Newsmax, a conservative news website. On Tuesday, he’ll dial Rush Limbaugh. Between calls, Rubio monitors Twitter on his laptop and phone and keeps an eye on C-SPAN, which is broadcasting Senate floor speeches. He occasionally sips from a bottle of mineral water. “Who’s next?” Rubio asks, turning toward his press
|
Comments: Rubio is a serious young man. He has vision, intelligence and courage. His role in this go-round of immigration reform negotiations will indicate whether he has first-rate political skills and is savvy enough to finally secure our borders and productively integrate eleven million Hispanic people into our schools and workforce without disadvantaging existing citizens or people already in our immigration pipeline.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Stlouislaxbros dad, 1/30/2013 5:09:51 PM (No. 9149207)
At least Senator Rubio stands for something. He is willing to say what he believes.
I have heard too many conservatives and Republicans lately say they are giving up.
I can never do that. I have a family.. a wife and kids.. and I love my country.
And I want it back.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
altoona, 1/30/2013 5:13:55 PM (No. 9149218)
I, for one, find his charm offensive when employed in the service of Schumer, O, McCain and Bob Menendez. Rush praised him the other day, even while not agreeing that immigration reform/amnesty is being done right. No matter how many times it is said, the borders won´t be secured "first" and all this effort will result in is the dissolution of conservatives in red states and a permanent Dem base. Rubio is earnest, intelligent and a wonderfully facile speaker, but I am not on board with him.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 1/30/2013 5:17:54 PM (No. 9149228)
I do not trust Rubio. To me, he and Jeb are one and the same.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 1/30/2013 5:43:05 PM (No. 9149269)
Rubio has shown his true career politician colors. He may look good in a suit and exchanges pleasantries with attention-starved radio talk show hosts, but some of you need to wake up and smell the coffee. Amnesty for 11 to 20 million illegal guests is not just another issue. It would be a permanent structural shift in the electorate in favor of the socialists. At that point, we all might as well give up. If you want to save the country take off the blinders of race, physical appearance, biography --all that crap -- and focus on the substance of the issues. Sad to say that many on the right have been suckered by Rubio in the same way those on the left were with Oblahma. You cannot rely on some talk show host to tell you what is right or wrong for the country.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
bighambone, 1/30/2013 5:58:13 PM (No. 9149291)
I heard Rubio talk the other day about his legalization proposal for long-term illegal aliens. From what I heard Rubio say, his proposal is very different that what Obama and the liberal Democrats are proposing.
Rubio said that he supports a conditional immigration status for long-term illegal aliens that does not contain any sort of path to citizenship. Rubio´s proposal would allow qualified illegal aliens to stay in the US indefinitely, to work, to gain the protection of all US laws, and to travel to and from the USA as long as they obey all US laws. After an alien received a conditional immigration status, if that alien wished to later on become a permanent resident alien, he or she would have to qualify for an immigrant visa in accordance with the immigration laws, just like all legal immigrants must do now. After becoming a permanent resident that alien must complete five years residence in the USA and meet all the other requirements for citizenship that all legal immigrants must do today. The alien, if he or she wished, could then petition to be naturalized as a US citizen. Only then would that person receive US voting rights.
Obama and the liberal Democrats want all illegal aliens now in the USA to be put on a special streamlined path to citizenship, so that they could be naturalized and be given US voting rights as soon as possible. Obama and the liberal Democrats would not be doing that if the had any inkling at all that more then a small percentage of those new voters would ever have an epifinany and vote for conservative Republicans, you can safely bet on that!
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Rafter, 1/30/2013 6:05:17 PM (No. 9149299)
Eventual citizenship is still citizenship with voting rights.
Why should anyone grant that to those whose presence here is a violation of U.S. law?
Rubio has been photographed with Schumer. No one who is serious would allow himself to be photographed with Schumer. See the article. There the two of them are. This is not going to sit well. How many people love McCain?
Hope all this "immigration reform" talk is just that -- and goes away eventually.
Electing the right enforcing president will be all the reform needed. Neither the Jebster nor the Rubester could qualify.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
dr fate, 1/30/2013 7:37:28 PM (No. 9149435)
Rubio is now consorting with some of the lowest forms of human debris in the Senate in order to enact legislation which in ANY form would empower the dims until the end of time while dooming his own party. At best he is incredibly gullible and self-serving. I noticed that although Rush and Levin, both of whom I respect did not broach the question of electoral suicide to Rubio during their interviews, although they both have spoken at length on this subject on many occasions. Let´s have tougher interviews, please.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
3XALADY, 1/30/2013 8:02:26 PM (No. 9149454)
He says nothing will be done until the southern borders are closed. I don´t believe that will ever happen and every one of the requirements of his plan will just be smoothed over and never taken care of like always. If they can´t find 11 million to send home, how will they find them to sign them up? We were hearing the same thing a couple of years ago but people fought it down.
If he was talking to the conservative outlets, why didn´t he call Glenn Beck? Several million would have heard him there.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
miceal, 1/30/2013 8:25:23 PM (No. 9149473)
Well, I for one find Marco Rubio just plain offensive. I will not worship at the alter of an appeaser who wants amnesty for illegals. I don´t care how much lipstick he puts on his pet pig.....
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 1/30/2013 8:27:27 PM (No. 9149475)
#8, yes. We must all remember we heard the "securing the border" garbage (appropriate word) when W was in office. Rubio rushed through that phrase in every interview about immigration. He should be pinned down. Senator, please define "securing the border first." Details. No specifics, oh I see. Well, we will be ready to listen when specifics are all spelled out. THEN ask us for our support of this plan.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
hisself, 1/30/2013 9:52:19 PM (No. 9149571)
Rubio voted to confirm john kerry - a traitor and a liar!
So much for Rubio!
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "johngalt1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "johngalt1"
|
Pentagon bracing for public dissent over climate and energy shocks
|
|
The Guardian, by Nafeez Ahmed
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: johngalt1- 6/16/2013 5:33:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Top secret US National Security Agency (NSA) documents disclosed by the Guardian have shocked the world with revelations of a comprehensive US-based surveillance system with direct access to Facebook, Apple, Google, Microsoft and other tech giants. New Zealand court records suggest that data harvested by the NSA´s Prism system has been fed into the Five Eyes intelligence alliance whose members also include the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. But why have Western security agencies developed such an unprecedented capacity to spy on their own domestic populations? Since the 2008 economic crash, security agencies have increasingly spied on political activists
|
Ryan: We Need to Cut Fat, Not Bone
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: johngalt1- 6/12/2013 2:52:06 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During his opening remarks at today´s House Budget Committee hearing on the Department of Defense and the 2014 budget, Paul Ryan said, "The first duty of government is to keep us safe. And to keep us safe, our strategy should drive our budget. But under this administration, the budget is driving the strategy." With Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, there to testify, Ryan continued: "Last year, Secretary Panetta made a budget request [that] he said was the minimum necessary to execute the President’s strategy.
|
World from Berlin: Prism Spying ´Attacks Basic Civil Rights´
|
|
Spiegel, by Kristen Allen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: johngalt1- 6/12/2013 2:38:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The world has been scandalized to learn about Prism, the broad data surveillance program used by the US at home and abroad. German commentators say that both Berlin and Brussels must defend Europe from this invasion of privacy. Revelations about a far-reaching intelligence program in the United States leaked last week aren´t just causing problems for President Barack Obama at home. While American citizens are left wondering whether their privacy has been violated by the Internet and phone surveillance, officials abroad are expressing serious concerns too.
|
|
Repeal the 17th Amendment!
|
|
National Review, by Charles C. W. Cooke
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: johngalt1- 3/1/2013 1:14:04 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In our grubby, unhelpful political lexicon, certain words exist solely to end conversations. The most prominent such word is “racist.” Less popular, but by no means less potent, are “democracy” and “rights.” When welded together as “democratic rights,” the pair becomes all-powerful — strong enough to send grown men spinning for the exits and to render eloquent speakers mute. For a good example of this principle in motion, witness the orthodox reaction to anyone who calls for the repeal of the 17th Amendment. (Direct election of senators, if you’re wondering.)
|
|
Hillary Clinton´s Middle East Legacy
|
|
American Thinker, by Thomas A. Oakes
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: johngalt1- 2/22/2013 6:54:22 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Most of the time foreign policy barely registers on the radar screens of American voters. That´s why it´s easy for Hillary Clinton fans to promote the false notion that she was a first-rate Secretary of State despite her four-year string of failures. "I´ve done what was possible to do," Clinton told reporters just hours before she resigned. Apparently, it was not possible to strengthen our relationships with allies like Britain, Israel, Canada, Mexico, Poland, and the Czech Republic, but easy to throw the Middle East into turmoil. Clinton´s reset with Russia has been a diplomatic disaster.
|
| |
|
Why Not a $100 Per Hour Minimum Wage?
|
|
American Thinker, by Dan Nagasaki and Glenn Doi
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: johngalt1- 2/15/2013 12:36:37 PM
Post Reply
|
President Obama announced that he´s supporting a federal, inflation-adjusted minimum wage increase from $7.25 to $9.00 per hour. Even if he settles for $8 per hour, this seems irresponsible in light of our stubbornly slow economic recovery. But if the government is going to raise the minimum wage, why stop at such a low wage rate? If higher minimum wages are so wonderful, why don´t we just raise the minimum wage to $50 or $100 per hour? Headline split by staff
|
|
In Defense of Obama’s Drone War
|
|
National Review, by Charles Krauthammer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: johngalt1- 2/15/2013 11:57:38 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The nation’s vexation over the morality and legality of President Obama’s drone war has produced a salutary but hopelessly confused debate. Three categories of questions are being asked. They must be separated to be clearly understood. 1. By what right does the president order the killing by drone of enemies abroad? What criteria justify assassination? Answer: (a) imminent threat, under the doctrine of self-defense, and (b) affiliation with al-Qaeda, under the laws of war. Imminent threat is obvious. If we know a freelance jihadist cell in Yemen is actively plotting an attack, we don’t have to wait
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence in new documentary, claim original conclusion about cause of crash is wrong
|
|
FOX News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: smcchk- 6/19/2013 12:41:02 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight 800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago. However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was shot down. Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute to Paris when it exploded
|
Benghazi Whistleblower Lawyer Says Joint Chief’s Chairman Lied to Congress
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Fred Lucas
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 8:06:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
An attorney whose firm represents two Benghazi whistleblowers said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, lied to the Senate when he said there was never a “stand down” order during the Benghazi attack on Sept. 11, 2012. “What was fascinating is that he explained his lie to them,” Joe DiGenova, an attorney representing one of the whistleblowers, told CNSNews.com. “He actually said they were sent to Tripoli. They were needed in Benghazi,” said DiGenova, a former U.S. attorney, now with the Washington firm of DiGenova & Toensing.
|
Edward Snowden Is In The Process Of Destroying Any Support And Sympathy He Has Built Up
|
|
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information
|
| |
|
Obama: ´If Catholics Have Their Schools and Buildings and Protestants Have Theirs ... That Encourages Division´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 3:46:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Likening religious schools to segregation--a racist system that forced blacks to attend different schools and use different facilities than whites in the American South--President Barack Obama told a town hall meeting for youth in Belfast, Northern Ireland on Monday that there should not be Catholic and Protestant schools because such schools cause division. "Because issues like segregated schools and housing, lack of jobs and opportunity--symbols of history that are a source of pride for some and pain for others--these are not tangential to peace; they’re essential to it,"
|
G8: Barack Obama looks like a president going through the motions
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Alex Spillius
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 4:58:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Listening to Barack Obama give his speech in Belfast on Monday, it was hard not to stifle a yawn. I kept waiting for the part when he would say something interesting, but, about three quarters of the way through, realised it wasn’t going to come. Judging from television pictures some of his young audience felt the same, after the initial rush of euphoria of receiving the rock star president in their midst had passed. This is not surprising, for we had already heard this number about the inspirational role of the Northern Ireland peace process and the Emerald Isle’s
|
Obama: You Can´t Fathom ´Complexities´ of Syria Policy ´If You Haven´t Been in Situation Room´
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/18/2013 5:30:04 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Charlie Rose last night asked President Obama his new Syria policy. The president first objected to it being called a new policy. "I´m not sure you can characterize this as a new policy. This is consistent with the policy that I´ve had throughout," he said. Obama then explained the goal is regional stability, and especially in Syria. "Really, what we´re trying to do is take sides against extremists of all sorts and in favor of people who are in favor of moderation, tolerance, representative government, and over the long-term, stability and prosperity for the people of Syria," said Obama.
|
The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal
|
|
American Spectator, by Jeffrey Lord
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 10:37:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Marco Rubio. Paul Ryan. The IRS. Illegal immigration. And fraud to the tune of billions.. Now there’s a combustible mix. Let’s start with the IRS, illegal immigration and fraud. We’ll come back in a minute to Senator Rubio and Congressman Ryan. For those who came in late, a year before the IRS scandals burst onto the scene in early May of 2013, an alert investigative reporter for WTHR-Indianapolis (Channel 13), Bob Segall by name, produced a stunning piece of journalism. Segall’s video report is found here and we will quote from his story for the basics.
|
| | |
|
|