A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Gun control fails
rationality test
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Gun control fails
rationality test

Washington Examiner, by Randy Barnett

Original Article

Posted By:Judy W., 1/30/2013 12:29:11 PM

On Wednesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the various gun control proposals that have been floated in the wake of the Sandy Hook school shootings. Although they are said to be merely "reasonable regulations" of the Second Amendment´s right to keep and bear arms, most or all of these proposals are irrational and unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has established a two-tiered protection of liberty. Under the lowest tier, "rational basis review," it will uphold restrictions on liberty so long as it can imagine any possible reason why Congress might have adopted the measure. By contrast,

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: addicted_to_coffee, 1/30/2013 12:39:46 PM     (No. 9148670)

liberalism fails rationality test


Reply 2 - Posted by: Clinger, 1/30/2013 12:43:07 PM     (No. 9148681)

It´s perfectly rational in the context of a step toward dismanteling our constitutional republic.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Fireball27, 1/30/2013 12:54:57 PM     (No. 9148699)

Why do I need a gun? Because I want one! I need a gun, the same way Rosa Parks needed to sit in the front of the bus. It is our rights!!!


Reply 4 - Posted by: Redneck In NY, 1/30/2013 1:03:27 PM     (No. 9148714)

Whenever you hear "reasonable" and common sense" in relation to gun control, you know it is neither.


Reply 5 - Posted by: bpl40, 1/30/2013 1:28:48 PM     (No. 9148757)

Just as 0bamcare is ultimately not about health care or insurance, this latest power grab is not about guns, violence or children. Fundamentally altering the nature of the relationship between citizens and their government is the real goal.


Reply 6 - Posted by: woodsman, 1/30/2013 1:40:29 PM     (No. 9148772)

Great anaology #3!


Reply 7 - Posted by: Mr. Know-It-All, 1/30/2013 3:47:38 PM     (No. 9149028)

If "common sense" gun control laws actually had any measurable effect on violent crime these folks might have some credibility. But more gun restrictions merely restrict the rights of the law abiding, who are not causing the problems. Its that simple. Violent cities like Chicago and D.C. are real life examples of how gun laws don´t reduce violence.

You don´t even need to get into the 2nd amendment to shoot down all this nonsense.


   

 

  


 

Post Reply   Close thread 721292




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."



Five senators who know how
to control federal spending
Washington Examiner, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/21/2013 8:06:05 AM     Post Reply
This will come as a shock to those who believe the only significant news in recent weeks has been the Benghazi, IRS and AP/Fox News intimidation scandals, but there have been some significant developments on other issues. Consider the May 14 "Dear Colleague" letter by Republican Sens. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Rand Paul of Kentucky, and John McCain and Jeff Flake of Arizona. One sentence in particular stands out: "We, therefore, are notifying you of our intention to object to the consideration of any legislation that fails to meet any

Never Mind Impeachment; Keep
your Eyes on the Prize
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/21/2013 7:33:37 AM     Post Reply
Conservatives and Republicans would be unwise to pursue President Obama´s impeachment as my colleague Bruce Walker today argues. The odds are the effort would backfire, and there is a much more important goal that should be at the center of our political strategy: sweeping Democrats out of office in 2014 and 2016 in numbers sufficient to enact structural reforms, including replacement of the tax system and junking the IRS and outlawing public employee unions. President Obama is handing his opponents the means, if only they have the wit to pursue the bigger goal.

Virginia’s High-Octane GOP Ticket
National Review, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/20/2013 11:10:38 AM     Post Reply
The battle lines are drawn for the November election in Virginia, with Democrats seeking to portray the GOP ticket that emerged from the party’s state convention this weekend as “extreme” and “all Tea Party, all the time.” (Snip) Now Democrats think they can discredit E. W. Jackson, the minister and lawyer the GOP nominated for lieutenant governor after four ballots this weekend. He told delegates on Saturday he was “not an African American, but an American” and vowed to “get the government off our backs, off our property, out of our families, out of our health care

The Impeachment Option
National Review, by Robert Costa    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/20/2013 10:06:41 AM     Post Reply
Representative Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican, says President Barack Obama may face impeachment over his administration’s response to the Benghazi attack. (Snip) Chaffetz’s tension with the White House has been building for months, ever since he took a fact-finding trip to Libya last October, less than a month after the terrorist attack. During that visit, he huddled with several U.S. diplomats, including Gregory Hicks, a former deputy chief of the Libya mission. But the heavy-handed tactics of the president’s advisers, he complains, sullied his investigation from the start.

   

 



 
Oslo Journal, Part III
National Review, by Jay Nordlinger    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/20/2013 8:45:34 AM     Post Reply
Editor’s Note: Last week, Jay Nordlinger attended the Oslo Freedom Forum, the annual human-rights conference held in the Norwegian capital. I have a friend named Mileydi Fougstedt, who’s a Cuban journalist resident in Stockholm. Her first name is pronounced pretty much like “m’lady.” So when you’re speaking to her, you feel like you’re speaking to a high-class Englishwoman. (Snip) One of the speakers here is the prime minister of Tibet — the democratically elected prime minister of Tibet. I’m speaking, of course, of what’s called the “Central Tibetan Administration”: Tibet’s government-in-exile, located in Dharamshala, India.

DOJ on ‘Gays’: ‘Silence Will be
Interpreted as Disapproval’
Townhall, by Matt Barber    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/20/2013 8:24:26 AM     Post Reply
Under President Obama, “justice” is anything but blind. (Snip) Our sources have provided Liberty Counsel an internal DOJ document titled: “LGBT Inclusion at Work: The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Managers.” It was emailed to DOJ managers in advance of the left’s so-called “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Pride Month.” The document is chilling. It’s riddled with directives that grossly violate – prima facie –employees’ First Amendment liberties. Following are excerpts from the “DOJ Pride” decree. When it comes to “LGBT” employees, managers are instructed: “DON’T judge or remain silent. Silence will be interpreted as disapproval.”

A Clean Slate
American Thinker, by C. Edmund Wright    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/20/2013 8:00:20 AM     Post Reply
It is a bizzaro world indeed when left-leaning Slate makes a better case for limited government than the Mitt Romney Campaign and the GOP establishment managed to make during the 2012 cycle. Yet for the second time in less than a week, two different writers from Slate have done so, making compelling arguments for conservatism, and tweaking the establishment at the same time for good measure -- simply by observation and common sense.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

   

 

  


 
Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

Democratic Senator uses Okla.
tornado for anti-GOP rant
over global warming

39 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM     Post Reply
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care

   

 



 
   

Post Reply   Close thread 721292





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~