|
|
| |
Topic: Is Winning the Argument Enough? |
Is Winning the Argument Enough?
American Thinker, by Peter Wilson
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:DW626, 1/30/2013 7:24:21 AM
|
| I attended the National Review Institute conference in Washington this weekend and came home rejuvenated and satiated by an abundant intellectual feast -- 16 hours of speeches and panel discussions on Saturday alone, with one 45 minute break for cocktails. The All Star cast included Paul Ryan, Bobby Jindal, Ted Cruz, Jim DeMint, Scott Walker, Tom Cotton, Bob McDonnell, Peter Thiel, Grover Norquist, Andy McCarthy, Mark Steyn, Charles Krauthammer, Michael Barone, Larry Kudlow, and on and on. A conservative Woodstock.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Jebediah, 1/30/2013 8:04:38 AM (No. 9147956)
Absolutely excellent----except that it appears we will have to turn dishonest and creepy to win.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 1/30/2013 8:16:55 AM (No. 9147979)
Seems as though having succeeded at rigging the elections and co-opting the media the government might see the need to start stockpiling ammunition.
This might all turn out just fine but I don´t see how.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
bobgray2, 1/30/2013 8:47:52 AM (No. 9148050)
It doesn´t matter how smart you are, or how brilliant your argument is, if the the voters you need to convince are not smart enough to understand it. Case in point, my mother in law. A die hard 78 year old democrat and enthusiastic 0bama supporter. Singing his praises, and then literally in the next breath, complaining about the costs of gasoline, food, healthcare, and her doctor refusing to take new medicare clients. As if 0bama´s policies had nothing to do with any of those things.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh, 1/30/2013 9:47:39 AM (No. 9148212)
FTA: I´m afraid the battle is going to be much harder, more boring, more calculated and more soulless
It doesn´t have to be. Convincing arguments can be based on solid principles. There are two groups we need to reach; first the Republicans that didn´t vote, second the middle ground voters that often agree with Conservative positions in polls but need more emotional based persuasion.
The argument must be the necessary solid core but it is insufficient by itself. We need to understand all the electorate that we might win and learn to speak their language. What do they need to hear? Do our principles encompass what they want? If so, HOW do we talk to them effectively? It probably will not be through a reasoned argument but through an emotional appeal. That´s where Republicans often drop the ball. These folks don´t feel their concerns are being addressed and that they are not cared about. We need to make sure they are reassured.
And yes, we need the modern data gathering and analysis to support the needed communication effort. I thought the Republicans had gotten that straighted out but although they made vast improvement, the dems upped the game with their "Cave". For a party that values achievement we are dropping the ball here.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
JAN, 1/30/2013 10:02:21 AM (No. 9148251)
Until every state has legitimate voter I.D. there will be no legitimate elections.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
starboard, 1/30/2013 10:50:32 AM (No. 9148382)
I agree with #3.
The GOP needs to learn how to sell the sizzle. They also need to become fearless in their approach.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
ivehadit, 1/30/2013 11:06:24 AM (No. 9148435)
Hello republicans? I watched a discussion about a book the democrats were following on the psychological analysis of voting (paraphrasing) on MSNBC last JUNE. J.U.N.E! And I told a republican author about it...
PAY ATTENTION! And get with it! This is not some lofty moral and academic exercise of debating ideas (MARCHING IN A STRAIGHT LINE WITH RED JACKETS ON-we all remember how well that worked out for the British!)this is a battle for the LIFE AND SOUL OF OUR COUNTRY...its very existence! PULL OUT ALL THE STOPS! This is NOT your grandfather´s democrat party. This is your GREAT-grandfather´s fight for democracy and freedom against very dark intentioned forces. Craftiness, shrewdness, street smarts and TECHNOLOGICAL and SOCIAL GENIUS are ALL needed.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Japanorama, 1/30/2013 5:52:12 PM (No. 9149284)
Only a clueless academic would believe that winning an argument in D.C. has any effect on the votes of tens of millions of dim-bulb American voters.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "DW626"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "DW626"
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
Witch-Hunting Returns to Massachusetts
|
|
American Thinker, by Robert Weissberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 5:50:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
By all accounts, today´s college campuses grow more intolerant by the day. We move closer to the old Soviet Empire, where political dissidents risked the gulag for even joking about Marxism. In the U.S., however, the hate crimes concern anything that touches on race, ethnicity, gender differences, diversity, and sexuality (see here and here). Even an old-fashioned ethnic joke almost guarantees mandatory counseling. Skeptics need only look at the pervasiveness of campus speech codes, coerced sensitivity training, the mandatory injection of multicultural propaganda into courses, and other top-down censorship.
|
Obama Consoles Student After Failing To Answer Math Problem: ‘Subtraction Is Tougher Than Addition’
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/17/2013 5:20:16 PM
Post Reply
|
|
BALTIMORE — Trying to reset the agenda amid scandal in Washington, President Barack Obama turned his attention Friday to the economy and said lawmakers should spend every day resolute on how to help it grow and get people back to work. “Our focus cannot drift,” he said. After a week that put him on the defensive and consumed by a trio of political controversies, Obama left the turmoil behind on a short helicopter flight about 40 miles north to Baltimore. The city has had its share of tough times in its move from an industrial to service economy
|
| |
|
Benghazi Narrative Shift Was Perfectly Clintonian
|
|
Jack Cashill, by American Thinker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/17/2013 4:45:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
"We´ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing do to with," said Hillary Clinton to the families of the four Americans killed at Benghazi and others gathered at a September 2012 memorial service. Her boss, President Barack Obama, had been reciting the same lie in one forum after another in the days following the September 11 attack on the American outpost in Benghazi. To give the lie credence, his Justice Department immured the producer of the video, a Coptic Christian named Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, in a West Texas prison.
|
The End of the Obama Illusion
|
|
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/15/2013 3:29:05 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama is shattering the illusions of his supporters, and eyes are opening, even among his former media allies. As if waking from a slumber, a newly aggressive White House press corps yesterday raked Jay Carney over the coals over various lies and evasions, prompting Megyn Kelley of Fox News to quip, "What´s happened? Who are these reporters who showed up here?" They are disillusioned and angry liberals who are starting to grasp that they have been lied to, who realize that a skeptical stance is necessary
|
|
If Obama had an Uncle...
|
|
American Thinker, by J.R. Dunn
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/15/2013 3:24:28 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Don´t tell me the left doesn´t survive primarily on luck. On Friday, April 12, the legacy media was on the ropes. A spectacular uproar, of a type never before seen, had erupted over media refusal to cover the trial of Kermit Gosnell, the serial killer lucky enough to own an abortion mill. The story they were attempting to bury involved his trial for a homicide by medical malpractice (one of several such), the murder of four healthy infants (out of hundreds of similar killings), the abuse of human remains, and assorted associated felonies.
|
|
Benghazi Coverup Uncovered
|
|
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/12/2013 5:24:55 AM
Post Reply
|
|
BBC has apologized for its coverage of the Benghazi murders; ABC has unraveled the mendacious tale of the talking points ´ genesis and the Congressional hearings this week have dramatically established the administration´s elaborate lies about how our ambassador and his brave defenders were murdered and its failure to protect them. Maybe now the press will feel it´s okay to get off their duffs and report how a thoroughly incompetent administration, motivated solely by self-interest, left our ambassador and others to be murdered and then lied about it with consequences to us all.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
| |
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
| |
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
| | |
|
|