A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Common sense, emotion
and women in combat
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Common sense, emotion
and women in combat

Washington Times, by Lt. Gen. Jerry Boykin

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/29/2013 11:11:25 AM

The recent decision by outgoing Secretary of Defense Leon E. Panetta to allow women to serve in front-line combat units is fraught with problems, and no one in the administration or at the Department of Defense seems to be considering them. First of all, it is important to understand that the nature of warfare has changed substantially in the last couple of decades. Linear battlefields with clearly defined front lines and rear areas are no longer the norm and are unlikely to re-emerge in future warfare. Furthermore, Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs)

Comments:
Gen. Boykin gives an excellent analysis. He has called the 0bama regime a Marxist insurgency. How right he is! No wonder he was booted out by the regime.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: MattMusson, 1/29/2013 11:22:41 AM     (No. 9146335)

In private businesses you get sued for a Hostile Working Environment.


Reply 2 - Posted by: GomerShabazz, 1/29/2013 11:23:01 AM     (No. 9146339)

Our enemies will love the women!....could be construed as aid and comfort!

Raped, mutilated females......makes prison camp guard duty passable.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: KanCreeper, 1/29/2013 11:26:27 AM     (No. 9146345)

This is going to be a really bad move! See some of previous posts.

The Liberal women and men who are behind this will never get in Harm´s Way.
Pity those who will,though.


Reply 4 - Posted by: viking diver, 1/29/2013 11:29:38 AM     (No. 9146355)

the only time women should see combat is in the defense of our own boarders and then everyone becomes a defense line


Reply 5 - Posted by: 80coyotekate, 1/29/2013 11:47:33 AM     (No. 9146392)

Spending our limited defense funds on "inferior soldiers" is suicidal.



Reply 6 - Posted by: Bevan, 1/29/2013 12:07:43 PM     (No. 9146437)

And leftists say conservatives deny science.


Reply 7 - Posted by: The Architect, 1/29/2013 12:43:57 PM     (No. 9146538)

This is what happens when elitist eggheads make decisions. Leon went right from college to the Army as a 2nd Lt. in the Army Intelligence. He never saw any combat or lived in the field. He is an academic who makes decisions based on theory and not real life. When will these left wing idiots realize that nature made men and women different for a reason. Humans are not "one size fits all". For the most part, women are weaker and smaller than men. In close combat, especially hand-to-hand combat, they will be completely outclassed by our current enemy who holds women in low regard and believes that rape is a legitimate part of war. Not only that, but male soldiers will run a greater risk because they can´t count on the soldier on either side of them in combat to fight as effectively as they do. Also more men will die trying to protect the women in combat situations. Its human nature. This idea has "disaster" written all over it. It was a political decision and not a military or even common sense idea.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Razorgirl, 1/29/2013 12:57:50 PM     (No. 9146571)

The military has finally "jumped the shark" with this one. The Oscars are coming up. The nominations include catagories for Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Supporting Actor and Best Supporting Actress. By their thinking, these honors should no longer be separated by the sexes. There should only be catagories for Best Acting-person and Best Supporting Acting-person. It´s only fair.



Post Reply   Close thread 721099




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



GAO: ‘Visa Overstay’ Backlog at
DHS Remains Over One Million
Weekly Standard, by Jeryl Bier    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:15:44 AM     Post Reply
Today, the Government Accountability Office issued a report of preliminary finding on the progress the Department of Homeland Security has made in its efforts to reduce the backlog of immigrant visas. Although almost 863,000 records were "closed" in the last two years, the backlog of potential overstays remains at more than one million [emphasis added]: In the summer of 2011, DHS reviewed the 1.6 million potential overstay records. As a result, DHS closed about 863,000 records and removed them from the backlog. Since that time, DHS has continued to review all potential overstay records for national

Fast and Furious/Benghazi investigative
reporter Sharyl Attkisson: Something
fishy’s been going on with my computers
since early 2011
Hot Air, by Allahpundit    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:07:29 AM     Post Reply
Via the Chris Stigall Show and WPHT in Philadelphia. Two weeks ago, this wouldn’t have been worth posting; Attkisson herself, I suspect, wouldn’t have mentioned it publicly. Even if she’s right about something fishy going on, there are other plausible culprits besides the U.S. government when it comes to reporters’ computers being infiltrated. Two weeks later, though, knowing now that the DOJ was willing to order a dragnet of AP reporters’ phone records and actually read James Rosen’s e-mails, there’s no way around the obvious suspicion. If the feds were willing to monitor Rosen and the AP in the

Barack Obama, the Great Bystander
PJ Media, by Bryan Preston    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 10:55:36 AM     Post Reply
It’s hard to improve on this paragraph by Jim Geraghty, from today’s Morning Jolt. Obama didn’t know the IRS was targeting conservatives until he read it in the papers. He didn’t know about “Fast and Furious” until he read it in the papers, too. He has “complete confidence” in Holder, and didn’t know about the decision to collect the phone records of reporters. He didn’t know about the investigation into CIA director David Petraeus’s affair. He told Letterman during the election he didn’t know what the national debt was. He didn’t know about the AIG

   

 



 
Dems to challenge constitutionality
of GOP Keystone bill
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Pete Kasperowicz    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 10:38:15 AM     Post Reply
House Democrats this week will challenge Republican plans to call up legislation that provides for congressional approval of the Keystone pipeline, and removes the need for presidential approval. Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) on Monday said he would raise a question of the privileges of the House in order to challenge consideration of H.R. 3, the Northern Route Approval Act. House Republicans are expected to call up that bill on Wednesday. House rules allow members to raise questions of the privileges of the House, which can be used to stop proceedings affecting the safety, dignity and

White House-created “doctored”
war on Jon Karl and Stephen
Hayes falls apart
Legal Insurrection, by William A. Jacobson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 10:05:52 AM     Post Reply
White House planted “doctored” email narrative in press, then used press reports to push the “doctored” narrative as a political talking point I saw this coming from a mile away. When the White House leaked a single email about Benghazi to Jake Tapper, it launched a war on Jon Karl and Stephen Hayes because the wording of the email varied slightly from the accounts in their reporting. Their reporting, however, was based on summaries because the originals had not been released by the White House, but both reporters stood by the substance of their reporting.

‘I Don’t Want To Be A Psychiatrist
Here, But…’ O’Reilly Diagnoses
Obama’s ‘Personality’
Mediaite, by Matt Wilstein    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 9:47:40 AM     Post Reply
Bill O’Reilly is definitely not a psychiatrist, but that didn’t stop him from offering up his own diagnosis of President Obama‘s “control” issues on Laura Ingraham‘s radio show Monday. According to O’Reilly, growing up without a father in the house has led directly to Obama’s desire to “control his environment” in the White House. O’Reilly told Ingraham that “control” is a “hallmark of Barack Obama’s personality.” He mused, “I don’t want to be a psychiatrist here, but when you’re a kid raised in a real turbulent situation… no authoratative figure, no father, all of that,

Senate panel OKs tax-welfare
benefits for newly legal immigrants
Washington Times, by Stephen Dinan    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 9:38:25 AM     Post Reply
The SenateJudiciary Committee voted Monday to allow illegal immigrants who get legal status to begin collecting tax-welfare payments, as the panel spent a fourth day working through amendments to the massive immigration bill and party-line splits began to emerge. In one major change, the committee voted 17-1 to make a third drunken-driving conviction a deportable offense for the newly legalized immigrants if at least one of those offenses occurs after they are approved for legal status. But immigrant-rights groups called that a rollback of due-process rights for the immigrants and said a drunken-driving incident



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

   

 

  


 
White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

60 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

   

 



 
Republicans owe Rice an apology
on Benghazi, Obama adviser says

38 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 7:38:42 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said Sunday Republicans owe Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, an apology for alleging she played a part in formulating the White House’s response to the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, last year that killed four Americans. Pfeiffer said on ABC’s “This Week” that the release of more than 100 pages of Benghazi emails and notes show “beyond a shadow of the doubt” that accusations she tried to change the narrative of what happened in the attacks was false. "And, frankly, I think that many of the Republicans

   

Post Reply   Close thread 721099





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~