A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: CBS´s Charles Osgood: ´Is
Constitution Truly Worthy
of Reverence in Which
Most Americans Hold It?´
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
CBS´s Charles Osgood: ´Is
Constitution Truly Worthy
of Reverence in Which
Most Americans Hold It?´

NewsBusters, by Noel Sheppard

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/28/2013 10:26:48 AM

Imagine you´re getting ready to head to church one fine Sunday morning and on your television you hear a man say, "Let´s give up on the Constitution." Such actually happened when CBS News Sunday Morning aired a rather inflammatory commentary by a Georgetown University law professor teased by host Charles Osgood asking, "Is the U.S. Constitution truly worthy of the reverence in which most Americans hold it?" (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHARLES OSGOOD, HOST: Is the U.S. Constitution truly worthy of the reverence in which most Americans hold it?

Comments:
I certainly never thought I would see conduct like this during my lifetime.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: GOPJihad, 1/28/2013 10:30:02 AM     (No. 9143937)

This usurper has emboldened them to bare their true feelings about this nation and its founding principles.

Is it any wonder why they are so aggressively seeking to take away from the American public the firearms that are most effective in resisting tyranny?


Reply 2 - Posted by: Whamdbambam, 1/28/2013 10:34:13 AM     (No. 9143956)

Apparently not that First Amendment thingee, without which you and your ilk would all be in jail, Cholly.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: trapper, 1/28/2013 10:37:43 AM     (No. 9143965)

He is professor of CONSTITUTIONAL law at Georgetown. Great. A constitutional law professor teaching contempt for the constitution. I suppose if seminaries can employ atheists to teach Christianity, why not this? Georgetown is the incubator for American Communitarianism, so this should be expected. But I wonder how many prospective law students, and their parents who will be writing the tuition checks, fully understand the anti-American sewer they are wading into.


Reply 4 - Posted by: ledbythnose, 1/28/2013 10:41:46 AM     (No. 9143983)

There will come a time very soon when this Clown and his Ilk will be hiding underground from millions of angry American Patriots. I doubt if he can run very fast.LOL


Reply 5 - Posted by: Jethro bo, 1/28/2013 10:44:22 AM     (No. 9143992)

The revered Constitution didn´t even hold this country together for 100 years. And Lincoln shredded it in order to ´preserve´ it. We know there are incredible flaws that allow the ´checks and balances´ to eliminate the will of the people (look at the SCOTUS´ decision on Obambicare). Our constitution allows our lawmakers to exempt themselves for the very laws that enslave us. Our goobernment has agencies that are unaccountable to anyone or anything (HHS and rules on Obambicare). Our constitution now allows for legalization of abhorrent behavior (abortion, homosexual marriage). What is legal isn’t right and our goobernment and its beloved Constitution leave no proves for eliminating the evil imposed by the SCOTUS. The one saving grace in the near worthless parchment is for now we can bear arms and thus be in a better position for revolution. So Osgood is correct in that we need to destroy the flawed docuament we ahve now and create one that eliminates the ability of a ruthless and evil goobernment from enslaving us.


Reply 6 - Posted by: smoolie, 1/28/2013 10:44:37 AM     (No. 9143993)

If this was a way to open a serious discussion on why the Constitution is vital to freedom throughout the world, then I say rock on! However, if it is just to bash America some more, Well that a whole different kettle of fish.


Reply 7 - Posted by: grampagasman, 1/28/2013 10:45:45 AM     (No. 9143995)

The country is done. For those of you over 50 just look back in time and remember how things have changed. From anti-smoking to food laws (Bloomberg) the changes have been incremental, but effective in remaking the country.

The idea of dumping the constitution may seem silly now but the left will not stop. The idea will be taught in schools and be in movies, print, and TV until, twenty years from now it will become reality.

Don´t believe me? If someone told you 30 years ago that you would not be able to smoke in a bar would you have believed them or just laughed.

America is dying.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: bpl40, 1/28/2013 10:47:15 AM     (No. 9143998)

The Constitution is the best representation of Rule of Law. If you do not have reverence towards it, your attitude towards the rule of law is suspect. What the lefty is really trying to say is that the Constitution holds out a constant, fair and unchanging common platform for peacefully resolving differences. What he and 0bama would rather have is a framework where their views will take precedence over those who disagree with them. Thats what the entire struggle is all about.


Reply 9 - Posted by: LudicrousSextus, 1/28/2013 10:47:39 AM     (No. 9144000)

The *better* question would be - ´Is CBS News
Truly Worthy of Reverence in WhichMost Americans Hold It?´

A few decades ago, CBS News was probably one of the most trusted outlets going. As Dan Rather conveniently pointed out, however...the propaganda eventually beat out unbiased reporting.

From 60 Minutes on down - CBS News is now better described as the farce that keeps on giving, and pretty far down the scale as far as ´actual´ news reporting goes.

Tough cookies, CBS. Thinking Americans know you´re no longer on the ´thinking´ side of the equation.


Reply 10 - Posted by: chumley, 1/28/2013 10:52:21 AM     (No. 9144020)

#7, as right as your observations are, I hope your conclusions are not. Now I´m depressed.

The people who created that constitution started a country from savage wilderness. Many people fought to the death to make it a reality.
The US communists have created nothing. In fact, they have severely damaged a thriving republic. Gee, I wonder who I should hold in greater reverence?


Reply 11 - Posted by: veritas, 1/28/2013 10:59:29 AM     (No. 9144042)

1. There are some 190 countries that don´t use the US Constitution. Planes leave the US every day. In, oh, 6 to 10 hours, any American can be in one of those countries, so there´s obviously no need to throw out the Constitution here.

2. Seidman is incapable of rational thinking, unwilling to employ it, or both.

3. FTA: To be clear, I don´t think we should give up on everything in the Constitution. The Constitution has many important and inspiring provisions, but we should obey these because they are important and inspiring, not because a bunch of people who are now long-dead favored them two centuries ago.

So Seidman maintains that every law is made moot when those who voted for it die?


Reply 12 - Posted by: Freeloader, 1/28/2013 10:59:52 AM     (No. 9144043)

Here´s what Daniel Webster, one of America´s greatest constitutional lawyers/scholars, had to offer on the importance of The United States Constitution:

"Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster and what has happened once in 6,000 years, may not happen again. Hold on to the Constitution, for if the American Constitution should fail, there will be anarchy throughout the world."

Daniel Webster
(1782-1852)


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 1/28/2013 11:04:46 AM     (No. 9144052)

This just in:
For the upcoming super bowl game next Sunday NFL judges will NOT use the accepted NFL rule book. Instead, the judges will make determination and rulings based on their experiences, the mood of the public, the score, and the outcome they want.


Reply 14 - Posted by: nimby, 1/28/2013 11:08:29 AM     (No. 9144060)

Try him for treason and throw him out of the country.Yet, what am I thinking? Its Holder´s DOJ after all.


Reply 15 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 1/28/2013 11:09:47 AM     (No. 9144066)

Could we ignore it long enough to drag you out of your house and execute you on the spot as a traitor, Charles?

The subversives don´t even feel a need to hide it anymore...


Reply 16 - Posted by: 4freedom, 1/28/2013 11:11:00 AM     (No. 9144069)

This is what progressive-ism is all about, take down the country has been their goal for 100+ years. And to think Hillary calls herself a "Modern Progressive", the thought of her being our next president is truly frightening. It will be more of the same of what´s in there now.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Coy860, 1/28/2013 11:21:16 AM     (No. 9144099)

I am glad I grew up in the 50s. I look back with fondness.
Now in my twilight years, will I find it necessary to lie to preserve my right to healthcare, no more candor with my doctor, lest it be reported to the government? Neighbors will spy on neighbors, children will spy on parents. And America will be no more.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Vaquero45, 1/28/2013 11:22:26 AM     (No. 9144100)

These people are all evil scum.


Reply 19 - Posted by: O.S. Banker, 1/28/2013 11:22:33 AM     (No. 9144101)

The Constitution is most certainly deserving of the reverence and esteem that the American Citizens hold for it. Unfortunately, Federal Agenst, Congress and the President seem to hove less reverence for the document that created their positions than for the people who pay their salaries.

For the citizen the Constitution is a shield against public officials. For a Public Official, the Constitution is an impediment to their achieving a given objective.


Reply 20 - Posted by: lylacat, 1/28/2013 11:41:53 AM     (No. 9144159)

Who in the world is Charles Osgood? Just like a liberal, if it does not work for them, then just toss it out and do what you want, after all, that´s what our president is doing. I have great respect for our founding fathers who had the intelligence to put checks and balances in our constitutution, so that one branch cannot force their wishes upon the other.


Reply 21 - Posted by: mickturn, 1/28/2013 4:51:12 PM     (No. 9144891)

Well charlie no kick at the football for you, you are already in the bowl.


Reply 22 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 1/29/2013 12:30:51 AM     (No. 9145492)

My heart weeps.

This is the domino effect of a anti-American leader.


   

 



 

Post Reply   Close thread 720926




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Colorado sheriffs seek to
block new gun restrictions,
file lawsuit against state
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM     Post Reply
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations

´We could lose everything´: Tea
Party groups prepare to sue IRS
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.

First Lady Expands Anti-
Obesity Campaign to Museums
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community

Congressman: IRS asked pro-
life group about ´the content
of their prayers´
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM     Post Reply
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although

Treasury Knew of I.R.S.
Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,

HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t
Employees More Time for ´Planning
and Preparing Healthy Meals´
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM     Post Reply
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.

Will real villains in IRS
scandal ever be punished?
Fox News, by Juan Williams    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM     Post Reply
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

48 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.

43 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM     Post Reply
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

41 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

When it rains, it pours: Ten
press conference take aways

35 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM     Post Reply
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

35 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 720926





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~