A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: The Rubio Con
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
The Rubio Con
Daily Caller, by Mickey Kaus

Original Article

Posted By:Fiesta del sol, 1/28/2013 8:29:23 AM

Sometimes a political con is just too transparent to fly: Remember the idea that Mitt Romney had defused the venerable Medicare issue in Florida because Obama had squeezed some money out of the program (money that Romney would inevitably have to squeeze himself)? Right. I suspect the con at the heart of what seems to be the immigration proposal from the Senate “Gang of 8“–seven veteran amnesty supporters plus Marco Rubio–will prove equally unworkable: According to a five-page document provided to POLITICO, the sweeping proposal — agreed to in principle by eight senators

Comments:
The GOP is dead to me. Rubio is the new Jeb Bush is the new McCain. If the establishment ruling elite in the GOP wants to pander to people who will never!!! vote for them, and throw my vote under the bus, then under the bus I plan on staying. I held my nose and voted for McCain. I didn´t need as big of a clothespin for Romney, but this is the last straw.

You´ll never convince me that McCain wanted to winin 2008. He wanted (wants) revenge on the Republican party, he wants it destroyed. Now Rubio?

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: right-turn, 1/28/2013 9:01:52 AM     (No. 9143720)

Any time a left wing source has an article which designates a group as ´a gang´ it´s time to be suspicious. When does Politico ever refer to dems as a ´gang´?


Reply 2 - Posted by: StormCnter, 1/28/2013 9:06:42 AM     (No. 9143733)

There are some fights we can win and some fights that leave us bloodied and beaten on the sidelines, having accomplishing nothing. Deciding that the only way to cure/stop/remedy illegal immigration is to find them, gather them up and send them home is one of the fights we cannot win. That Marco Rubio is looking for a solution that attempts to fix some things, compromises on others and creates workable programs is to his credit. The accusation that we must not look for a way to reassure legal Hispanics with an immigration reform that works because they will "never vote for us" is a really good example of how we have lost the legal Hispanic vote. These good people are not our enemy.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Bur Oak, 1/28/2013 9:10:17 AM     (No. 9143741)

I guess we don´t need 100 senators. All the country needs is a gang.

No more secret deals and 2,000 page bills that have to be passed before we know what´s in them. Debate the issues on the floors of Congress as was intended.


Reply 4 - Posted by: BadgerBill, 1/28/2013 9:19:32 AM     (No. 9143760)

I hold our congress (going back decades--and that´s how long many of them have been there) accountable for the illegal alien invasion. They turned their collective backs on existing laws regarding such.

Vote all bums out, and start over with true conservative, non-career-seeking, electeds (I almost said politicians).


Reply 5 - Posted by: starboard, 1/28/2013 9:57:31 AM     (No. 9143845)

Republicans need to be more inclusive and find an immigration solution and a reason for Hispanics to join the party. If they can´t or won´t they´re history. Remember, the Hispanics will become the largest voting block in the not to distant future.


Reply 6 - Posted by: bogeegolf, 1/28/2013 10:05:39 AM     (No. 9143864)

Let the illegals stay here as long as they want. Don´t give them drivers liscenses, health care, free education or any of the benefits of a citizen. Fine businesses that hire them and take away welfare and food stamps from people that refuse to work. Tell the mexican gov to suck eggs as they self deport.


Reply 7 - Posted by: manitouman, 1/28/2013 10:15:45 AM     (No. 9143896)

#5 Conservatism is inclusive when it is articulated. The challenge is to find a real one with a desire to speak rather than look for a senatorial tenure retirement package.

AND as soon as someone erupts from the morass described as the inside the beltway crowd, the press and the forum participants can´t wait to tell all us ignorants that the current flavor is putrid in some minute way.

In the mean time gutless conservatives will contentedly commission liberals to define them without arguement.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: yuban, 1/28/2013 10:34:27 AM     (No. 9143957)

Once again many posters are saying move Left and the GOP might win. If the GOP makes many more Left turns they will pass the Democrats.


Reply 9 - Posted by: olcap, 1/28/2013 11:01:51 AM     (No. 9144047)

Marco Rubio is a RINO as John McCain is a RINO as Lindsey Graham is a RINO, ETC. ETC.

Keep bringing along the lil RINOs. Such as Christie, whose RINOism prompted a poster here in the past couple of weeks to apologize to those of us who said all along that Christie is a RINO.

Live and learn, live and learn. But you won´t win over conservatives when you continue to prop up obvious RINOs and ask they be given "time" to dig in their heels for untold numbers of years in Washington.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Pinkpanther, 1/28/2013 12:00:13 PM     (No. 9144203)

#2 & #5 Hispanics have NEVER voted in large numbers for Republicans-ever not even for Reagan and he granted them amnesty! Look up the numbers, the GOP will never get the Hispanic vote and selling out this country trying to buy their votes only hastens the destruction of it.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Kristen, 1/28/2013 12:11:27 PM     (No. 9144247)

Of course illegal aliens can be and should be deported. They should not be in this country at all! Most of them are disgusting and/or dangerous. President Eisenhower deported them. Other countries deport them. Look at Mexico´s dealing with illegal aliens.

I hope the House will stand up to this dangerous measure that will only destroy this country.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 1/28/2013 12:46:25 PM     (No. 9144338)

The Dems don´t care about citizenship.

La Raza will vote just fine the way the system is right now.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: saguni, 1/28/2013 4:45:44 PM     (No. 9144872)

We should have "comprehensive" reform to make our immigration policy mirror the policy of the person´s home country.

If they come from Mexico, then they face Mexico´s harsh policy applied to them.

If they were born in Canada, then they face Canada´s more lenient policy.

Please note...the country they were born in, not the country they were traveling through just prior to settling here--or getting caught.

While living in Southern California I have personally known a first generation (his parents immigrated and still own land in Mexico) Mexican-American (my husband´s Best Man) and a third generation Mexican-American from Colorado. Both told of family travails working their way through the immigration system, and both felt that anyone not following every rule the way they/their parents did did not deserve to avoid deportation. One was a Republican, the other I´m not sure, but both were conservative business owners.

For Marco Rubio to live through and know what his parents endured on their "path to citizenship" and betray their hard work by pushing rewards for people who choose to thumb their noses to our entire system of laws makes him, in my book, unworthy of further office.


Any and every person who refuses to make the very important distinction between a legal immigrant and a criminal alien invader is either an idiot or a liar...take your choice.


Reply 14 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 1/28/2013 5:03:53 PM     (No. 9144925)

Rubio has sold the GOP down the river and not a peep about this at Drudge or on Hannity or even on the Must Reads. Amnesty for 20 million illegal "immigrants" -- -- they´ve broken immigration laws, tax laws, customs law, labor laws, they´ve committed perjury in many cases and now they´re to be granted US Citizenship by decree thanks to our corrupt politicians and media. That´s absolutely revolutionary.



Post Reply   Close thread 720903




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Fiesta del sol"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Fiesta del sol"



Past presidents have
sent IRS after critics
Associated Press, by Tom Raum    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/17/2013 11:14:02 AM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service controversy dogging President Barack Obama is hardly the first time a White House and the tax agency have been accused of political meddling and bias. Over the past week, Republicans have been trying to link Obama to what the IRS has acknowledged was improper extra scrutiny of conservative political groups seeking tax-exempt status. That’s despite the fact that little — if anything — has surfaced to suggest White House officials had advance knowledge of the IRS actions. The line between IRS misconduct and the Oval Office appears less fuzzy in IRS political incidents in previous administrations.

Ad on Rush Limbaugh
featuring Belk
creates online stir
Charlotte Observer, by Ely Portillo    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/16/2013 12:38:35 PM     Post Reply
Charlotte-based Belk Inc. found itself in the middle of an online battle between political partisans this week, when an ad featuring the company ran on conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh’s radio program. The fight highlights the fine line companies walk with advertising and social media. The ad featuring Belk was apparently first noticed Monday by a group on Facebook that monitors Rush Limbaugh’s advertisers in an effort to pressure the talk show host financially. On Tuesday, the liberal website Daily Kos mentioned the ad in a posting. People started posting messages on Belk’s Facebook page protesting the ad.

   

 

  


 
W.H. Holds off-the-
record Benghazi briefing
Politico, by Dylan Byers    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/10/2013 2:31:40 PM     Post Reply
The White House held an off-the-record briefing with reporters on Friday afternoon to discuss recent revelations about the Benghazi investigation, sources familiar with the meeting tell POLITICO. The meeting began around 12:45 p.m. and postponed the daily, on-the-record White House press briefing to 1:45 p.m. White House press secretary Jay Carney did not respond to a request for confirmation of the meeting. The off-the-record session was announced to reporters in the wake of an ABC News report showing that White House and State Dept. officials were involved in revising the now-discredited CIA talking points about the attack on Benghazi.

Obama orders top aides
to praise Obamacare
during commencement speeches
Washington Examiner, by Joel Gehrke    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/9/2013 4:20:38 PM     Post Reply
President Obama has ordered his Cabinet officials to praise Obamacare when giving speeches at college commencement ceremonies, even as the president’s aides fear that poor implementation of the law will tarnish his legacy. “To counter the criticism, the White House has told all Cabinet members and senior officials to use commencement speeches to drive home for graduating college students and their parents the benefits they gain from a provision of the law that allows young adults to stay on their family’s insurance plans until they turn 26,” Bloomberg reports. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., did her part to tout

John McCain Wants to
Blow Up The Cable Industry
As We Know It
Business Insider, by Jay Yarow    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/9/2013 1:19:00 PM     Post Reply
John McCain is going to release a bill that would dismantle cable as it´s currently constructed, Brenden Sasso at The Hill reports. The legislation would force cable companies and satellite TV providers to give consumers an option to pick and choose which channels they get. This is called "à la carte programming," and it´s long been a dream of consumers who only want a handful of channels. McCain tried to introduce similar legislation in 2006 and it went nowhere.

Benghazi: Incompetence,
but no cover-up
National Journal, by Michael Hirsh    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/8/2013 6:04:54 PM     Post Reply
There was tragic incompetence, plainly, in the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi attacks, and even possibly some political calculation. It is a record that may well come to haunt Hillary Clinton, the first Secretary of State to lose an ambassador in the field in more than three decades, if she runs for president in 2016. But the obvious Republican effort to turn this inquiry into the Democratic (Obama) version of the Iraq intelligence scandal that has tarred the GOP since the George W. Bush years -- led by that least-credible of champions, the almost-always-wrong Darrell Issa --

Benghazi Again
Time Magazine, by Joe Klein    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/8/2013 11:21:13 AM     Post Reply
The Republicans, apparently with nothing better to do, are still chasing their tails over the tragic events in Benghazi on September 11.Actually, no. That’s not true. They’re chasing their tails over what happened after the tragic events of September 11. They’re mostly concerned that the Obama Administration tried to cover up the fact that this was a terrorist attack by a local militia (translation: local street gang) which aspired toward bad-butt Al Qaeda status. This is a pretty hard sell since, the day after the attack, the President called it an “act of terror.”

   

 



 


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

60 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

   

Post Reply   Close thread 720903





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~