|
|
| |
Topic: The terrifying mindset
of Secretary Clinton |
The terrifying mindset
of Secretary Clinton
Washington Times, by Joseph Curl
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 1/28/2013 5:20:39 AM
|
| Her words are already long gone from the daily flow; in fact, they never really resonated at all, were all but ignored by the mainstream media, and were characterized more as a feisty in-your-face comeback than what they truly were. And what they truly were was horrifying — but at the same time a deep insight into the Democratic mindset, as well as a peek at what may be coming in 2016. Last week, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton finally appeared to answer questions before two congressional panels on exactly what happened at the U.S. Consulate
|
 
Reply 1 - Posted by:
provide, 1/28/2013 5:41:25 AM (No. 9143510)
There was a statement from Chrissy Mathews about Bammy offering Hitlary a seat on the Supreme Court.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
uno, 1/28/2013 6:14:14 AM (No. 9143528)
Having Hillary Gollum Clinton on the Supreme Court is pretty terrifying! There isn´t an honest bone in that thing´s body!
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
pineledger, 1/28/2013 6:45:14 AM (No. 9143542)
Hillary on SCOTUS? Game´s over.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
M2, 1/28/2013 7:34:34 AM (No. 9143574)
Democrats and liberals have provided America with many amusing and dangerous classics that have wormed their way into the American lexicon:
I did not have sex with that woman. Monica Lewinsky.
Put some ice on that.
I don´t recall.
A blue-dress moment.
Baking cookies.
I served in Viet Nam.
Sharks still swim the waters where slaves were thrown overboard.
False but accurate.
The island would capsize.
I have never been proud of my country until Barack was elected.
Fifty seven States.
Corpse.
You didn´t build that.
We have to pass the bill to see what´s in it.
What difference does it make?
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
wtm, 1/28/2013 7:44:49 AM (No. 9143586)
Don´t you really think that Obammy would love to get Hitlary on the Supreme court ???
It gets her out of the way for him to run again in 2016, when the Progs dump the Constitution and demand that people elect him for life !!!
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 1/28/2013 7:49:13 AM (No. 9143592)
FTA - - - - - - - - -
And that is terrifying. The secretary of state said simply, “The ends justify the means.” The Obama administration had lied about what happened in Benghazi to help secure a second term for the president, buried the murder of Americans in a private investigation, then, when finally questioned, said, “What difference does it make!?” what we said way back then.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
tocsin, 1/28/2013 8:22:03 AM (No. 9143631)
FTA;´´A politician running for president who need not answer questions from anyone.´´
There is only ONE reasons democrats get away with this...REPUBLICANS!
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
little guy, 1/28/2013 8:29:26 AM (No. 9143650)
Kind of funny that Hitlery´s campaign debt of almost $25 million from 2008 was paid off IN FULL the week before she testified. Also interesting she is claiming that she still has health problems. What better way to "retire" than to go to the Supreme Court and take Ruth Buzzy´s place? It also clears the way for Biden in 2016.
#5 --- my answer to anyone who asks: Why some people need a powerful rifle like an AK-47? To prevent someone else from trying to get a third term in violation of the Constitution!
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
gwmcclintok, 1/28/2013 8:44:05 AM (No. 9143689)
Rubio could have asked the following questions?
Was this a CIA mission house or a consulate?
Was this a gun running operation gone bad?
Was there a drone over head recording everything in live time, and giving you immediate information?
How many hours did the attack last?
Who and where are the survivors?
What a bunch of pansies these Senators were.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
suziannr, 1/28/2013 9:06:35 AM (No. 9143732)
I don´t think they are pansies. I think they are complicit. We the People have no representation in Washington.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
privateer, 1/28/2013 9:16:50 AM (No. 9143756)
They´re not just cowards, they are to stupid to press their own advantage when---rarely---they have it. They only care about keeping their puny little fiefdoms, and hope Tyrant Hussein will allow them to continue in their ineffectual sinecures.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
mannew, 1/28/2013 9:21:38 AM (No. 9143766)
Hillary will make the exact same kind of President as Obama. After all they are both controlled and financed by George Soros. Most of the dirty work will be accomplished by the time Obama leaves. Hillary,according to plan, will have an easier time.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Arby, 1/28/2013 10:38:01 AM (No. 9143966)
If it walks like a PIAPS . . .
Appointing her to the SCOTUS would be a first: a person who had flunked the bar exam.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
previouslyon24, 1/28/2013 12:07:31 PM (No. 9144233)
This was a Senate hearing controlled by her friends; 5 minute segments where it was difficult to pin Hillary down with her scripted statements. Why isn´t the House having a hearing requiring her testimony?
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
suziannr, 1/28/2013 12:16:18 PM (No. 9144268)
see my reply above. sickening
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
chicodon, 1/28/2013 12:33:31 PM (No. 9144312)
#1
Let´s not forget we are but one more Progressive Justice away from tyranny.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Reillybinx, 1/28/2013 12:49:51 PM (No. 9144347)
Remember that private meeting between Hillary and Obama during the 2008 campaign? It was held at Diane Feinsteins home. What did Obama promise her for her support?
That he´d take his turn as POTUS and then after his term he would support her 100%? She needed his guarantee that she would be next in line.
But with her health not good (wearing specialized glassed for double-vision and now on Coumadin (a blood-thinning medication you are on for life) she may not be able to perform any job and is clearly lame and impotent. Obama was counting on driving her down and out..as she appears to be heading.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 1/28/2013 3:00:00 PM (No. 9144659)
#18, agree that Obama made Hillary some offer she couldn´t refuse. What he probably was counting on, and she´s too full of hubris to do so, was her age. He´s only 50 now; she´ll be 70 in 2016, and she´s not well now.
The one thing even Hillary can´t defeat is Father Time.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Rafter, 1/28/2013 5:32:16 PM (No. 9144982)
#15, I believe the House hearing was held the afternoon of the same day as the
morning Senate hearing.
There was a congressHo or two who axed pointed questions.
Hill-err-ee-ass was fully rehearsed by then.
The real fault is not in our (GOP) stars --
it is in the fraudulent and corrupt media Ho´s who allow all this to pass without controversy.
The media could rip this Badministraton to shreds.
There is no more corrupt liar than Obie WON Kenya-Obie.
But he´s doing the Dirty Work of the New Yawk Slimes.
It´s Teddy Kennedy´s wildly liberal agenda put into force.
Teddy got Obie the 2004 DimWitz conv speaking gig, Obie got into the Senate in
the Nov 04 elections, and started running for prez. Teddy and Caroline anointed him.
Teddy got Kerry through the 2004 primaries.
He got Obie through over Hillary in 2008.
And the press now keeps everyone from criticizing a black man´s agenda.
It´s Cradle To Grave TeddyCare and pro-communism. Without Teddy´s baggage of a dead girl, etc.
All in the name of Civil Rights.
Just not yours.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s nurses admit
it’s hard not to call him ‘hon’
|
|
Washington Times, by Cheryl K. Chumley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 11:08:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Nurses treating Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev say their natural inclination toward compassion makes it difficult to see the 19-year-old as a possible terrorist. And they have to make concerted effort — and buddy-system pacts — to keep from referring to him with terms of endearment such as “hon.” One 29-year-old nurse said on Gawker: “When you’re in the room, it’s just a patient. You’re here to … make sure they’re feeling better. When you step away, you take it in. I am compassionate, that’s what we do. But should I be? The rest of the world hates him right now.”
|
Fox News Reporter May Face Criminal
Charges for Reporting on the CIA
|
|
Atlantic, by Philip Bump
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 11:03:53 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The government will use any and all information at its disposal to find journalist sources, as shown in The Washington Post´s report this morning on a Department of Justice investigation into Fox News chief correspondent James Rosen, who may face criminal charges for reporting government secrets. In June 2009, Rosen reported on CIA analysis suggesting that North Korea might respond to new UN sanctions with renewed nuclear tests. In order to determine how Rosen learned of the analysis, which had been issued by the CIA only a few hours prior, FBI investigators used every tool at their disposal: analyzing
|
| |
|
|
It’s.The.Law
|
|
American Spectator, by Ross Kaminsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 6:17:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Last Thursday, Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) started a Twitter prairie fire with his call for people to describe #ObamacareInThreeWords. (My contribution was “Sorry, Doctor retired.”) (Snip) The White House, never shy to jump into social media, responded with a flurry of tweets, including “It’s. The. Law.” which smacked, more than anything, of typical Obama chest-thumping. Is the administration sure they want to aggressively take credit for a law which, for almost the entire three years since its passage, has had more Americans supporting its repeal than supporting the law itself and which, according to Rasmussen Reports
|
Tooth and Nail: Fluoride
Fight Cracks Portland´s Left
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Joel Millman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:57:35 AM
Post Reply
|
|
PORTLAND, Ore.—In the 1950s, after health authorities began fluoridating U.S. water supplies, they faced opposition from groups like the John Birch Society, which called it "an unconstitutional mass medication of the public." Sixty years later, the fight over fluoridation has erupted in Portland, where the battle has drawn in the city´s craft-beer brewers, organic-food purveyors and environmentalists. Even some of the city´s famed indie-rock musicians are taking sides. The debate has prompted something of an existential crisis in this self-consciously liberal city, which votes Tuesday on whether to overturn the city council´s 2012 decision to fluoridate.
|
What Angelina Jolie
forgot to mention
|
|
CNN, by H. Gilbert Welch
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:54:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
I first saw the headline early Tuesday on Real Clear Politics, a political news site where I generally start my morning. It´s not where I expect to see a story on breast cancer. Then I checked my e-mail messages -- they all seemed to be about Angelina Jolie´s op-ed. Students in my undergraduate class wanted to discuss it in our next session. Colleagues expressed concern and wondered what the right response was. People I don´t even know sent e-mails. One, from a research fellow at the International Agency for Research on Cancer, nicely summed up the general concern:
|
|
Three Signs There’s a Cover-Up
|
|
National Review Online, by John Fund
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:46:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The late columnist William Safire once said that a good clue that someone in Washington was engaged in “an artful dodge,” i.e., a cover-up, was that they used the phrase “mistakes were made.” Safire defined it as a “passive-evasive way of acknowledging error while distancing the speaker from responsibility for it.” The phrase became infamous when both Richard Nixon and Ron Ziegler, his press secretary, deployed it to explain away Watergate without explaining who did what and when or whether any ill motive was involved. Astonishingly, the Internal Revenue Service resurrected the Nixonian expression within hours
|
Deval as Holder’s fill-in?
That just wouldn’t be just
|
|
Boston Herald, by Holly Robichaud
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:27:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Just when you think the news surrounding Obamagate cannot get any worse, it does. Some say U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s days on the job are numbered and that it’s just a matter of when he’ll be forced to resign. While I’ll not shed a tear over Holder’s departure, one of the replacement names being floated has me reaching for tissues: Gov. Deval Patrick. Patrick has denied he’s interested — but the job isn’t on offer yet. If it is, President Obama should not select him nor should he be confirmed by the Senate for a plethora of reasons.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
| | |
|
|
