|
|
| |
Topic: Women Serving in Combat Positions Is a Batty Idea |
Women Serving in Combat Positions Is a Batty Idea
Townhall, by Doug Giles
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:lcl4, 1/27/2013 4:12:14 PM
|
| Last Thursday Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and other U.S. military leaders lifted the ban on women serving in combat positions. I, for one, think this is a great idea and have a few modest proposals, if the brass inside the beltway is open to suggestions, on how they should deploy the dames (and whom they should deploy). First off, if you truly want to eviscerate the enemy—namely Muslims—then I propose sending the most nerve grating and foul women Hollywood has to offer straight into hot zones as our forward armies.
|
Comments: I think this should be a ´Must Read´.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Spidey, 1/27/2013 4:29:50 PM (No. 9142787)
I think it´s crazy for an outgoing def. sec. to drop this bomb on the way out the door. Number two,it should have gone through congress,so the idea is thoroughly vetted.
This is really nothing more than a liberal social agenda item which has the potential to hurt readiness because women are obviously a distraction for men.
The whole thing is moot anyway as the left wants to transform the military into a humnitarian duty only.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Judith, 1/27/2013 4:55:48 PM (No. 9142843)
Maybe it is not such a crazy idea. After all, look at all the babies the liberal women have slaughtered. Perhaps the draft should only apply to liberal women.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Gallo3, 1/27/2013 5:14:40 PM (No. 9142879)
Good stuff. Then add in Sandra Bernhart, Janeane Garafolo, and Madonna. The 101st Harpy Battalion would be a sight to see. Remember that all their units need to have a 125% number of soldierettes on the roster, because at any given time, 25% will be out with the menses. But, hey I forgot about how in close conditions their menses synchronize. How we going to deal with that? How do these commys come up with this ridiculous stuff?
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
jgat, 1/27/2013 6:03:19 PM (No. 9142975)
With one dim exception notice that none of these clowns pushing women in combat have ever heard a shot fired in anger.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
slipstik, 1/27/2013 6:18:49 PM (No. 9143011)
Is every female "warrior" gonna have a "minder" who keeps one bullet in his weapon just for her in case of capture?????
If they hate their own women enough to torture and kill them, what do you think they´ll do to one of our women who has tried to kill or succeeded at killing them??
Imagine the spectacle on Al´s jazeera with one of our women getting raped and tortured to within a millimeter of her life and then getting beheaded.
Makes me stop and think, too bad the people (and I use that term advisedly) in DC don´t.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
ufos4, 1/27/2013 6:20:42 PM (No. 9143015)
I´m quite sure the enemy is very happy about this. Insanity and another wedge of collapse.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
0658, 1/27/2013 6:34:13 PM (No. 9143031)
I may be wrong but it seems that the majority of the people that are advocating women in front line roles are women who are not in the military, hate the military, or would never qualify or volunteer for a combat job if they were in the military.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Bumblebee, 1/27/2013 7:43:02 PM (No. 9143113)
I don´t know any women that could play on a men´s football team. Although I heard that one tried once. There are very few women that can pass the brutal strength tests that are presently required ,almost none, so they will have to lower the bar. They would have to lower the physical standards and that would be silly, but the left is usually silly. They are going to bump up against the ´truth´ at some point. I do think that women would be good at some things , like pilots, but not ground fighting.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
tren9, 1/27/2013 7:56:25 PM (No. 9143137)
The idea could work if the women had their own units [all female] and a completely different Rules of Engagement. Although it is rightly forbidden the men, the women should be permitted to rape, pillage, and loot. They would absolutely terrorize the enemy,
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
jt26, 1/27/2013 8:12:33 PM (No. 9143154)
Only a person who has never served in the infantry could possibly think this is a good idea.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
KanCreeper, 1/27/2013 8:58:32 PM (No. 9143223)
A couple of years back, the Marine Corps hand picked a couple of women to be test subject and go through the Infantry Officers Basic Course at Quantico. Neither could make it.
My big question is when these women come back ( or not from their Combat Tours) How will the Veterans Admin Handle the problems created by injuries, children, wounds both mental and physical. The VA cannot handle the current crop of returning vets and their injuries, Traumatic Brain Injuries, amputation and PTSD. Their inability to process these Veterans into the VA´s current system has created the need for organizations like the Wounded Warrior Foundation and DAV and AmVets, and American Legion who are trying to step in and take care of these Veterans til the VA can get around to rating and arranging for their specific care needs. THe bigh hump is getting the money appropriated for the VA to be able to do their duty to the Promises made by the Country to its Veterans.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Coy860, 1/27/2013 9:06:07 PM (No. 9143237)
The VA is a joke. My spouse´s 2006 claim for Agent Orange in Viet Nam was finally decided in April, 2012, 4 months after he died.
|
| |
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "lcl4"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "lcl4"
|
Achtung, Baby: Are People Being Encouraged to Rat On ´Anti-Government´ Neighbors?
|
|
Townhall, by Doug Giles
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: lcl4- 5/5/2013 2:47:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Just when you thought the crap couldn’t get any creepier in Obamaland, BOOM, it does and things just got a little bit more … how shall I say it … peculiar. Can we still use the word “peculiar”? We can? Good. Cue Twilight Zone music, por favor, and allow me to proceed. So, what am I talking about you ask? Am I referring to the forced lesbian kissing class in a Red Hook, New York middle school? No, silly. That was like two weeks ago.
|
How Capitalism is Destroying My Neighborhood
|
|
Townhall, by Mike Adams
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: lcl4- 4/30/2013 1:25:16 PM
Post Reply
|
|
I used to be caring and compassionate and liberal. I supported gun control and the “right” of the government to seize a large chunk of my paycheck in order to plan my retirement for me. But, somewhere, somehow, along life´s twisted way, I became a greedy capitalist pig. And, truth be known, it´s affecting my entire neighborhood. It all started on New Year´s Eve when my friend Adam came by to help me with a small project inside the house. On that Eve, Adam informed me that my property wasn´t exactly looking like the Garden of Eden.
|
|
Jihad On Our Tax Dollars? Screw That.
|
|
Townhall, by Doug Giles
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: lcl4- 4/28/2013 2:26:49 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Since the Boston terrorist attack on 4/15/13 we’ve been learning a whole lot about the two Muslim morons who blew up little children and severely injured hundreds of innocent onlookers and merry marathon runners. Speaking of the Boston terrorist attack, how long do you think it’ll be before the Leftists and their co-belligerent compadres, the Muslims, start whining about building a mosque close to the finish line of the Boston Marathon? I’ll give it … eh … six months. One-year tops. Back to getting to know the demonic Frick and Frack brothers. Of the all the revelations spilling out
|
|
Progressives’ Ultimate Fetish
|
|
Townhall, by Derek Hunter
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: lcl4- 4/21/2013 6:20:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Progressives can’t help themselves. When normal person hear of a tragedy, they feel the natural range of emotions – fear, anger, sympathy, etc. But progressives are not normal humans. When they hear news of a tragedy their first thought is “How can this help the cause?” There’s something oddly perverse about this mental defect that somehow overrides decency in tragedy’s aftermath, but it’s as widespread amongst the political left as freckles are on redheads. Harsh? Perhaps. But sometimes the truth hurts.
|
| |
|
|
Why Don Opposes Capital Rape
|
|
Townhall, by Mike Adams
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: lcl4- 4/19/2013 7:43:10 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Don is angry with me. He cannot understand why I support punishing rapists with death while simultaneously defending the rights of the unborn. He accuses me of applying double standards, promoting hypocrisy, and of being "inconsistent." But I am perfectly consistent in my beliefs. And, truth be known, so is Don. The reason so many people are unfairly labeled as "inconsistent" is because the term "double standard" is applied in such a haphazard fashion. People are actually guilty of applying a double standard when they treat two identical things differently.
|
If Rubio´s Amnesty is So Great, Why is He Lying?
|
|
Townhall, by Ann Coulter
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: lcl4- 4/18/2013 4:11:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
When Republicans start lying like Democrats, you can guess they are pushing an idea that´s bad for America. During his William Ginsburg-like tour of the Sunday talk shows last weekend, Sen. Marco Rubio was the Mount Vesuvius of lies about his immigration bill. Here is how Rubio explained the powerful border-enforcing mechanism in his bill on "Fox News Sunday," which he denied was merely a meaningless goal:
|
I Went to Bed a Christian and Woke Up a … Terrorist?
|
|
Townhall, by Doug Giles
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: lcl4- 4/14/2013 2:50:16 PM
Post Reply
|
|
According to the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security, evangelical Christians are now a national security threat. I’m talkin’ at the top of the list folks. As Gomer Pyle used to say, “Surprise, Surprise, Surprise” eh, Christians? Under the New Rules enacted by these agencies under this administration’s tutelage the following acts are now to cause red flags of “terrorism” to fly, alerting cops and military personnel to a new group[s] which could start blowing crap up like the other group that we can no longer speak the truth about.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
| |
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
| | |
|
|