A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Jindal: The man who
could be GOP king
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Jindal: The man who
could be GOP king

Tribune-Review (Pittsburgh PA), by Salena Zito

Original Article

Posted By:afortiori, 1/27/2013 11:16:24 AM

CHARLOTTE — Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal stands out among the Republican Party’s up-and-comers. As president of the Republican Governors Association and a frequent speaker for the GOP, he’s one of a new generation of reform-minded, young Republican leaders — among them, U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, and Govs. Chris Christie of New Jersey, Nikki Haley of South Carolina and Susana Martinez of New Mexico. Many observers consider Jindal, 41, potential presidential material. He is a blunt talker who pushes big change for government and his party.

Comments:
I like Gov. Jindal and hope he does well. I just hope he has gotten over his stage fright that happened at his 2009 SOTU response.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: kanphil, 1/27/2013 11:21:51 AM     (No. 9142262)

The man talks an awful lot of sense.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Starlady, 1/27/2013 11:24:32 AM     (No. 9142267)

I am not impressed with Governor Jindal. He went to the Obama school of leadership it seems, the scold method.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: chuck koala, 1/27/2013 11:45:53 AM     (No. 9142310)

Is he a natural born citizen?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: tocsin, 1/27/2013 12:08:17 PM     (No. 9142338)

Krispie Kris? Really!,Salena?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: ROLFnader, 1/27/2013 12:09:43 PM     (No. 9142340)

I agree with #4- especially a newspaper from Pennsylvania, where in some areas, NO ONE voted for Romney- or so they told us.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: StormCnter, 1/27/2013 12:09:51 PM     (No. 9142341)

I have been a Jindal fan from the beginning. He lacks the chiseled looks that voters seem to expect from Republicans, but maybe that won´t matter. Mitt Romney had those and still lost.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: FunOne, 1/27/2013 12:13:52 PM     (No. 9142343)

#4: It now appears that the Fifth Amendment, --(to refuse to answer that question because the response could provide self-incriminating evidence), trumps that requirement.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: GreatPlains, 1/27/2013 12:33:13 PM     (No. 9142377)

" His executive experience began at 24 when he was appointed to run Louisiana’s Department of Health and Hospitals, an unwieldy bureaucracy."

Now what was Barry doing at 24 , again ?
Obama´s sketchy ethnic background was ( and still is ) given the Manti Te´o treatment by the media.
They will dissect and besmirch and cast aspersions on Jindal´s background,
no doubt implying that he´s Muslim.




  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: SoCalGal, 1/27/2013 12:34:19 PM     (No. 9142379)

I don´t think so. Having good ideas is not enough. There are others who are just as smart, just as conservative, but present themselves better. The competition has gotten stiffer.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: BadgerBill, 1/27/2013 12:34:43 PM     (No. 9142383)

Not so sure about an up-and-comer....I still want a statesman, seasoned and wisened.

Oh, and carries a big ol´ conservative stick!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: WAN2, 1/27/2013 12:35:59 PM     (No. 9142389)

#8: "Chiseled Looks" indeed! This lacking leaves Jindal DOA. And still...Hillary thunders on in all her beauty and charism.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: WAN2, 1/27/2013 12:36:59 PM     (No. 9142393)

Sorry: CHARISMA...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Margie, 1/27/2013 12:42:05 PM     (No. 9142404)

He is not natural born. When his parents came here from India, his mother was pregnant with Bobby. Bobby was born here, but his parents were not citizens yet. Same thing with Rubio. Parents were not citizens yet. Obama has to be exposed for being an illegal president or we will have more like him in our future. Jindal and Rubio are at least on America´s side; Obama is not.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: controlfreak, 1/27/2013 12:48:18 PM     (No. 9142417)

Jindal is governor of my state. He is not a fiscal conservative.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: trapper, 1/27/2013 1:13:59 PM     (No. 9142455)

There´s lots of football left between now and 2016, and not to put too fine a point on it, but Jindahl is still just flexing his muscle in Division III. He has yet to take his first NFL hit. We´ll see if he gets up the first time he gets his bell rung. Talk to me about him then.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Cor-vet, 1/27/2013 1:47:52 PM     (No. 9142502)

Did she really say Cris Hussein Cristie was a Republican up and comer?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: chicodon, 1/27/2013 1:53:59 PM     (No. 9142513)

I don´t think we´ll see another Caucasian male in the Presidency for some time. Just an opinion.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Sunhan65, 1/27/2013 2:18:13 PM     (No. 9142551)

#5, if the Federal government created an act that imposed recognition of same sex marriage rights on the states, would you still oppose it on principled constitutional conservative grounds? If the answer is "no," then the disagreement with Jindal is about preferred outcomes, not first principles. If you believe, as I do, that the Constitution does not empower the Federal government to decide who can get married, then you are looking to the states to debate and legislate the issue. However, proponents of same sex marriage are pursuing their goals by suing their fellow citizens. This turns a political and social question into a legal decision whereby one state judiciary can create a right that previously did not exist and then leverage the Constitution´s full faith and credit clause to nationalize recognition of that right. Jindal´s position is that the power to create rights (e.g. marriage) carries with it the power to destroy rights (e.g. the 2nd Amendment) and the judiciary does not, and should not, have that power.

Men of good faith can debate the issue of same sex marriage. Jindal´s support of the Defense of Marriage Act was couched in terms of opposing judicial activism at the state level. I´m still waiting to find a proponent of same sex marriage who also opposes judicial activism in support of that goal.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: calgrammy, 1/27/2013 2:37:08 PM     (No. 9142581)

Myself, I don´t want a King. Besides four years is a very long time. I know the past four seem like a lifetime and we still have another four of El O´.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: veritas, 1/27/2013 2:50:29 PM     (No. 9142606)

#4: No, Jindal and Rubio and Obama do not meet the Constitutional eligibility requirements. See #15.

And for those interested in the Rule of Law, that closes the matter. Period.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Pluperfect, 1/27/2013 3:23:48 PM     (No. 9142673)

No, #22, your interpretation does not close the matter. There are many credible, informed, legal and constitutional scholars who believe otherwise.This is from the Cornell University Law School: Some debate exists as to the meaning of this phrase. Consensus exists that anyone born on U.S. soil is a "natural born Citizen." One may also be a "natural born Citizen" if, despite a birth on foreign soil, U.S. citizenship immediately passes from the person´s parents.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: gagolfer, 1/27/2013 3:40:21 PM     (No. 9142703)

The vast majority of the country would revolt and never stand for it if a person born in the US was not allowed to run for President. Congress and the courts won´t touch it with a 10 foot pole and most legal scholars agree natural-born means born in the USA OR born of citizen parents if born outside the physical boundaries of the country. To the tiny group who is still fighting the ´both parents must be citizens´ fight, give it up. It´s over.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Laurie, 1/27/2013 4:17:41 PM     (No. 9142760)

The GOP doesn´t need a king.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: redink, 1/27/2013 4:52:19 PM     (No. 9142834)

Agree #25. I would consider a Mama Grizzly though.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Judith, 1/27/2013 5:01:58 PM     (No. 9142851)

I remember having such high hopes for him....until he joined the dem bash wagon attacking Pres. Bush after katrina. I swear, you could not tell any difference between what the dems were saying about Pres. Bush and what jindal was saying.....they read from the same script. After that, I didn´t have much regard for him. If he is doing a good job in LA, let him stay there and finish the reformation....don´t let him near the dc crowd again, he can´t keep his head straight.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Theeo, 1/27/2013 5:05:34 PM     (No. 9142858)

Jindal just not American enough.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Rakasha, 1/27/2013 5:51:57 PM     (No. 9142958)

#23, No.s 22 and 15 are not offering their own interpretations but Vattel´s.

Those attempting to redefine this term have yet to explain the difference between citizen (qualification for Representatives and Senators) and natural born citizen (qualification for President) as presented in the Constitution. They are clearly two seperate terms. It should also be noted that the phrase ´...a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution...´ seems also to indicate two different types of citizenship.

Words mean something and the consensus of scholars and experts does not change their meaning.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Bumblebee, 1/27/2013 7:51:20 PM     (No. 9143127)

I like him as what he says always makes sense. Too bad he doesn´t have a ´Reagan´ personality! 50% of people vote on personality.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: veritas, 1/28/2013 1:58:01 AM     (No. 9143441)

Dunno if anyone will see this, but I must address errors.

#23: I neither make nor offer an "interpretation." My #22 is correct. Post #29 is correct. I [and #29] correctly accept that the Constitution sets the qualification for President. Period. Further, an actual "interpretation" [read: opinion] of some judge, some law school, or some political party did not and does not set the qualifications. That´s clear beyond obviousness.

The only way to have "room" for the subjective opinion quoted in #23 is if we assume the Constitutional Convention was comprised of morons who didn´t understand that they used "natural born citizen" just one time for one office only and used "citizen" elsewhere but did not mean to indicate a difference. But it´s beyond clear that they understood the meaning of "natural born citizen" and used it specifically to impose that well-understood meaning.

I won´t dig into de Vattel yet again [I´ve posted on "The Law of Nations," the deliberations, and the relevant Federalist Paper again and again, and still some people who never even heard of de Vattel ´til they read my post argue with me]. Been there over and over. Thanks.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Twiggy, 1/28/2013 2:47:10 AM     (No. 9143458)

I think Susana Martinez is one sharp cookie and I´m very impressed with her. None of the men on the list excite me at all. Maybe it´s time for a woman president and I don´t mean Hillary.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 720820




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "afortiori"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "afortiori"



Stop the Metaphor Madness
National Journal, by Major Garrett    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 11/28/2013 12:47:43 PM     Post Reply
Can we, before our L-Tryptophan coma commences, vow to abandon all attempts to festoon Obamacare with ridiculous historical metaphors? The damn law is big, with a regulatory heft now in excess of 20,000 pages. But even this governmental behemoth groans under the weight of metaphorical ornaments both daft and dull. Obamacare is not Katrina, not in fact or political impact. Obamacare is not Iraq, not in its human or material cost or in the reckless misuse of a commander in chief´s most sacred obligations of truth, judgment, and management. Obamacare is not the Bay of Pigs, not in concept, execution, or

Trayvon Martin and the
Irony of American Justice
Atlantic, by Ta-Nehisi Coates    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 7/15/2013 11:09:04 AM     Post Reply
In trying to assess the the killing of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman, two seemingly conflicted truths emerge for me. The first is that based on the case presented by the state, and based on Florida law, George Zimmerman should not have been convicted of second degree murder or manslaughter. The second is that the killing of Trayvon Martin is a profound injustice. In examining the first conclusion, I think it´s important to take a very hard look at the qualifications allowed for aggressors by Florida´s self-defense statute: Use of force by aggressor.

Why This Scandal Is Different
Wall Street Journal, by Peggy Noonan    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 6/1/2013 10:21:32 AM     Post Reply
Sometimes when you’re writing part of a column you keep getting close to the meaning of what you want to say but you don’t quite get there, the full formulation of the idea eludes you. Then two days later, relaxing in conversation with friends, the thought comes to you whole, and you think: That’s what I meant to say. That’s what I was trying to get. This week I had one of those moments.

Where Obama Went Wrong
In The Gun Control Fight
BuzzFeed, by Evan McMorris-Santoro & Ruby Cramer    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/20/2013 6:03:36 PM     Post Reply
In one of the toughest defeats of President Obama´s political career, the Senate this week sank a piece of gun control legislation that the White House had been laboring over for months. As the post-mortems of the loss begin, some have questioned if gun control got bogged down with the president´s ongoing struggle to effectively operate the levers of power in Washington. Culprits for the bill´s demise are plenty — from gutless Senate moderates, to inflexible pro-gun conservatives, to a brazen gun lobby that waged an aggressive, and sometimes misleading, campaign to defeat the legislation.

Let Not Your Heart Be Troubled
RedState.com, by Erick Erickson    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/20/2013 11:26:22 AM     Post Reply
I remember it so clearly — a memory you can only remember so clearly when it is from sadness. You can’t let it go. I was sitting in the mud by the rear passenger side tire of my old Acura cradling my one year old in the steady, driving rain. I was sobbing doing my best not to fall apart in front of my little girl. But the tears ran. My throat hurt as I tried to suppress the guttural cries I wanted to cry there in the mud.

With background check proposal,
Toomey’s not just firing off the cuff
Tribune-Review [Pittsburgh PA], by Eric Heyl    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/15/2013 9:41:37 AM     Post Reply
Pat Toomey obviously isn´t flummoxed by basic arithmetic. The Republican Pennsylvania senator is proving that as he and Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., attempt to modestly modify requirements for criminal background checks on gun purchases. The two senators, both gun-rights advocates, are pushing legislation that would require such checks for all gun show and Internet sales. Toomey is being labeled a Judas in conservative circles for backing what is being described incorrectly as a gun control bill. It is not.

Why I Didn´t Write About
Gosnell´s Trial--
And Why I Should Have
Daily Beast, by Megan McArdle    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/13/2013 10:45:59 AM     Post Reply
Kermit Gosnell, a Pennsylvania abortion doctor, is on trial for a lurid series of lurid crimes at his clinic. I can´t bring myself to describe them, so I´ll let Kirsten Powers do it. Infant beheadings. Severed baby feet in jars. A child screaming after it was delivered alive during an abortion procedure. Haven´t heard about these sickening accusations? It´s not your fault. Since the murder trial of Pennsylvania abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell began March 18, there has been precious little coverage of the case that should be on every news show and front page.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Kim Novak responds to post-
Oscars ridicule: ‘I was bullied.’

54 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Soroya Nadia McDonald    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/18/2014 5:02:40 AM     Post Reply
After presenting at the Academy Awards this year, Kim Novak didn’t want to leave her house. The Hitchcock screen siren, 81, was too humiliated to venture from her home near the Rogue River in Oregon. She read the cruel posts and Internet snark about her appearance, and it was just too much. “It got to me like it gets kids and teenagers,” she told the Associated Press. The “Vertigo” actress, considered one of the great beauties in her day, posted a note on her Facebook wall Thursday, acknowledging that she’d gotten fat injections in her face and addressing her halted

The Folly Of The Bundy Ranch Rebellion
44 replie(s)
The Federalist, by Grace Olmstead    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 4:21:46 AM     Post Reply
It’s the stuff of Westerns: a showdown on the desert plains, the big bad government against an underdog farmer. Though the story has only grabbed national headlines in the past several days, rancher Cliven Bundy has illegally grazed cattle on the Nevada land surrounding his farm for over 20 years. He hasn’t paid grazing fees since 1993, and refuses to renew the necessary grazing permit.(Snip)Rather than using the avenues and pathways presented to him, Bundy has staunchly declared his own law and allegiances. Unfortunately, reality doesn’t work this way. If only it did—we could rebel for paying stupid taxes, refuse to

White House blames fox for
destroying Michelle’s garden

44 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Vince Coglianese    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 3:59:04 PM     Post Reply
The White House is going to war with another fox — and this time, it’s personal. The Wall Street Journal reports that a red fox has been causing chaos around the White House, tripping security alarms, digging up Michelle’s garden and distracting the president from his duties. The Secret Service won’t give any details about how often the fox trips the White House’s obviously sophisticated security alarms, but rest assured, officials say, they’re watching. President Obama was apparently “stunned” to see the fox roaming freely down the oft-photographed White House colonnade, home to the world’s shortest, but most dramatic, outdoor strolls. The bushy-tailed visitor

Students Demand Acknowledgement of
Robert E. Lee´s ´Racist and Dishonorable Conduct´

43 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by AWR Hawkins    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/18/2014 12:35:28 PM     Post Reply
A group of seven multiracial Washington and Lee University (W&L) students are demanding the school remove all Confederate flags from campus and "acknowledge" General Robert E. Lee´s "dishonorable side." According to the Roanoke Times, "seven multiracial students, calling themselves ´The Committee,´" have also demanded the school "acknowledge and apologize for participating in chattel slavery." They want recognition of "Martin Luther King Jr. Day on the undergraduate campus" and an end to "neo-Confederates" marching across campus "to the Lee Chapel on Lee-Jackson Day." The students say they will "engage in civil disobedience" if their demands are not met by September 1st. They added: "The

Living in the New York Times World
37 replie(s)
American Thinker, by J. Paul Masko    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/19/2014 7:48:36 AM     Post Reply
I began reading the entirety of the first section of the New York Times at nine years old, and continued that practice, more or less, for decades.(snip) ...the power of reverence, intrinsic to what I call the “cascade” of The Times: the near avalanche-like flow and distribution of information through electronic and print networks: through like-minded network newscasts, magazines, local newspaper s, blogs, daytime talk TV, late-night entertainment, statements at media award ceremonies, the celebrity Twitterverse, etc. The cascade rolls through Saturday Night Live, Jon Stewart, The New Yorker, the mouths of third-grade teachers, Elmo, Madonna and Susan Sarandon …through

In a Hole, Golf Considers
Digging a Wider One

32 replie(s)
New York Times, by Bill Pennington    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/19/2014 10:48:33 AM     Post Reply
GREENSBORO, Ga. — Golf holes the size of pizzas. Soccer balls on the back nine. A mulligan on every hole. These are some of the measures — some would say gimmicks — that golf courses across the country have experimented with to stop people from quitting the game. Golf has always reveled in its standards and rich tradition. But increasingly a victim of its own image and hidebound ways, golf has lost five million players in the last decade, according to the National Golf Foundation, with 20 percent of the existing 25 million golfers apt to quit in the next few years. People under 35 have especially spurned the game, saying it takes too

Obama: ´For me, Easter is a story of hope,
a belief in a better day to come´

30 replie(s)
Investor´s Business Daily, by Andrew Malcolm    Original Article
Posted By: SurferLad- 4/19/2014 9:16:36 AM     Post Reply
Hi, everybody. For millions of Americans, this time of year holds great meaning. Earlier this week, we hosted a Passover Seder at the White House, and joined Jewish families around the world in their re-tellings of the story of the Exodus and the victory of faith over oppression. And this Sunday, Michelle, Malia, Sasha, and I will join our fellow Christians around the world in celebrating the Resurrection of Christ, the salvation he offered the world, and the hope that comes with the Easter season. These holy days have their roots in miracles that took place long ago. And yet, they still inspire us, guide us, and strengthen us today. They remind us of our


Post Reply   Close thread 720820





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~