|
|
| |
Topic: Shops to start charging you for paying by credit card from tomorrow |
Shops to start charging you for paying by credit card from tomorrow
Daily Mail [UK], by Staff
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Attercliffe, 1/26/2013 5:20:51 PM
|
| A new rule going into effect Sunday could cost you more when shopping with a credit card at some stores. Visa and Mastercard have agreed to let merchants add a service charge equal to the cost of processing a credit transaction to the bottom line. The cost of processing is usually 1.5 to 3 perc cent, and merchants are capped at a 4 per cent fee under the agreement.[Snip]Merchants will still not be allowed to add a surcharge to debit card transactions. However, few stores seem interested in raising their customer´s costs. ´We have discussed the settlement with many,
|
Comments: As time goes on I think most shops will charge extra. Their expenses are rising quickly and the end is not nigh.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
MissMolly, 1/26/2013 5:23:17 PM (No. 9141093)
Why are they showing American Express, when only Visa and Mastercard are part of the deal?
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Coy860, 1/26/2013 5:26:55 PM (No. 9141096)
3 - 4% is a pretty hefty charge. I would start paying cash.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
octrojan, 1/26/2013 5:31:51 PM (No. 9141104)
Seems fair enough. Why should cash customers subsidize the choice to use plastic? If cash is cheaper, why not pass along that savings to the customer?
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
keekng, 1/26/2013 6:05:00 PM (No. 9141145)
Not me, #2, if the places I shop all the time want to charge me a fee, ´because they can´, I will find new places to spend my money.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
TheMotherCO, 1/26/2013 6:14:39 PM (No. 9141161)
I have never had a surcharge and have had the two for years. I don´t mind a very small charge, but somehow they always raise the limit that is available.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
judy, 1/26/2013 6:31:49 PM (No. 9141187)
Businesses have been paying this fee for years . Visa & MC are making the $$$$, not the businesses. Sometimes it´s as high as 5%. Government agencies have always charged this fee to the customer.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
earlybird, 1/26/2013 6:36:08 PM (No. 9141191)
It will be up to the retails to choose whether they want to charge the surcharge or not. The consensus seems to be that most will not. Here´s one reason:
Both Visa and MasterCard have rules requiring retailers to handle credit cards the same way in every store regardless of location, so if a chain has a store in a state where surcharges are banned then none of its locations would be allowed to have a surcharge.
Under the settlement terms, a merchant adding surcharges on Visa or MasterCard would have to do the same with American Express cards, but that company prohibits surcharge fees.
´The bottom line is that very few retailers would be able to surcharge under the settlement, and that the vast majority don’t want to surcharge even if they could,´ Sherman said.
´In the brick-and-mortar world, no one who does any sort of volume business is going to want to surcharge because it will drive their customer crazy and slow down transactions,´ agreed Ed Mierzwinski, Director of Consumer Programs at U.S. PIRG.
Some small retails might where there is no big volume competition.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
SoCalGal, 1/26/2013 6:37:19 PM (No. 9141195)
Re #3, read the whole article. Most retailers already add in the surcharge when they price their merchandise. An additional charge would be double dipping.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
fljack, 1/26/2013 6:37:44 PM (No. 9141196)
More impetus to go to a cash only then barter society. A whole lot of business is going to be going underground, including medical. I hear that in some areas, doctors have gone cash only already.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
ncgrammie4, 1/26/2013 8:30:36 PM (No. 9141298)
Don´t forget if you carry a balance on any credit card the interest charges have also gone up. Cash is the way.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Crasher, 1/26/2013 8:31:48 PM (No. 9141299)
Another reason to go the Dave Ramsey cash/debit route.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
wsdiego, 1/26/2013 8:40:33 PM (No. 9141308)
What do you mean start? They already are! A store I shop it has sign by register .45 to use card!
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Hotrod, 1/26/2013 8:40:55 PM (No. 9141309)
Business already have this expense built into their prices. Why break it out seperatly? If simply added on to the price, it would essentially be an increase in price.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Mushroom, 1/26/2013 9:04:59 PM (No. 9141344)
Perhaps a better way to work this would be to offer a cash discount of 4%.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Ribicon, 1/26/2013 9:35:48 PM (No. 9141376)
Since the credit card surcharge is already built in, the honest approach would be to offer a cash discount, the same way it used to be done for gasoline. I´d go for that. I´d also be more inclined to use self-checkout lanes if offered a discount for the added hassle.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 1/27/2013 5:20:16 AM (No. 9141730)
I use a credit card for everything I buy, then pay off the whole thing when the bill comes in. Yesterday, I went to a grocery store and specifically asked the clerk if they were charging this fee for a credit card purchase. They said no, so I swiped my credit card. Maybe I gave them an idea.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"
|
SAS troops capture Taliban commander
|
|
Daily Express [UK], by Marco Giannangeli
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/18/2013 10:08:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The insurgent leader, who has not been named for operational reasons, commanded seven groups of Taliban fighters and bombers across southern Afghanistan. The dawn raid, carried out with Afghan forces, took place in the Marjah region near Nad-e-Ali, close to the British base in Lashkar Gah. It is believed the Taliban leader, who sources confirmed had regularly travelled between Helmand and Pakistan, had been hunted for a year after being linked to at least three other attacks. Corporal William Savage, Fusilier Samuel Flint of the 2nd Battalion, Royal Regiment of Scotland and Private Robert Hetherington, of the 7th Battalion, Royal
|
North Korea fires short-range missiles
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Tom Phillips
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/18/2013 12:17:06 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Citing defense ministry sources in Seoul, Yonhap said the missiles had crashed into the Sea of Japan, off the eastern coast of the Korean peninsula. Two rockets were launched this morning while a third was launched in the afternoon, Yonhap said. Early South Korean media reports suggested “shore-based anti-ship” missiles had been fired. Such tests are not unusual in North Korea. In March, a similar launch was carried out with two short-range missiles taking off from the country’s eastern coast. The Tokyo-based news agency, Kyodo, reported the missiles had not fallen into Japanese waters. Yonhap said South Korea had “beefed
|
New breed of ‘Crazy Ants’ which nest everywhere and damage electrical systems are taking over southeastern United States
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by Jessica Montoya Coggins
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/18/2013 9:04:38 AM
Post Reply
|
|
You certainly wouldn´t want these ants in your pants. A species of ants, nicknamed ´crazy´ by researchers because they are prone to sporadic movements has descended upon the Southeastern region of the country, particularly in coastal areas with warmer temperatures and has wreaked havoc on yards and homes. ´Crazy´ ants are known scientifically as ´Nylanderia fulva´ and are native to Argentina and Brazil, they are also referred to as ´rasberry´ after the exterminator Tom Rasberry who discovered them in Houston in 2002. The ´crazy´ ants do not have such a painful sting as their insect counterparts, they are still a
|
|
Worthy of the prize
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/18/2013 8:27:02 AM
Post Reply
|
|
People are often called heroes these days without deserving the description. But one who does is Sir Nicholas Winton, who tomorrow celebrates his 104th birthday. As Neil Tweedie reports, this unassuming man characteristically does not want a fuss made either of his great age or of his illustrious past. He is uncomfortable being referred to as the British Oskar Schindler. Yet his achievements warrant the plaudits. In 1939, it was through his efforts that hundreds of predominantly Jewish children living in Czechoslovakia were evacuated to Britain, thereby escaping the Holocaust. Sir Nicholas’s pivotal role in what became known as
|
|
The inconvenient truth about GM
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Geoffrey Lean
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/18/2013 8:16:57 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Some 10,000 years ago, somewhere in the Middle East’s fertile crescent, happenstance sowed the seeds of much of modern agriculture. Pollen from a wild goat grass landed on primitive wheat, creating a natural--but stronger and more productive--hybrid. [Snip] Now scientists at Britain’s National Institute of Agricultural Botany (NIAB) have deliberately duplicated that ancient accident, with a different goat grass, in an attempt to restart--and enormously accelerate--the process with new genes. Early indications are that this could increase wheat yields by a dramatic 30 percent. The National Farmers’ Union president, Peter Kendall, describes the potential as “just enormous”.
|
| |
|
Theater critic smashes cellphone of woman who wouldn´t stop using it during performance
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by David McCormack
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/17/2013 9:40:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A theater critic is unrepentant after he quite literally took the law into his own hands and smashed the cellphone of another patron who refused to stop using it during a performance on Wednesday night. Kevin Williamson, a writer for the National Review, was attending a performance of ´Natasha, Pierre, and the Great Comet of 1812,´ described as an ‘electro-pop opera’ based on ‘War and Peace’ and playing in New York at Kazino, a temporary structure beside The Standard Hotel. Writing about the incident on the National Review’s website, Williamson said he recommended the show but thought the audience
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
| | |
|
|