|
|
| |
Topic: Subway promises sandwiches which ARE a foot long after investigation revealed products came up short |
Subway promises sandwiches which ARE a foot long after investigation revealed products came up short
Daily Mail [UK] & Associated Press, by Staff
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:JoniTx, 1/26/2013 1:20:02 PM
|
| Subway restaurants is now saying it will live up to its promise of a foot-long sandwich. Days after two men filed a lawsuit contending the world´s largest fast-food chain was skimping on its sandwich size, the company said it regrets ´any instance where we did not fully deliver on our promise to our customers.´ Subway will ´ensure that every SUBWAY® Footlong sandwich is 12 inches at each location worldwide,´ according to a statement released by the company. Scroll down for video -Subway also told Eater.com it has ´redoubled our efforts to ensure consistency and correct length in every sandwich
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
plex, 1/26/2013 1:22:01 PM (No. 9140739)
This has to be one of the silliest issues of all time.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
franq, 1/26/2013 1:26:56 PM (No. 9140750)
Do they advertise it as a 30.5cm sandwich in Europe? Enquiring minds want to know.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Grambo, 1/26/2013 1:35:46 PM (No. 9140763)
Too much time on their hands.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
ruready?, 1/26/2013 1:36:48 PM (No. 9140765)
They probably just reduced the width of the sandwich.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
lotsamojo, 1/26/2013 1:52:55 PM (No. 9140787)
I wonder if the MSM can be sued for leaving out relevant news coverage?
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
SheikYerBooty, 1/26/2013 2:15:21 PM (No. 9140826)
Let a woman measure next time.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
AGGW, 1/26/2013 2:30:36 PM (No. 9140845)
Agree with #1. There have been footllong hot dogs since I was a child in the 50´s. I don´t recall advertising them as such ever being challenged. It is a catchy term of description not a contract.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Doctor P, 1/26/2013 2:35:13 PM (No. 9140850)
So give everyone a coupon for another sandwich on the house while serving slightly bigger sandwiches.
If anything the new sandwiches could be slightly BIGGER than 12 inches.
ADVERTISING bonanza to follow
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
0658, 1/26/2013 2:40:23 PM (No. 9140858)
We ought to start calling 0bama President Subway; he consistently comes up short.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
snakeoil, 1/26/2013 2:43:44 PM (No. 9140863)
Wonderful. Now I have to wait an extra 10 minutes while the food preparer gets the tape out. Or will they go hi tech and use a laser.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Rumblehog, 1/26/2013 2:44:36 PM (No. 9140864)
More bread, less meat.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Coy860, 1/26/2013 2:45:35 PM (No. 9140867)
Add up one inch of meat filling times every sandwich..in every store for many years..equals millions of dollars saved by the stores. Just think of filling your gas tank..suppose each gallon was 1 ounce short? hmmmmm?
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Kurto, 1/26/2013 2:47:41 PM (No. 9140874)
There must be a reason that some people are fixated on size. Compensation?
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 1/26/2013 2:47:42 PM (No. 9140875)
There´s a great joke that I can´t tell you here ....except to say that the punch line is: "Still, I don´t use it as a rule."
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
pomom, 1/26/2013 2:51:42 PM (No. 9140881)
Easier to stretch the bread than come up with a new jingle....$5 dollar 11 & 1/2 long....
These two doofuses sued over a 1/2 inch less bread.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
judy, 1/26/2013 2:53:24 PM (No. 9140885)
The world is falling apart a & a dem worries about a non 12 inch sub....while repubs are busy working....
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Conservativegirl, 1/26/2013 2:59:05 PM (No. 9140899)
Doesn´t matter how long their sandwiches are, they are crap. Probably the worst sandwich chain in the country. Their sandwich bread tastes like it was made with chalk instead of flour. If you want a quality chain sandwich, go to Quiznos or Jersey Mike´s.
Girl´s Hubby
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
judy, 1/26/2013 3:10:50 PM (No. 9140919)
Penn Station makes the best subs I have ever tasted.....
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
veritas, 1/26/2013 3:41:19 PM (No. 9140963)
Can I sue these characters for wasting taxpayer money and court time? Can I sue the judge for allowing the suit?
And are these guys just starting a cottage industry of suing over every ad slogan?
#2: No. The Euro-wiches are 305 millimeters. Huge, I tell ya!
#8: They´re being test-marketed here. I got one that was 12 and 7/64ths long! I´m gonna sue over the unasked-for extra bread because it puts me at risk for obesity!
#12: Sorry, not comparable. "Foot-long" is clearly an ad slogan. Gasoline is sold by state-regulated volume, to the point where [most? all?] states do calibration checks on gas pumps and apply stickers to them. But all is not lost. Buy a gallon of gas at the hottest time of the hottest day, then measure it again on a really cold day. It might be possible to prove a short-volume of a couple milliliters.
#15: Say -- maybe Subway should counter-sue, saying the $5 bill tendered in payment has less buying-power than a year ago, or two, etc.
#6, meet #14. #14, meet #6.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Opsimath, 1/26/2013 3:50:58 PM (No. 9140986)
Disagree, #17, I´ve never gotten a bad Subway sandwich; but I think it depends on how you tell them to make your sandwich. Many times I see customers give their order then walk on to the register--as I watch and see the sandwich maker not fulfill what the person before me just requested. I wait to see until my sandwich is made to my liking then proceed to the register.
I like the Veggie delight on honey oat bread, toasted, with one squirt of lo-fat mayo, ranch dressing, mustard, and vinegar. Yum!
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
MisterDickens, 1/26/2013 3:51:25 PM (No. 9140987)
I don´t know what Subway bread tastes like but it sure smells bad when it´s cooking.
Now they will be sued for making people fatter.
Not quite big enough for you? Age old problem. Subway won´t solve it.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 1/26/2013 3:53:50 PM (No. 9140991)
Oh gosh, another issue for Mayor Bloomjerk to exploit. Ban any sandwich over 12 inches as anything larger may causes excess weight gain.....
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
dman, 1/26/2013 4:50:33 PM (No. 9141052)
I put this in the class of the old Chesterfield "A silly millimeter longer" and the Winston "It´s not how long you make it, it´s how you make it long." slogans. Unimportant.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
philly_patriot, 1/26/2013 4:59:32 PM (No. 9141061)
Anyone who shops there DESERVES what they get!
People should be BOYCOTTING Subway like I do ......... the owner gave money to Great Leader´s campaign.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
tomanderson61, 1/26/2013 5:02:10 PM (No. 9141068)
Is it me, or do people just keep getting less intelligent, "measurably", as the days go on?
Look at the freaking photograph, let´s start from the top, call it #1, counting up pictures, only the ones with rulers..
#1, the bun is obviously squished together. Look at the left half, between 7 and 8 inches mark.
#2, some brain dead idiot is trying to convince us that the left part of the sandwich is aligned with the starting point of the ruler by using a gum box. However, the bun overlaps the box by a good 1/2 " or more. Not even considering the sandwich has a bite out of it, which would have probably compressed that half.
#3 Here, measurements start at 1/2", and end at 12 1/2", looks like a foot to me.
#4, marginal, looks like sandwich to me is not fresh, as in been refrigerated, which can cause compression.
#5 Starting the measurement at least at 1/2 inch, ended at 12 1/2, that makes a foot..
People are jerks. I´ve got an idea for these plaintiffs. Make a bar of nothing but pure chocolate, nothing added, no sugar or milk, and force it down their throats. There you go, something that is 100% as advertised.
Anyone who has accidentally bit into unsweetened chocolate knows what I mean....
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
BigGeorgeTX, 1/26/2013 5:14:05 PM (No. 9141080)
I seriously doubt the extra length of the bread makes the sandwich taste any better. A silly issue. I suppose people will now grouse when they raise the cost of the sandwich by five percent.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
KingBubo, 1/26/2013 5:16:31 PM (No. 9141086)
Probably prebaked size. I will eat buy subway if the owner gave to Obama and I will buy Papa Johns/Whole Foods after the owners criticized.
Newsflash:Men lie about size
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
keekng, 1/26/2013 5:28:59 PM (No. 9141099)
With all undue respect, in my opinion of course, post #27 has to be the dumbest post I have ever read.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Wendybird, 1/26/2013 5:42:46 PM (No. 9141118)
This is a slippery slope. Next they may be sued for making it a little longer than twelve inches. They should change their advertising to "roughly a foot long".
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Spidey, 1/26/2013 6:18:35 PM (No. 9141165)
This reminds me of a big box of cereal that´s only half full and there´s a disclaimer that contents may have settled during shipment.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Nevadadad46, 1/26/2013 6:22:06 PM (No. 9141169)
Yeah, the bread is the issue? What about the skimpy filling inside?
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"
|
|
Obama admits he’s a socialist
|
|
New York Post, by Kyle Smith
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:59:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
You may be forgiven if you missed it during last week’s tsunami of scandals, but President Obama finally let slip that he is a socialist. Buried in the 17th paragraph of one of those mewling New York Times pieces on the woes of Obama — can we start calling him Woe-bama yet? — appeared these two words: “going Bulworth.” Obama himself, the Times explained, has been “longingly” telling his inner circle that what he’d really like to do is what Sen. Jay Bulworth, played by Warren Beatty in his 1998 movie “Bulworth,” did: to go public as
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
WH: Legality of IRS Action Against Conservatives ´Irrelevant´
|
|
Breitbart Big Government, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:43:10 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Appearing on Sunday morning on ABC News’ This Week, White House Senior Adviser Dan Pfeiffer told a credulous George Stephanopoulos that the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups was “inexcusable,” and that the law with regard to the activity was “irrelevant.” “I can’t speak to the law here,” he said. “The law is irrelevant. The activity was outrageous and inexcusable, and it was stopped and it needs to be fixed so we ensure it never happens again.” When asked for clarification, Pfeiffer expounded: “What I mean is, whether it’s legal or illegal is not important to the fact
|
WH: ´Irrelevant´ Who Edited Benghazi Talking Points
|
|
Breitbart Big Government, by William Bigelow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:40:46 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Appearing on CBS’ Face the Nation, White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said that it was “largely irrelevant” who edited the talking points the Obama administration trotted out in the aftermath of the terrorist attack in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. Host Bob Schieffer asked, “That was just a PR plan, to send out somebody who didn’t know anything about what had happened. Why did you do that? Why didn’t the Secretary of State come and tell us what they knew, and if they knew nothing, say ‘We don’t know yet?’ …. Why are you here today?
|
WH: ´Irrelevant´ Where Obama Was During Benghazi Attacks
|
|
Breitbart Big Government, by Ben Shapiro
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:37:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Fox News Sunday this morning, White House spokesman Dan Pfeiffer was asked by Chris Wallace where in the White House President Obama was during the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi that killed four Americans. “Question,” asked Wallace. “What did the President do the rest of that night to pursue Benghazi?” Pfeiffer answered, “Look, the President was kept up to date on this as it was happening the entire night, from the moment it started until the very end …. I recognize that there’s a series of conspiracy theories Republicans have been spinning about it
|
Non-deportation rate drops — to 99.2 percent
|
|
Washington Times [DC], by Stephen Dinan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:28:53 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Homeland Security Department has granted legal status to 99.2 percent of all illegal immigrants who have applied under President Obama’s new non-deportation policy for young adults, according to the latest numbers released Friday. That’s a slight drop from the 99.5 percent approval rate reported last month. The policy, known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, grants legal status to most illegal immigrants under the age of 31 who came to the U.S. before age 16 — usually brought by their parents. They are allowed to remain in the U.S. without fear of deportation, and are given work
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|