A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: The coming collapse
of the abortion lobby
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
The coming collapse
of the abortion lobby

Fox News, by Dr. Charmaine Yoest

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 1/26/2013 6:08:40 AM

Forty years after Roe v. Wade, a powerful shift is taking place within Big Abortion. What abortion advocates could not win through choice, they intend to impose through coercion. Even Time magazine recently acknowledged on their cover that, for those so inclined to celebrate Roe’s anniversary, the rejoicing over abortion on demand should be tinged with concern. On January 14th Time asked “What Choice?” and then answered their own question: “40 years ago, abortion rights activists won an epic victory with Roe v. Wade,” the cover noted and then concluded: “They’ve been losing ever since.”

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: ruready?, 1/26/2013 6:32:13 AM     (No. 9140055)

A wonderful article. Any news that our nation is turning back to God is like a drink of cool water in a desert land.


Reply 2 - Posted by: arkfamily, 1/26/2013 6:41:58 AM     (No. 9140068)

You know there is something really wrong or sick about a society that defends the right to have a baby killed.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Japanorama, 1/26/2013 6:42:41 AM     (No. 9140069)

55,000,000 American kids have been aborted.
One of them might have cured the disease that will kill you someday.


Reply 4 - Posted by: jsulman, 1/26/2013 6:55:29 AM     (No. 9140079)

What is amazing is how tone deaf the Dems are. This can be seen in their latest convention where abortion was one of the primary platforms that they put forth. They cannot imagine how appalling it is for many Americans to put the killing of a baby in the womb as the most important reason for supporting a party. I think that if the Repubs ever quite listening to the stupid non-social/moral issues members of their party and came strongly and rationally against abortion as Reagen did we would win on the issue. We do not even have to run on an overturn of Roe v Wade. Simple issues like parental consent, waiting periods for abortions and alternatives presented to those seeking abortions would win the day since most Americans are for such things.

The problem is most establishment republicans are so afraid of the issue that they do not speak out as they should so it is left to the nuts Aiken to do so, and we see where that has gotten us.


Reply 5 - Posted by: kanphil, 1/26/2013 7:19:30 AM     (No. 9140099)

There is no question that we were a more moral nation before the SCOTUS up and declared a right that nobody had sued for. One problem we face is rooting out all the hidden sources of funding for Planned Parenthood. We were avid supporters of Susan G Komen March for Life, for example, until we learned that hidden deep in their agenda was money donation to Planned Parenthood. Talk about a contradiction! A March for Life donating to a death dealing ooutfit like PP! The State of Texas, among others is in the process of withdrawing any funding to PP.


Reply 6 - Posted by: pgvoisin, 1/26/2013 7:23:10 AM     (No. 9140103)

Let´s talk "cold-blooded murder", shall we?

Abortion has been responsible for 55,000,000 deaths in this country over the last 4 decades. People killed those little ones not guns. They were all "Pro-Choice" or "Pro-Death" advocates.

We don´t need more "Gun Control", we need "Abortion Control"!

Wake up America!


Reply 7 - Posted by: Zarin, 1/26/2013 7:26:52 AM     (No. 9140107)

Yet please note that this is one issue that apparently helped Obama win & the Dems win the Senate. Recall how their campaigns proclaimed that any Republican or Conservative would deny all women their ´right´ to ´reproductive freedom.´


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Mr. Hanky, 1/26/2013 7:46:29 AM     (No. 9140127)

Amazing that the Dems find the right to an abortion in the Constitution and anything short of free abortion on demand is a limit to that right. Yet they want to ban the right to bear arms, which actually is in the Constitution...you know, for the children...


Reply 9 - Posted by: Bpl40, 1/26/2013 8:14:55 AM     (No. 9140161)

The ultimate irony, which is lost on Democrats is that they pursue these policies under the slogan "It´s for the children". Strange!!


Reply 10 - Posted by: sorosisbehindit, 1/26/2013 8:46:27 AM     (No. 9140221)

Thanks for posting this ray of hope for this weary pro-life warrior to read!
I wonder if the libs will regret their "choice" when social security collapses under the weight of the baby boomers with a significantly thinned out generation to follow?
The pro-life debate of the future will be whether Obamacare will be allowed to withhold medical care to let the broken down old people die off, which will save taxpayers money.


Reply 11 - Posted by: miceal, 1/26/2013 8:51:30 AM     (No. 9140227)

They advocate the murder of our most precious resource and attack any who call out their evil. From the very rock bottom of my heart, I pray God can forgive "them" because I NEVER WILL!


Reply 12 - Posted by: Travis Mcgee, 1/26/2013 9:14:14 AM     (No. 9140255)

This is especially salient given the new hysteria regarding gun control and demonizing the NRA. At an organizational level who is directly responsible for the greatest loss of human life; Planned Parenthood or the NRA.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: bgarrett, 1/26/2013 9:14:28 AM     (No. 9140257)

I consider myself as conservative but wonder: "If abortion is outlawed, what will happen to the young girls who will do it anyway in the alley with a coat hanger?" Because they WILL


Reply 14 - Posted by: spengler, 1/26/2013 9:23:03 AM     (No. 9140266)

Abortion is no more than institutional modern Moloch worship.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Keekng, 1/26/2013 9:23:45 AM     (No. 9140268)

40+ years ago, we adopted two boys. One of them is now a MD and the other is a Paramedic-Firefighter. If Roe v. Wade had occured a few years earlier they might never have been born. What a loss to humanity that would have been.


Reply 16 - Posted by: ann, 1/26/2013 9:32:06 AM     (No. 9140277)

#14....55 MILLION murdered babies......and this is your only response?......words fail me......I have trouble buying your ´conservative´ label....this is the same propaganda used 40 years ago....not very original.


Reply 17 - Posted by: miceal, 1/26/2013 9:33:35 AM     (No. 9140279)

May God bless you and your Children #16.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: donnaclaire, 1/26/2013 9:34:32 AM     (No. 9140280)

To these pro-abortion activists, what´s 60,000,000 dead babies? - just a drop in the bucket. Excuse the ´pun´ but it was intended. Their goals and ambitions are indeed chilling, horrific and sad beyond words.


Reply 19 - Posted by: farmwife, 1/26/2013 9:39:33 AM     (No. 9140285)

What all those abortion advocates refuse to acknowledge is that we have come a long way down the road. When this decision was handed down, it was understand there would never be taxpayer funding for abortion. Now most abortions are funded by taxpayers in one way or another.

Next up on that slippery slope, the option of having an abortion will become the duty to have an abortion with the government deciding who will be undergoing the procedure.

Abortion is evil. And people who promote it should be called out at every turn.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Freeloader, 1/26/2013 9:59:21 AM     (No. 9140311)

Re #14...There are numerous felony laws on the books, state and federal, prohibiting aggravated assault, burglary, motor vehicle theft, forgery, arson, murder etc. Yet these crimes are still committed on a daily basis. Therefore, should society simply disregard these laws?


Reply 21 - Posted by: krause, 1/26/2013 10:10:44 AM     (No. 9140324)

There is no ´choice´ for the baby, is there? PP and NARAL should, if they want to be honest, start using the term ´birth control´ because that is what abortion is, in most cases.


Reply 22 - Posted by: gusman, 1/26/2013 10:23:07 AM     (No. 9140343)

Here is how you win on the issue at federal level - stop making it a federal issue. Federal government has NO reason to be discussing, legislating and funding abortion. Republicans should simply tell libs you are right it is none of the federal governments business what you do with your body therefor we are not going to do anything about it including funding it. Say it is a state and local issue where individuals have more say and pull with their law maker. Same goes with gays!


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Ruhn, 1/26/2013 10:37:06 AM     (No. 9140412)

The article uses an apt analogy of the abortion lobby and the Soviet bloc: the latter eventually collapsed under the shaky foundation of its own lies and the indefensibility of its basic arguments in application.

But if we are to the outcomes post-Soviet collapse and the pending collapse of the abortion lobby, we must consider where pro-abortionists will migrate to. Communists didn´t go away. They eventually scuttled over to the environmental/AGW cabal to push a statist, anti-capitalist agenda. Likewise, pro-abortionists will re-locate to kindred spirits in coercive, statist entities like CAP, American Bridge, etc. to continue their agenda under a different guise, (i.e. health care).


Reply 24 - Posted by: bluefindad, 1/26/2013 11:01:52 AM     (No. 9140457)

Thanks so much for posting this uplifting article.


Reply 25 - Posted by: RancherJack, 1/26/2013 11:03:20 AM     (No. 9140460)

I´ve heard this kind of jibber jabber every day of my adult life just as I´ve heard the hoots and clicks that gay marriage is never going to happen, Unions are being broken and the Democrats are going the way of the Dodo.

This article is for people who need solace as they whistle past the graveyard.


Reply 26 - Posted by: John318, 1/26/2013 11:15:57 AM     (No. 9140481)

"And with all deceivableness of un-righteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness."
2 Thess.2:10-12 The only way that God will remove the delusion is America acknowledges its Sin and repents. Do you really think that is going to happen? If anyone cannot see the judgment that we are under these days they are those that have believed the lies we have been promoting for decades.


Reply 27 - Posted by: marthaville, 1/26/2013 11:16:27 AM     (No. 9140483)

If Planned Parenthood is really so necessary to women because they provide primary care to these women, and since Planned Parenthood claims this is their primary reason for existence, they should just stop performing abortions. Plain and simple.

Of course we know they are liars beyond belief. Their president is Cecile Richards, daughter of Ma Richards of Texas fame. Perhaps she couldn´t continue to be paid $400K per year without the profit they derive from federal government funded 333,000 abortions per year.


Reply 28 - Posted by: ocjim, 1/26/2013 11:18:20 AM     (No. 9140487)

More mandatory ultrasound laws. Let the women see for themselves on the scopes and then make an informed choice whether to believe their own eyes or the Leftist lies about it not being murder.
And let´s not allow the Left to conflate abortion or the day after pill with ´´family planning.´´ The Left loves to play with the language in order to bamboozle, BUT, family planning is taking preconception steps, not post conception action.


Reply 29 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 1/26/2013 11:20:30 AM     (No. 9140493)

Fortunately, most all of the victims were little liberals, taken out before they could breed or vote. Without Roe, Gore would have most certainly won the White House...


Reply 30 - Posted by: arcady, 1/26/2013 11:30:41 AM     (No. 9140514)

55 million! We´re giving the European and Asian socialists and communists a run for their money with our own version of government sanctioned murder...


Reply 31 - Posted by: tomanderson61, 1/26/2013 11:34:26 AM     (No. 9140524)

#30, such ultrasound laws might save a few lives, and I welcome that, but it won´t really make much of a dent. You would be forcing a medical person to force someone to look at something, which their heart will not be into doing when the person is resistant. Nowadays, EVERY woman except maybe a young teen knows EXACTLY what the baby looks like at what stage and she can likely feel it moving around even at 3 months. Cold blooded freaks that have abortions will just say, yep, I saw it, now go ahead with the procedure.


Reply 32 - Posted by: gator, 1/26/2013 1:02:57 PM     (No. 9140707)

Just think of number of gang-bangers, welfare entitlement payouts, deadbeats, new democrat voters and babies having babies there would be today if abortion were illegal. And most would be dead before they were 25 anyway.


Reply 33 - Posted by: jfodoch, 1/26/2013 1:14:58 PM     (No. 9140731)

I may be showing how out of touch I am with this question, but how expensive would it be to furnish birth control pills to those who can´t afford them but request them? Administered by local county health departments. Or maybe better, an IUD?


Reply 34 - Posted by: peterfleming, 1/26/2013 1:26:40 PM     (No. 9140748)

Turning abortion into a tax paid high speed industry was as harmful and sending our kids to die is some damn remote desert we´ll never visit. Desolate. Killing thousands of babies on an assembly line.
Abortion welfare is horrifying. Kids abandoning caution because of abortion welfare. Tax payers ready to cover your mistakes. What a mess. Socialism, the State, communism, in any form does not work.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Caveman, 1/26/2013 1:43:49 PM     (No. 9140775)

New bumper sticker.

ABORTION -- ´´It´s for the children!´´


Reply 36 - Posted by: Javelin, 1/26/2013 1:54:24 PM     (No. 9140790)

I am respectful of those who couch their pro-life arguments in religious terms. I sometimes do, as well.
However, I have found that citing science (blood typing, DNA, ultra sound) is more effective with many people, including religious people, who don´t like to acknowledge the moral aspects of their actions or political positions. A few people have hesitated - and some may have had occasion to alter their view - when confronted with "science" rather than faith.


Reply 37 - Posted by: raphaela, 1/26/2013 2:06:46 PM     (No. 9140807)

#14, what makes you think that abortion clinics are any better than back alley abortions? Read the Grand Jury report on Kermit Gosnell and his staff. Or go to Lifesite News and read about the unsanitary and septic conditions of those clinics in operation today. I bet you wouldn´t want to clip your toenails in places like that.


Reply 38 - Posted by: belwhatter, 1/26/2013 2:19:10 PM     (No. 9140834)

I´ve heard say that this is the legacy of eugenicist Margaret Sanger, and was primarily designed to elimnate black populations. I think if I were a black person this idea would not have much appeal.


Reply 39 - Posted by: FormerDem, 1/26/2013 2:21:01 PM     (No. 9140837)

great article. The abortion lobby is actively and brazenly pivoting away from choice to coercion (approx paraphrase). thanks OP


Reply 40 - Posted by: thatsomewhereplace, 1/26/2013 3:09:20 PM     (No. 9140914)

One-sixth of the USA has been murdered in vitro. Potential tax payers and heaven knows we need more tax payers and social security payers. It amazes me that the money mongrels of the dem party, who search for everyone elses money, don´t see their folly by endorsing, since 1973, aborting potential tax payers. Now, my example is horrid. I in no way support abortion. It sickens me to think 55 million innocent lives have been snuffed out. Now those of you Lucianne fans born after Jan, 1973. You do realize that your mother could have snuffed your life out, legally? You were on the do or don´t ledge of being exterminated because...now in the case of rape or incest...both are punishable crimes. I don´t know if there have been many prosecutions for the rape or family molestations. It´s all been a word game with pro aborts. Refine this. refine that so that we eventually lose the meaning of abortion. I fervently pray that I see the end of abortion. The haters have to lose. Repulsive haters.


Reply 41 - Posted by: 4Justice, 1/26/2013 4:33:14 PM     (No. 9141037)

I am no fan of abortion and would never have one. But I think the biggest problem with the issue is that it never stayed the way it was originally intended...i.e. "making it legal, safe and RARE" and only allowed in the first trimester (unless the life of the woman is in danger). Instead, the left pushed it almost into a religion. They turned it into a form of birth control and pushed it not only past the 2nd trimester but all the way to "partial birth" abortion with some even advocating "post birth abortion", like P. Singer. While I feel all potential for life is a gift from God, I can accept that people´s beliefs differ. So, if abortion is going to be legal, then we should limit it to the first trimester before it´s fully developed. But it should be state regulated and education required to discourage it. We can make it rare without outlawing it outright. We just need to discredit the left´s pro-murder agenda.


Reply 42 - Posted by: sorosisbehindit, 1/26/2013 4:35:13 PM     (No. 9141041)

#38 In my case, I had no knowledge of, or opinion about abortion until the day in the early 80s when I saw the film "Silent Scream" on public television. When I saw the ultrasound of that little baby moving around in the womb to avoid the instrument that was invading its space, and then the open mouth...in that moment I became a pro-life advocate.
But over the years as Bible verses have popped up that speak so powerfully on the subject, it is difficult to stay with science alone.
Proverbs 31:8-9


Reply 43 - Posted by: dman, 1/26/2013 5:12:17 PM     (No. 9141079)

Time for "prenatal emancipation". Take care of mom for nine months; then give baby to a couple who´ll love and appreciate it. The recent flap with Putin over Russian adoption - not to mention the cost of adoption these days - should remind us how precious all children are.


Reply 44 - Posted by: octrojan, 1/26/2013 5:30:36 PM     (No. 9141102)

I´m as pro-life as anyone but I have to say: the Dems made abortion one of the centerpieces...and they won the Presidency during a very stagnant economy.

So I´m forced to conclude that the strategy of picking off a few groups--dominating blacks, Hispanics, unmarried women, gays, muslims (about 2% of the vote but helpful when you only won by 3-4%) was helped by their pro-abortion strategy. It kept young unmarrieds on the plantation, got millions of Hollywood money flowing in (which they wouldn´t have gotten with a pro-life platform)...meanwhile pro-lifers sat on their hands because mittens or williard or "the Mormon" wasn´t Christian or conservative enough.

So this time around, it worked for the Dems.


Reply 45 - Posted by: Crasher, 1/26/2013 5:41:24 PM     (No. 9141117)


Reply 46 - Posted by: Crasher, 1/26/2013 5:48:40 PM     (No. 9141125)

When I see that there have been at least 55,000,000 abortions that means that 27,500,000+ women have been denied their reproductive rights because they have been denied their right to trial by jury before getting a death sentence.

Men should also beware as 27,500,000 men were also denied their right to trial by jury before getting a death sentence.

How many who push for abortion want to do away with the death penalty for murderers?


Reply 47 - Posted by: pearlyjo, 1/26/2013 5:58:43 PM     (No. 9141136)

"Safe, legal and rare." Riiigghhhttt.
Let´s cut to the chase folks: abortion is big money. BIG money. It´s not about helping women or helping children or helping society or any of that other clap trap. It´s big money. They prey upon people (men included) at one of the toughest times of their lives. Think of it as impulse buying at its worst, only there´s not returning your purchase if you are unhappy with it.


Reply 48 - Posted by: M Stuart, 1/26/2013 10:57:15 PM     (No. 9141476)

I simply don´t believe this article.

If this is winning, I´d hate to see losing.

I also don´t see where this is coming from when 3 out of 4 Christian kids leave the church after leaving home. crossexamined.org
has ammunition to help kids overcome the anti-Christian bias.



Post Reply   Close thread 720695




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Obama Speaks, The Heart Sinks
PJ Media, by Michael Ledeen    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/25/2013 5:00:01 AM     Post Reply
He’s actually getting worse. This president will not admit that we are in a war, as President George W. Bush defined it, with various terrorist organizations and with countries that support them. In his overlong, rambling speech to the National Defense University on terrorism and national security, the president never even mentioned Iran, which happens to be our main enemy and the world’s leading sponsor of international terrorism. Not one word. You may well ask how it is possible for the president to talk about his counterterrorism “strategy” without addressing the main source of terrorism.

Keeping Our Heads in
the Sand after Boston
Accuracy in Media, by Steve Emerson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/25/2013 4:49:48 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration’s policy banning references to “Islamic extremism” and “jihad” in discussions about terrorism drew criticism during the House Homeland Security Committee hearing on the Boston Marathon bombings. The bombings “should again teach us that the enemy we face is violent Islamist extremism, not just al Qaida,” said former U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman. “Osama bin Laden is dead. And the remaining leadership of al Qaida is on the run, but the ideology of violent Islamist extremism is rapidly spreading.” The Boston investigation already has shown that Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev “adopted the outrageously false narrative of violent Islamist extremism,

Obama´s drone rules leave
unanswered questions
Associated Press, by Julie Pace    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/25/2013 4:46:25 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama left plenty of ambiguity in new policy guidelines that he says will restrict how and when the U.S. can launch targeted drone strikes, leaving himself significant power over how and when the weapons can be deployed. National security experts say it´s imperative to leave some room in the guidelines, given the evolving fight against terrorism. But civil rights advocates argue too little has been revealed about the program to ensure its legality, even as the president takes steps to remove some of the secrecy. "Obama said that there would be more limits on targeted killings,

Eric Holder versus journalism
Salon, by Alex Pareene    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/24/2013 10:19:23 AM     Post Reply
Attorney General Eric Holder personally signed off on the warrant naming Fox News journalist James Rosen a “possible co-conspirator” in violation of the Espionage Act, Michael Isikoff reported yesterday. Which is sort of awkward, because Barack Obama also yesterday told the country (the whole country) that he didn’t want to criminalize reporting, and that he was going to ask his Justice Department to make sure not to do that anymore. Rosen wasn’t charged. In truth, the government never really intended on charging him. (Snip)That’s the scandal: That the government could charge a journalist with, effectively, spying, simply for reporting.

A Toxic Combination
Weekly Standard, by Jeffrey H. Anderson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/24/2013 10:07:20 AM     Post Reply
Of all the scandals in his administration that President Obama knows nothing about, the one Americans find most appalling is the decision by the Internal Revenue Service to target the president’s political adversaries. What’s more, as subsequent congressional testimony has made clear, the IRS isn’t particularly repentant about its actions. One thing Republicans and Democrats should therefore be able to agree on is that this is no time to significantly expand the IRS’s power. Yet that is exactly what will happen under Obamacare if no action is taken. A simple proposal: Remove the IRS from any role

The United States of El Norte
American Spectator, by Larry Thornberry    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/24/2013 6:13:28 AM     Post Reply
Rookie Florida Senator Marco Rubio continues to work tirelessly to get the United States to annex Mexico, though an exhaustive (and exhausting) search of his 2010 election campaign reveals no promises to do, nor even a mention that he might consider doing such an outlandish thing. Au the contraire, the pre-election Rubio said all the right things about line-cutters and lawbreakers. That’s one of the reasons he’s a senator today. There are only two sure consequences of the current 800-page immigration hairball before Congress. The first is that a minimum of 11 million citizens of other countries, more Mexicans

President Obama dreamily wants
to scale back the war on terror
New York Daily News, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/24/2013 6:04:56 AM     Post Reply
President Obama declared on Thursday that it’s time for the U.S. to leave behind the global war on terror. He might first try convincing America’s war-waging global enemies to do the same. Almost a dozen years after 9/11, the President wishfully hopes to demilitarize national security in the age of Islamist radicalism. He judges the country ready for such a step because a long fight has markedly degraded the attacking capacities of Al Qaeda and affiliates. Even so, Obama dared not utter the word victory in his address at the National Defense University, because plainly the hostiles are still coming



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Criminality Appears To Lie at the
Heart of the IRS Scandal

54 replie(s)
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM     Post Reply
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.

Eva Longoria graduates with
master´s degree in Chicano studies

52 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 5/23/2013 3:03:53 PM     Post Reply
Eva Longoria is backing up her beauty with a whole lot of brain. The actress graduated with a master´s degree Wednesday. Longoria, 38, took home a real degree (not an honorary one) in Chicano studies from Cal State Northridge, where she physically attended classes for three years, according to TMZ. "Big day today!!! Very excited to graduate for my master´s degree in Chicano studies! You´re never too old or too busy to continue your education!" the actress wrote on her Who Say site Wednesday, sharing loads of pics of her big day, posing with her family, cohorts and diploma.

Mark Levin Tears Into Obama: ‘Flat-
Out, Bald-Faced Lie’ That He Knew
Nothing About IRS Targeting

51 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Josh Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 9:48:28 PM     Post Reply
Conservative radio host Mark Levin is very skeptical of the idea that President Obama had absolutely no idea about the IRS tea party targeting before the story broke in the news mere weeks ago. Levin declared adamantly that it is a “flat-out, bald-faced lie” that Obama didn’t know beforehand, citing prior reports by a few conservative news outlets picking up on the news well before the 2012 presidential election. Levin said, “I don’t believe for two seconds that Obama wasn’t aware of this.”

Obama nominates Nuland for
assistant secretary of state

51 replie(s)
Politico, by Reid J. Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 10:08:52 PM     Post Reply
President Obama on Thursday nominated Victoria Nuland, a State Department official involved in the editing of the administration´s talking points on Benghazi, to be the next assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs. Nuland, a career foreign service officer who was until recently State´s top spokesperson, had long been expected to be nominated the post to replace Philip Gordon, who Obama picked to serve as Middle East coordinator for the National Security Council. Nuland´s nomination -- which requires Senate confirmation -- could come under scrutiny from Republicans who see her as playing a central role in shaping

Why was the Department
of Homeland Security monitoring
Tea Party IRS demonstrations?

50 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/23/2013 8:09:21 AM     Post Reply
What´s so interesting about 60 tea partiers protesting the IRS in San Jose, California on Tuesday, May 21st? The fact that this bit of information was conveyed to the protesters by a Department of Homeland Security officer who was also in attendance. What was a DHS agent doing at the San Jose Tea Party protest? (snip) they weren´t just spying on us in San Jose and monitoring us in San Francisco, they were watching us throughout the entire state

Anthony Weiner says Houston
psychiatric facility made
him ‘a new man’

50 replie(s)
Houston Chronicle, by Nicole Narea    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 10:52:02 PM     Post Reply
Anthony Weiner’s New York mayoral candidacy was only made more improbable today after he revealed that he visited a Houston psychiatric facility following his resignation from Congress in 2011. Haunted by scandal surrounding his sexually explicit online communications with women, the Democratic former congressman sought treatment for his compulsive behavior from mental health professionals at the Gabbard Center. According to its website, the facility provides “3-day outpatient psychiatric evaluation,” particularly to “professionals who are in personal or professional crises.” While Weiner did not disclose

The Mystery Night
43 replie(s)
Politico, by Rich Lowry    Original Article
Posted By: RappVol- 5/23/2013 7:36:59 AM     Post Reply
On “Fox News Sunday” last weekend, White House aide Dan Pfeiffer was asked about President Barack Obama’s whereabouts the night of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi. This was the night when we lost our first ambassador in 30 years, and when three other Americans were killed in an attack that lasted all night long at multiple locations within the eastern Libyan city. Since the president is commander in chief, one would think where he was and what he did during such an event would be of obvious public concern.


Post Reply   Close thread 720695





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~