|
|
| |
Topic: After Mike Bloomberg´s rule for hospitals, FDA panel votes to restrict use of painkillers |
After Mike Bloomberg´s rule for hospitals, FDA panel votes to restrict use of painkillers
Washington Examiner, by Joel Gehrke
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/25/2013 6:22:00 PM
|
| Federal Drug Administration advisers voted today to restrict access to certain kinds of prescription drugs in an effort to fight drug abuse. The vote had experts divided over the risk of drug abuse as weighed against the risk of increased pain or difficulty for patients on the medication. “It will have an impact on a lot of patients who have been receiving them for some time for legitimate purposes,” Dr. Lynn Webster, president-elect of the American Academy of Pain Medicine, said per Health Day News ahead of the vote. The FDA rule change is designed to implement
|
Comments: Once again an agency goes around congress. Note that Senate passed a rule change to implement the policy and the House killed it. This regime is out of control. This regime is completely out of control. The courts sure are going to be busy in the next four years.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
JAN, 1/25/2013 6:30:34 PM (No. 9139502)
Governor Hickenlooper of Colorado has followed Bloomers lead and is now enforcing the same hospital restrictions.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
thewarden, 1/25/2013 6:33:01 PM (No. 9139508)
Just another part of the plan. Less pains meds, more pain, more resulting deaths, including suicides. Red pill or blue pill? How about neither?
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 1/25/2013 6:33:22 PM (No. 9139509)
Two years ago it was: "No surgery for you...take this pain pill."
Now it´s:"Hurry up and die...untended in the hallway...in pain."
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
JimS, 1/25/2013 6:48:18 PM (No. 9139532)
Bloomburg says, so what if you have a little pain. Under his plan, pain med refills cannot be called in, faxed in, and are not refillable. That is a HUGE obstacle for many people to overcome--going to the doctor´s office to pick up a refill. So, we punish the sick and elderly because of the drug abuse of miscreants? I say give out as much painkillers, free and in whatever quantity desired. Let the miscreants abuse them and die off to thin the herd of undesirables. Nanny Bloomburg thus makes this imperial proclamation.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
MamaD, 1/25/2013 6:53:14 PM (No. 9139544)
So NYC Mayor Bloomberg doesn´t think this will harm patients?
“Number one, there’s no evidence of that,” Bloomberg said. “Number two, supposing it is really true, so you didn’t get enough painkillers and you did have to suffer a little bit. The other side of the coin is people are dying and there’s nothing perfect.”
Is there no end to Bloomberg´s arrogance?
I´d like to add that yes, having uncontrolled pain CAN harm people. When people have unmanaged pain, they are less likely to move, less likely to participate in exercise. For some, this could mean increased risk for pneumonia, bedsores, blood clots, etc.
Also, as a home health care RN, I want to emphasize how very difficult it can be for some patients to leave their homes, often because of the very pain that needs to be controlled. Many health care providers have no clue about this. It IS a big deal for some patients to have to increase their doctor visits to four times per year instead of two in order to get their prescriptions refilled.
I´m also appalled that a so-called "pain management specialist" thinks this is no big deal.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
bkt23, 1/25/2013 6:54:26 PM (No. 9139546)
Evidently, we and our doctors are too stupid to decide what´s best. We need mindless bureaucrats following the script handed to them by legislators to make these decisions for us.
On an unrelated topic, has anyone else noticed how ammo has REALLY gone up in price? Funny, that.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
nonsense, 1/25/2013 7:09:57 PM (No. 9139570)
Ridiculous regulation. Druggies will still have drugs, gang-bangers will still have guns.
Innocent citizens will pay for the crimes of the criminals. They are killing us softly with their regulations.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
terry_tr6, 1/25/2013 7:31:33 PM (No. 9139604)
anyone out there wishing an excruciating but non-fatal condition on bloomburg?
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
fljack, 1/25/2013 7:32:08 PM (No. 9139606)
Communism and control at its finest. Submit and die.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
mackrand, 1/25/2013 7:48:22 PM (No. 9139632)
Bloomberg should go through some procedure like a Radical Prostatectomy and go home with a Foley Catheter inserted to pee through and go through the recovery period with minimal or reduced pain medication. I did it and was really thankful that I had ample pain medication. If I was confronted by a rule by some pompous ass of a politician that said that I had to suffer I would likely have resorted to--- Well, lets us say that I would have not been a happy camper.
People go through lots of different procedures that are radical in nature that result in lots of pain. This is not going to go over so well with patients and Doctors. I can imagine that they will just ignore the rules. Another example of citizens reduced to being lawbreakers for living normal lives.
Like guns, with-holding pain management medication will result in a lot of people stocking up on it when ever they can. Throw it away when it expires??? Are you crazy?
And yes, I have noticed first hand how expensive ammo is.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
TunnelRat, 1/25/2013 7:57:27 PM (No. 9139645)
"so you didn’t get enough painkillers and you did have to suffer a little bit."
So you didn´t get enough painkillers. Who cares? The important thing is to keep drugs out of the hands of those who shouldn´t have them...
How´s that War on Drugs working for you now?
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
smcchk, 1/25/2013 7:58:38 PM (No. 9139649)
#5, perhaps the "pain management specialist" is figuring there will twice the office visits, that he can charge for, per patient?
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
smcchk, 1/25/2013 8:01:46 PM (No. 9139654)
Sorry for the double posts but right now, I am thinking of a number of chronic pain conditions that I wish upon Mayor Bloomberg since he thinks suffering a little more is no big deal.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 1/25/2013 8:30:23 PM (No. 9139713)
This painkiller idiocy is the same thought process as gun control. Because a few abuse all must suffer.
Govn has no ability whatsoever to think critically.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
jntsrgn, 1/25/2013 8:36:22 PM (No. 9139724)
This is the same Government that REQUIRES us to measure pain as an additional vital sign on a scale of 1-10. I can be sanctioned and SUED for not providing adequate care for pain. Which is it ?!?!?!?!?
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 1/25/2013 8:39:50 PM (No. 9139728)
This government really stinks. We will soon all be in lockdown to prevent us from being harmed by a terrorist attack.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
ricktutt, 1/25/2013 9:50:31 PM (No. 9139795)
I can´t believe it´s come to this.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 1/25/2013 9:51:44 PM (No. 9139796)
What an idiot. Now he thinks he is a doctor.
This hurts cancer patients with unbearable pain. One of my friends has to go to a pain clinic with the drugies now for pain killers instead of getting it from her doc.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
lil dotty, 1/25/2013 11:09:11 PM (No. 9139836)
These fools continue down THIS road and the pain the patient is feeling will be nothing compared to the pain the fools will be feeling when the patient and family get their hands fee. They will be begging for pain relief of any kind. Pain drives a person crazy...good defense.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
oh-heck, 1/26/2013 12:23:17 AM (No. 9139897)
In the UK they have the LCP (Liverpool Care Protocol) where the doctor decides who is unlikely to survive and give them pain killers but withholds fluids and nourishment until the patient dies.
Now Bloomberg offers the BCL (Bloomberg Cares Less) which is to withhold fluids, nourishment and painkillers.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
LanieLou, 1/26/2013 1:11:24 AM (No. 9139927)
I think Bloomberg is Obama´s trial ballooner. Once Obama sees the feedback, he knows how to squash it. Saying that making peeps in pain suffer is a fair trade off if it keeps drugs from dopers lacks any compassion, I can´t breath.
Now let´s back up a couple years, when Obama decided things like hip replacements are wasted on old peeps so we should consider just giving them pain meds instead. Now he´s limiting the pain meds! I guess he wants old folks to beg for euthanasia.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Remember when Fox News wasn’t ‘real news’?
|
|
Human Events, by David Harsanyi
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 10:21:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
We now know that the Justice Department kept exceptionally close tabs on Fox News reporter James Rosen in 2010, following his trips in and out of the State Department, hacking his personal emails and phone calls. Normal newsgathering activities are being treated as criminal activities by the White House. But consider what the same White House had to say about Fox News back in 2009. You might remember the concerted effort by White House officials to brand the right-leaning Fox News as a bogus news outlet, unworthy of attention.
|
|
More Secrets From Huma Abedin
|
|
FrontPage Magazine, by Arnold Ahlert
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 10:03:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Huma Abedin, former Secretary of State Hillary’s Clinton’s long time aide with extensive ties to Muslim Brotherhood groups, was granted an arrangement by the State Department to do outside consulting work, even as she remained a top advisor in the Department. Abedin did not disclose either the arrangement, or how much she earned from it, on her financial report, despite a requirement that public officials must disclose significant sources of income. Clinton advisor Philippe Reines contended she was under no obligation to do so. Abedin, who has served Clinton for 15 years, became a “special government employee”
|
Judge ruled feds need not notify Fox reporter of search
|
|
Politico, by Josh Gerstin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 6:45:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A federal judge in Washington ruled in 2010 that the Justice Department was not required by law to notify Fox reporter James Rosen that prosecutors had obtained his emails in connection with an investigation into a leak about North Korean plans to test a nuclear weapon. In September 2010, Chief U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth overruled the conclusion of federal magistrate John Facciola that Rosen—whose Gmail account was searched—was entitled by law to be informed. Prosecutors contended that under the statute used to get Rosen´s emails, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, they were not
|
DOJ Reacts to Rosen Report in Statement
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:45:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Department of Justice released a statement moments ago amid reports of the department obtaining a subpoena in order to access Fox News reporter James Rosen´s personal emails. "Leaks of classified information to the press can pose a serious risk of harm to our national security and it is important that we pursue these matters using appropriate law enforcement tools. Such investigations and prosecutions, including this particular case, follow all applicable laws, regulations, and longstanding Department of Justice policies intended to safeguard the First Amendment interests of the press in reporting the news and the public in receiving it."
|
Malkin To Kelly: IRS Not Just Scandal Because Of ‘Ideology,’ But Because Of Obama’s ‘Brass- Knuckled Intimidation’
|
|
Mediaite, by Matt Wilstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:34:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Malkin joined Megyn Kelly on Fox News Monday afternoon to discuss the latest developments in the investigation into the IRS targeting conservatives for audits. Malkin insisted it was not merely her “ideology” that has led to critique the Obama administration on their handling of the IRS issue and others, but rather the evidence she’s seen of their “bully brigade tactics” to “intimidate and criminalize their political opponents.” Malkin began by going after White House Press Secretary Jay Carney for his handling of the various Obama “scandals,” saying the “clown Carney press briefings have turned in
|
Fox News Will Defend Reporter Against ´Co-Conspirator´ Charge
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:05:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Justice Department, already under fire for seizing AP phone records, also viewed e-mails of Fox News chief Washington correspondent James Rosen, calling him a criminal ´co-conspirator´ for his reporting. Fox News´ executive vice president of news, Michael Clemente, released a statement defending Rosen. The statement issued Monday afternoon is below: "We are outraged to learn today that James Rosen was named a criminal co-conspirator for simply doing his job as a reporter," Clemente said. "In fact, it is downright chilling. We will unequivocally
|
Former Counterterrorism Head: FBI Never Called Ft. Hood ´Workplace Violence´
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Peace, by Kerry Picket
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 2:49:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Michael Steinbach, former head of the FBI’s counterterrorism division and now special agent in charge of Miami, told over 30 congressional staffers in March of 2012 that, contrary to the White House´s classification, the bureau does not refer to the Fort Hood shooting as "workplace violence." As head of the FBI counterterrorism division, Steinbach oversaw the investigation into the mass murder at Texas Army base. Steinbach made this claim during an unclassified counterterrorism briefing on Capitol Hill. “Do you guys teach your agents that Fort Hood was workplace violence?” one staffer asked.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|