A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Obama Fires Top General
Without Even a Phone Call
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Obama Fires Top General
Without Even a Phone Call

Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/25/2013 12:56:07 PM

President Barack Obama fired General James Mattis, the head of Central Command, without even calling the general to let him know he was being replaced. "I am told that General Mattis was travelling and in a meeting when an aide passed him a note telling him that the Pentagon had announced his replacement as head of Central Command. It was news to him -- he hadn´t received a phone call or a heads-up from anyone at the Pentagon or the White House," Thomas E. Ricks reports. In another post, Ricks says Mattis was fired because:

Comments:
What a low class, vile man 0bama is. Everything in this nation will be utterly destroyed when his reign of terror is over.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: stablemoney, 1/25/2013 1:02:43 PM     (No. 9138932)

As long as a person does their job, I have no problem with them having an opinion. Outcomes will happen and determine who is right.


Reply 2 - Posted by: richwill, 1/25/2013 1:04:53 PM     (No. 9138939)

More credence to the rumor that Hussein is replacing military leaders who may not fire upon civilian revolutionaries.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 1/25/2013 1:08:01 PM     (No. 9138946)

Details aside -and they sound very important indeed- this, if true, is no way to treat a top general. It is bad manners and it is bad policy. And it is dangerous - very dangerous. Just how does the administration think senior military officers, indeed all career military people, will feel about this way of treating a top commander? Actions like this can have unintended consequences. This is the work of amateurs.

If it is correct. These days, who knows what is true and what is false? Hillary had comforted us by telling us that it really doesn´t make any difference, but some of the more old fashioned among us cannot escape the nagging feeling that facts just might matter after all.

If it is a fact that Obama dismissed this general in this gratuitously offensive fashion, it adds weight to my belief that he, Obama, does not understand politics. He has no political ability. He does not know how to work with others - especially if they disagree. The whole business is beyond him, over his head. The reason some people think Obama has superb political skills is that he is a classic demagogue. His rhetoric can sway the masses and mislead the intelligentsia. But he is a tyrant at heart. He doesn´t understand the American system.


Reply 4 - Posted by: keekng, 1/25/2013 1:15:32 PM     (No. 9138964)

Bam Bam´s modus operandi....step on your opponents whenever possible.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Msctex1, 1/25/2013 1:20:43 PM     (No. 9138974)

Why assume the General learned of his firing after Obama? I honestly do not necessarily believe the man is that far within the loop of his own Administration.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 1/25/2013 1:37:28 PM     (No. 9139004)

Reminds me of that video of Saddam Hussein

in an auditorium full of government types as he announces who is to be taken outside and shot in the head.

Kill one....scare a hundred.

However....military types may not go down the garden path with Spooky.

If he isn´t worried about the loyalty of the military.....he should be.

Semper Fi


Reply 7 - Posted by: mythman, 1/25/2013 1:40:11 PM     (No. 9139012)

It is not clear from the article why he was fired. What was meant in regards to his attitude about Iranians having nuclear weapons? If he was against the denial to Iran of nuclear weapons because Iran could take conventional action against our interests after their destruction, he was a fool. If he was in favor of destroying Iranian nuclear weapons because having them would also encourage Iran to take more conventional actions against our interests, he was a patriot.

I believe Obama said plainly somewhere that Iran will not be allowed to have nuclear weapons. Let´s hope that´s true


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: CEP, 1/25/2013 1:43:50 PM     (No. 9139018)

This General is much more distinguished than Obama and this is not the way you treat someone who has given the best years of their life to the country. Obama is a low class jerk not worthy to shine this Generals shoes.


Reply 9 - Posted by: F16 guy, 1/25/2013 1:55:43 PM     (No. 9139035)


#2 has heard the rumors. Here´s something in writing:

http://www.examiner.com/article/shock-claim-obama-only-wants-military-leaders-who-will-fire-on-u-s-citizens


Reply 10 - Posted by: terry_tr6, 1/25/2013 1:56:25 PM     (No. 9139037)

i fear in the near future we will need people like the general. It is good he is now available for duty


Reply 11 - Posted by: right-turn, 1/25/2013 2:01:12 PM     (No. 9139045)

Just another example of how the Obama administration is a real ´class act´.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Penney, 1/25/2013 2:20:15 PM     (No. 9139077)

Apparently, beginning in the 1960´s & definately during the 1970´s, the perverted generation of radical lefty/lib/statist dem pols burst into the political arena, first targeting the military with legislated policies intended to deminish, (-destroy?!), America´s strength to defend freedom. ´´Peace through strength,´´ had already historically proved its merit, but militant lefties simply can´t tolerate that wisdom as it defeats their communal BIG Governmental goal.

The current beltway dem pols who emerged from that hippie/dippie/lefty militant gang, such as Kerry, have consistantly supported an ruthless agenda of statist policies which but prove that the entire dem party leadership, ...as so eloquently once stated by slick, ´´loath the military,´´ This time their words do match their actions.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: PChristopher, 1/25/2013 2:22:30 PM     (No. 9139083)

He´s one skinny, mouthy community agitator who couldn´t lead from the front if his life depended on it. I have to wonder if the military shouldn´t exploit this weakness in our enemy and act like patriots.


Reply 14 - Posted by: JAN, 1/25/2013 2:22:50 PM     (No. 9139084)

Another Commander in Chief who loathes the military.


Reply 15 - Posted by: lil dotty, 1/25/2013 2:27:28 PM     (No. 9139091)

When asked by Two Won whether or not he would fire upon US Citizens, he must have said NO. Thus the door was shown to him. Only those who will accept our pResident´s orders without question will be allowed to serve.


Reply 16 - Posted by: nonsense, 1/25/2013 2:33:41 PM     (No. 9139097)

Chain of command, Soros to ValJar, and ValJar to Mr. o. An incredibly scary story, and far too easy to believe.


Reply 17 - Posted by: pineledger, 1/25/2013 2:39:05 PM     (No. 9139110)

He is gutting the military.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: nonsense, 1/25/2013 2:40:58 PM     (No. 9139113)

oh, I went to the link #9 provided and that is what I was thinking about.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Magic8Ball, 1/25/2013 2:41:33 PM     (No. 9139116)

Maybe he sent Susan Rice to fire him


Reply 20 - Posted by: melman, 1/25/2013 2:44:15 PM     (No. 9139121)

In my opinion Obama and many in his administration are enemy’s to our Constitution. There has to be at some time those who will rise and be faithful to their sworn oath "to protect and defend the Constitution from ALL enemies foreign and DOMESTIC".


Reply 21 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 1/25/2013 2:47:27 PM     (No. 9139133)

The General`s firing was a message to other military personnel to keep their mouths shut.


Reply 22 - Posted by: jerseyden, 1/25/2013 3:12:05 PM     (No. 9139174)

This is just what Morsi in Egypt did when he won the election. Remove all top military leaders who may still be loyal to the constitution. We may have a Fascist in charge now, but he really wants it to be communism. We are in for a long four years. Hope we survive as a free democracy till then.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: trapper, 1/25/2013 3:36:47 PM     (No. 9139215)

Did no one see the front page story in the WSJ this morning? General Mattis this month banned Kam Air, the largest private airline in Afghanistan, from getting any military contracts because they are alleged to have been smuggling bulk amounts of opium on civilian flights. Now Obama has fired Mattis.

Did the good general jeopardize the illegal drug profits of someone who is connected?


Reply 24 - Posted by: Rafter, 1/25/2013 3:39:40 PM     (No. 9139220)

The aide who delivered the note lip-synced the firing message.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Sergeant Major, 1/25/2013 6:03:55 PM     (No. 9139467)

Grrrrrrrrrrrr.......


Reply 26 - Posted by: BadgerBill, 1/25/2013 7:10:21 PM     (No. 9139571)

What a POS you are boy.

Ladies, please pardon my French.


Reply 27 - Posted by: saraguay, 1/26/2013 1:50:13 AM     (No. 9139949)

what difference does it make? few people will read this and it will get little, if any t.v. time. i think the book Animal Farm needs to be required reading by every american. i will most likely be dead by the time of the next revolution but my children and grandchildren will have to be prepared to defend themselves in every way possible.


Reply 28 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/26/2013 4:16:59 AM     (No. 9139987)

Obviously Obama wants the 4-star generals to simply be his yes men, showing that he has little or no respect for their experience and knowledge of all things military. This is just another consequence of the election and could end up with a lot of Americans being killed someday.



Post Reply   Close thread 720578




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



IRS Offices Closed in Northern
Arizona on Day of Tea Party Protests
Townhall, by Katie Pavlich    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 8:49:11 PM     Post Reply
IRS offices in Flagstaff and Prescott, Ariz. were temporarily closed Tuesday as protests of IRS offices around the country were planned by Tea Party activists. "They have a notice up that says ´temporarily closed," said Tom Case, a Lake Havasu resident.Case drove three hours and 200 miles Tuesday with his wife to participate in the IRS protest of the Flagstaff office, located at 1633 S. Plaza Way. This was going to be Case´s first rally. "I follow the politics of the Tea Party, I´m not necessarily a hardcore tea party person," Case said. "This IRS thing to me is

Taking the Fifth -- What It
Does (& Doesn´t Do) for Lerner
Townhall, by Carol Platt Liebau    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 8:36:48 PM     Post Reply
Tomorrow, Lois Lerner -- director of Exempt Organizations at the IRS when all the targeting occurred -- is going to come to Capitol Hill and take the Fifth Amendment. It will be quite a spectacle. As a matter of law, a jury cannot use someone´s invocation of the Fifth Amendment as evidence of guilt. But we are not in a court of law -- we are in the court of public opinion, as everyone in The White House knows, and Lerner wouldn´t be taking the Fifth unless she was in danger of prosecution . . . or

Three Labor Unions, Including
Teamsters, Want ObamaCare
Repealed; When Will Media
Report?
NewsBusters, by Matt Vespa    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 8:28:00 PM     Post Reply
As the media, by and large, ignores the train wreck that is on the horizon with ObamaCare, yet another union has jumped ship on the president’s health care overhaul. Back in April, you may recall, the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers, and Allied Workers officially said thanks but no thanks to the president’s plan. Well, now, a major labor union in the grocery industry is balking at the policy. According to The Hill: The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president —

BuzzFeed’s Anburajan: Ted Cruz a
‘LINO’ — ‘Latino in Name Only’
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 8:20:46 PM     Post Reply
In a post on her Twitter account, Buzzfeed Director of Partnership Development Aswini Anburajan took a swipe at Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz’s ethnicity, calling him a “LINO,” or a “latino in name only.” Anburajan, who is also a contributor to WNYC’s “It’s a Free Country” blog, the website for the New York City NPR affiliate, also knocked Cruz’s presidential aspirations for his opposition to giving undocumented immigrants government benefits : “Ted Cruz is a LINO ‘latino in name only’ good luck w/ prez aspirations w/ that stand on undoc immig and benefits”

Outgoing IRS Chief: IRS Targeted
Conservatives to ‘Be More Efficient’
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 8:11:34 PM     Post Reply
Outgoing IRS Commissioner Steven Miller told a Senate committee Tuesday that the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative groups was not partisan, but merely “foolish mistakes” made by employees trying to be “more efficient.” “I do not believe that partisanship motivated the people who engaged in the practices described in the Treasury Inspector General’s report,” Miller said in his opening statement before the Senate Finance Committee. “I reviewed the Treasury Inspector General’s report and I believe its conclusions are consistent with that.” “I think that what happened here was that foolish mistakes were

Krauthammer On IRS Scandal:
"This Is Going To Go On
And It Could Be Fatal"
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 8:01:43 PM     Post Reply
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Here´s why this has legs: Number one, as Kirsten says, everybody is outraged. Everybody knows what the IRA can do, and everybody´s afraid of it. Second, because you now have somebody that´s going to plead the Fifth, in a court of law, the jury is not supposed to interpret that as hiding something, but this isn´t a court of law, and we aren´t a jury. Clearly there´s something happening here. Everybody understands there is a red flag. And last is the fact who was a member of Congress who was just up there? That was the

Carney Likens Questions About
Scandals To Birth Certificate
Controversy
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 7:57:08 PM     Post Reply
MAJOR GARRETT, CBS NEWS: On Sunday, Dan Pfeiffer said that one thing Republicans do when they lack an agenda is try -- I’m quoting him directly -- “try to drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.” Can you describe what he’s talking about? JAY CARNEY, WHITE HOUSE: I think we have a history here already for the past several years of attempts by Republicans to politicize matters -- GARRETT: Is there anything that´s -- an issue now fall into that category in your opinion -- in the White House’s opinion?



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

44 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

Democratic Senator uses Okla.
tornado for anti-GOP rant
over global warming

39 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM     Post Reply
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care


Post Reply   Close thread 720578





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~