A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Schools must provide
sports for disabled, US says
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Schools must provide
sports for disabled, US says

Associated Press, by Philip Elliott

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 1/25/2013 5:11:02 AM

WASHINGTON -- Students with disabilities must be given a fair shot to play on a traditional sports team or have their own leagues, the Education Department says. Disabled students who want to play for their school could join traditional teams if officials can make "reasonable modifications" to accommodate them. If those adjustments would fundamentally alter a sport or give the student an advantage, the department is directing the school to create parallel athletic programs that have comparable standing to traditional programs. "Sports can provide invaluable lessons in discipline, selflessness, passion and courage, and this guidance will help schools ensure

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: lydwho, 1/25/2013 5:27:56 AM     (No. 9137972)

And if the school doesn´t have enoough disabled, they will be required to break the leg of the first 3 people in line. (And one of them will have to be homosexual).

Art


Reply 2 - Posted by: scurfie, 1/25/2013 5:55:04 AM     (No. 9137991)

Hmm we are currently working with a salary freeze and the US department of ED is directing school districts to provide MORE sports programs? Somebody has to tell the dept of ED we are broke.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: privateer, 1/25/2013 5:57:32 AM     (No. 9137994)

Next up: it´s unfair that stupid kids are denied a spot on the academic bowl team.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Patchy Groundfog, 1/25/2013 6:05:45 AM     (No. 9138000)

Today´s liberal lesson in ´selflessness´: create bogus teams so that selfish liberals can undermine another traditional institution.

The view is quite hazy frm the ivory tower so these utopians may not know that sports teams are expensive. Lack of funding forces them to pay for travel, uniforms, etc. Facilities are usually booked solid due to that other liberal debacle known as Title IX. And who will coach the wheelchair pole vault team?

As usual the feel-goodism fails to take reality Into account.


Reply 5 - Posted by: rabbit, 1/25/2013 6:11:20 AM     (No. 9138006)

Using a visual cue for a deaf runner makes sense.

Letting someone compete in a racing wheelchair against runners makes no sense.

This could turn out to be smart, like in the first example, or stupid, like in the second example (both from the article).


Reply 6 - Posted by: jalo1951, 1/25/2013 6:20:18 AM     (No. 9138012)

I have a lot to say on this subject but will just put it into a few words. This is stupid.


Reply 7 - Posted by: jeff100, 1/25/2013 6:24:32 AM     (No. 9138014)

This is just retarded


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Janjan, 1/25/2013 6:34:48 AM     (No. 9138024)

This is what I hate about stupid stupid liberals.


Reply 9 - Posted by: truthfetish, 1/25/2013 6:37:33 AM     (No. 9138027)

Next . . . front line infantry. Go, lefties, go!

/s


Reply 10 - Posted by: pineledger, 1/25/2013 6:37:34 AM     (No. 9138028)

When you´re grown up, you realize that we are not all created equal. And there is a reason for that.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Lala, 1/25/2013 6:42:41 AM     (No. 9138033)

In the school district where I live, all sports and other extra curricular activities were lost for one year due to budget issues. This ruling could kill them permanently. What school district could afford this? I think the Dept. of Ed did this not to be inclusive but to be intentionally destructive.


Reply 12 - Posted by: yourblueroom, 1/25/2013 6:46:14 AM     (No. 9138037)

um, so what about the non-disabled kids who didn´t make varsity or JV? do they get their own teams too? what the frack?


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: hicksvillekid59, 1/25/2013 6:52:28 AM     (No. 9138040)

Great, now even the vertically disabled will have a spot on the basketball team.

And dimocrats will make the math team.


Reply 14 - Posted by: chillijilli, 1/25/2013 7:08:27 AM     (No. 9138056)

Maybe it´s time for all the non-disabled, un-hyphenated students of no color everywhere to just drop out of everything.


Reply 15 - Posted by: MickTurn, 1/25/2013 7:10:07 AM     (No. 9138059)

The Dept of Education does not educate anyone, it is a bureaucratic organization that basically does nothing but disrupt the education of our children and cause more paperwork. It is a negative organization, everything it does makes education worse and cost more. Time to totally get rid of this and many other Departments as they provide no value!

Now that this is settled, I suggest the Bureaucrats be made to be practice dummies, ball fetchers, second base bags and a host of useful things. Now the disabled kids will have bureaucrats doing something productive and they can schwack the heads of bureaucrats and call it T-Ball!


Reply 16 - Posted by: halfnorsk, 1/25/2013 8:01:00 AM     (No. 9138127)

"Official time-out to repair a flat tire on the halfback´s wheelchair."


Reply 17 - Posted by: jinx, 1/25/2013 8:01:24 AM     (No. 9138129)

School districts already spend more on Special Ed students than they do on regular students. They pay the teachers the same but the SE teachers only teach 1-8 students per day. We have one teacher who pushes a SP student from class to class and takes notes for him. She gets paid the same as any other teacher. SE teachers will have maybe 5 students and will get a paid aide. Regular teachers do not get aides and teach upwards of 130 students per day. This is stupid.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Judith, 1/25/2013 8:08:01 AM     (No. 9138147)

When I was in school here in MA, kennedy was potus and they concentrated on physical fitness. We also had a very well-equipped gym. Now, come forward 35 years, in that same town, and my son had almost no gym equipment in these same schools and their gym time was frequently spent standing with their backs to the walls, talking. This in a middle-income suburb of boston, ma. They couldn´t even offer my child who had no disabilities, an exercise regime. Liberals! Useless bunch of creatures.


Reply 19 - Posted by: STLstudent, 1/25/2013 8:17:28 AM     (No. 9138171)

Isn´t it Article 9 (demanding the Left´s view of gender equality) that has eliminated many men´s sports in colleges? The should do something similar in high school sports if a federal judge agrees with the Little Dictator´s bureaucracy.


Reply 20 - Posted by: civilservant, 1/25/2013 8:26:17 AM     (No. 9138191)

Demanding that others change to accomodate you is NOT going to teach ANYONE-players or hopefuls- ´Selflessness"

If anything it is a PERFECT example of SELFISHNESS.

But, typical to liberals they turn everything upside down.

Democrats delenda est, for the good of the planet.


Reply 21 - Posted by: a man over thirty, 1/25/2013 8:29:25 AM     (No. 9138199)

Well if Ben Bernanke will continue printing $40 billion a week and the Chinese will continue to loan us money I don´t see a problem with spending the billions it would take to implement this lunacy, do you?


Reply 22 - Posted by: lifelonghuman, 1/25/2013 8:52:38 AM     (No. 9138256)

Actually, by eliminating the D of E we will have enough money for EVERYONE to be on a sports team with enough left over for ribbons, if not plaques.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: sgtfox of the jarhead clan, 1/25/2013 8:53:55 AM     (No. 9138261)

If it´s time to integrate women into combat maybe we should integrate girls into high school football and hockey too. They should be sharing the same locker rooms just to make everything fair.


Reply 24 - Posted by: privateer, 1/25/2013 9:14:29 AM     (No. 9138317)

Liberalism is a cancer of the mind, a blight on the culture and the death of Liberty. Those who love it are evil incarnate.


Reply 25 - Posted by: stablemoney, 1/25/2013 9:14:29 AM     (No. 9138316)

Why don´t weak people get to play on the sport´s team? There are many more instances of weak people not being allowed participation, and it isn´t fair that they should be excluded.


Reply 26 - Posted by: G-Tom, 1/25/2013 9:27:35 AM     (No. 9138344)

Will there be wheelchair hurdles?


Reply 27 - Posted by: 3XALADY, 1/25/2013 9:39:37 AM     (No. 9138384)

I´m thinking some of the dudes in the Dept. of Edumacation must have ridden the short bus some time ago. W. T. H. !

My DH had construction company at one time and eventually wandered into school renovation. One of his jobs was to take a room in the school, totally tile it and make it a place for the wheelchair student to be taken - a few times a day - for a complete washdown and then be returned to class (with aide). Cost about $300,000. Student moves through that school and guess what he needs at the next school. And the next school. In the meantime we were donating boxes of copier paper to our grandson´s classes because he was bringing home papers that had been copied on used paper.


Reply 28 - Posted by: navybrat, 1/25/2013 9:45:01 AM     (No. 9138396)

The Dept. of Education should be eliminated. It should have never been created as there is no need for it and this is an example.


Reply 29 - Posted by: sooznews, 1/25/2013 9:48:21 AM     (No. 9138405)

Oh, goodie, next will be ugly women must be included in beauty contests.


Reply 30 - Posted by: toddh, 1/25/2013 10:56:55 AM     (No. 9138587)

Replace sports with video games.



Post Reply   Close thread 720510




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Despite the WaPost, Benghazi
Is a Major Scandal
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:16:56 AM     Post Reply
There’s a huge red flag in the Benghazi mess, but conservatives are letting the media get away with using a red herring to avoid it. Give the establishment media credit for obstinacy: Once it settles on a standard narrative or explanation for a particular subject, it shows remarkable discipline in explaining away any evidence that contradicts its own approved spin. So it has been with the media’s 250-day old determination to downplay the scandalous nature of the Obama administration’s treatment of its outpost in Benghazi before, during, and after the terrorist attack there that took four American lives.

Role of Health-Law
´Navigators´ Under Fire
Wall Street Journal, by Louise Radnofsky    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:14:03 AM     Post Reply
Lawmakers across the country are tussling over the Obama administration´s plans to create a small army of assistants to guide millions of Americans as they sign up for new health-insurance options available this fall. Backers of the health-care overhaul face an uphill battle to spread the word about the law, in the face of consumer research that suggests most uninsured people know little about it and are skeptical about the value of health insurance generally. Some Democrats have openly worried that the administration is doing too little to make sure the enrollment process goes smoothly. That is where the "patient navigators"

Labor unions break ranks with
White House on ObamaCare
The Hill [DC], by Kevin Bogardus    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:04:54 AM     Post Reply
Labor unions are breaking with President Obama on ObamaCare. Months after the president’s reelection, a variety of unions are publicly balking at how the administration plans to implement the landmark law. They warn that unless there are changes, the results could be catastrophic. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president — is very worried about how the reform law will affect its members’ healthcare plans. Last month, the president of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers released a statement calling “for repeal

Issa Warns Hillary
National Review Online, by Jonathan Strong    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:36:12 AM     Post Reply
Since Hillary Clinton last came up to Capitol Hill, we’ve learned senior State Department officials sought to scrub references to terrorism from the infamous Benghazi talking points to insulate Foggy Bottom from political criticism — citing concerns of their “building’s leadership” to justify the demands. The rising temperature of the scandal means it’s possible that Hillary could be asked to return and testify again. If she comes back, she had better be prepared, says House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa. “We are interviewing lots of people, most of them under oath,” Issa says, describing the “methodical” approach his committee

Billy Sol: Now That Was a Scandal
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:32:49 AM     Post Reply
We hear a lot, these days, about how President Obama is not like Lyndon Johnson and thanks be to heaven for that small mercy. The point seems to be that the president doesn´t know how to arm twist, sweet talk, bribe, and emasculate both friend and enemy (of which he truly had neither) in order to further his agenda. Since many among the chattering class believe, still, in that agenda, his is generally regarded as an excellent presidency. Never mind that more than half a century after Johnson declared war on poverty ...

How Hope and Change Gave
Way To Spying on the Press
Daily Beast, by Kirsten Powers    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:11:50 AM     Post Reply
First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out – because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out – because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a You Tube video, and – okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?Turns out, it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization, to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen,

Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi
Whistleblowers with Info
Devastating to Clinton and Obama
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:02:13 AM     Post Reply
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon. These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law. According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

48 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

Democratic Senator uses Okla.
tornado for anti-GOP rant
over global warming

39 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM     Post Reply
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care


Post Reply   Close thread 720510





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~