A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Panetta: ´Everyone Entitled to a
Chance´ to be Combat Soldier
in ´Gender Neutral´ Military
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Panetta: ´Everyone Entitled to a
Chance´ to be Combat Soldier
in ´Gender Neutral´ Military

Cybercast News Service, by Matt Cover

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/24/2013 7:34:22 PM

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Thursday that whether they are male or female "everyone is entitled to a chance" to become a combat soldier in a military that will now adopt "gender netural" standards. “If members of our military can meet the qualifications for a job--and let me be clear, we’re not talking about reducing the qualifications for a job--if they can meet the qualifications for the job then they should have the right to serve,” Panetta said at a Pentagon press conference. The Defense Department announced today that it would rescind its 1994 policy restricting women

Comments:
Un.be.lievable. I´m glad my father who was in the Navy in WWII is not here to see this disgraceful, shocking behavior of those in Washington. They are totally unleashed with 0bama´s re-election. They won´t be happy until they destroy everything in this country. It is infuriating.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 1/24/2013 7:40:31 PM     (No. 9137527)

Here they admit that standards will be lowered:

FTA: If we do decide that a particular standard is so high that women couldn’t make it, the burden is now on the service to come back and explain to the Secretary why is it that high, does it really have to be that high, Dempsey said.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Bpl40, 1/24/2013 7:51:21 PM     (No. 9137547)

If I was the mother or wife of someone going into harm´s way I would be livid. I am the father but luckily my son is back in one piece.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: god of irony, 1/24/2013 7:54:06 PM     (No. 9137553)

The result will be fewer women in the military. But then again there goal is to destroy the military.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: fmrusmc0302, 1/24/2013 7:54:58 PM     (No. 9137555)

agree with poster #2. The perfumed princes of the pentagon and their fellow lambs just don´t have to stones to dissent. They are just concerned about how many stars they can wear on their shoulders. This is a damned obscenity

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Sfacheem, 1/24/2013 7:57:04 PM     (No. 9137558)

Another d***less wonder.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/24/2013 8:01:00 PM     (No. 9137569)

There is no such thing as "gender neutral" in human nature. The liberal Democrats will want to see big results from this policy change to sooth the very liberal advocacy groups who have been pushing for this. In order to reach that level of desired result they are going to have to lower the physical fitness standard for females there is no way around that.

If females really could keep up with men physically you would see women playing baseball in the major leagues, basketball in the NBA, football in the NFL, and hockey in the NHL. The reason that women are not in those professional sports leagues is that their physical fitness would break down pretty quickly. It will be the same during sustained infantry type combat operations. If they would keep the standards up I would say give the woman a chance to show what they can do, but that´s not the way it works with the liberal Democrats.

Very few women want to go in the infantry. for the women who do, this will give them the chance to punch their ticket to qualify for higher rank. That´s really what all this is all about.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: CEP, 1/24/2013 8:11:37 PM     (No. 9137586)

With the current crop of so called leaders that are at the top in the military, there is no way that our country can defend itself. Everyone will be having to explain themselves lest they might insult the enemy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 1/24/2013 8:17:28 PM     (No. 9137598)

I say do it- do it now, before we get into something really big and really ansty. I have been in combat, some of the worst in modern warfare and was fortunate enough to be among the few survivors. Let me be the first to say, there is a reason the women are not playing NFL football. There is a reason women are not out there on the pro hard ball fields. and there is a very good reason women should never be brought onto the full scale battle field. Before folks get to shouting "Sexist" at me, they had better take in a huge dose of reality- leave their idiotic Angelina Jolie movies behind in the kiddies in childhood locker. The real world is full of horror and tough stuff. Putting women in the Chosen Reservoir, on Guadalcanal, or in the swampland battlefield of Vietnam will do a whole lot to get Americans killed in wholesale lots! AS in Desert Storm warm up in the navy- on the carriers, in two week of the run-up, the women on board began reporting to sick call claiming pregnant – doing all they could to get out of it when everyone though Saddam had ship killer missiles and lots of them. Very quickly, critical sections were left undermanned as the gals were taken off ship. I know how the mind reels when you get orders to go to a combat zone and you have a combat MOS! This Panetta thinking is nothing but liberal fantasy BS!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Mike PHX, 1/24/2013 8:19:16 PM     (No. 9137601)

"Oh, my non-balls! They got my non-balls!
Corpse-man! Corpse-man!!"

Thank GOD I grew up in the era that I did. You poor kids.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: crimea river, 1/24/2013 8:25:25 PM     (No. 9137613)

To Dimocrats the military is just another jobs program. Real ground combat is messy and expensive, and will be avoided at all costs. So in their minds, the ´Gender Neutral´ Military has no downside. This is where the real world will come crashing in.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: krause, 1/24/2013 8:29:19 PM     (No. 9137618)

Don´t forget to make room for the transgendered, too. In any stage, thereof.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: CEP, 1/24/2013 8:55:29 PM     (No. 9137654)

But what Panetta forgets is that not everyone is entitled to get someone killed because they just aren´t up to the job that is required especially one that involves combat in the military. It ain´t just about shooting a gun.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 1/24/2013 8:58:40 PM     (No. 9137659)

Somewhere, Pat Schroeder is doing her little ´squinty smile´ at this. Barf.

Somewhere else, General George Patton is either weeping or cursing a blue streak. Probably both.

"Gender neutral" ? WTH is that ?!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 1/24/2013 9:04:26 PM     (No. 9137666)

There are several agendas and lots of confusion on this topic. There is nothing new in the idea - the Soviets, among others, were there long ago. So was Plato in the Republic. It is the logical extension of radical egalitarianism, which ultimately fades into totalitarianism. It is an interesting and perhaps fatal internal contradiction of democracy that it results in the abolition of the individual. Everybody is equal, nobody is different, difference is forbidden. Ridiculous scenarios ensue.

But there is an even deeper, if unacknowledged issue. Does America want to become the kind of society that sends its women -wives, daughters, mothers- to do its fighting for it? What are the implications of such a policy? More is involved than the ability to do the job and the inevitable consequences of putting young men and women together in close quarters. Have people really thought through the notion of gender neutrality?

Ironic, indeed, that the males of the Sixties skedaddled in large numbers when their country called them - and now the same crowd is all in favor of putting women on the front lines.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: beancounter, 1/24/2013 9:09:09 PM     (No. 9137672)

So when do women start registering for the draft?

The administration is good at handing out goodies, lousy at carrying out its duties.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Penney, 1/24/2013 9:09:22 PM     (No. 9137673)

The formerly required physical standards have already been changed & the bar has been lowered throughout law enforcement in order to accommodate unrealistic social experimentation, and now the military is being forced to do the same, which presents an even more ominous threat to the security of the entire country? This will not work out well.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Reillybinx, 1/24/2013 9:18:41 PM     (No. 9137690)

Enlistments have been at an all-time low since Obama became President.
Proof now that the dems have a war on women!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 1/24/2013 9:21:16 PM     (No. 9137694)

Hmmm - - I wonder how many "gender-neutral? men will become pregnant in the combat zone?

By the way, Leon - - "gender" is a grammatical term. What you really meant to say is "sex neutral" - - isn´t it?

Yeah - - that´s what I thought.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Pros7767, 1/24/2013 9:34:47 PM     (No. 9137709)

These people have truly lost their minds! Any woman who wants to be on the front lines against the Islamists has lost hers too.

I wonder how many men will lose their lives trying to protect their female counterparts because of this idiotic policy. I am sooooo tired of this administration, the feminists and the liberal/progressives. They all disgust me.

And I´m a woman.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: reilly, 1/24/2013 9:37:47 PM     (No. 9137712)


They´ll love taking a dump in a foxhole.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Keekng, 1/24/2013 9:51:50 PM     (No. 9137739)

The obamanation is doing everything possible to ruin this country.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: billa, 1/24/2013 10:20:31 PM     (No. 9137771)

I am woman and believe in all kinds of "equality" and people who have the skills to have an opportunity to prove it. But not on this point. But lower standards to accommodate a privilege group has no place in our domestic and national defense.

I understand the argument regarding the rank system and the ways to fast track to advancement, but not at the cost of our soldier´s lives and our defense.

Any one who believes in gender neutrality is utterly ignorant of human nature.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: smcchk, 1/24/2013 10:26:56 PM     (No. 9137777)

Every day, the Islamists´ day is made by the USA. They can not believe their luck.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: The Advocate, 1/24/2013 10:30:21 PM     (No. 9137780)

Obama is systematically weakening our military.
He is turning it into the USPS for jobs.
Obama sent Amb. Stevens to Benghazi to be sodomized and murdered.
Why should women be any different?
He truly is The Lord of the flies.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Revolution76, 1/24/2013 10:37:56 PM     (No. 9137786)

How many gang rapes by enemy combatants and women who didn´t know they were pregnant coming home in body bags will it take before this insanity ends?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: manitouman, 1/24/2013 11:37:19 PM     (No. 9137845)

A soldier is entitled to honor among his leaders.

That´s the only entitlement in the military.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: otronome, 1/25/2013 12:00:10 AM     (No. 9137857)

Nex t high priority exercise and budget allocation will be implementing wheel chair ramps to all combat zones so absolutely nobody is left out. After making all accomodations and access points comply with ADA, a special task force will design battl filed accommodations for the blind.

Why have any priority other than "fairness" however it might be defined.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: doctorfixit, 1/25/2013 1:11:44 AM     (No. 9137895)

The military is now thoroughly politicized. You cannot get rank without passing the PC tests. They will dumb down the tests, just like they did for firemen and policemen. But the politicizing has far more ominous threats, because top officers are now being pressured into thinking about firing on US citizens.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/25/2013 1:40:24 AM     (No. 9137917)

Obama and his liberal crew are micro managers when it comes to implementing liberal social policies in the military and elsewhere. In that respect the admirals and generals that Obama has put on the Joint Chiefs of Staff have been relegated to being nothing more then yes men when it comes to liberal policies like this.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: PChristopher, 1/25/2013 1:44:07 AM     (No. 9137921)

Has Panetta ever served? The Sec. of Defense and, most importantly, the Prezdent, should be required to have served. It gives a better perspective.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: tommyr, 1/25/2013 9:27:08 AM     (No. 9138343)

According to Wikipedia, Panetta served two years as a Lieutenant in Army Intelligence.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 720471




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Baby philanthropists wooed by Obama:
Administration invites Rockefeller,
Marriott and Hilton heirs to talk
about future of philanthropy
Daily Mail [UK], by Alex Greig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/19/2014 10:54:26 AM     Post Reply
Some of the country´s richest young people came together at the White House recently for a day-long conference about how exactly they plan to spend their inherited wealth. The invitation-only event sought to engage the young billionaires with the public sector and with each other in order to empower and advance their philanthropic endeavors. The event was organized by Thomas Khalil, a deputy director for technology and innovation in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy along with Nexus, an organization that aims to encourage philanthropy among the young and rich. Founded by Jonah Wittkamper and

Report: Wendy Davis caught
up in FBI investigation
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/18/2014 10:44:20 PM     Post Reply
The FBI is probing past legal work done by Texas gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis, according to a report her Republican opponent’s campaign calls a “bombshell.” The Dallas Morning News reported Friday that documents “related to Sen. Wendy Davis’ work as a lawyer for the North Texas Tollway Authority are part of an FBI inquiry of the agency.” The news outlet said it’s unclear how much this investigation revolves around Davis, the Democratic nominee for governor. “It’s not clear whether Davis’ work for the tollway authority is a focus of the FBI or only part of the material collected in connection

Google: the unelected superpower
Telegraph [UK], by Katherine Rushton    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/18/2014 10:36:46 PM     Post Reply
Researchers at Princeton and Northwestern universities have pored over 1,800 US policies and concluded that America is an oligarchy. Instead of looking out for the majority of the country’s citizens, the US government is ruled by the interests of the rich and the powerful, they found. No great surprises there, then. But the government is not the only American power whose motivations need to be rigourously examined. Some 2,400 miles away from Washington, in Silicon Valley, Google is aggressively gaining power with little to keep it in check. It has cosied up to governments around the world so effectively that its chairman,

Dem Rep: Obamacare will bury us
Legal Insurrection, by William A. Jacobson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/18/2014 10:31:00 PM     Post Reply
Steve Lynch is a Democratic Rep. from Massachusetts who doesn’t hesitate to buck the party line from a centrist point of view, and to speak openly about problems in the party and with party positions. Lynch ran for Senate to fill John Kerry’s seat, but lost in the primary to now-Senator Ed Markey. Lynch recently was interviewed by The Boston Herald about upcoming Obamacare problems and how devastating they will be for Democrats. That runs contrary to cut current news cycle Democratic spin that (allegedly) meeting sign up goals means electoral problems related to Obamacare are over. U.S. Rep. Stephen Lynch, the

“Hallelujah” Irish priest to headline NY
Town Hall Irish concert May 13 (Videos)
Irish Central [New York], by Kate Hickey    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/18/2014 10:14:05 PM     Post Reply
Father Ray Kelly, the singing Irish priest who shot to fame with his wedding ceremony cover of “Hallelujah,” will perform in New York, on Tuesday May 13, to support the Irish Lobby for Immigration Reform. On April 7 a short video of the 60-year-old priest, from Oldcastle, County Meath, singing at a recent wedding ceremony went live. In just 11 days the touching video has racked up close to 30 million hits on YouTube and his fame now reaches to every corner of the earth. As his video gathered traction online Fr Kelly was a guest on RTE’s “Late Late Show.” He told host Ryan Tubridy that he hoped his new found fame

Documents: Biden and Kerry both
opposed Hillarycare before
they supported Obamacare
Daily Caller, by Patrick Howley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/18/2014 10:01:25 PM     Post Reply
Then-Sens. Joe Biden and John Kerry were both opposed to Hillary Clinton’s 1993 health-care reform program, according to documents released by the Clinton presidential library. Clinton marked a handwritten “No” beside Biden’s name on Clinton’s list of Capitol Hill lawmakers that she needed to win over for her universal health care law, known as the “Clinton health plan” or “Hillarycare,” to pass. John Kerry, meanwhile, was marked with a “Probably not.” “Hillarycare” ended up dying in the Democratic-controlled Senate in 1994 without coming to a floor vote. As vice president, Biden has been a loyal supporter of the Obama administration’s

The ´soft despotism´ of regulation
imposes high costs on Americans
Washington Examiner, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/18/2014 9:37:39 PM     Post Reply
Wayne Crews of the Competitive Enterprise Institute and Alexis de Tocqueville, author of the classic Democracy in America, were born in different times and places. But the French aristocrat and American think tanker have the measure of the federal behemoth in the age of Obama. Writing in 1835, Tocqueville eloquently predicted how it would function, while Crews today supplies in his annual compilation of federal rules and regulations, “10,000 Commandments,” the hard numbers that describe the behemoth´s contemporary reach and costs. It is always worthwhile to revisit de Tocqueville’s description of what he called the



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Kim Novak responds to post-
Oscars ridicule: ‘I was bullied.’

54 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Soroya Nadia McDonald    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/18/2014 5:02:40 AM     Post Reply
After presenting at the Academy Awards this year, Kim Novak didn’t want to leave her house. The Hitchcock screen siren, 81, was too humiliated to venture from her home near the Rogue River in Oregon. She read the cruel posts and Internet snark about her appearance, and it was just too much. “It got to me like it gets kids and teenagers,” she told the Associated Press. The “Vertigo” actress, considered one of the great beauties in her day, posted a note on her Facebook wall Thursday, acknowledging that she’d gotten fat injections in her face and addressing her halted

Analysis: Obama Celebrates
Eight Million ´Enrollments,´
Again Declares Debate ´Over´

45 replie(s)
Townhall, by Guy Benson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:56:28 PM     Post Reply
President Obama addressed the White House press corps today, announcing that with the final numbers in, Obamacare´s exchanges have attracted eight million sign-ups -- 35 percent of whom are "under the age of 35," he said. Several elements of his comments were misleading: (1) At first blush, the 35 percent stat is both significant and impressive. As recently as last month, the share of "young invincibles" signing up for plans was struggling in the 25 percent range, far short of the actuarial target of nearly 40 percent. A leap into the mid-30´s, while still shy of the goal, would constitute a major step, and would bode well for the risk pools'

The Folly Of The Bundy Ranch Rebellion
44 replie(s)
The Federalist, by Grace Olmstead    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 4:21:46 AM     Post Reply
It’s the stuff of Westerns: a showdown on the desert plains, the big bad government against an underdog farmer. Though the story has only grabbed national headlines in the past several days, rancher Cliven Bundy has illegally grazed cattle on the Nevada land surrounding his farm for over 20 years. He hasn’t paid grazing fees since 1993, and refuses to renew the necessary grazing permit.(Snip)Rather than using the avenues and pathways presented to him, Bundy has staunchly declared his own law and allegiances. Unfortunately, reality doesn’t work this way. If only it did—we could rebel for paying stupid taxes, refuse to

Students Demand Acknowledgement of
Robert E. Lee´s ´Racist and Dishonorable Conduct´

43 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by AWR Hawkins    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/18/2014 12:35:28 PM     Post Reply
A group of seven multiracial Washington and Lee University (W&L) students are demanding the school remove all Confederate flags from campus and "acknowledge" General Robert E. Lee´s "dishonorable side." According to the Roanoke Times, "seven multiracial students, calling themselves ´The Committee,´" have also demanded the school "acknowledge and apologize for participating in chattel slavery." They want recognition of "Martin Luther King Jr. Day on the undergraduate campus" and an end to "neo-Confederates" marching across campus "to the Lee Chapel on Lee-Jackson Day." The students say they will "engage in civil disobedience" if their demands are not met by September 1st. They added: "The

White House blames fox for
destroying Michelle’s garden

43 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Vince Coglianese    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 3:59:04 PM     Post Reply
The White House is going to war with another fox — and this time, it’s personal. The Wall Street Journal reports that a red fox has been causing chaos around the White House, tripping security alarms, digging up Michelle’s garden and distracting the president from his duties. The Secret Service won’t give any details about how often the fox trips the White House’s obviously sophisticated security alarms, but rest assured, officials say, they’re watching. President Obama was apparently “stunned” to see the fox roaming freely down the oft-photographed White House colonnade, home to the world’s shortest, but most dramatic, outdoor strolls. The bushy-tailed visitor

Living in the New York Times World
36 replie(s)
American Thinker, by J. Paul Masko    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/19/2014 7:48:36 AM     Post Reply
I began reading the entirety of the first section of the New York Times at nine years old, and continued that practice, more or less, for decades.(snip) ...the power of reverence, intrinsic to what I call the “cascade” of The Times: the near avalanche-like flow and distribution of information through electronic and print networks: through like-minded network newscasts, magazines, local newspaper s, blogs, daytime talk TV, late-night entertainment, statements at media award ceremonies, the celebrity Twitterverse, etc. The cascade rolls through Saturday Night Live, Jon Stewart, The New Yorker, the mouths of third-grade teachers, Elmo, Madonna and Susan Sarandon …through

In a Hole, Golf Considers
Digging a Wider One

31 replie(s)
New York Times, by Bill Pennington    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/19/2014 10:48:33 AM     Post Reply
GREENSBORO, Ga. — Golf holes the size of pizzas. Soccer balls on the back nine. A mulligan on every hole. These are some of the measures — some would say gimmicks — that golf courses across the country have experimented with to stop people from quitting the game. Golf has always reveled in its standards and rich tradition. But increasingly a victim of its own image and hidebound ways, golf has lost five million players in the last decade, according to the National Golf Foundation, with 20 percent of the existing 25 million golfers apt to quit in the next few years. People under 35 have especially spurned the game, saying it takes too


Post Reply   Close thread 720471





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~