A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Women in Combat ´Part of
Another Social Experiment,´
Says Retired Army General
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Women in Combat ´Part of
Another Social Experiment,´
Says Retired Army General

Cybercast News Service, by Susan Jones

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/24/2013 1:58:53 PM

Retired Army Lt. Gen. William G. Boykin, the former head of the U.S. Special Forces Command, says infantry and other front-line units are no place for women, and it has nothing to do with their courage or capabilities: "The people making this decision are doing so as part of another social experiment, and they have never lived nor fought with an infantry or Special Forces unit," Boykin said in a statement released by the conservative Family Research Council, for whom he now works. "These units have the mission of closing with and destroying the enemy, sometimes

Comments:
Amen to that General! How do we ever repair the damage that is being done to us by radical leftists. Gen. Boykin has called the 0bama regime a Marxist insurgency. He was also forced out by the 0bama regime from speaking at West Point. All of the military members who speak the truth about 0bama are banished by this regime.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Redneck In NY, 1/24/2013 2:15:25 PM     (No. 9136901)

Liberals have ALWAYS viewed the military as a captive laboratory for their twisted social experiments.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: HistoryBuff, 1/24/2013 2:16:47 PM     (No. 9136907)

All males must register for the (non existant) draft at the age of 18.

Say that outloud, and ask when all 18 years old, male, female, straight or gay will register for the draft.

Oh, and that is all 18 year olds – including aliens – because in the ’60´s you could be drafted if you were 18 and resident of the USA.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: tulipwood, 1/24/2013 2:26:15 PM     (No. 9136923)

Good luck, ladies. You are on your own.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 4 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 1/24/2013 2:36:14 PM     (No. 9136940)

"I don´t care if we ARE under attack....I´m not going out looking like this!!!"

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: upstate54, 1/24/2013 2:42:48 PM     (No. 9136952)

If individual women can meet the same stringent strength and agility requirements as the men, then go for it. Otherwise no.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Rafter, 1/24/2013 3:24:07 PM     (No. 9137036)

New meaning to the term foxholes.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: EQKimball, 1/24/2013 3:24:32 PM     (No. 9137038)

We already know how female news reporters are treated when simply surrounded by a crowd of angry men during demonstrations in Cairo. There is no doubt that a worse fate will await female combat POWs captured by jihadists.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: boiler57, 1/24/2013 3:30:40 PM     (No. 9137055)

My solution: Don´t integrate them. Form up all women units, from private up to general if needed. Send them out, if they do good, Hooray. If they get creamed, tough noogies.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Theeo, 1/24/2013 3:47:00 PM     (No. 9137091)

Does this mean foxhole with bidet for the Special Forces couple?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: MattMusson, 1/24/2013 4:11:41 PM     (No. 9137142)

Three Words: Hostile Working Environment

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Conservativegirl, 1/24/2013 4:32:48 PM     (No. 9137181)

Allow me to deliver the lib/prog rebuttle to his comments. "Who cares what an old, retired general thinks?" You know that´s their attitude.


Girl´s Hubby

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: cactus, 1/24/2013 4:40:15 PM     (No. 9137197)

It will be interesting to see whether women continue to enlist at the current rates. I´m not seeing any guarantees that they won´t be forced to the front lines if the "need" is there whether they want to go or not. I believe we´ve already seen examples of what happens to women who are captured during the current war on terror.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: keekng, 1/24/2013 4:44:57 PM     (No. 9137208)

If you want to be treated like a man, you get to fight like a man. Unfortunately, too many want the position but lack the mental and physical ability.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Ida Lil, 1/24/2013 5:26:27 PM     (No. 9137310)

Since this issue arises because of promises made to special interest activists be fair. Don´t force a woman or a metro sexual into combat units but if they volunteer stand back and give them a chance to learn on the jop what combat really means..
To make that easier on men who believe women are special beings units should be formed by choice.
1. All gay and lesbian male oriented troops form one battle unit choice
2. All Gay and lesbian female oriented troops can help keep assistance flowing to the front lines
3. All straight troops men or women can fill their choices too-- free from the stress caused mixed abilities.
Activists now without a cause probably will just fade away and a balance of lives and living can be achieved to our benefit.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Doc Obiwan, 1/24/2013 5:31:08 PM     (No. 9137319)

Dittoes, Sir. General Boykin has long been a teller of unpopular truths in a politically correct world, and has caught a lot of flack because of it. Usually he´s right.

He certainly is in this case.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: globalwarmer, 1/24/2013 5:33:25 PM     (No. 9137324)

Boykin nails it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: mickturn, 1/24/2013 5:43:17 PM     (No. 9137345)

Guarantee: Standards will be lowered so Fems don´t fail...the courses. On the battlefield it will be life/death and I´m afraid our ´Guys´ will die either saving or being saved by fems that just can´t do it.

The less than 1% that can measure up will be hired away by the Ruskies. They like Tough Women!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 

Post Reply   Close thread 720434




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Facebook removes my post about
Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy
Fox News, by Todd Starnes    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 9:45:44 PM     Post Reply
Your friendly neighborhood columnist has once again run afoul of Facebook’s elusive community standards. Now before you call up the preacher and put me on the church prayer list – let me assure the posting was neither unseemly nor ungentlemanly. This time I was censored for writing something about Rancher Cliven Bundy. I realized I had landed in the Facebook gulag when I tried to post our daily Bible verse. However, I was unable to post anything because Facebook had taken great offense to something I had written. “We removed something your page posted,” Facebook told me in a rather unpleasant message.

Analysis: Obama Celebrates
Eight Million ´Enrollments,´
Again Declares Debate ´Over´
Townhall, by Guy Benson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:56:28 PM     Post Reply
President Obama addressed the White House press corps today, announcing that with the final numbers in, Obamacare´s exchanges have attracted eight million sign-ups -- 35 percent of whom are "under the age of 35," he said. Several elements of his comments were misleading: (1) At first blush, the 35 percent stat is both significant and impressive. As recently as last month, the share of "young invincibles" signing up for plans was struggling in the 25 percent range, far short of the actuarial target of nearly 40 percent. A leap into the mid-30´s, while still shy of the goal, would constitute a major step, and would bode well for the risk pools'

Democrat: Voters ´Frustrated
and Embarrassed´ by Obamacare
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:51:55 PM     Post Reply
Rep. Colleen Hanabusa (D-HI) says her constituents are "frustrated and embarrassed" by Hawaii´s failed Obamacare exchange, which cost taxpayers $204 million and signed up only 8,000 people. On Wednesday, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) announced it will launch an investigation into Hawaii´s busted Obamacare program. "This is not a partisan issue, this is an economic issue," said state Sen. Sam Slom. Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie previously predicted "hundreds of thousand of people" would sign up for Obamacare in the President´s home state. On Thursday, President Barack Obama tried to rally Democrats to

Fox News Poll: 49 percent think White
House had IRS target conservatives
Fox News, by Dana Blanton    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:47:35 PM     Post Reply
Nearly half of American voters think the IRS targeted conservative groups at the request of the White House, and most want Congress to keep investigating the matter. The latest Fox News poll also finds 69 percent don’t feel President Obama has followed through on his vow to “find out exactly what happened on this.” By a 49-41 percent margin, voters believe the Obama administration “intentionally had the IRS target conservative political groups.” That includes 26 percent of Democrats, 52 percent of independents and 71 percent of Republicans. Meanwhile, 67 percent of voters want Congress to keep investigating the IRS until

   

 



 
Lawmakers Call for Examination of Hate
Speech in Media Bill introduced in wake
of Kansas City shooting
Adweek, by Katy Bachman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:22:11 PM     Post Reply
Reacting to Sunday´s hate crime at two Jewish centers in Kansas City, Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) introduced today a bill to update the government´s 20-year-old report on hate speech in the media. The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014 would examine the role of the Internet and other telecommunications in encouraging hate crimes based on gender, religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation, and would provide recommendations to address such crimes. On Sunday, the eve of the Jewish Passover, a 73-year-old man shot and killed three people at the Jewish Community Center

Report: Obama Considering Bond
Hearings for Detained Illegal Immigrants
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 7:53:38 PM     Post Reply
Even though the number of illegal immigrants who have been deported through the courts has dropped by 43% since President Barack Obama took office, the Obama administration may enact administrative changes to allow bond hearings for detained illegal immigrants. According to the Los Angeles Times, this could result in "several thousand" illegal immigrants being released from jails and "could slow the pace of deportations" even more. The Times notes that the White House is scrambling to "ease the concerns of Latino groups and other traditional allies that have turned on President Obama in recent weeks" by trying to brand him

Eric Cantor: Obama and I totally
had an angry conversation about
immigration yesterday
Hot Air, by Allahpundit    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 7:41:24 PM     Post Reply
It’s pitiful that we’ve reached this point, but Obama’s account of this chat really is more credible than Cantor’s. O’s position on immigration is straightforward: He wants amnesty badly, partly for legacy reasons and partly because he’s understandably keen to legalize a few million future Democratic voters, and he’s hoping the GOP will go along so that he doesn’t have to do something risky like an executive moratorium on deportations. The GOP leadership’s position is anything but straightforward. They’re convinced that they need to pass some sort of immigration bill before 2016 or else Latinos will hand the White House



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Has Rush Limbaugh Finally
Reached the End Of The Road?

47 replie(s)
Forbes Magazine, by Rick Ungar    Original Article
Posted By: EveningStar- 4/16/2014 7:24:05 PM     Post Reply
Like him or hate him, there is no disputing that Rush Limbaugh’s very special brand of mixing right-wing politics with his flare for entertainment has produced one of the most successful radio programs in the medium’s long history. Whatever the burning political question of the day, millions of Americans have relished the opportunity to tune into Rush’s program, knowing that he would quickly take that hot potato, throw a few gallons of verbal kerosene into the mix and elevate the matter into a five alarm fire with a just a few well-chosen words spoken in the style only Rush Limbaugh could

Michelle Obama Riverdances
Through Dublin to the Tune
of $7,921,638

40 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Tom Fitton    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/17/2014 6:45:16 AM     Post Reply
When it comes to tracking the cost of Obama family vacations, there are two primary challenges. First, the Obamas are prolific jet-setters, so there are many details to track. Second, the Obama administration, clearly embarrassed by these lavish and frequent family vacations, stonewalls the release of records at every turn. But we have been relentless in pursuit of this information. Our attorneys file the lawsuits and make our case, and our investigators pour through pages of records and crunch the numbers. And the information we’ve uncovered – information that would otherwise remain under lock and key – shows that the

Why is US Senator Harry
Reid so concerned with
a local Nevada rancher?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Wayne Allyn Root    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:37:12 PM     Post Reply
I live in Las Vegas. I live and breath Nevada politics. Something is very wrong. Something smells rotten in the Nevada desert. And Senator Harry Reid’s fingerprints are all over it. I am of course referring to the Bundy Ranch siege. This was a dispute between a Nevada ranching family with rights to the land in question for 140 years and the BLM (Bureayu of Land Management). The government claims they haven’t paid grazing fees for 20 years. The result was a government assault on the ranch- including snipers with assault rifles, SUV’s, helicopters, airplanes and over 200 heavily armed troops. No

Which Actor Portrays The
Best James Bond?

38 replie(s)
American Spectator, by Jonah Goldberg and Taki Theodoracopulos    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/16/2014 11:20:22 AM     Post Reply
Look, everyone loves Sean Connery, particularly Sean Connery. That’s why he plays Sean Connery in every movie he’s in. People love that Scottish brogue so much, they don’t mind that he has it when he plays Juan Sánchez Villa-Lobos Ramírez, an immortal Spaniard in Highlander. The guy even won an Oscar for playing an Irish cop with a Scottish accent. Talk about sexist double standards: Meryl Streep has to master foreign dialects to get her golden statuettes. Connery just has to show up on time. In economics you devalue a currency by printing too much of it. In film you

Elizabeth Warren whines about coverage
of her fraudulent Indian claim

35 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Patrick Howley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:54:52 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote in her forthcoming book that she was “hurt” and “angry” by 2012 reporting on her fraudulent claim to Native American heritage. “What really threw me, though, were the constant attacks from the other side,” Warren wrote in her book “A Fighting Chance.” “I would almost persuade myself that I was starting to get the hang of full-throttle campaigning and then — bam! Out of left field, the state Republican Party, or the Brown campaign, or some blogger, would launch a rocket at me,” Warren wrote, adding, ”I was stunned by the attacks.” This reporter (blogger?) reported extensively

Former US president joins
opposition to Keystone XL

33 replie(s)
Houston Chronicle, by Jennifer A. Dlouhy    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 10:32:12 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Former President Jimmy Carter joined fellow Nobel laureates Wednesday in opposing Keystone XL, insisting that approving the pipeline would trigger “more climate upheaval” around the globe. In an open letter to President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, Carter and the nine other Nobel Peace Prize winners bluntly warned the leaders: “Your decision on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline will define your climate legacy.” The missive, published as an advertisement in Politico, represents the first time Carter has taken a position on the $5.4 billion project and makes him the first former president to come

Fox News Poll: Many voters say Obama lies
to the country on important matters

30 replie(s)
Fox News, by Dana Blanton    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 7:39:27 PM     Post Reply
About six in ten American voters think Barack Obama lies to the country on important matters some or most of the time, according to a Fox News poll released Wednesday. Thirty-seven percent think Obama lies “most of the time,” while another 24 percent say he lies “some of the time.” Twenty percent of voters say “only now and then” and 15 percent “never.” Click here for the poll results. President Obama has been accused by political opponents and media fact-checkers alike of telling falsehoods. Frequently cited: His repeated claim that under Obamacare “If you like your plan, you can keep

   

Post Reply   Close thread 720434





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~