|
|
| |
Topic: Women in combat? Pentagon says yes |
Women in combat? Pentagon says yes
USA Today, by Jim Michaels*
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:MissMolly, 1/24/2013 5:51:35 AM
|
| The thought of women dodging bullets and bombs in combat may have seemed jarringly out of place in earlier eras of Doughboys and G.I. Joes and the wars of the previous century. But for anyone familiar with today´s troops and the missions they face — or who has paused to read the names of this nation´s combat casualties — the historic move by the Pentagon to open up front-line roles to women is hardly a shock.(Snip)Women are serving and have been serving in uniform alongside their male counterparts in Afghanistan and did so in Iraq for much of the past decade,
|
Comments: *[w/Tom Vanden Brook and William M. Welch]
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Judge, 1/24/2013 6:28:51 AM (No. 9135819)
I must be frank. As a combat veteran from Vietnam, I can truthfully say I wouldnt want a woman in a foxhole with me and although thats not very PC, its a view shared by most veterans
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
planetgeo, 1/24/2013 6:47:40 AM (No. 9135832)
This is a three-fer for Obama. He pleases the feminists, further destroys the military, and will make lots of lawyers very, very rich.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
kanphil, 1/24/2013 7:22:42 AM (No. 9135872)
This is a very bad idea on a lot of levels. For that reason, it will probably become reality in this insane asylum named Washington, D.C. And the way it was announced illustrated once again that Congress is completely irrelevant.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Keekng, 1/24/2013 7:35:20 AM (No. 9135887)
Other than being a terrible idea, timing of the information release detracted from the Benghazi hearing. Coincidence? I think not!
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Catherine, 1/24/2013 7:46:29 AM (No. 9135906)
Women have no place on the front lines. They aren´t as strong as men and have personal body issues that men just don´t. If they decide to do this, it should be only if the woman volunteers for it.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
HerbVA, 1/24/2013 7:53:23 AM (No. 9135918)
The buchest bulldyke is not nearly as physically strong or aggressive as a below average man. It´s mostly in the testosterone.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
RCFlyer98, 1/24/2013 7:54:32 AM (No. 9135921)
Agree #4. Nothing this administration and it´s stooges do surprises me. Also nothing they do is coincidence. Whatever they do is choreographed to the Nth degree.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Doc Obiwan, 1/24/2013 7:56:44 AM (No. 9135926)
Dittoes, #2, et. al. I, too, am a Vietnam combat veteran (Rangers) and a long serving Special Forces soldier.
All I can say is this is stupid, stupid, stupid, and it will cost lives. Both male and female lives.
Early this morning someone sent me Michael Yon´s comments, and he is right on target.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
jgat, 1/24/2013 8:17:41 AM (No. 9135973)
In order to please some critics expect the defense to be women may "volunteer" but not be required to serve in front lines. Career military females not "volunteering" for front line duties will be placed at a disadvantage for promotions and choice duties.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Keekng, 1/24/2013 8:17:53 AM (No. 9135974)
Now forming....Panetta´s Foxhole Club.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Freeloader, 1/24/2013 8:18:49 AM (No. 9135976)
So what do we have here America? Yet another Obama Administration Official Act of Insanity, surely "cooked up" by a bunch of leftist sad sacks, yardbirds, feminazis, draft dodgers and perfumed princes sitting around an LSD (Long Smooth Desk), somewhere deep in the bowels of The Pentagon, guaranteed to adversely affect the "esprit de corps" and readiness levels of our nation´s front-line units, stationed at home and around the globe!
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
jlw509, 1/24/2013 8:29:19 AM (No. 9135993)
Physiological fact: even fit, athletic women have, on average, 50% less upper-body strength as men.
Some will dispute this on account of the fact that women generate the same force per unit of muscle as men. Of course. But women have a lot bigger fat-to-muscle ratio than men. And we hAVE to. If a woman´s fat-to-muscle ratio goes down below about 14%, she stops producing estrogen, which is the very hormone that maintains bone strength in women.
In other words, train til you´ve gotten rid of all the feminine body ratios, and you go hormone-deficient, your bones go brittle, your muscles get inflammatory, and you get disabled by pressure fractures and shin-splints when you run, esp. carrying a heavy pack.
And In combat what are the men in the unit going to do? Carry them? Or more likely, the men will constantly be pulled back to help the women.
THis is going to get people killed.
And they say conservatives have a "War on Women.":o/.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Achilles, 1/24/2013 8:34:05 AM (No. 9136007)
There was a time when nothing could beat the U.S. military. They will lower the physical standards. They will make the combat arms kinder, more gentle organizations. This new policy should even things up for the next civil war.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
45_Auto, 1/24/2013 8:46:55 AM (No. 9136031)
This is one of the stupidist ideas I have ever heard.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
pdmccas, 1/24/2013 8:52:39 AM (No. 9136044)
Did anyone at DOD ask the serving soldiers for their opinion before coming up with this one?
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
JAN, 1/24/2013 8:53:32 AM (No. 9136047)
Pentagon says.......look over here, don´t look at the Benghazzi hearings.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
coldborezero, 1/24/2013 9:00:36 AM (No. 9136064)
Our headlong descent into barbarism is accelerating rapidly. What civilization can survive when it sends its women, its mothers, its FUTURE, overseas to fight and die? And please tell me what they will be fighting for; this unlawful and illegitimate government? Unrestricted abortion? Homosexual unions? Dependency? Rampant regulation? Unlimited debt? NO! NO! NO! I gotta tell you, folks; I was an American. I loved America. I proudly served in America´s Marine Corps. But no more. That America is dead and gone, never to return. A communist, statist takeover has occurred in this country and the tragic truth is that the majority is just fine with it. Me? I do not care anymore. Wallow in what you have created, America. And if you can even remember, cry for what you have lost.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
melman, 1/24/2013 9:02:56 AM (No. 9136065)
Did they not even think to look at the Israeli experience with women in combat units? They are so blind with their grand visions of political correctness they fail to apply the lessons others have already learned.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Bevan, 1/24/2013 9:11:09 AM (No. 9136078)
And liberals claim conservatives are anti-science. Be careful what you wish for ladies.....
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
MattMusson, 1/24/2013 9:11:14 AM (No. 9136079)
Can women sue for: HOSTILE WORKING ENVIRONMENT?
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
santokitime, 1/24/2013 9:20:27 AM (No. 9136104)
Post reply 17 speaks for me also. There is nothing to believe in anymore. Kaput.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
bighambone, 1/24/2013 9:42:19 AM (No. 9136148)
Very, very few women are going to serve in army and marine infantry and special operations forces for very long. This policy change by the liberals is political, and simply gives women a chance to volunteer for those ground combat units, thus allowing them to punch their ticket, and qualify for advancement to the higher ranks in combat branches where they will never actually be expected to endure the extreme hardship of close quarter sustained ground combat. After all, Obama is shutting down the wars on a date certain in 2014.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
LadyVet, 1/24/2013 9:50:16 AM (No. 9136171)
Re #17, one thing they won´t be fighting for is victory.
This president never mentions the word. It is not a goal. When he uses the word "fight," it is always against Republicans or political opponents, Americans.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Coy860, 1/24/2013 10:01:23 AM (No. 9136189)
#12. And will the females expect to go to the front of the line with their VA claims 40 years down the road? Will they wait 4-10 years to get a claim decided?
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
52Mustang, 1/24/2013 10:06:41 AM (No. 9136203)
I guess now all women over 18 will be eligible for the draft! Wives, mothers, girl friends, sisters, and who knows?
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
William1, 1/24/2013 10:14:29 AM (No. 9136227)
On F&F this morning, Allison Camarata said that this will open up "new jobs" for women. Since they´ve never have had to undergo the travails of combat before, I will give them some slack for such blockheaded thinking. The military, however, is complicit in this attitude with the relentless feel-good advertising for the volunteer military. Yet another example of the slippery slope.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
aasilver, 1/24/2013 10:22:07 AM (No. 9136249)
Men are required to ´go into combat´.
Will women be required to ´go into combat´ or will women have to volunteer for combat?
Will women be ´required´ to register for the draft.
Just wondering.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
navybrat, 1/24/2013 11:04:20 AM (No. 9136360)
If women are eligible for the draft, the Obama girls should be required to register.
Chelsea is probably too old.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
monique, 1/24/2013 3:58:39 PM (No. 9137111)
OMG rolls eyes mommies in body bags. physical issues men just don´t have. not in my foxhole. get a grip people. nobody should be in combat. it is nasty, dirty, crippling, and physically and mentally disabling. half the population should not be protected from it when it is a matter of national security. half the population should not be denied the promotion opportunities that those jobs put before a person during peace time either. but most of all, the playing field should not be leveled, the requirements should not be adjusted so everyone could do it, which is just as stupid as building each foxhole with handicap ramps. this is not lets give everyone an A and a prize so nobody feels bad. Back in the late 70´s when there was such an uproar in the EOD field about women in the field, my brother got tired of the well, they can´t carry the 8" rounds out, and we´d have to do for them. So, being a big guy, he went and got one, and put it on his shoulder and walked into the discussion, and said, okay, here it is. any of you girls can´t pick this up and carry it, turn in your badges. only one guy in the whole room could do it. probably the reason i got to blow up stuff for almost 20 years (big grin)
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Chief1942, 1/24/2013 10:45:30 PM (No. 9137796)
This nation´s enemies who we will confront on the battlefield are going to really enjoy these "easy pickins". When all the realities of face to face combat come back to haunt those that saw fit to use this nation´s military for "social experimentation", I hope they become deathly ill over their lunacy. Of course it will not be them who pays the ultimate price for their stupidity, but our service members both male and female.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"
|
|
Amnesty Opposition Grows
|
|
Washington Free Beacon, by Alana Goodman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/20/2013 5:37:45 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The union representing U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officials will officially oppose the proposed Senate immigration reform legislation on Monday, according to an advance statement obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. The National Citizenship and Immigration Services Council (USCIS Council) says the legislation fails to address its top concerns about the current system, including the pressure on USCIS officers to approve visa applications without thorough review and the bureaucratic barricades that prevent them from coordinating with Immigrations and Customs Enforcement officials. Sources say it is highly unusual for the USCIS Council to weigh in publicly on legislation.
|
|
Taxing Times for Obama
|
|
New York Times, by Maureen Dowd
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/20/2013 5:06:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — I WENT to New York last week to cover the TV presentations for the new season, shows like “Scandal,” “Shark Tank” and a faltering “American Idol.” I may as well have stayed here. You know that the faltering American idol in the White House must be reeling in this scandalous spring. No Drama Obama is immersed in drama so over the top it could have been scripted by Shonda Rhimes and Karl Rove. Just four months after his second inauguration, the president is buffeted by gushing investigations, smug and deranged Republicans, and cat-who-ate-the-canary conspiracists.
|
O.J. Simpson talks about prison life, plans after he´s released
|
|
New York Post, by Philip Recchia
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/20/2013 4:51:47 AM
Post Reply
|
|
After 4 1/2 years behind bars, battling weight gain and depression, O.J. Simpson is hopeful freedom is just around the corner. In a series of exclusive jailhouse conversations, including a 30-minute video chat last week, an upbeat Juice told a Post source he was cautiously optimistic and ready to start a new life on the outside. In a move sure to infuriate the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, whom Simpson was acquitted of killing after a spectacular trial, that new life will include a planned college speaking tour to earn money.
|
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
|
Ideological Revenue Service
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Mark Hemingway
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:22:26 AM
Post Reply
|
|
With three different scandals threatening to consume the White House last week—the Benghazi cover-up, the Justice Department’s seizure of the phone records of dozens of Associated Press reporters, and the revelation of an anti-Tea Party inquisition by the Internal Revenue Service—CNBC’s John Harwood offered his journalistic peers some advice on Twitter: “Those of us in political-media world should just shut up about ‘narratives’ and focus on what’s true.” CBS anchor Scott Pelley joined in: “We are getting big stories wrong, over and over again.” The fact that these sentiments needed to be expressed is a damning indictment of the media,
|
Revenge, ego and the corruption of Wikipedia
|
|
Salon, by Andrew Leonard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 6:02:51 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wee hours of the morning of January 27, 2013, a Wikipedia editor named “Qworty” made a series of 14 separate edits to the Wikipedia page for the late writer Barry Hannah, a well-regarded Southern writer with a taste for the Gothic and absurd. Qworty cut paragraphs that included quotes from Hannah’s work. He removed 20 links to interviews, obituaries and reminiscences concerning Hannah. He cut out a list of literary prizes Hannah had won. Two edits stand out. Qworty excised the phrase “and was regarded as a good mentor” from a sentence that started:
|
Zogby: Scandals cost Obama liberals, majority -- ´Are locusts next?´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 5:45:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Pollster John Zogby reports in our weekly White House report card that President Obama´s scandal-filled disaster week has cost him his majority support and sapped enthusiasm for his second term. "As Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth might have said, this was ´weekus horribilis´ for President Obama. Three fires in the form of three scandals to put out in one week. Are locusts next? While Obama has tried to get ahead of each -- Benghazi, the Associated Press, and the IRS vs. the Tea Party -- the time to get ahead of these things is, well, ahead of them.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|