|
|
| |
Topic: The Mickelson Vote |
The Mickelson Vote
Wall Street Journal, by Editorial
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Pluperfect, 1/23/2013 5:34:57 AM
|
| California golfer Phil "Lefty" Mickelson says he will no longer publicly criticize the government for taking most of his paycheck. That´s a shame. But even if it´s now socially unacceptable for high achievers to suggest they should keep the fruits of their labor, that doesn´t mean they will keep supplying that labor. After a brilliant round Sunday at a tournament in La Quinta, California, Mr. Mickelson hinted that new tax burdens might drive him out of the state, out of professional golf, and perhaps even out of the country. "There are going to be some drastic changes for me
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
pineledger, 1/23/2013 5:53:21 AM (No. 9133543)
Used to be my favorite golfer. Did they threaten at audit?
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
planetgeo, 1/23/2013 6:04:31 AM (No. 9133548)
Just because the LowFos gave King Putt a Mulligan, it doesn´t mean we should let a duffer like him tee off on the whole country.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
steveW, 1/23/2013 6:07:45 AM (No. 9133553)
Going Galt may now mean going Red State. If so, it will not be long before Blue States will demand to plunder Red States, in the name of "fairness" and Dear Leader.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Antiquegolf, 1/23/2013 6:35:55 AM (No. 9133568)
Poster 3 nails it. Look out Texas, look out Wyoming, and other red states. The leftist have no doubt plotted to confiscate your oil, gas and mineral wealth for redistribution purposes.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 1/23/2013 6:46:31 AM (No. 9133580)
Or...turn it all over to China in repayment for the debt we owe them.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
ohioTom, 1/23/2013 6:51:36 AM (No. 9133586)
Is it inappropriate to suggest that Mickelson should have some balls?
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Wetlandz, 1/23/2013 6:55:15 AM (No. 9133590)
So it´s ok to protect your financial interests just don´t speak out against the regime? Ok I get it.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Antiquegolf, 1/23/2013 6:56:19 AM (No. 9133592)
Good poster 5. All Liberal spending drops into the same fungible rat hole.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Safari Man, 1/23/2013 7:08:26 AM (No. 9133608)
I am sincerely hoping what Phil is now saying is that ACTIONS speak louder than words and that he will be making a high-profile relocation. Actually, I would like to encourage him to relocate to Monaco and send a strong signal not just to California, but to Premier Barry and the other dims about what they are doing to this entire country.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Jebediah, 1/23/2013 8:05:01 AM (No. 9133697)
Mickelson was probably pulled aside by his sponsors and read the riot act, warning him that 1/2 their audience might be "offended" by his complaints about a totally confiscatory tax in California. But someone should tell the sponsors (and Phil!) that the audience they are going for with arthritis meds is probably largely over 50, and desperate to shore up any remaining wealth the government has not already made off with, and will not look kindly on this backtracking, even if they understand why it has occurred.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Muncsdad, 1/23/2013 8:25:41 AM (No. 9133726)
Look for the media to dig around in every dark corner of Lefty"s life--that is what they told him would happen if he dissed Obama.
Rumors about gambling? Swinging? All will be subject of breathless front page exposes in the mainstream media.
By the time Obama and his media hit men are done with Phil he and his family will be destroyed.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Grace Veritas, 1/23/2013 8:32:43 AM (No. 9133738)
#3 is almost certainly right.
Going Galt will mean going Red State for a while, until it really starts to pinch the blue ones. Then the Feds will work to withhold federal dollars from states without income taxes, characterizing them as freeloader states who refuse to collect what they need from their own people, like the more responsible blue states.
Then it will be necessary to leave the country to go Galt, but a guy like Mick would probably have to give up golf altogether, since almost all of his golf winnings would be on U.S. soil.
Just to steer clear of "offending" those who feel entitled to his money, he should have done what he needs to do, and keep the reasons to himself, like wealthy Obama voters always do.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Grambo, 1/23/2013 9:04:19 AM (No. 9133806)
And now the Red states are contemplating "exit" taxes on order to nab those fleeing the fleecing.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 1/23/2013 9:34:20 AM (No. 9133883)
Mikelson was right the first time. I disagree with those posters who think it is patriotic to turn one´s money over to Obama to spend. I would not blame people who want to start (or continue) a business for taking their money and using it somewhere else. When the inevitable collapse comes it will not help us for them to be part of it. After the fall, they can come back and help us pick up the pieces. Don´t worry about their not coming back because they will.
Obamacare is going to destroy us financially. No point in everybody going down with the ship.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
bob913, 1/23/2013 9:38:02 AM (No. 9133891)
Tiger Woods moved in 1996. He probably saved at least $50 million from state taxes.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
BuckeyeRon, 1/23/2013 10:16:09 AM (No. 9133966)
#13, is right, perhaps Phil should have moved to FLA years ago, but it is his personal choice. Tiger is on a totally different level because his father´s military/intelligence background led to strategic thinking and career planning. Phil, 5 years older, turned pro 4 years before Tiger, and started his foundation 12 years later in 2004 and now is looking to make a move after 20 years on the tour...
Tiger went pro in ´96, launched his foundation in ´96 based in his home community in CA, thus avoiding any blowback when he moved to FLA in ´96...
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
BuckeyeRon, 1/23/2013 10:35:01 AM (No. 9134026)
Ooops, shouldabeen #15 and not #13...
|
| |
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"
|
Washington bureaucrats use force to suffocate liberty
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/20/2013 5:50:08 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Remember Armand Armendariz, the Environmental Protection Agency regional administrator who resigned after regaling an audience of Big Green activists with a history lesson to illustrate his agency´s approach to critics of the EPA´s harshest policies? When the Romans conquered a new province, he said, they would "... find the first five guys they saw and they´d crucify them ..." to make the province "really easy to manage for the next few years." The EPA, he continued, also makes "examples of people who are not complying with the law, you make examples out of them,
|
|
Reactionaries in New York
|
|
Time, by Joe Klein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 8:27:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Democratic candidates for mayor in New York are campaigning to win the support of the teachers union. They threaten to return the city to the horrors of the David Dinkins era. Back at the turn of the 1990s, New York City was a mess. Crime was rampant. The schools were dreadful. Children in foster care were brutalized because–as the head of the Child Welfare Agency said–”oversight is racist.” The mayor was an incompetent. And, above all, the city was run for the benefit of its employees rather than its citizens. What followed was 20 years of governance
|
|
Immigration reform no sure bet
|
|
Politico, by Seung Min Kim & Jake Sherman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 6:29:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
After years of false starts, Washington finally appears to be on the path to rewriting the nation’s immigration laws. The Senate Gang of Eight bill is holding its own in committee and is expected to hit the Senate floor in June. And in the House this week, members of a bipartisan group agreed “in principle” on a big bill to be revealed in June. But in this case, looks are deceiving. There are still major hurdles before immigration reform can reach President Barack Obama’s desk. The biggest one is the GOP-controlled House. Right now, the Senate bill has no chance
|
At Cincinnati IRS office, surprise over claims of partisan villainy
|
|
Washington Post, by Lisa Rein & Dan Zak
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 5:17:34 AM
Post Reply
|
|
CINCINNATI — The fog of scandal hangs over a boxy, modernist, 10-story building that looks like a monument to paperwork. Shrubs and chain smokers flank its front entrance here on Main Street, in the heart of downtown. Every day, 2,000 employees go to work at various federal agencies in this John F. Kennedy-era structure, whose chief tenant is the Internal Revenue Service — which is having just about the worst week an agency can have. Up on the fourth floor — with its gray linoleum, low ceilings and fluorescent lights, file carts heaped with manila envelopes, its keypad-coded doors labeled 4-022
|
| |
|
The Smoking Gun Can Tell the AP What a Federal Leak Investigation Is Like
|
|
Atlantic, by Philip Bump
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/18/2013 5:22:57 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When, in 2006, the website The Smoking Gun released a secret CIA memo documenting prisoner organizing strategies at Guantanamo Bay, the FBI took notice. Now the site has posted details of the ensuing 44-month-long investigation, offering a timely glimpse into the black box of a Department of Justice leak prosecution. And The Smoking Gun got lucky. Over the course of the FBI´s hunt, code-named "Stubborn Ways," 43 different people were interviewed, in locations stretching from New Mexico to Boston to Saudi Arabia. After the investigation narrowed to one person who was then exonerated — a woman from Virginia
|
There Was No Surge in IRS Tax-Exempt Applications in 2010
|
|
Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/18/2013 5:03:01 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A number of people have sought to explain the IRS targeting of Tea Party, patriot, and 9/12 group applications -- as well as those from other conservative groups -- for "specialist team" treatment (mainly delays and excessive and inappropriate questions) in 2010 by pointing to the Citizens United decision that year allowing for unlimited, undisclosed fundraising by such groups. That´s the explanation IRS official Lois Lerner gave a week ago when she first revealed that the agency had improperly handled a slew of applications -- the political shorthand was a mistaken attempt to deal with a surge in applications.
|
|
Obamacare and Chicago’s Unions
|
|
American Spectator, by Eileen Norcross
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 6:13:58 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Much has been said about the trouble with public-sector pensions. Many state and local plans are underfunded and, unless policy and accounting changes are undertaken, some major plans will run out of assets to pay benefits over the coming years. That means these plans will have to operate on a pay-as-you-go-basis, forcing budgetary tradeoffs and tax hikes. Public-sector pensions often come with legal guarantees. For instance, Illinois and New York offer a constitutional guarantee of promised benefits. Many other states offer statutory protections. That’s why economists make the case that pension benefits
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
| | |
|
|