|
|
| |
Topic: Top aide: Obama seeks to split Republican Party into warring factions before 2014 midterm election |
Top aide: Obama seeks to split Republican Party into warring factions before 2014 midterm election
Daily Caller, by Neil Munro
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/21/2013 9:18:42 AM
|
| President Barack Obama’s top political aide used an Inauguration Day interview to sketch out a provocative political strategy intended to split the Republican Party in time to impact the 2014 midterm elections. “The barrier to progress here in many respects, whether it is deficits, measures to help economy, immigration, gun safety legislation … is [that] there are factions here in Congress, Republicans in Congress, who are out of the mainstream,” White House advisor David Plouffe said on CNN’s “State of the Union with Candy Crowley.” “We need more Republicans in Congress to think like Republicans in the country
|
Comments: In the meantime the lying hypocrite 0bama will pretend that he will unify the country. The Republicans need to get their stuff together and not continually play right into the hands of this political hack.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
pineledger, 1/21/2013 9:21:28 AM (No. 9129645)
You don´t see the Dims fighting among themselves.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
CEP, 1/21/2013 9:31:36 AM (No. 9129657)
If only he would concentrate on doing the job he was elected to do. But nope, he isn´t capable of doing that just campaigning endlessly.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Chuzzles, 1/21/2013 9:33:07 AM (No. 9129659)
Crybaby Speaker of the House will be right there helping him. At least Harry Reid has the guts to stand firm on the issue of not passing Obama´s gun control measure. It is only to protect 6 senators who have iffy re-election fights in their districts, but hey, I think we should take all the help we can get right now.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Jethro bo, 1/21/2013 9:36:51 AM (No. 9129668)
I couldn´t care less. Now that I am no longer a Rebublican, but a coveted independent, I expect more attention from the Rebublicans going forward. The Rebublicans are more interested in reaching out and winning´ independents than in representing current Rebublican members. Thus, the Rebublicans will do more for me now that I am no longer one of them than when I was one of them.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Davids918, 1/21/2013 9:44:48 AM (No. 9129684)
Sorry, #4, but the Democrats just proved that the majority of independents are nothing much more than a bunch of disgruntled Republicans.
Obama is now a lame duck president. And his agenda can really be curtailed by uniting behing a fiscally responsible, pro-energy growth strategy.
However, if Democrats win the House in 2014 it will provide Obama the book-ends he needs to cement the Progressive agenda.
Democrats in the Senate seem to be planning to present a budget this year. It will be loaded with tax increases, particularly on the "wealthiest top 3%". It will hardly put a dent in the deficit, and the GOP should take it, and exploit how little extra $$ it produces compared to the deficit still remaining.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
wendybird, 1/21/2013 9:52:37 AM (No. 9129695)
I hope that it splits into the Tea Party vs the Tea Party.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
NorthernDog, 1/21/2013 9:53:18 AM (No. 9129696)
It won´t work. Most Lo-Fo voters don´t vote in mid term elections (just look at 2010). Also, Obamacare will be taking hold, with all its fees, taxes, long waits, and 2,000 pages of regulations.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Starlady, 1/21/2013 10:00:03 AM (No. 9129707)
I think the Senate Dems plans to raise taxes will have a broader negative effect on voters, as well as increased costs and less service for healthcare. Obama´s agenda will get the majority of voters riled up, not the political ineptitude of the GOP in the House.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
rabbit, 1/21/2013 10:04:21 AM (No. 9129719)
The Republicans are already doing a pretty good job of splitting themselves into warring factions. The vitriol towards Colin Powell was unbelievable, merely because he chose to state a different view. Every time a Republican columnist or politician points out something that isn´t 100% lockstep with the most conservative elements, they howl like a pack of wolves on the hunt.
There has to be room for a variety of conservative opinions within the party. And if there is a disagreement, then it needs to be on solid principles as opposed to name-calling.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
zephyrgirl, 1/21/2013 10:19:04 AM (No. 9129754)
#9 - anyone who thinks Colin Powell is a republican is delusional. I´ve not heard him say a good thing about the Republican party in at least 8 years, he´s openly supported a socialist for president twice, and smeared anyone who doesn´t support the socialist as a racist.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Burger, 1/21/2013 10:25:05 AM (No. 9129771)
Colon Powel is a text book republican moderate. The vitriol dripping from HIS mouth is a lesson to ALL republican moderates. Of course, Republicans moderates will never accept the fact that it is they who are out of the mainstream, and will continue to paint the conservatives who want to balance the budget as extremists who are out of touch. Cheers.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Axeman, 1/21/2013 10:25:41 AM (No. 9129774)
Careful what you wish for, Zipp0. Plenty of time to get things sorted out before the next election. Their strategy didn´t work so well for the last midterms.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
MDConservative, 1/21/2013 10:32:52 AM (No. 9129792)
This strategy makes no sense to me. The congressional GOP has no core values, no leadership and no gumption whatsoever. Starting a war means eventually someone will emerge to fill that vacuum.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
hamrman, 1/21/2013 10:41:55 AM (No. 9129815)
Now this guy touts himself as being The Leader, why would a REAL leader even go down a road like this? How about doing what he is supposed to be doing?...maybe there is a lack of character!
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Cleanhousein2012, 1/21/2013 10:50:43 AM (No. 9129833)
13 - that is exactly why the GOP will lose the house in 2014. Lack of leadership.
The only thing we can trust from the GOP is bluster, noise and then cave.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Reality, 1/21/2013 10:59:54 AM (No. 9129860)
Was Plouffe just giving Candy her marching orders.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
eoddad, 1/21/2013 11:03:44 AM (No. 9129870)
Wonder what our guys are thinking in the House, when the WH is apparently giving away their game plan. Splitting the opposition is normal politics why spout it for all to see. The wax from the messiahs wings are melting. Now is the time to stay together and withstand the onslaught. If Republicans hold the line it will be as Churchill´s described it after the Battle of Britain. "Never has so much been owed by so many to so few." (as in RAF Pilots) Its not Boehner´s fault the American People elected more Democrats to the Senate and reelected Obama. Gun control maybe Obama´s mistake. Hitler during the Battle of Britain changed from targeting the RAF to Targeting cities Strategic blunder, Obama maybe making the same overreaching mistake on guns.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
ok state mom, 1/21/2013 11:07:32 AM (No. 9129881)
Obama won´t have to do much to split and divide an already divided 49.9%. Evangelicals are giving us Obama´s second term. They led the ones who stayed at home and sat out this election. Homophobia inspires one sanction while "I don´t care what you do in the bedroom" leads another. Obsessive, single mindedness about abortion leads one side, while the other side, "it is wrong but needs to be left to the states" another. Pro-life leads the gambit of no birth control methods to late term abortion with a lot of meat in the middle. In the mean time...Obama wins with gay marriage, late term abortions, and an anti 2nd amendment agenda. Leaving the majority of the 49.9% disenfranchised and without representation.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
tomishere, 1/21/2013 11:24:16 AM (No. 9129926)
The above comments prove Obama´s strategy is working.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
tisHimself, 1/21/2013 11:30:20 AM (No. 9129947)
So again, the Rockefeller republicans maintain control, squelch discussion from you know, those extremists who believe in the sanctity of life, limited government and its relationship to the second amendment, and the importance of spirituality and religion in the public square and then blame said extremists for their own failures. The Reagan/Kemp/Palin and Rockefeller/Bush/Romney dichotomy exists, not because Obama exploited it, but because the BarBush palace guard benefits from it.
And again, the evangelicals who stayed home and like unicorns. Nobody has yet to see one, but keep that fairy story alive if it makes you feel smug and superior.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
geoguy, 1/21/2013 11:30:45 AM (No. 9129948)
I suggest the Republicans study and understand, Sal Alinsky "Rules for Radicals" and develop a strategy ASAP.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Susannah, 1/21/2013 11:43:38 AM (No. 9129985)
Quite true, #19. I´d add only that Obama doesn´t have to do anything. We´re doing it to ourselves.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
ok state mom, 1/21/2013 12:00:23 PM (No. 9130032)
#20: What, if any, specific group stayed home in November? Many on this site said they would not vote for Romney. Their posts leaned towards evangelicalism. Romney had fewer voters than McCain in 2008. Someone didn´t vote. I will admit, the unicorns may be the ones that tilted the election toward the One. Do not think I was a rabid GOP establishment voter. I have been a supporter of Paul Ryan for over ten years, since he married a local young woman. He threads that narrow needle of being establishment while being conservative financially and socially. Yet, I think, he has tarnished his image with the 2012 trying in vain to salvage our country. I pray I am wrong.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
StormCnter, 1/21/2013 1:07:07 PM (No. 9130220)
Waste of time, #23. #20 never explains, just throws out impenetrable opinions signifying little, but containing a lot of repetition from previous postings.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
IdahoSky, 1/21/2013 2:16:42 PM (No. 9130411)
We´ll hang together or we´ll hang separately. The American electorate gave Mr. Obama a second term. I am not too optimistic about what happens next.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
tisHimself, 1/21/2013 3:14:11 PM (No. 9130543)
There is no evidence that evangelicals sat this one out. There is every indication that the Rockfeller Bush Romney wing of the republican party is fearful of populist conservatism as represented by Reagan, Kemp, Gingrich, Palin and their lineage.
Romney and his enthusiasts went to war with conservatives during the primary, congratulations on how that turned out.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Colorado sheriffs seek to block new gun restrictions, file lawsuit against state
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations
|
´We could lose everything´: Tea Party groups prepare to sue IRS
|
|
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.
|
First Lady Expands Anti- Obesity Campaign to Museums
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community
|
Congressman: IRS asked pro- life group about ´the content of their prayers´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although
|
Treasury Knew of I.R.S. Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
|
|
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,
|
HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t Employees More Time for ´Planning and Preparing Healthy Meals´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.
|
Will real villains in IRS scandal ever be punished?
|
|
Fox News, by Juan Williams
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|