|
|
| |
Topic: Top Dem promises to pass budget — but only to raise taxes |
Top Dem promises to pass budget — but only to raise taxes
Washington Examiner [DC], by Byron York
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:MissMolly, 1/21/2013 4:51:34 AM
|
| In recent days Republicans have had some success pointing out that it will soon be four years since Senate Democrats have allowed Congress to pass a budget — something the Congressional Budget Act requires lawmakers to do each year. After a determined campaign by Sen. Jeff Sessions, ranking Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, the House GOP joined forces in a plan to pass a short-term debt-ceiling increase on the condition that Congress pass a budget. The Democrats’ strategy has long been clear. The last time Majority Leader Harry Reid allowed a budget
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Spidey, 1/21/2013 5:18:20 AM (No. 9129333)
Another day,another liberal stunt to put republicans on the defense over protecting rich people and evil corporations.Obama´s passed another legal deadline on submitting his budget and the stall is intentional so the senate dems can do the dirty work.
These tax increases are poison pills knowing the house republicans won´t vote for them but then they can claim they passed a budget,even though it´s not a good faith effort.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 1/21/2013 5:33:33 AM (No. 9129338)
Chucky Schumer wants a budget, so they can raise taxes. Never mind that they´re supposed to pass one every year.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Mr. Hanky, 1/21/2013 5:45:41 AM (No. 9129344)
Ok, just propse to raise taxes enough across the board to cover the Dems budget...46% increase ought to cover it for this year...
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
bmw50, 1/21/2013 6:58:39 AM (No. 9129392)
Democrats ability to get elected hinges on their ability to use the public treasury (raising the national debt) to buy votes via entitlements, bailouts and subsidies.
Reduce the spending and Democrats lose their ability to get elected. It is their bread and butter and they WILL NOT cut spending; they will not cut their own throat.
Covering for them is the media which WILL NOT tell the public the truth about taxes. Democrats are lying when they say they are only going to tax the rich, as if it will not affect everyone, only the wealth. It affects everyone and affects the poor more.
When the wealthy are taxed, money set aside for job creation is gone. Products get more expensive, even for the poor. To pay for the debt, the government prints more money devaluing the dollar and what money the poor have is worth less and buys less.
Democrats are leading us into a catch-22 where taxes increase causing more job losses putting more people in the unemployment lines, welfare lines, and medicaid lines adding more cost to the nation forcing it to raise taxes further and the cycle deepens.
And the people of this nation are too stupid to see it! This ain´t rocket science.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 1/21/2013 7:15:44 AM (No. 9129413)
Shumer: "We´re going to raise taxes and you can´t stop us."
He´s right. Republicans are powerless to stop them. This is a fact not recognized by many LDotters who day after day fulminate against "spineless" Repubicans. Every time I read a post demanding that the Republicans do the impossible I cringe and feel more hopeless.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Country Boy, 1/21/2013 7:27:30 AM (No. 9129434)
#4, very likely we will get a VAT tax soon, same as Europe (currently over 20%). Libs will start it by saying the moocher class will get exemptions, but that will fade. Will eventually crush the Moocher class, but it will be too late to dent the power base in Washington, by way of elections.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Kerryman, 1/21/2013 7:29:04 AM (No. 9129440)
They can put as many Tax increases in the Senate Budget that they want. Then all the Senators get to vote on it to pass it. The key is the Republicans have to have a deficit reduction target that Democrats have to meet. The President talked about $3 in spending cuts for every dollar of tax increase. If they want that rule, fine. If their entire budget is just tax increases they once more slip into the mantra of "Tax and Spend" a noose they´ve slipped with their dance with "Middle Class Tax Cuts" which were only the Bush Tax Cuts, now permanent. Let them put forth their fraud with all tax increases. Start them off. Repeal the "Tax Extenders" just passed in the Fiscal Cliff Bill. That would be $76 Billion of tax increases hitting the special iterests that wedged it into the Fiscal Cliff bill.
Semper Fi
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Patriot Forever, 1/21/2013 11:14:46 AM (No. 9129906)
Big talk, no follow-up. Even the Dem senators are not likely to vote for the higher taxes, not if they expect to be reelected. So let´s relax and see this fall apart when the Dems fail to pass anything even close to this scare talk.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"
|
|
Amnesty Opposition Grows
|
|
Washington Free Beacon, by Alana Goodman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/20/2013 5:37:45 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The union representing U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officials will officially oppose the proposed Senate immigration reform legislation on Monday, according to an advance statement obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. The National Citizenship and Immigration Services Council (USCIS Council) says the legislation fails to address its top concerns about the current system, including the pressure on USCIS officers to approve visa applications without thorough review and the bureaucratic barricades that prevent them from coordinating with Immigrations and Customs Enforcement officials. Sources say it is highly unusual for the USCIS Council to weigh in publicly on legislation.
|
|
Taxing Times for Obama
|
|
New York Times, by Maureen Dowd
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/20/2013 5:06:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — I WENT to New York last week to cover the TV presentations for the new season, shows like “Scandal,” “Shark Tank” and a faltering “American Idol.” I may as well have stayed here. You know that the faltering American idol in the White House must be reeling in this scandalous spring. No Drama Obama is immersed in drama so over the top it could have been scripted by Shonda Rhimes and Karl Rove. Just four months after his second inauguration, the president is buffeted by gushing investigations, smug and deranged Republicans, and cat-who-ate-the-canary conspiracists.
|
O.J. Simpson talks about prison life, plans after he´s released
|
|
New York Post, by Philip Recchia
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/20/2013 4:51:47 AM
Post Reply
|
|
After 4 1/2 years behind bars, battling weight gain and depression, O.J. Simpson is hopeful freedom is just around the corner. In a series of exclusive jailhouse conversations, including a 30-minute video chat last week, an upbeat Juice told a Post source he was cautiously optimistic and ready to start a new life on the outside. In a move sure to infuriate the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, whom Simpson was acquitted of killing after a spectacular trial, that new life will include a planned college speaking tour to earn money.
|
| |
|
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
|
Ideological Revenue Service
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Mark Hemingway
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:22:26 AM
Post Reply
|
|
With three different scandals threatening to consume the White House last week—the Benghazi cover-up, the Justice Department’s seizure of the phone records of dozens of Associated Press reporters, and the revelation of an anti-Tea Party inquisition by the Internal Revenue Service—CNBC’s John Harwood offered his journalistic peers some advice on Twitter: “Those of us in political-media world should just shut up about ‘narratives’ and focus on what’s true.” CBS anchor Scott Pelley joined in: “We are getting big stories wrong, over and over again.” The fact that these sentiments needed to be expressed is a damning indictment of the media,
|
Revenge, ego and the corruption of Wikipedia
|
|
Salon, by Andrew Leonard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 6:02:51 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wee hours of the morning of January 27, 2013, a Wikipedia editor named “Qworty” made a series of 14 separate edits to the Wikipedia page for the late writer Barry Hannah, a well-regarded Southern writer with a taste for the Gothic and absurd. Qworty cut paragraphs that included quotes from Hannah’s work. He removed 20 links to interviews, obituaries and reminiscences concerning Hannah. He cut out a list of literary prizes Hannah had won. Two edits stand out. Qworty excised the phrase “and was regarded as a good mentor” from a sentence that started:
|
Zogby: Scandals cost Obama liberals, majority -- ´Are locusts next?´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 5:45:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Pollster John Zogby reports in our weekly White House report card that President Obama´s scandal-filled disaster week has cost him his majority support and sapped enthusiasm for his second term. "As Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth might have said, this was ´weekus horribilis´ for President Obama. Three fires in the form of three scandals to put out in one week. Are locusts next? While Obama has tried to get ahead of each -- Benghazi, the Associated Press, and the IRS vs. the Tea Party -- the time to get ahead of these things is, well, ahead of them.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
|
|
Politico, by Kevin Robillard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.
|
| |
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
Man questioned in Boston Marathon bombing shot, killed by FBI
|
|
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.
|
Leaks turn to deluge for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner lost her rights
|
|
Politico, by Rachel Bade
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”
|
| |
|
Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi is a Laughable Joke’
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.
|
| | |
|
|