Hopefully they´ll ignore Clinton on this, because on this issue, Clinton is spot on.

Clinton wants to put some light between Hillary & the current Prez.

I hate the term "spot on". It´s un-American. No offense meant, #1, I just hate it. It sounds elistist and creepy, kind of like adddressing other men as "old boy".

What Clinton, the greatest liar to come down the pike until Zero, means is "you have to trick the dummies into believing something that isn´t true about democrats". i.e. that you are NOT against gun control and confiscation which, of course, democrats are.

Bill Clinton may be a moral idiot, but he knows politics, and understands the U.S. because he is a part of it.
President Hologram does not fully understand the U.S., because he is curiously detached from it.

If Hilary is truly running for president, this may be a great place to begin. I know MANY liberal women who are gun owners. They own them for protection, mostly protection of their "lady parts" and their homes. It might behoove President "Lady Parts" to remember this group who voted for him. Older, wealthy liberal women are chomping at the bit to get Hilary in the White House.
At some point, a Democrate presidential contender will have to come forward. I think Cuomo already has, but he did very badly. Hilary can come in with "rational" discourse on this subject and she may steal both Obama and Cuomo´s thunder.

Obama and the liberal Democrats are making a lot of noise about gun control, but you must also remember that a lot of regular Democrats are also gun owners and support the 2nd Amendment.

Also the Democrats have about 14 US Senate seats to defend next year, some in States that have a lot of 2nd amendment supporters and gun owners. Senators from those States remember what happened in the past when the Democrats pushed through worthless gun control measures and recognize if they vote for over reaching gun control that will become unelectable back home causing the Democrats to loose control in the US Senate.

As scummy as he is, Clinton is also a master politician. He understands this is a disaster for the Dems to pursue, and, as mentioned above, is probably hoping to help Hillary with this issue.

I don´t think Obama is a communist. I think he fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood, who say they will take over our country and enforce Sharia law if it takes a hundred years. Otherwise why are we sending arms and fighter planes to the Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt? Also-how many of Obama´s appointees and czars are members? -----Dead silence-----.

If the dims have 14 seats to defend in 2014, doesn´t that mean that the pubs have 19? Isn´t turnover 33 every election? Pubs have a bigger problem than the dims.

Even a blin hog finds an acorn now and then. Oh, wait, I didn´t mean to compare our ex-Pres to a hog, it wouldn´t be fair to either of them.

Broken clock and all that.

As stated above, Clinton is an expert at politics, and he is correct, in my opinion. There are some Dems that are in big trouble if they "go for the guns."

The "Dumbest Senator" Feinstein will be fine in California with her vote to take our guns, but there are a whole bunch of senators that would be skewered. Reid among them. Let´s watch them squirm.

Take a look at that picture in the article.

0bama is looking at Clinton as if to say: Are you jiving me, man? Or, hurry up cracker! What are you gonna tell me I don´t already know? I got Reggie waiting for me.

Clinton looks bad. Very old. And what is up with his hand? That is a HUGE hand. The palm looks abnormally long.

13, you are right. That hand in the picture, that is a sign of photoshopping gone bad. Now, the question would be, why photoshop the picture? Would love to see the original, and see why it was inappropriate to use. Looks like Clinton was added, or was much, much closer and intimate, and in the process of moving him, the hand got stretched out of proportion. The photoshopper forgot to go back and repair it.

Must have been lunchtime.