A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Public Gloomy Ahead
of Obama Inaugural
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Public Gloomy Ahead
of Obama Inaugural

Breitbart´s Big Government, by Mike Flynn

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/18/2013 11:37:08 PM

When Barack Obama first took the oath of office in 2009, he enjoyed around 70% approval ratings in the polls. His historic election had triggered a groundswell of hope and good feelings about his first term. By overwhelming majorities, Americans were hopeful about the future. Just days before his second inauguration, however, a new poll from The Hill finds that the public is much more pessimistic about the next four years. Just 18% of voters believe that Obama´s first term exceeded their expectations. 80% feel the first term fell below or simply met

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: pickle1, 1/18/2013 11:53:23 PM     (No. 9125695)

Impeach and throw him in jail.


Reply 2 - Posted by: PageTurner, 1/19/2013 12:08:06 AM     (No. 9125704)

Oh, but Obama will assure us the economy is getting better. Isn´t that enough? /s


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: cmardh, 1/19/2013 12:10:23 AM     (No. 9125705)

You know, I still can´t get my head around this election. There is something so WRONG about the whole thing. Massive fraud, an incredible acceptance by the Romney camp -("oh I lost? OK.). Dems don´t do that. No One is excited about the Inauguration. The whole thing is just weird.


Reply 4 - Posted by: smcchk, 1/19/2013 12:51:58 AM     (No. 9125725)

#3, several people said that to me the day after the election. These folks, Romney voters but working in Obama environments, commented that no one was happy with Obama´s re-election. Will we ever know anything about this creep?


Reply 5 - Posted by: Cato the elder, 1/19/2013 1:41:38 AM     (No. 9125739)

"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard." -- H.L. Mencken


Reply 6 - Posted by: The Advocate, 1/19/2013 1:45:19 AM     (No. 9125742)

There is nothing to celebrate.
Exposé, try, convict and execute.


Reply 7 - Posted by: avikingman, 1/19/2013 2:06:21 AM     (No. 9125754)

Not gloomy. Utter disbelief and PO´d that this incompetent is POTUS.
Not in a million years did I ever think I´d see this day. And two terms yet!

We survived FDR, just barely, and his grimy fingernails still grasp at us, but this guy is something else. And it´s not pretty.

Where is our Reagan? Where is our Churchill?
Where are our statesmen?


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 1/19/2013 2:31:32 AM     (No. 9125762)

They´re going to be a lot gloomier after. This bozo has a lot more flexibility now.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Spidey, 1/19/2013 4:47:30 AM     (No. 9125806)

I don´t even know how you conduct a poll like this when half the country had no expectations of him the first time. You have to be a real sap to believe any of Obama´s deceitful,false promises of Utopianism.

Still,there´s enough people clinging to Obama because the alternative is getting a job,something unemployed leftists dread.

If conservatives got duped by a false god president,they would be the first ones to come out and attack the person,yet no one on the left will call Obama out on his composite of failures.

It should have been a tip off when Obama bowled a 34.


Reply 10 - Posted by: steveW, 1/19/2013 6:18:29 AM     (No. 9125857)

Oddly, no Democrat has demanded that the Obama Inaugural be declared a gun-free zone, so Dear Leader can show his solidarity with "the children". Come on, Democrats - show us how much you care and demand a Gun-Free Obama Inaugural! Be honest for once, and show us how good your intentions are..


Reply 11 - Posted by: ruready?, 1/19/2013 7:46:30 AM     (No. 9125928)

Hope he stays with his gun control shtick. If he does, his ego and ideology may melt him down like the wicked witch of the west.


Reply 12 - Posted by: suncitypro, 1/19/2013 8:01:44 AM     (No. 9125944)

When the hollywood types are not coming to the ball, that tells you that the bloom is off the rose. But our tax dollars will be freely spent to entertain the grabbers who do show. I hope that the #1 post comes to pass.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: hamrman, 1/19/2013 8:15:01 AM     (No. 9125960)

Wouldn´t it be hailarious if O like Jim Carey in Liar, Liar had to tell the truth during both his inaugural speech and State of the Union address...the Sheeple would be confounded!


Reply 14 - Posted by: Sinatra5, 1/19/2013 8:27:56 AM     (No. 9125986)

....It gets worse. I heard yesterday that one of my favorite C & W stars is playing at this "event" - Brad Pasiley. I can see the other clowns jumping around for BO, but Brad Paisley? Guess I´ll just have to cross him off my list.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Adam, 1/19/2013 8:35:08 AM     (No. 9125999)

I have no sympathy for the majority of voters. NONE. By any objective measure, his first term sucked. And you morons imposed him on us. now it will get even worse. to paraphrase Ed Koch, "the people reelected him and now the people must be punished"


Reply 16 - Posted by: Coy860, 1/19/2013 8:36:56 AM     (No. 9126002)

Never mind his speech !
Keep a close watch on his behavior. He is spending us into oblivion, he has messed up foreign policy, he is attacking our Liberty and dismanteling the Constitution, and starving our military of necessary funds, while performing social experiments sure to hurt the military. He refuses to close our border and wants to play Santa Claus to illegals and give free things to his people, all the while squeezing those of us still left out there with paying jobs, and messing up royally the greatest Medical Care system in the World. That is what he has DONE..trust the behavior which darn sure doesn´t match the words.


Reply 17 - Posted by: franq, 1/19/2013 8:48:53 AM     (No. 9126021)

Can´t wait to miss his "speech". I predict it will be the same head-swiveling, lisping blather we´ve grown used to. Look for the same cliches: best is ahead of us, accomplished much fixing the mess I inherited, still far to go, safer schools for kids, etc. One I don´t expect he´ll used is "focused like a laser".


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: jofel, 1/19/2013 9:21:46 AM     (No. 9126122)

#14 I´ve known that Paisley was an Obama lover for some time, I believe performers are so busy working on their material, they do not pay attention like we do. I also blame his actress wife has something to do with this. I never liked his stupid so-called songs.


Reply 19 - Posted by: synchronicity, 1/19/2013 9:32:11 AM     (No. 9126148)

I´ve been doing a lot of reading and thinking since Romney lost, trying to make some sense out of what appears senseless. My current theory is that psychologically our nation is mimicking Germany pre-WW II. The irrational has been embraced by the majority of voting Americans who have given unlimited power to those in charge as long as they champion the irrational. Carl Jung would say this is the result of not consciously acknowledging the shadow (the evil within all humans - not believing it exists) which will inevitably lead to man´s shadow getting stronger and manifesting in the world since it has been repressed / not recognized and dealt with by the individual.

Long story short - the only way this can now play out since a critical mass has been reached is a whole lot of really bad stuff has to happen until such time that the irrational has been exhausted and the survivors stare in disbelief over the wasteland their ignorance created.


Reply 20 - Posted by: AutumnJoy, 1/19/2013 9:35:09 AM     (No. 9126156)

FTA: "[The Won] won reelection by a narrow but solid margin" I have been wondering since the election, just WHAT is a "narrow but solid" margin? What made this particular narrow margin "solid"? Can someone explain this to me? /s/


Reply 21 - Posted by: Grambo, 1/19/2013 9:41:52 AM     (No. 9126184)

How I wish those electronic voting machines had been quarantined and subjected to forensic analysis.


Reply 22 - Posted by: pineledger, 1/19/2013 10:06:46 AM     (No. 9126234)

19, if you read The Patriarch: The Remarkable Life and Turbulent Times of Joseph P. Kennedy, you will be even more convinced of your theory. It is a book everyone -- even though we may despise the Kennedys -- should read.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: lil dotty, 1/19/2013 10:10:09 AM     (No. 9126244)

The ´Transformer´ has misplaced significant parts of America as he attempted to transform OUR AMERICA into his version This inauguration is a farce, just like he.


Reply 24 - Posted by: chicodon, 1/19/2013 10:15:24 AM     (No. 9126258)

A complete revamp of the voting process is called for. Picture Voter ID. Certify that voter rolls are purged of dead voters. No more early voting where SEIU can ferry voters to the polls for days on end. At least this would be a start. And yes, I´m suggesting the election was stolen.


Reply 25 - Posted by: mickturn, 1/19/2013 10:42:12 AM     (No. 9126314)

Hey dim morons, how´s that skinny paycheck working out for ya? Wait for it...wait for it...it gets worse!


Reply 26 - Posted by: Republic Can, 1/19/2013 10:43:12 AM     (No. 9126317)

Contradictory on its face: 18% to 80% in the polls, yet zero won it by a "narrow but solid" margin.

The election was more than stolen. It had been engineered at least since the debates. Zero could hardly muster the gumption to argue with Romney at the first debate because he knew it was in the bag then.

Unfortunately, everything in America must now be postponed while we get our vote back.

The election was engineered. It was our vote that was stolen, and with it, the lives of our fathers who bought it for us with their futures.

This is America´s blood libel.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Poliskeptic, 1/19/2013 11:16:33 AM     (No. 9126394)

I grimaced when I read he won "by a solid majority." Just this week I talked to another hard-core Democrat who said Romney was the first Republican she had ever voted for. Obama ´won´ by voter fraud....pure and simple....he knows it but still wants to lord his ´victory´ over all of us and shove his agenda down our throats.


Reply 28 - Posted by: synchronicity, 1/19/2013 11:27:25 AM     (No. 9126425)

Since #22 believes I may be on to something, let me paraphrase what Jung would probably say about our present situation:

Loss of roots and lack of tradition just ask for neurosis and thus prepares the ground for mass hysteria which will result in individual liberty vanishing and terrorization to begin.


Reply 29 - Posted by: O.S. Banker, 1/19/2013 11:36:54 AM     (No. 9126444)

In re #7, Churchill had Kipling. Reagan had Zane Grey. Today we have Jay Z. Like it or not, the Culture drives the politics, and with the exception of parts of Nashville and Regnery Press, conservatives are not driving the culture.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Ken M., 1/19/2013 11:37:58 AM     (No. 9126445)

Inauguration, coronation whatever; I don´t give a bleep and could not care less. Tomorrow is Championship Sunday and my TV will be set to football only.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Boneshaker, 1/19/2013 11:38:30 AM     (No. 9126448)

It is astounding and depressing to see how simple and gullible the majority of Americans have become.

There was a time when Americans were known as sharp bargainers and hard to fool or get the better of.

Now we look out and see a nation largely peopled by drooling nincompoops, eager for a chance to follow a black-skinned charlatan because it feels good and proves (to themselves) that they aren´t racists.
.


Reply 32 - Posted by: RedLegLeader68, 1/19/2013 11:40:14 AM     (No. 9126450)

What #24, and on down, said!

I simply do not believe that this "narrow" victory was anywhere near "solid." For those of us old enough, harken back to the 1960 election and review the IL results which "gave" us JFK.

Just sayin´ ..


Reply 33 - Posted by: Cleanhousein2012, 1/19/2013 11:56:13 AM     (No. 9126489)

19 - it is really simple. Romney was a lousy candidate. He might have been the best guy for the job, but a lousy candidate. His campaign did everything they could to disintermediate the Conservative voters, and he never was going to overcome the rich, evil white guy label that everyone knew was going to be coming and he´s as dynamic as milquetoast.

With Romney, the Repubs didn´t have someone who was going to be able to overcome the fraud, and ground game that the Dems had set up.

And now, the Republican Party is movijng faster, following in his footsteps, disintermediating the Conservatives in the party, and doing nothing but appearing to be "almost Democrats".

Think it´s ugly now. Just wait till 2015.
Cleanhousein2012


Reply 34 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 1/19/2013 12:38:20 PM     (No. 9126566)

It will be loaded with lies- that´s a given. And, I am now part of a pool on how many times he uses the words, "me", "I´, "my" and "personally"- I have a high one; 243 times. I´ve already had offers for my number in trade.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Timber Queen, 1/19/2013 2:13:19 PM     (No. 9126702)

#19/28 – I have also been trying to make sense of the senseless, and concur with your current theory. The parallel between our times and pre-WWII Germany has been pointed out by many Ldotters over the last four years, but your reference to Jung provides a explanation for our current societal psychology, and its inevitable chilling conclusion.

We are all well aware of the progressive’s century-long dismantling of our American traditions, and tearing our cultural roots from the soil of liberty. They were able to accomplish this by convincing people that evil does not exist and therefore need not be acknowledged or addressed by moral discipline. I believe Pope Leo XIII warned that the greatest accomplishment of satan in modern times was convincing people he did not exist. He said this at the turn of the 20th century. This is not a new problem.

I remember the nuns in school teaching us about the importance of a daily examination of conscience, including identifying our motives and particular temptations. We were expected to know our weaknesses and to avoid “the near occasions of sin.” We were to be responsible for the content of what we chose for entertainment; reading, TV, movies, activities. If we gave in to our moral weaknesses, if we did not resist temptation, if we followed unbridled passions, we would experience the “just consequences.”

And so as #28 observes, “Loss of roots and lack of tradition just ask for neurosis and thus prepares the ground for mass hysteria which will result in individual liberty vanishing and terrorization to begin.”

God have mercy on America.


Reply 36 - Posted by: redwhite&blue2, 1/19/2013 3:14:24 PM     (No. 9126808)

Who in their right mind would have bet on a Kenyan mulatto ARAB foreign exchange student getting elected and re-elected President of the DSA(Divided States of America) not long after ARABS flew two airplanes into the WTC and killed thousands of innocent men, women, and children? "My Muslim Religion"...remember that? "57 states"..remember that? "Fundamentally transorm America"...remember that?

Are we all in BIZARRO world? What the hell happened to my country? I used to be such a proud veteran, but now? Not so much.....

Semper Paratus


Reply 37 - Posted by: globalwarmer, 1/19/2013 4:33:45 PM     (No. 9126901)

Public gloomy? Ha! The "public" hasn´t seen anything yet. Get ready for confiscatory taxes and idiotic social programs the like of which you´ve never dreamed. Thanks for saddling us with four more years of this aberration.


Reply 38 - Posted by: hamrman, 1/19/2013 5:01:24 PM     (No. 9126941)

They should be, this guy is destroying us...


Reply 39 - Posted by: shrugger, 1/19/2013 5:34:56 PM     (No. 9126985)

A group of words continue to bother me since the final election count.
Phonetically, maybe, but I´ll try.
Eli Eli lama sabathcanee....


Reply 40 - Posted by: FormerDem, 1/19/2013 5:47:04 PM     (No. 9126993)

He won because he cheated. But look on the bright side - the power of the Feds grew when they were trustworthy and that was dangerous. Let´s decentralize. You can squeeze a rock but you can´t squeeze sand.


Reply 41 - Posted by: KanCreeper, 1/19/2013 6:20:32 PM     (No. 9127021)

Like many I am really bothered by the election (Fraudlently?) by Obama.
1.) according to the Daily Mail @ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2210323/Obama-family-costs-taxpayers-1-4BILLION-year.html
The Obamas cost this Country $1.4 Billion a year.
2.) No one EVER discusses his Health? WHY?
3.) Notice how he never seems to stay around the WH very often or for long periods?
4.) Wonder why they have ordered a large number of buses to block his parade route down Penna. Ave after he´s sworn in?
5.) There was only a brief mention and then nothing; on the fact that they found a bullet in the door face of the Truman Balcony last year. ( where Zippy goes to sneak a smoke.)
6.) For a sitting President, his behavior seems to suggest that he is running scared as hell, and afraid for himself.
7.)It all seems to point to the fact that Zippy has to wonder IF something were to happen ( ala Pres. Reagan) WOULD those SSA´s really step up and take a hit for an avowed Socialist Community Organizer Commie?
8.) NO wonder he bobs and weaves around...I would not be him for all the tea in China.


Reply 42 - Posted by: rocco49, 1/19/2013 7:05:11 PM     (No. 9127085)

So you think he´s gonna get it?


Reply 43 - Posted by: srhcb, 1/19/2013 7:09:28 PM     (No. 9127097)

I work in a professional office and volunteer at the local Salvation Army. I talk with a broad spectrum of people every day.

I haven´t heard anyone say they give a damn about Obama´s Inaugural.


Reply 44 - Posted by: OregonBoomerGirl, 1/19/2013 7:24:40 PM     (No. 9127112)

On OReilly last night he talked about the inevibility of the economy crashing soon because of the unsustainable debt, and how all our money and assets will be worthless. What I want to know is, why don´t members of the media care about this - they all have a lot of assets. I only conclude that they don´t believe it will happen, they engage in magical thinking.

I too notice that Obama spends very little time at the Whitehouse, he gallivants around far too much to be able to be really running the country. Therefore, it´s Jarrett and all the toadies and ivy league pointyheads making decisions. Then you look at how idiotic so many congress members are, and we get a realistic picture of what our government is comprised of, and it is sickening.

I have been robbed of my hope and my pride in this country, and I know the next four years will be hell. How he won re-election I will never, ever understand. But it has sealed our fate, I´m afraid.


Reply 45 - Posted by: eorsc, 1/19/2013 7:32:11 PM     (No. 9127124)

But-but-Jamie Foxx said Obama is our Lord and Savior. The same guy who can´t get up in public without making racist remarks. Obama set race relations back 50 years and Foxx is cheering him on!


Reply 46 - Posted by: EnsignO´Toole, 1/19/2013 7:45:55 PM     (No. 9127139)

#42´s questions are excellent ones, and if we had true journalists, some of them might be answered. Just as other Ldotters, I am still in disbelief that Obama won re-election. However, I do remember him stating very confidently that he would win - it struck me as odd at the time he said it because his and Romney´s numbers were so close. There was a certainty when he said it, and it wasn´t false bravado. Everything about the man is creepy.


Reply 47 - Posted by: nimby, 1/19/2013 10:37:07 PM     (No. 9127303)

Does anyone seriously believe this cr@p?


Reply 48 - Posted by: Penney, 1/19/2013 11:55:03 PM     (No. 9127359)

´There is no joy in Mudville.´ The 0bama Administration has struck o-u-t.


Reply 49 - Posted by: WhatMediaBias, 1/20/2013 10:23:46 AM     (No. 9127900)

Nov. 6, 2012: The day democracy died.


Reply 50 - Posted by: pete moss, 1/20/2013 10:39:07 AM     (No. 9127921)

"I have been robbed of my hope and my pride in this country, and I know the next four years will be hell. How he won re-election I will never, ever understand. But it has sealed our fate, I´m afraid."

The next four years will be hell and then the next four years after that will be even worse. Hillary Clinton... Andrew Cuomo....? Who will the Republican idiots run? That fat slob Chris Christie? Maybe they´ll run that total surrender monkey, idiot John McCain again!!! We need to find a REAL candidate. I don´t know, at this point who that would be, but it needs to someone who is not a carbon copy of the Demonrats.




Post Reply   Close thread 719645




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Journalist and author Haynes
Johnson dies at 81
Associated Press, by Barry Schweid    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/25/2013 12:57:50 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Haynes Johnson, a pioneering Washington journalist who won a Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of the civil rights movement and migrated from newspapers to television, books and teaching, died Friday. He was 81. The Washington Post reported he died at Suburban Hospital in Bethesda, Md. In a statement to the Post newsroom, Managing Editor Kevin Merida said Johnson died of a heart attack. Johnson was awarded a Pulitzer in 1966 for national reporting on the civil rights struggle in Selma, Ala., while with The Evening Star in Washington. He spent

Alleged member of
Hezbollah arrested here
San Antonio Express-News [TX], by Guillermo Contreras,    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/25/2013 12:37:05 AM     Post Reply
The FBI has arrested a San Antonio man on charges he lied to get into the United States and tried to get a sensitive Defense Department position. Wissam Allouche, 44, appeared for an initial hearing Friday afternoon, and shook his head when U.S. Magistrate Judge Henry Bemporad read the charges leveled in a federal indictment. The judge ordered him held pending a bail hearing and his arraignment Tuesday. “He allegedly tried to cover up his affiliation with Hezbollah,” said special agent Erik Vasys, spokesman for the FBI in San Antonio. “It is believed

The press must have
the ability to ask questions
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/25/2013 12:31:00 AM     Post Reply
A FREE press in a democracy demands a delicate balance. The First Amendment means the media must have the right to inquire without hindrance. The government has a legitimate interest in keeping some national security information secret. When these come into conflict, the balance often has been struck this way: The media are free to pursue secrets, but it is up to those in government to keep them. When the media come into possession of information that, if disclosed, could be damaging, the government can plead the case for secrecy — and the media generally are open to persuasion.

The Inevitable Decline
of Great Britain (Cont.)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/24/2013 11:54:00 PM     Post Reply
The brutal murder of an off-duty soldier by two Muslim activists continues to dominate the news in Great Britain. The scene was utterly bizarre: in broad daylight, in a busy section of London, the two Muslims apparently ran the soldier down with a car, within a block or two of his barracks, and then attacked him with knives and a meat cleaver. They attempted to behead him, apparently not quite successfully, as hundreds of passers-by looked on. No one stopped them–private ownership of firearms being illegal in the U.K.–but three random women

GOP widening Sebelius
shakedown probe
Hot Air, by Ed Morrissey    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/24/2013 8:41:11 PM     Post Reply
A day after insurers complained that Kathleen Sebelius and the Obama administration had pressured them to fund Enroll America, a House committee sent them a request for more information on the matter. The Energy and Commerce Committee had already begun looking into whether Sebelius had broken any laws by attempting to get donations from an industry that will be heavily regulated by her under ObamaCare, and now The Hill reports this new request as a widening of that probe (via Rare): House Republicans have widened their probe of Health and Human Services

Obama signals retreat in
the fight against terrorism
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:23:10 PM     Post Reply
President Obama delivered an address today at the National Defense University called “The Future of our Fight Against Terrorism.” Actually, part of the speech was about the past, including much self-congratulation and some shots at President Bush. This part of the speech is revisionist rubbish. As Max Boot explains: Obama said, for example, that after he came into office, “we unequivocally banned torture, affirmed our commitment to civilian courts, worked to align our policies with the rule of law, and expanded our consultations with Congress.” Umm, actually all of that happened in Bush’s second term.

Obama’s Speech: Hamlet
as Wartime Leader
National Review Online, by Bing West    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:19:52 PM     Post Reply
In seventy lugubrious paragraphs, President Obama today asked America whether as commander-in-chief he should bomb terrorists. He concluded that sometimes he should, and sometimes he shouldn’t. He couldn’t quite make up his mind. Therefore, he would appoint a panel to advise him. Mr. Obama has already authorized more than 200 such drone bombings. His staff has bragged that before ordering a bombing, he personally reviews who lives and who dies. Imagine if Prime Minister Churchill or President Truman had appeared on television to announce an advisory panel before bombing our enemy. We would be appalled



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Criminality Appears To Lie at the
Heart of the IRS Scandal

54 replie(s)
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM     Post Reply
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.

Eva Longoria graduates with
master´s degree in Chicano studies

52 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 5/23/2013 3:03:53 PM     Post Reply
Eva Longoria is backing up her beauty with a whole lot of brain. The actress graduated with a master´s degree Wednesday. Longoria, 38, took home a real degree (not an honorary one) in Chicano studies from Cal State Northridge, where she physically attended classes for three years, according to TMZ. "Big day today!!! Very excited to graduate for my master´s degree in Chicano studies! You´re never too old or too busy to continue your education!" the actress wrote on her Who Say site Wednesday, sharing loads of pics of her big day, posing with her family, cohorts and diploma.

Mark Levin Tears Into Obama: ‘Flat-
Out, Bald-Faced Lie’ That He Knew
Nothing About IRS Targeting

51 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Josh Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 9:48:28 PM     Post Reply
Conservative radio host Mark Levin is very skeptical of the idea that President Obama had absolutely no idea about the IRS tea party targeting before the story broke in the news mere weeks ago. Levin declared adamantly that it is a “flat-out, bald-faced lie” that Obama didn’t know beforehand, citing prior reports by a few conservative news outlets picking up on the news well before the 2012 presidential election. Levin said, “I don’t believe for two seconds that Obama wasn’t aware of this.”

Obama nominates Nuland for
assistant secretary of state

51 replie(s)
Politico, by Reid J. Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 10:08:52 PM     Post Reply
President Obama on Thursday nominated Victoria Nuland, a State Department official involved in the editing of the administration´s talking points on Benghazi, to be the next assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs. Nuland, a career foreign service officer who was until recently State´s top spokesperson, had long been expected to be nominated the post to replace Philip Gordon, who Obama picked to serve as Middle East coordinator for the National Security Council. Nuland´s nomination -- which requires Senate confirmation -- could come under scrutiny from Republicans who see her as playing a central role in shaping

Why was the Department
of Homeland Security monitoring
Tea Party IRS demonstrations?

50 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/23/2013 8:09:21 AM     Post Reply
What´s so interesting about 60 tea partiers protesting the IRS in San Jose, California on Tuesday, May 21st? The fact that this bit of information was conveyed to the protesters by a Department of Homeland Security officer who was also in attendance. What was a DHS agent doing at the San Jose Tea Party protest? (snip) they weren´t just spying on us in San Jose and monitoring us in San Francisco, they were watching us throughout the entire state

Anthony Weiner says Houston
psychiatric facility made
him ‘a new man’

50 replie(s)
Houston Chronicle, by Nicole Narea    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 10:52:02 PM     Post Reply
Anthony Weiner’s New York mayoral candidacy was only made more improbable today after he revealed that he visited a Houston psychiatric facility following his resignation from Congress in 2011. Haunted by scandal surrounding his sexually explicit online communications with women, the Democratic former congressman sought treatment for his compulsive behavior from mental health professionals at the Gabbard Center. According to its website, the facility provides “3-day outpatient psychiatric evaluation,” particularly to “professionals who are in personal or professional crises.” While Weiner did not disclose

The Mystery Night
43 replie(s)
Politico, by Rich Lowry    Original Article
Posted By: RappVol- 5/23/2013 7:36:59 AM     Post Reply
On “Fox News Sunday” last weekend, White House aide Dan Pfeiffer was asked about President Barack Obama’s whereabouts the night of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi. This was the night when we lost our first ambassador in 30 years, and when three other Americans were killed in an attack that lasted all night long at multiple locations within the eastern Libyan city. Since the president is commander in chief, one would think where he was and what he did during such an event would be of obvious public concern.


Post Reply   Close thread 719645





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~