A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Backfire: Obama Approval
Plummets During Gun Push
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Backfire: Obama Approval
Plummets During Gun Push

Breitbart´s Big Government, by Mike Flynn

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/18/2013 9:17:09 PM

Just a week before the New Year, Obama enjoyed his highest approval ratings of 2012. According to Gallup, 58% of Americans approved of the job Obama was doing. Survey results released today by Gallup, though, show Obama´s approval rating has plummeted to just 49%. It is a dramatic drop, especially coming over a holiday period when people traditionally pay little attention to politics. Four years ago, at his first inauguration, a full 69% of Americans approved of Obama. The drop in Obama´s approval from 4 years ago is understandable, given the sluggish economy and the hope American´s had

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Bpl40, 1/18/2013 9:36:13 PM     (No. 9125556)

This stuff is pure meaningless garbage. When push comes to shove the 47% parasites still vote for their free phones. It´s not going to be easy getting out of this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: fireman28, 1/18/2013 9:58:32 PM     (No. 9125576)

From the 20th Amendment
Section 1. The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, ....

So we will be without a Prez until Dear Reader is sworn in on the 21st.

How convenient.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: veritas, 1/18/2013 10:38:50 PM     (No. 9125619)

FTA: Four years ago, at his first inauguration, a full 69% of Americans approved of Obama.

Hey, thanks to Stinky´s water-carrying media accomplices, he was bathed in a more glowing light than the subject of a Thomas Kincade painting, but we knew less about him than we did about "D.B. Cooper" -- and still do.

#2: The United States has not had a President [or Vice-President or...] since the end of George W. Bush´s term.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Crosscut, 1/18/2013 10:49:33 PM     (No. 9125632)

He will never drop below 47%.


Reply 5 - Posted by: chance_232, 1/18/2013 11:08:31 PM     (No. 9125654)

Well.....I guess that this proves that 49% of the population are complete morons and 10% are just stupid.


Reply 6 - Posted by: get er done, 1/18/2013 11:09:10 PM     (No. 9125655)

Must agree with #3, point #2. America has not had a legitimate president or vice president since President George W. Bush left office.


Reply 7 - Posted by: southron, 1/18/2013 11:37:35 PM     (No. 9125685)

His approval might drop even lower as more of the low-information voters feel squeezed by the souring economy.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: floridagator, 1/19/2013 4:52:35 AM     (No. 9125809)

After adjusting my tinfoil beanie and getting the propeller to spin again, I realized the the Joos who secretly run the world from bunkers beneath their banks decided to use the Newtown massacre to trick society back into political homeostasis by getting their boys in DC to fire up the gun crowd. The pubbies were feeling a little low after the election and were beginning to drift away. This brought everyone back and allows them to feel as if this country is still worth fighting for. /s


Reply 9 - Posted by: hamrman, 1/19/2013 8:02:46 AM     (No. 9125945)

It ought to be as low as Congress´!


Reply 10 - Posted by: hadass23, 1/19/2013 8:11:49 AM     (No. 9125954)

Given a free choice there isn´t a family in America that would choose Michelle & Obama for protection over a trustworth Smith & Wesson. Even pigs in the the Shumer family chose guns over cops for protection.


Reply 11 - Posted by: ROLFnader, 1/19/2013 9:45:00 AM     (No. 9126190)

FTA:"The drop in Obama´s approval from 4 years ago is understandable......".
No, it is not understandable at all. It should have dropped by triple digits.



Post Reply   Close thread 719625




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



This Is What Tyranny Looks Like
American Thinker, by Bryce Buchanan    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 10:55:48 AM     Post Reply
Here is a woman we will need to learn much more about in the coming weeks. Sarah Hall Ingram is a highly valued employee at the IRS. In the last three years she has received $103,390 in bonuses for her excellent work. She was the Commissioner of the Tax-Exempt and Government Entitles Division. Under her leadership, groups that expressed a fear of large, out-of-control government were systematically crushed by her branch of our large, out-of-control government. They were specifically singled out for harassment for political reasons. Secret information about the conservative applicants was leaked to leftist

GOP eager to link IRS scandal to
‘Obamacare’ takedown efforts
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr.    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:27:20 AM     Post Reply
An exasperated Rep. Pat Tiberi on Friday asked the former acting chief of the IRS to explain to Congress why he would move the leader of the division that targeted conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status to a branch that is overseeing one of the most partisan issues of recent memory — President Obama’s health care law. “Because she’s a superb civil servant, sir,” Steven Miller, who resigned under duress last week, told the Ohio Republican at a hearing before the House Committee on Ways and Means. The transfer of Sarah Hall Ingram to the helm

What If the Obama Scandals
Had Surfaced Last Fall?
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:19:58 AM     Post Reply
I was on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show last night, talking about the Benghazi talking point emails. Near the end of the segment, Hugh asked whether I thought the presidential election might have turned out differently if Obama and Clinton had not succeeded in covering up the truth about Benghazi. I was skeptical. The story of the election, I said, was the Obama campaign’s ability to turn out, once again, a large majority of the low-information voters who swept Obama into office in 2008. Few of those low-information voters, I said, would either have understood, or cared about, Benghazi

A Breach of Trust
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Susan Combs    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:15:18 AM     Post Reply
As tax collector for the nation’s second-largest state, I know it’s a necessary function — from the fire station to the space station, nothing government does is possible without taxes. But it’s sure no path to popularity. Tax collectors have had a rotten reputation since biblical times. For all the services and all the people that depend on it, our work has to be viewed as fair and even-handed. It’s a basic bond of trust, and once that trust is lost, it’s hard to get back. Our entire nation was born when the colonists decided Britain’s taxes were unfair

Durbin Asked IRS’ Shulman
to Probe ‘Several’ Conservative
501(c)(4) Groups in 2010
PJ Media, by Bridget Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:28:31 PM     Post Reply
While many Democrats have joined Republicans in public shaming of the Internal Revenue Service for singling out conservative groups, others say the scandal is just a byproduct of muddied rules about nonprofits and political activity in the wake of the Citizens United ruling — and they’re hoping that they can steer the conversation from outrage over political targeting to fuel for campaign finance reform. But senior Dems may have much more than an opportunity to try to turn scandal to their advantage: they may have a degree of culpability as one especially vocal proponent

   

 

  


 
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

IRS Actions Show High-
Level, Political Coordination
PJ Media, by Bryan Preston    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 9:13:13 PM     Post Reply
In today’s hearing before the House Ways and Means Committee, outgoing not-really-fired commissioner Steven Miller admitted that a high-ranking member of the Internal Revenue Service planted the question that led to the agency’s apology for targeting conservatives. [IRS official] Lerner disclosed the information last Friday while speaking at a tax conference organized by the American Bar Association. Asked about the incident, she said only that she answered honestly a question that was posed to her. The question, however, was posed to Lerner by Celia Roady, a Washington, D.C. tax lawyer who sits



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

48 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.

43 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM     Post Reply
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.

   

 



 
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

41 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

When it rains, it pours: Ten
press conference take aways

35 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM     Post Reply
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

35 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 719625





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~