|
|
| |
Topic: Republicans Can´t Govern From One House Of Congress |
Republicans Can´t Govern From One House Of Congress
Investors Business Daily, by Charles Krauthammer
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Desert Fox, 1/17/2013 8:08:32 PM
|
| It has become conventional wisdom that Republicans are suffering an internal split that President Obama is successfully exploiting to neuter the Republican House. It is not true, however, that the Republican split is philosophical and fundamental, and that a hopelessly divided GOP is therefore headed for decline, perhaps irrelevance. In fact, the split is tactical, not philosophical; short-term, not fundamental. And therefore quite solvable. How do we know? Simple thought experiment: Imagine that we had a Republican president. Would the party be deeply divided over policy, at war with itself in Congress? Not at all.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
TruthAndJustice, 1/17/2013 8:23:58 PM (No. 9123152)
The wobbly Docs advice...bend over!
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
trackman999, 1/17/2013 8:26:43 PM (No. 9123157)
The republicans CAN defund.They can refuse to pass anything backed by reid and obama.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
nonsense, 1/17/2013 8:47:19 PM (No. 9123197)
...but they will never run out of other people´s money in this country as long as Helicopter Ben can print, add, digitize, or whatever he does to create funny money.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
sunsong, 1/17/2013 8:48:39 PM (No. 9123202)
Offer to raise the debt limit by $250 Billion.
The pubbies need to hire some top notch PR people.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
KTWO, 1/17/2013 8:52:43 PM (No. 9123211)
Dr. K usually offers good advice. This time I wonder.
What is a tactical split? Why would a party want to employee such a split. Or any split?
Granted, the GOP can´t govern while they control only the House. So what? Is it therefore better to divide and be even weaker?
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
nhchemist, 1/17/2013 9:03:35 PM (No. 9123235)
"Republicans should simply block what they can, further tax hikes, for example. The general rule is: From a single house of Congress you can resist but you cannot impose."
Republicans can still be the party of NO. They cannot impose their will on 0bama, but they hold the purse strings. Refuse to pass Continuing Resolutions and force the Senate to address a House passed budget. Bargain with the Democrats but don´t give up their power to shape spending.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
rabbit, 1/17/2013 9:05:12 PM (No. 9123237)
Dr. K does indeed offer good advice. All the screaming and stomping of feet is not winning new Republican voters, and is turning off some current Republican voters.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Juzthinkin, 1/17/2013 9:08:55 PM (No. 9123243)
The good Dr. is telling it like it is. Good advice.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Cleanhousein2012, 1/17/2013 9:14:49 PM (No. 9123253)
#7 - what is turning off many former Republican voters is their acting Like Democrats. My Congressman voted to raise my taxes and not cut government spending (and I´m not one of the so-called rich).
If the end result is the same, what difference does it make which party we vote for. Higher taxes and no spending cut is the same, whether Dem or Repub. I can´t see how the repubs will ever get my vote back again.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
harper, 1/17/2013 9:17:34 PM (No. 9123255)
If the Dems wind up owning what they create and enact, the voters will have an easy choice to make.
However, the Dem-Media tag team is pretty good at covering their tracks. The Dems know they can usually create a problem, then jump in front of the subsequent protest parade, and the media will ensure the low-info voter believes it.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Blackeagle, 1/17/2013 9:59:17 PM (No. 9123321)
Define leadership. The GOP-lead Congress bottled up Clinton for six years (1994-2000). That´s why the economy didn´t do an Obama-style pratfall. Gridlock can be a good lock.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
noproblems, 1/17/2013 11:27:29 PM (No. 9123438)
has Charles spent more than a day outside the DC/NY bubble he lives in?
time to retire Charles. take the Faux "allstars" with you
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 1/18/2013 12:30:01 AM (No. 9123472)
Yes 11, but when Clinton was President we had the House and the Senate. Even so, we failed to impeach Clinton. The House voted to impeach but the Senate would not and so it died. So much for a different and better kind of leadership. It didn´t exist in the Senate.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
sickened, 1/18/2013 1:07:56 AM (No. 9123484)
Too many spineless Conservatives in Congress and in the media. Let´s not forget, Congress defunded the Vietnam War against the wishes of a President who was elected by a landslide. Boehner has the power of the purse, but the backbone of a jellyfsh.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Rakasha, 1/18/2013 6:16:13 AM (No. 9123591)
Republicans don´t have the power because they have too broad a consensus. Perhaps I should say Republicans won´t excercise power because they have too broad a concensus. They don´t dare risk alienating anyone so, like the miller and his son, they do foolish and dangerous things that will end in disaster if they continue.
The idea that the party will automatically rally around fellow Republicans 100% is ludicrous. Did the party rally around Reagan? Did they rally around Newt? Sarah Palin? Allen West, Ted Cruz, Joe Miller? The philosophical and fundamental differences will not go away just because people stick their fingers in their ears and pretend they aren´t there.
Here´s a thought experiment. If all the fools and children who think the party should stand on its original principles of small government and rigid constitutionality were to get fed up enough to withdraw from the party, would the Republicans win? If so, then you have no worries. You are free to ignore us and quit pretending that we are needed in the ´big tent´. If not, then perhaps you´d better find a way to include us (Hint: ´Quit whining and vote for the Republican´, is not inclusion) because it should be clear by now that we don´t back down. It´s not in our nature. So deal with it or move on.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Desert Fox"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Desert Fox"
|
Obama Surrenders Just As Islamic Jihad Intensifies
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/24/2013 7:28:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
War On Terror: As jihadists bomb Boston, behead a soldier in London and firebomb police in Sweden, President Obama has decided America´s actions have offended them and it´s time to retreat. In arguably the weakest national security speech by a commander in chief, Obama denied Thursday that our terrorist enemy is inspired by Islam — while at the same time appeasing Islamic critics by apologizing for drone strikes and agreeing to throttle back on such precision bombings, and close down the terrorist prison at Guantanamo. He vowed to wind down further military actions in the war on terror,
|
| |
|
The Dots Already Lead To Obama In The IRS Scandal
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/24/2013 7:11:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Abuse Of Power: Any scandal investigation that expects a "Eureka!" moment, a White House e-mail, or Oval Office smoking gun will be misguided. In fact, the dots are already connected directly to the president. Barack Obama is not foolish enough to have a tape recording system hidden in his desk. And his administration staff are not careless enough to send one another incriminating e-mails. If the president was behind the IRS unlawfully harassing conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, we can be sure the communications were all sotto voce and in persona, like any good Chicago political operator.
|
Obama Orders Eric Holder To Investigate Himself
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/24/2013 7:00:15 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Press Freedom: The president worries about the "chilling effect" of leak investigations as his attorney general signs the warrant labeling a Fox News reporter as a violator of the Espionage Act. The hypocrisy is breathtaking. ´I am troubled by the possibility that leak investigations may chill the investigative journalism that holds government accountable," President Obama said with a straight face in a speech Thursday at the National Defense University. "Journalists should not be at legal risk for doing their jobs." Indeed, investigative reporting should not be a criminal offense — just ask Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, whose digging unearthed Watergate.
|
Obama Says Don´t Fear Gov´t; Tell That To Fox News
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/24/2013 6:57:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Amendment: Even Barack Obama´s cheerleaders are gagging at the latest news of spying on reporters. But will they also understand that this is just part of a much broader attack on freedom? The president told Ohio State graduates three weeks ago to tune out those who warn that "tyranny is always lurking just around the corner." Since then — pardon our paranoia — the news has been thick with warnings. First was the revelation that the Internal Revenue Service had been targeting conservative groups for extra scrutiny. Next came the news that the Department
|
|
Bystanders in their own fate
|
|
Orange County Register (Ca), by Mark Steyn
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/24/2013 5:32:34 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Wednesday, Drummer Lee Rigby of the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, a man who had served Queen and country honorably in the hell of Helmand Province in Afghanistan, emerged from his barracks on Wellington Street, named after the Duke thereof, in southeast London. Minutes later, he was hacked to death in broad daylight and in full view of onlookers by two men with machetes who crowed "Allahu Akbar!" as they dumped his carcass in the middle of the street like so much roadkill. As grotesque as this act of savagery was, the aftermath was even more unsettling
|
Liberal Schlub Lies to Insult Fox Viewers
|
|
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/24/2013 5:11:46 PM
Post Reply
|
|
RUSH: Here´s Mike in Greenville, North Carolina. Great to have you, sir, on Open Line Friday. Hi. CALLER: Thank you, sir. I really appreciate it, Mr. Limbaugh. It´s a pleasure to be on your show, and let me do two things. First of all, I´m saying from the good people of North Carolina to you, good health. And you can be forgiven for confusing an F-4 with an F-104, as far as I´m concerned. RUSH: I appreciate that, sir. Thank you for your understanding and your tolerance.
|
| |
|
You Can´t Convince Me the Code Pink Heckler Wasn´t a Setup
|
|
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/24/2013 4:50:30 PM
Post Reply
|
|
RUSH: It´s Open Line Friday. The greatest career risk taken in modern American big, major American media, turning the content of the program over to rank amateurs. Compared to me, highly trained broadcast specialist. And that´s when we go to the photocopies. On Friday, whatever you want to talk about is hunky-dory, so have at it. Whatever: question, comment, a brief sentence and a hang-up. If you want to call in protest, if you want to pretend you´re Code Pink. You know, how about that?
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Criminality Appears To Lie at the Heart of the IRS Scandal
|
|
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.
|
Eva Longoria graduates with master´s degree in Chicano studies
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: NorthernDog- 5/23/2013 3:03:53 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Eva Longoria is backing up her beauty with a whole lot of brain. The actress graduated with a master´s degree Wednesday. Longoria, 38, took home a real degree (not an honorary one) in Chicano studies from Cal State Northridge, where she physically attended classes for three years, according to TMZ. "Big day today!!! Very excited to graduate for my master´s degree in Chicano studies! You´re never too old or too busy to continue your education!" the actress wrote on her Who Say site Wednesday, sharing loads of pics of her big day, posing with her family, cohorts and diploma.
|
Mark Levin Tears Into Obama: ‘Flat- Out, Bald-Faced Lie’ That He Knew Nothing About IRS Targeting
|
|
Mediaite, by Josh Feldman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 9:48:28 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Conservative radio host Mark Levin is very skeptical of the idea that President Obama had absolutely no idea about the IRS tea party targeting before the story broke in the news mere weeks ago. Levin declared adamantly that it is a “flat-out, bald-faced lie” that Obama didn’t know beforehand, citing prior reports by a few conservative news outlets picking up on the news well before the 2012 presidential election. Levin said, “I don’t believe for two seconds that Obama wasn’t aware of this.”
|
Obama nominates Nuland for assistant secretary of state
|
|
Politico, by Reid J. Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 10:08:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama on Thursday nominated Victoria Nuland, a State Department official involved in the editing of the administration´s talking points on Benghazi, to be the next assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs. Nuland, a career foreign service officer who was until recently State´s top spokesperson, had long been expected to be nominated the post to replace Philip Gordon, who Obama picked to serve as Middle East coordinator for the National Security Council. Nuland´s nomination -- which requires Senate confirmation -- could come under scrutiny from Republicans who see her as playing a central role in shaping
|
Why was the Department of Homeland Security monitoring Tea Party IRS demonstrations?
|
|
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 5/23/2013 8:09:21 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What´s so interesting about 60 tea partiers protesting the IRS in San Jose, California on Tuesday, May 21st? The fact that this bit of information was conveyed to the protesters by a Department of Homeland Security officer who was also in attendance. What was a DHS agent doing at the San Jose Tea Party protest? (snip) they weren´t just spying on us in San Jose and monitoring us in San Francisco, they were watching us throughout the entire state
|
Anthony Weiner says Houston psychiatric facility made him ‘a new man’
|
|
Houston Chronicle, by Nicole Narea
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 10:52:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Anthony Weiner’s New York mayoral candidacy was only made more improbable today after he revealed that he visited a Houston psychiatric facility following his resignation from Congress in 2011. Haunted by scandal surrounding his sexually explicit online communications with women, the Democratic former congressman sought treatment for his compulsive behavior from mental health professionals at the Gabbard Center. According to its website, the facility provides “3-day outpatient psychiatric evaluation,” particularly to “professionals who are in personal or professional crises.” While Weiner did not disclose
|
The Mystery Night
|
|
Politico, by Rich Lowry
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: RappVol- 5/23/2013 7:36:59 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On “Fox News Sunday” last weekend, White House aide Dan Pfeiffer was asked about President Barack Obama’s whereabouts the night of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi. This was the night when we lost our first ambassador in 30 years, and when three other Americans were killed in an attack that lasted all night long at multiple locations within the eastern Libyan city. Since the president is commander in chief, one would think where he was and what he did during such an event would be of obvious public concern.
|
| | |
|
|