Subtext: "Real Men at Work Spur Envy in the Effeminate Elites on the Right Coast".

(Alternate subtext: Eunuchs Need Not Apply.)

Heh.

My next-door neighbor told me about the oil fields in N. Dakota. He pulled up stakes to go and hasn´t been back. I guess he´s doing just fine. He couldn´t make any money here in job-poor California.

Elitist lefties hate average Americans.

Yes, and how many crimes against women occur in NYC? If it is news, so be it. Maybe it is Breitbart spinning the article.

Yep, this is their new angle in the war on fracking. Since SCIENCE! has shown that fracking actually reduces our "carbon footprint", they have to take another tack. Apparently, fracking not only brings jobs, it brings ... *gasp* ... men.

Some commenters I´ve seen have pointed out that there´s a deep bench for employees in these jobs and the companies have the ability to be intolerant of truly damaging shenanigans outside of work. So if the NYT is talking about anything more aggressive than men showing interest in women (I know, shocking!), then the company can easily remove said perpetrators.

Why doesn´t the NYT send its girly-men and manly-women to Saudi Arabia and vicinity to report on how women are treated in this oil producing region? Surely there must be some enlightened islamist practices we yokels need to be educated about by the superior intellectual wussies of the NYT?

I work up there and can say that the NYT article is pure BS. While it´s true that there are not many women, I have never witnesses any sort of harassment.

Corb Lund has a good video on YouTube called, ´´The Toughest Neck Around,´´ which seems appropriate to recommend here.Lund is a new favorite Canadian musician of ours, along with Ian Tyson´s western music. Both are from Alberta.

This is like the screaming about murder rate in the United States with all the guns.
Yet, if you compare the murder rate with guns to the Caucasian race only. It is the same as Belgium.

It is the same as food stamp and welfare statements, "more white people on food stamps and welfare than African American or Latinos.”

Yes, but not mentioned in this little saying it Blacks make up only about 13% and Latinos only 15%.

Why is this woman in Williston if it is such a terrible place? Because, that´s where the money is and she, like the men who go there to work, wants a chance to make some money.

And she is in the bar because she, like them, wants a little action.

Some tattooed chick drinking shots at a bar... Who woule EVER think she´d take them up on their offer. Self-mutilating yourself with tattoos and being offended by a $7000 offer somehow doesn´t seem to fit.

The real "sexist nightmare" is in the fact that these are tough jobs in harsh conditions
unsuited for most women. Hard physical work,
cold climate, difficult living conditions, etc. Perhaps these "advances" were made by visiting NYT´s ´reporters´ and they were upset at getting rebuffed.

North Dakota is normally, or formerly, fly-over country.

But some lady feminist had to hop off her broom there... park it...
and then manage to get her failure to wear a bra caught in a wringer.
Bet that made a fwapping sound!

Now the rest of us have to pay for it...
by being subjected to the NYT´s diatribe.

Just pink lace panties in a wad.
To be ignored.

What´s the problem? I love manly men!

If you are tattooed and have piercings and doing shots in a bar, you should feel very lucky any guys, even a drunk ones want to look at you naked.

I´d bet money that the "womyn" weren´t offered that type of money - and were actually being the butt end of jokes - as all are subject to be in any bar setting - even Noo Yawk.

Well, it´s the same way in enlightened NYC. Just watch as the ladies walk past any construction site, where real men work.

Maybe I should move to ND.

Half (really, I´d say 80%) of the NYT´s readership is gay, so I´m sure many are planning a move to ´where the action is´...

These are the places Men go to work.

The nyt has no "Occupational Expertise" in these matters.