A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: More Guns = More Murders? A
Myth. More Guns = Fewer Murders
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
More Guns = More Murders? A
Myth. More Guns = Fewer Murders

Investors Business Daily, by John R. Lott Jr.

Original Article

Posted By:Desert Fox, 1/16/2013 7:45:34 PM

In the wake of the recent shootings, the liberal media have concluded we need more gun control. President Obama just signed 23 executive actions related to guns, and promises to do more later. To them the logic seems obvious, that more guns mean more deaths, suicides, and accidents. And the U.S. supposedly has very high murder rates, they argue, because our nation is teeming with guns. So with stricter gun control, we would suffer fewer murders and less violence. As Charles Blow recently claimed in the New York Times: "America has the highest gun homicide rate, the highest

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: ho72, 1/16/2013 8:12:58 PM     (No. 9121141)

All factual and logical arguments, as were the arguments against a second term for Obama -- and we know how that turned out.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 2 - Posted by: joew9, 1/16/2013 8:52:15 PM     (No. 9121199)

More murders - fewer murders. That statistic does not matter. It could get biased by criminals killing each other in massive numbers (which is what a large portion of the gun crime is). What does matter is fewer murders and violence against innocent law abiding people. Taking guns away from law abiding people will only mean violent crime against law abiding people will increase.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: dcomd, 1/16/2013 9:10:31 PM     (No. 9121217)

It already has #2, just google ´black on white crime´ since this regime has taken over and that will give you a window into what the future holds.

And for those of you who will jump on the "Oh, that´s racist"; prove me wrong (btw, I micturate on you and jug-ears!)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 4 - Posted by: fishermanswife, 1/16/2013 9:23:42 PM     (No. 9121233)

pResident Helter Skelter.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 5 - Posted by: dvc, 1/16/2013 9:27:21 PM     (No. 9121237)

Read his books. I have met and talked with John Lott for a few hours. Very bright reasearch economist who wandered into the gun research area, and was shocked at the hatred he got after a some simple research paper.

This piqued his interest, previously zero, in gun crime and it has been an interesting ride, as he has conclusively demolished the leftist and hoplophobe arguments with thorough and wide ranging research, and his mathematical and statistical research methods are absolute impeccable. They hate him but cannot factually challenge his work.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 6 - Posted by: hebrew_hammer, 1/16/2013 9:42:25 PM     (No. 9121254)

We know that gun control is counterproductive - a negative externality in an already dysfunctional environment. However, I believe we need to stop arguing the point.

I did something for the first time today - I flatly told a boss of mine that he was wrong. He told me he was in favor of Obama´s EOs and I said I was entirely opposed.

He started arguing the usual asinine NPR points about irrelevant things like hunters and so on, and I said the usual things about the statistically provable inverse relationship between gun control and violent crime. At that point he accused me, and all Republicans, of "twisting the facts to prove [our] point."

Tell that to the ´Republican´ Senate in NY, huh?

Anyway, at that point, I gently denied being a liar, and asked him to put facts and figures aside for the moment (this is easy because he´s a lib). I then pointed out that none of that is of importance, regardless of violent crime rates, because:

1.) This is a human rights issue. Our Bill of Rights explicitly states this is a right of American citizens. In combination with our Declaration of Independence, it implies that it is a human right, bestowed upon us by G-d or nature.

2.) It is explicitly worded in our aforementioned Constitution, and by virtue of being in the top ten, has a special place within it. Regardless of what petty fascists like Obama and Feinstein say or do, that law says what it says - it´s not alive, and it is the foundational SUPREME law of the land. And certain things shall not be infringed.

These are the points we always need to make.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 7 - Posted by: F16 guy, 1/16/2013 11:51:28 PM     (No. 9121388)

I found this earlier:

"The great irony of this assault on one of the most important protections in the Constitution is that it is extremely unlikely that Obama himself could pass a background check required to obtain a firearm permit, as this requires submission of data that would be troubling for Obama, given the ongoing dispute about his birth narrative (place of birth) and undetermined citizenship status.

The permit also references unlawful drug use. It´s well known that Obama acknowledged illicit use of cocaine during the ´08 campaign; the type of hard drug use that would mean denial of a security clearance to an ordinary citizen seeking a GS-13 position in the federal government (http://www.atf.gov/forms/download/atf-f-5310-12.pdf).

Obama was never vetted for his Constitutional eligibility; he cannot explain a Connecticut-based Social Security Number and has kept his citizenship-related records sealed from public disclosure, offering only online images (of his long-form birth certificate and draft registration) which computer and forensics experts have now widely declared to be crude forgeries."


  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

  


 

Post Reply   Close thread 719321




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Desert Fox"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Desert Fox"



Hillary Clinton Praises
‘Incredibly Brave’ Young
Woman Admitting Undocumented Status
New York Observer, by Colin Campbell    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/17/2014 7:51:42 PM     Post Reply
Hillary Clinton today praised a 19-year-old woman who broke down crying at an event today as she revealed that she is an undocumented immigrant. The former first lady, secretary of state and potential 2016 presidential candidate encountered the passionate young woman while taking questions at a “Girls: A No Ceilings Conversation” event at the Lower East Side Girl’s Club in Manhattan, “I have a very different glass ceiling than some of the girls are exhibiting here. For the first time publicly I want to say that I’m an undocumented immigrant,” said the woman, named Nova, who quickly began to tear

The ´War on Women´ Failed in 2012
Wall Street Journal, by Michael Medved    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/17/2014 7:48:13 PM     Post Reply
President Obama is suddenly upset about the alleged wage gap between men and women, but he´s not responding to a national economic crisis. Instead, he is attempting to revive the "war on women" theme that, according to Washington wisdom, helped carry Democrats to victory in 2012 and might do again in 2014. If this narrative were true, the White House could spend the year demonizing Republicans as women-hating creeps, driving women to the polls in November and helping the party hold the Senate. But the conventional analysis isn´t accurate. National exit polls from 2012 show scant success for the war-on-women

Judge Strikes Down Costly
Provision Of Dodd-Frank
Investors Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/17/2014 7:08:34 PM     Post Reply
Regulation: In a victory for common sense, a federal judge has voided a race-based mandate of the Dodd-Frank Act that would have cost manufacturers and retailers billions in compliance expenses. Marking the first time a court has ruled that a provision of Dodd-Frank violates the Constitution, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that the financial "reform" law´s bizarre rule requiring companies to disclose whether their products contain "conflict minerals" from Africa violates the First Amendment. As we´ve argued, the rule had zero to do with financial reform and was sneaked into the law by Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters

Regulator Without Peer
Wall Street Journal, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/17/2014 7:01:32 PM     Post Reply
Anyone wondering why the U.S. economy can´t seem to grow at its usual pace should examine one product category where production is booming: federal regulation. Washington set a new record in 2013 by issuing final rules consuming 26,417 pages in the Federal Register. While plenty of government employees deserve credit for this milestone, leadership matters. And by this measure President Obama has never been surpassed in the Oval Office. The latest rule-making tally comes from the Competitive Enterprise Institute´s Wayne Crews, who on April 29 will publish his annual review of federal regulation in

   

 

B-G1


 
Obama´s Plan: Taxes,
Spending And Debt
Investors Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/17/2014 6:59:40 PM     Post Reply
Fiscal Policy: Remember President Obama´s vow that, if re-elected, he´d pursue "balanced" deficit reduction? Either he forgot, or he hopes voters have, because a new report shows his latest budget is entirely unbalanced. When Obama released his budget this March, he said it included "smart spending cuts" and closed "tax loopholes" that benefit only "the wealthiest Americans." Obama added that his budget would put "our debt on a downward path as a share of our total economy, which independent experts have set as a critical target for fiscal responsibility." As with just about everything Obama says, none of these claims turns out be

Emails Show Corruption
At Heart Of Administration
Investors Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/17/2014 6:54:56 PM     Post Reply
Corruption: New emails show that both the IRS and Justice Department were involved in a probe of Tea Party and other conservative groups. This is no mere scandal — it´s a major breach of the law. The newly released emails were gathered for a Freedom of Information Act request by Judicial Watch, a nonpartisan public interest law group. They show that former Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner discussed with the Justice Department going after conservative groups that she believed lied about their political activities. What´s shocking is that this discussion came just days before Lerner acknowledged that the IRS had

Reid: Bundy Supporters
Are “Domestic Terrorists”
KXNT-FM (Las Vegas, NV), by Chucl Meyer    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/17/2014 6:11:02 PM     Post Reply
Supporters of Bunkerville rancher Cliven Bundy have been called domestic terrorists by Senator Harry Reid. He made the comments during an appearance at a Review-Journal event, and repeated them, saying “what happened there was domestic terrorism’ The government says Bundy owes more than a million dollars in grazing fees and fines stemming from a 20-year dispute over trespass cattle. After obtaining court orders and beginning a roundup of cattle more than a week ago, BLM backed down, called off the roundup, and returned the cattle, after armed supporters of Bundy converged on the area. Reid says Bundy is a law



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Has Rush Limbaugh Finally
Reached the End Of The Road?

47 replie(s)
Forbes Magazine, by Rick Ungar    Original Article
Posted By: EveningStar- 4/16/2014 7:24:05 PM     Post Reply
Like him or hate him, there is no disputing that Rush Limbaugh’s very special brand of mixing right-wing politics with his flare for entertainment has produced one of the most successful radio programs in the medium’s long history. Whatever the burning political question of the day, millions of Americans have relished the opportunity to tune into Rush’s program, knowing that he would quickly take that hot potato, throw a few gallons of verbal kerosene into the mix and elevate the matter into a five alarm fire with a just a few well-chosen words spoken in the style only Rush Limbaugh could

Michelle Obama Riverdances
Through Dublin to the Tune
of $7,921,638

40 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Tom Fitton    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/17/2014 6:45:16 AM     Post Reply
When it comes to tracking the cost of Obama family vacations, there are two primary challenges. First, the Obamas are prolific jet-setters, so there are many details to track. Second, the Obama administration, clearly embarrassed by these lavish and frequent family vacations, stonewalls the release of records at every turn. But we have been relentless in pursuit of this information. Our attorneys file the lawsuits and make our case, and our investigators pour through pages of records and crunch the numbers. And the information we’ve uncovered – information that would otherwise remain under lock and key – shows that the

   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Why is US Senator Harry
Reid so concerned with
a local Nevada rancher?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Wayne Allyn Root    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:37:12 PM     Post Reply
I live in Las Vegas. I live and breath Nevada politics. Something is very wrong. Something smells rotten in the Nevada desert. And Senator Harry Reid’s fingerprints are all over it. I am of course referring to the Bundy Ranch siege. This was a dispute between a Nevada ranching family with rights to the land in question for 140 years and the BLM (Bureayu of Land Management). The government claims they haven’t paid grazing fees for 20 years. The result was a government assault on the ranch- including snipers with assault rifles, SUV’s, helicopters, airplanes and over 200 heavily armed troops. No

Which Actor Portrays The
Best James Bond?

38 replie(s)
American Spectator, by Jonah Goldberg and Taki Theodoracopulos    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/16/2014 11:20:22 AM     Post Reply
Look, everyone loves Sean Connery, particularly Sean Connery. That’s why he plays Sean Connery in every movie he’s in. People love that Scottish brogue so much, they don’t mind that he has it when he plays Juan Sánchez Villa-Lobos Ramírez, an immortal Spaniard in Highlander. The guy even won an Oscar for playing an Irish cop with a Scottish accent. Talk about sexist double standards: Meryl Streep has to master foreign dialects to get her golden statuettes. Connery just has to show up on time. In economics you devalue a currency by printing too much of it. In film you

Elizabeth Warren whines about coverage
of her fraudulent Indian claim

35 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Patrick Howley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:54:52 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote in her forthcoming book that she was “hurt” and “angry” by 2012 reporting on her fraudulent claim to Native American heritage. “What really threw me, though, were the constant attacks from the other side,” Warren wrote in her book “A Fighting Chance.” “I would almost persuade myself that I was starting to get the hang of full-throttle campaigning and then — bam! Out of left field, the state Republican Party, or the Brown campaign, or some blogger, would launch a rocket at me,” Warren wrote, adding, ”I was stunned by the attacks.” This reporter (blogger?) reported extensively

Former US president joins
opposition to Keystone XL

33 replie(s)
Houston Chronicle, by Jennifer A. Dlouhy    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 10:32:12 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Former President Jimmy Carter joined fellow Nobel laureates Wednesday in opposing Keystone XL, insisting that approving the pipeline would trigger “more climate upheaval” around the globe. In an open letter to President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, Carter and the nine other Nobel Peace Prize winners bluntly warned the leaders: “Your decision on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline will define your climate legacy.” The missive, published as an advertisement in Politico, represents the first time Carter has taken a position on the $5.4 billion project and makes him the first former president to come

Fox News Poll: Many voters say Obama lies
to the country on important matters

30 replie(s)
Fox News, by Dana Blanton    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 7:39:27 PM     Post Reply
About six in ten American voters think Barack Obama lies to the country on important matters some or most of the time, according to a Fox News poll released Wednesday. Thirty-seven percent think Obama lies “most of the time,” while another 24 percent say he lies “some of the time.” Twenty percent of voters say “only now and then” and 15 percent “never.” Click here for the poll results. President Obama has been accused by political opponents and media fact-checkers alike of telling falsehoods. Frequently cited: His repeated claim that under Obamacare “If you like your plan, you can keep

   

 



 
   

Post Reply   Close thread 719321





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~