A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: What everybody needs to know
about our Constitution and
gun control
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
What everybody needs to know
about our Constitution and
gun control

Fox News, by Juan Williams

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/16/2013 5:42:17 PM

Quick draw Republicans in Congress, intent on stopping any gun-control proposal from the Obama White House, are way off target when they accuse the president of violating gun ownership rights under the Constitution. Gun control is completely consistent with the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. And President Obama is on target with the great American tradition of proposing gun control laws for Congressional approval as well as by issuing executive orders on gun control. The only opinion that matters here is the Supreme Court’s opinion. And the high court has ruled, several times,

Comments:
What I do know is that the alleged "Constitutional scholar" 0bama is shredding our Constitution and does his dirty work by executive order. He hasn´t even been sworn in for a second time and he is completely out of control.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: markinalpine, 1/16/2013 5:47:13 PM     (No. 9120833)

Just continue to grovel to Your Lord and Messiah, Juan.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: minuteman, 1/16/2013 5:51:25 PM     (No. 9120838)

Cherry picked facts and outright lies.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: STLstudent, 1/16/2013 5:51:47 PM     (No. 9120840)

Unfortunately for Juan and other leftists, we can read (unlike many leftists). We can read the Constitution. We can read history. We know that leftist, totalitarian gun control measures are not compatible with the Constitution or for the existence of a free people. If we cannot fight, we are servants of the government.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: ketchuplover, 1/16/2013 5:53:52 PM     (No. 9120844)

Another Juan-derful job of diluting the facts. Notice that his "presidential examples of gun control executive orders" ALL had to do with imports - except Clinton´s and the assault weapons ban he signed was allowed to expire. If that´s not enough to "convince" you - how about this juan: Bring up Pres. Lincoln! Why not? Obama´s doing his best to make himself look like Honest Abe - let´s just add to the mix, even if it doesn´t apply to the argument. And hey -- this gun control won´t be so bad...after all, Feinstein´s "strict" measure will allow Americans to keep their assault weapons. My, oh my - how GENEROUS our benefactors in Washington are ---- allowing us peasants to keep what is ours. Too bad these politicians have put themselves so high on a pedestal, it´s getting really hard for us commoners to kiss their posteriors. Finally - his closing remark is so bizarre that I will let another LDotter address it...I fear my word limit is almost reached.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: bpl40, 1/16/2013 5:54:27 PM     (No. 9120848)

The final word on what constitutes "infringement" and what does not will not belong to Congress, it will not belong to the SCOTUS. It will rest firmly with the 300 million arms held freely and constitutionally by law abiding citizens. They can accept this now or.. later.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Robert D, 1/16/2013 5:56:40 PM     (No. 9120852)

Mr. Williams ignores the evolving (thanks to Republican appointees with the various courts) interpretations of the 2nd Amendment in favor of an individualized right to bear arms to prevent tyranny by an uncontrollable government. Incredibly, the evolution probably began with a Yale Law Journal entitled "The Embarassing Second Amendment." It is a must read for anyone really interested in the issue. Mr. Williams is ignorant on this topic.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: MisterDickens, 1/16/2013 6:00:43 PM     (No. 9120855)

I saw the byline and instantly knew there was no reason to waste even invaluable time reading it.

Wonder if using the name Quan helped him get jobs? Really, I´m just wondering. No agenda, nothing like that... just wondering.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: alaskaal, 1/16/2013 6:01:39 PM     (No. 9120857)

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Juan, what is so tough to understand about "shall not be infringed"?

Infringe: 1. (tr) to violate or break (a law, an agreement, etc.)
2. (intr; foll by on or upon) to encroach or trespass

Juan, remember when the Constitution used to be the Supreme Law of the Land?


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: TunnelRat, 1/16/2013 6:19:31 PM     (No. 9120890)

"Sorry, Congressman but in gun lingo you have just shot off your rhetorical buckshot before having a clear view of the target, in this case, the facts"

Sorry, Juan, but that´s not any "gun lingo" that I can recognize...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 1/16/2013 6:20:11 PM     (No. 9120893)

What this deceitful leftist stooge "thinks" is of no concern to me.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 1/16/2013 6:23:42 PM     (No. 9120898)

Juan, would you feel the same way if it were the 1st Amendment being so regulated?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 1/16/2013 6:38:58 PM     (No. 9120928)

Here come the Øbama Harpies, screeching that he has the absolute power to do as he pleases and the Constitution be damned. Do not believe the "Gobel-ites" - they are telling half truths and lying by out-right omissions! Typical propaganda!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: TheMom, 1/16/2013 6:40:00 PM     (No. 9120932)

Juan is such a lapdog. Too bad he´s not housebroken.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: JAN, 1/16/2013 6:43:10 PM     (No. 9120936)

Uh oh. Didn´t the powers that be at NPR insist that Juan Williams was in need of psychiatric help.

Poor Juan. Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: hamrman, 1/16/2013 6:52:22 PM     (No. 9120964)

Juan, your doctor needs to ask you if you own a gun, and let the process begin...!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: dman, 1/16/2013 6:54:54 PM     (No. 9120970)

If only libs were half as determined to protect this explicit right against "infringement" as they are to protect other rights, implicit and explicit, against "infringement", such as the "rights" to vote without proper ID, have an abortion on demand, or push pornography, media violence, or profanity.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Not Always Right, 1/16/2013 7:03:13 PM     (No. 9120992)

If Juan were out walking in SE Washington, DC late at night and four of "Obama´s children" approached him what do you think he would most like to have in his sweaty hand? I doubt he would opt for a copy of the latest editorial from the Washington Post decrying mouth-breathers and their guns but I bet he would want one of those guns himself.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: chumley, 1/16/2013 7:17:38 PM     (No. 9121023)

Im with #10. I´m 53 years old and have been shooting since I was 9. I got my first gun of my own from Dad at 16. I have never heard that stupid phrase he mentioned. The closest thing to it might be "going off half cocked", a leftover from the flintlock days.

Also, am I the only one that notices that, whenever a lib discusses the constitution, the discussion centers around what they think it DOESN´T mean?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Seething Citizen, 1/16/2013 7:18:35 PM     (No. 9121024)

As soon as I saw the article was by Juan Williams, I had no reason to read it. Juan is FOX´s Affirmative Action hire and it shows.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: noproblems, 1/16/2013 7:24:39 PM     (No. 9121033)

does any serious person under the age of 65 still watch Foax news?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: weirdone, 1/16/2013 7:52:49 PM     (No. 9121102)


Webster’s Dictionary: Use a comma to set off nonessential elements that precede, interrupt, or follow the independent clause. (As in the 2nd Amendment below)

The 2nd Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not infringed.

Webster’s Dictionary: Use a comma to set off nonessential elements that precede, interrupt, or follow the independent clause. (As in the 2nd Amendment below)

The 2nd Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not infringed.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: weirdone, 1/16/2013 7:54:30 PM     (No. 9121105)

Sorry about the double post but if it is said often enough maybe it will be understood.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: billp, 1/16/2013 7:55:02 PM     (No. 9121107)

As usual, Juan is wrong. No surprise there - he´s a liberal and they are nearly always wrong about everything.

The right of the people (that´s us - the public, as individuals) to keep (have, possess, own, etc.) and bear (have with us wherever we are or go to) shall not be infringed (do I really have to spell this one out too).

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: strike3, 1/16/2013 8:01:45 PM     (No. 9121127)

Juan, there is only one reason that you make your living by writing and talking. You couldn´t make the grade at McDonalds.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: dvc, 1/16/2013 8:41:05 PM     (No. 9121174)

It never ceases to amaze how the leftist and hoplophobes manage to avoid the obvious. Words mean things, very specific, precise things. ". . . shall not be infringed." REALLY, REALLY simple words, easy to understand unless you WANT to not understand because you don´t like what it actually means.

In addition, the authors of the Constitution wrote a large document, basically a "what we really meant in the Constitution and why." It is called the Federalist Papers and is readily available.

Ask the next person who thinks the Second Amendment is unclear if they have bothered to read the portions of the Federalist Papers that explain it. The answer will always be a blank stare.

Ignorant, uninformed, obviously wrong but never in doubt that they know everything, like Juan.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: woodsman, 1/16/2013 11:30:41 PM     (No. 9121367)

Juan found the crack pipe again

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Kerryman, 1/17/2013 6:35:52 AM     (No. 9121607)

Lincoln did not free the slaves by Executive Order. As Commander in Chief, he freed slaves in the areas of rebellion. No slaves were freed in the rest of the country. Juan must of dozed off during or has not seen "Lincoln". By the way, can the screenwriter of the movie "Amazing Grace" sue the screenwriter of the movie "Lincoln"?

Semper Fi

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: drkillj0y, 1/17/2013 2:13:04 PM     (No. 9122454)

A ´militia´ isn´t a sports team and has no sporting purposes.
´Arms´ aren´t just ´firearms´.

Part of the problem started back in 1939 when the SCOTUS made up the BS notion that only arms suitable for a well regulated militia is covered by the 2AM (Miller v. United States). THAT became the basis of the ´sporting purpose´ test.
Ironically, that same ruling should have made everything used by the military available to the general public under the 2AM by now.


In Miller v. United States, (U.S.Ark. 1939), two men were charged with transferring a double barrel 12-gauge shotgun in violation of the NFA.
A federal district court rejected the indictment, ruling that the NFA did indeed violate the Second Amendment.
The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, disagreed.

Writing for the court, Justice James McReynolds dismissed the defendants case with this statement: "the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a ´shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length´ at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia*, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument."
[*opinion, not fact]

McReynolds:"certainly it is not within Judicial Notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense."
[Well, they sure as heck ARE now.]

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 719302




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Progressive Insurance
National Review Online, by Victor Davis Hanson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 10:08:10 PM     Post Reply
How do you ensure that you won’t be ostracized, denounced, or fired if you are a media celebrity, captain of industry, or high public official? For some, sexist banter is certainly no problem. Stand-up comedian Bill Maher called Sarah Palin a c–t and a tw-t, but suffered no ill consequences. David Letterman joked on air that Sarah Palin’s 14-year-old daughter had had sex with Alex Rodriguez during a New York Yankees game. There was no downside to that either. President Obama tosses around “sweetie” as he wishes. No problem with that. No one believes Barack could be condescending to women.

Rory Reid Slams BLM as
´Losers´ on Nevada TV
NewsBusters, by P.J. Gladnick    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 9:53:37 PM     Post Reply
Sheesh! Talk about a complete ingrate... Many people suspect that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) instigated an over the top paramilitary confrontation with Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy at the behest of Senator Harry Reid especially since the new BLM director, Neil Kornze, was an aide to Reid. So how does Harry´s son, Rory Reid, thank the BLM rangers for putting their lives at risk over desert tortoises that are being euthanized by the Feds? Why, he slams them as "losers" on Las Vegas television station KSNV where Rory serves as a commentator from the left. You can see Reid in

Washington Elite Nutritionist Goes
After Bubba Watson For Celebrating
Masters Win at Waffle House
NewsBusters, by Tom Blumer    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 9:39:38 PM     Post Reply
After his Masters victory, pro golfer Bubba Watson celebrated with his family at a Waffle House. Pictures tweeted from there went viral. Waffle House appreciated the appreciation. What´s not to like about this great story? Apparently some self-appointed nanny state-loving guardians of nutrition like Katherine Tallmadge believe that Watson set a bad example for Americans by eating there. Oh, and with her powers of telepathy, she just knows that Watson´s a complete phony about what he really eats. She went after Watson on one of Neil Cavuto´s Fox programs yesterday, and in doing so caught talk show host Rush Limbaugh´s

Biden Tells Boston Bombing
Survivors, ´It Was Worth It´ (Video)
Breitbart´s Instablog, by Debra Heine    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 9:28:18 PM     Post Reply
Less than a minute into his speech at the Boston marathon bombing memorial on Tuesday, Vice President Joe Biden went tragically off script and told the crowd of Boston bombing survivors that "it was worth it." After expressing how impressed he was with the tribute, he said somberly, "let me say to those ´quote survivors,´ my God, you have survived and you have soared. It was worth it. I mean this sincerely - just to hear each of you speak. You´re truly, truly inspiring." The audience sat in stunned silence until Biden declared, "I´ve never heard anything so beautiful than

CNN National Security Analyst:
Right More Deadly Than Al Qaeda
Breitbart´s Big Journalism, by John Nolte    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 9:21:28 PM     Post Reply
Without mentioning reports that the man accused of shooting up a Jewish Community Center over the weekend was apparently a fan of the left´s Max Blumenthal, CNN National Security Analyst Peter Bergen exploited the murders to claim the American Right is more deadly than jihadists. In fact, since 9/11 extremists affiliated with a variety of far-right wing ideologies, including white supremacists, anti-abortion extremists and anti-government militants, have killed more people in the United States than have extremists motivated by al Qaeda´s ideology. According to a count by the New America Foundation, right wing extremists have killed 34 people in the

Exclusive - Sen. Sessions Comes
Out Swinging Against Secretive
House Immigration Push
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Matthew Boyle    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 9:07:41 PM     Post Reply
RAW VIDEO: Sen. Jeff Sessions sits for interview with WSFA 12 News Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee and arguably the leading intellectual force against amnesty in Congress, is coming out hard against a proposal backed by Majority Leader Eric Cantor to grant amnesty to illegal alien DREAMers who enlist in the military. “We are now in a period of very large troop reductions. The last thing this nation should be doing is to provide those few slots to persons who illegally entered the United States or who overstayed their visas while denying young Americans the

Bill O’Reilly to Conservative Guest:
‘That’s Right-Wing Paranoia’
Mediaite, by Matt Wilstein    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 8:55:54 PM     Post Reply
It’s not every day that Bill O’Reilly accuses someone else of expressing “right-wing paranoia,” but that’s what happened Tuesday night when he faced off with Fox News contributor Monica Crowley over a proposed solution to the controversy over voter ID laws. O’Reilly began his show by giving a soft endorsement to an idea put forward by former President Bill Clinton that would add photos to social security cards, which American citizens are already required to have in their possession. “I am all for combating voter fraud by using voter I.D.,” Crowley told O’Reilly. “My issue with the social security card in particular



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama

54 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Obama Generation Losing
Interest in Obama

46 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by James Freeman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 4:23:09 PM     Post Reply
President Obama inspired a generation of young people to support his historic election in 2008. And in 2012, despite the struggles of his first term, Mr. Obama still managed to win the support of a full 60% of voters age 18-29. But the man who once dreamed of being a transformative leader in the Reagan mold is inspiring few of those young people to follow his lead. "For all the talk about the movement that elected Mr. Obama, the more notable movement of Obama supporters has been away from politics. It appears that few of the young people who voted

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

44 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Chelsea Clinton no longer
ruling out politics

35 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Katz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 11:57:36 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says when people ask her these days whether she wants to go into politics, her answer isn’t an automatic “no.” The 34-year-old former first daughter told Fast Company in an interview published Monday, “for so long the answer was just a visceral no. Not because I had made any conscientious, deliberate decision, but since people had been asking for as long as literally I could remember, it was no." Now, the only child of former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explains, "I live in a city and a state and a country where I

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights
Act: We need to redistribute wealth

34 replie(s)
Salon Magazine, by Matt Bruenig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/14/2014 7:20:41 PM     Post Reply
Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day. When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters)

Megyn Kelly and the
Sandberg Head Shaker

31 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Richard F. Miniter    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/15/2014 9:16:05 AM     Post Reply
Megyn Kelly’s "Kelly File" is a great news show. She’s incisive, informed and customarily handles the toughest guest with aplomb. But her lengthy interview of Facebook C.O.O. Sheryl Sandberg about her second book in the Lean In series Lean In: For Graduates was a head shaker. Amazing that she of all people allowed Sandberg to restring the same old, same old, shamed, and shopworn feminist myths about women and girls and then jangle it in front of her viewing audience like something new out of the box. Indeed Kelly all but genuflected in front of this woman. Kept her on thru

White is not right: Campus admins ask
for help weeding out white people

31 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 7:47:18 PM     Post Reply
Western Washington University sent a questionnaire to students asking them for advice on how the administration could succeed at making sure that in future years, “we are not as white as we are today.” The question notes that WWU’s racial make up does not perfectly reflect the nation at large, and asks students to consider strategies that other universities have used to focus on skin color as the paramount indicator of a student-applicant’s worth. The president of WWU has stated that his explicit goal is to reduce the white population on campus, according to Campus Reform. “I’ve said before and I’ll say it


Post Reply   Close thread 719302





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~