A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: White House calls NRA ad
that makes reference to Obama´s
daughters ´repugnant and cowardly´
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
White House calls NRA ad
that makes reference to Obama´s
daughters ´repugnant and cowardly´

Associated Press, by Staff

Original Article

Posted By:tocsin, 1/16/2013 4:26:01 PM

Washington - The White House says a National Rifle Association video that makes reference to President Barack Obama´s daughters is "repugnant and cowardly." Obama spokesman Jay Carney says most Americans agree that a president´s children should not be used as "pawns in a political fight." Carney was referring to an online video from the pro-gun lobby that calls Obama an "elitist hypocrite" for having armed Secret Service agents protect his daughters at school while voicing skepticism about installing armed guards in all schools. The NRA released the video ahead of Obama's

Comments:
Be sure to view the video embedded at the end of the article.

Please note proper way to post article. LCom Staff.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Coy860, 1/16/2013 4:30:13 PM     (No. 9120665)

I hope they are ticked off over it....HALF as much as I was being called a BITTER Clinger!
OR a teabagger..scruum


Reply 2 - Posted by: enemyofthestate, 1/16/2013 4:36:31 PM     (No. 9120675)

It´s been said before: liberals cannot handle the truth.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: tsquare, 1/16/2013 4:36:34 PM     (No. 9120676)

elitist hypocrite works for me


Reply 4 - Posted by: Feebie, 1/16/2013 4:36:36 PM     (No. 9120677)

Umm, but, umm, like - OTHER people´s kids are okay?


Reply 5 - Posted by: artman1746, 1/16/2013 4:38:43 PM     (No. 9120683)

But, you understand, it´s quite alright for Obama to use children in a political fight.

Hypocrite fits!


Reply 6 - Posted by: jalo1951, 1/16/2013 4:38:45 PM     (No. 9120684)

No child should be a pawn including the ones he used today. This man is a boil on our country. I hope the idiots who voted for him are happy.


Reply 7 - Posted by: noproblems, 1/16/2013 4:39:46 PM     (No. 9120687)

the hypocrisy is amazing. is that not lost on them?


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Stlouislaxbros dad, 1/16/2013 4:40:59 PM     (No. 9120690)

I must be stupid.

The White House claims that "a president´s children should not be used a pawn´s in a political fight."

but...

it is ok for the President today to trot out someone else´s kids to be a photo op as pawn´s in a political fight?

Got it. Our king´s kids are more important than the people´s kids.


Reply 9 - Posted by: eoddad, 1/16/2013 4:41:03 PM     (No. 9120691)

And this President is a coward and a bully. Some day, hopefully soon, someone is going to call this punk president out and show him for the Bully, he is. What ever happen to the media calling threats to freedom of speech "Sending a chill down the Freedom of the Press."


Reply 10 - Posted by: stonepony, 1/16/2013 4:45:43 PM     (No. 9120702)

The truth always upsets the left. Being black they are at greater risk than the normal white child anyway.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Reality, 1/16/2013 4:45:44 PM     (No. 9120703)

Jay
It may be news to you in the Whitehouse who have been wearing blinders, but you and your boss are hypocrites for using someopne elses children as campaign props to sell an unconstitutional program.
These kids are the ones who will have to live their lives in a controlled, managed society in lieu of the freedom we have enjoyed in the past.


Reply 12 - Posted by: armywife85, 1/16/2013 4:46:53 PM     (No. 9120706)

This from the jerk that trotted out other people´s kids today for his photo op and to push his political agenda.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Flipper3, 1/16/2013 4:46:56 PM     (No. 9120707)

The NRA was perfectly justified in making reference to B.O.´s two kids, Mahalia and Sacagawea (or whatever the hell their names are). The other points were well taken also. Job well done, NRA.


Reply 14 - Posted by: DCGIRL, 1/16/2013 4:47:59 PM     (No. 9120709)

I want more of these. At least one organization has a pair. Boehner is probably in his office crying.


Reply 15 - Posted by: FenwayFrank, 1/16/2013 4:48:08 PM     (No. 9120710)

Major league projection from the repugnant, cowardly knee-pad wearing Jay Carney.


Reply 16 - Posted by: ohyababy, 1/16/2013 4:50:02 PM     (No. 9120716)

Once again the WH tries to change the subject without answering the original item. Guess what 0bama you´re beginning your exit from the political stage cuz the vast majority of Americans are or are finally beginning to see what a smug, lying manipulator you truly are. My God you and your administration know no shame whether its the woman 0bama was comforting after Hurricane Sandy for the photo op during the election and now children surrounding you on stage - seems to me you guys will do anything and I do mean anything. You people make me sick and outraged at the same time....


Reply 17 - Posted by: Malia2012, 1/16/2013 4:55:13 PM     (No. 9120721)

Thank you, NRA and keep up the good work! BTW, If ANYONE represents the true definition of "repugnant and cowardly", it is THIS W.H. and the agitator-in-chief who sits on his throne there...at least ´til the impeachment!


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: billa, 1/16/2013 4:55:48 PM     (No. 9120722)

The irony is even more strange. Should a lunatic show up at BO´s kids´ school, the Secret Service protection and those provided to other kids from the political elite would be armed to take out someone before they even entered the classroom.

My question is why are his kids and those at that school more important than any of the children in any of the other schools in the US?

Oh, wait...I know why...because "I won."


Reply 19 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/16/2013 4:56:59 PM     (No. 9120723)

The point of the NRA ad. was not the President´s daughters, but that the President appears satisfied with his kids have heavily armed protectors while at that high end private school, while the President and the liberal Democrats apparently don´t give much credence to armed resource or security officers being stationed in just regular old public schools where the average family´s kids attend school.

There is absolutely no doubt that the very high level publicity given to the Sandy Hook murders by an obvious mentally ill individual have spawned a number of copy cat multiple murders and that in the short term the public schools are at risk from dangerous mentally ill persons going on their own personal suicide missions, coming up with ideas that to get the utmost attention, committing murders at schools before they take their own lives is the way for them to go. Right now armed resource or security officers in public schools is the only way to combat that threat.


Reply 20 - Posted by: ktwo, 1/16/2013 4:58:29 PM     (No. 9120724)

Haven´t seen the ad and don´t really care.

But any explicit mention of his family is probably a losing tactic, the MSM will attack the NRA for it.

Even so, it is true. Didn´t the SS accompany Chelsea while she went to Stanford? Maybe they still do.

Politicians are not like the rest of us. They have armed guards.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Philipsonh, 1/16/2013 5:01:34 PM     (No. 9120728)

Hypocrites. Dividers. Pick and choose who to reward, who to protect, who to treat with dignity. Your WH in action.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 1/16/2013 5:08:48 PM     (No. 9120744)

His children are off limits. But it´s okay to use other people´s kids as props.

Democrats are hypocrites.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Dante, 1/16/2013 5:08:55 PM     (No. 9120745)

The comment was about the nature of the Secret Service detail, nothing personal about the daughters. Trying to weasel, whine and change the issues doesn´t work here, you cowards.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Kurto, 1/16/2013 5:09:16 PM     (No. 9120746)

0-hole is the poster boy for ´repugnant and cowardly´...


Reply 25 - Posted by: judy, 1/16/2013 5:10:35 PM     (No. 9120750)

The ad is on Fox Nation . It includes Reid, Pelosi, Bloomberg, & the won.


Reply 26 - Posted by: judy, 1/16/2013 5:13:33 PM     (No. 9120762)

It´s gone, guess Fox fell to the left againnnnnnn


Reply 27 - Posted by: Patchy Groundfog, 1/16/2013 5:22:19 PM     (No. 9120779)

Does this mean Barack & Michelle will drop the ´as a parent of two daughters´ phrase from every speech?


Reply 28 - Posted by: paulfromTexas, 1/16/2013 5:28:17 PM     (No. 9120797)

If truth be told it is Mr O and his imperial bypass "laws" which fit this description.
Impeach him.


Reply 29 - Posted by: JAN, 1/16/2013 5:32:41 PM     (No. 9120806)

They are upset that the NRA is exploitng children.

Hard not to laugh.


Reply 30 - Posted by: rinohunter, 1/16/2013 5:39:02 PM     (No. 9120820)

The only thing repugnant and disgusting is what´s living in that White House. It´s going to take years to fix and undo what this neaderthal has done to our country not to mention unknown gallons of orange glo to degrease and destench the living quarters in said White House.


Reply 31 - Posted by: STLstudent, 1/16/2013 5:56:30 PM     (No. 9120851)

Obama´s children should have the protection of firearms, but my children are not worthy. Don´t you despise this bunch?


Reply 32 - Posted by: TXknitter, 1/16/2013 6:04:27 PM     (No. 9120862)

Outstanding ad. It isn´t just the mention of Obama´s teens either. It is as blunt, truthful and courageous as is called for at this time in America. Hey, GOP, take notes. NRA - please stand tall and do not apologize in any way. Bingo #4 and if Pubbies are smart, they will respond just that way when they are badgered on the cable shows tonight about this!!!


Reply 33 - Posted by: 6079 Smith, W, 1/16/2013 6:53:10 PM     (No. 9120967)

The White House calling something "repugnant and cowardly" doesn´t make it so.


Reply 34 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 1/16/2013 7:00:58 PM     (No. 9120986)

An Alinsky response if ever there was one.


Reply 35 - Posted by: dr fate, 1/16/2013 7:12:25 PM     (No. 9121012)

I´m glad so many on the left are freaking out over this. It means that someone on our side is actually hitting back and being effective for a change. Hoping they escalate the war of words and give them something more to be ticked off about. Better them than us.


Reply 36 - Posted by: stablemoney, 1/16/2013 7:30:19 PM     (No. 9121044)

The NRA hits dead center with shot one, and the WH issues their whine.


Reply 37 - Posted by: dman, 1/16/2013 7:34:24 PM     (No. 9121052)

More "projection" from the Won.



Post Reply   Close thread 719291




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "tocsin"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "tocsin"



The Many Ways That Cities
Cook Their Bond Books
Wall Street Journal, by Steve Malanga    Original Article
Posted By: tocsin- 6/1/2013 5:51:16 AM     Post Reply
It has been a busy few weeks for the Securities and Exchange Commission. In May, the SEC charged two cities—Harrisburg, Pa., and South Miami, Fla.—with securities fraud for allegedly deceiving investors in their municipal bonds. This follows similar fraud charges against states, New Jersey in 2010 and Illinois in March, after SEC investigators uncovered what they called "material omissions" and "false statements" in bond documents related to those state´s pension funds. With Harrisburg, however, the SEC has gone further and charged the city government with "securities fraud

A Person of Privilege?
National Review Online, by Fred Thompson    Original Article
Posted By: tocsin- 5/23/2013 9:52:17 AM     Post Reply
Lois Lerner, the IRS official in charge of tax-exempt groups, took her too-clever-by-half act to Congress yesterday and may have waived her right to claim her Fifth Amendment privilege in the process. Appearing before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, she couldn’t resist citing a little history, bragging on her public service, instructing the committee as to the purpose of the Fifth Amendment, and proclaiming her innocence of everything the committee might be interested in — all before asserting her Fifth Amendment privilege. Chairman Darrell Issa (R., Calif.) was a bit taken aback.

Bomber Command veterans
boycotting ´insulting´ award
Telegraph(UK), by Jasper Copping    Original Article
Posted By: tocsin- 5/18/2013 5:20:33 PM     Post Reply
Earlier this year, the Government launched the clasp for those who had taken part in the air offensive during the Second World War, but stopped short of awarding a medal, as campaigners had been calling for. But figures suggest that barely half of those eligible for the lesser award have so far applied, with veterans snubbing the “pathetic” award. (snip)only a clasp, rather than a medal, as “cheese-paringly” mean, adding: “What did those men do except lay down their lives for their duty? My father would have been raging – I know that to be sure.”

Gosnell Is Not an Aberration
National Review Online, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: tocsin- 5/14/2013 1:33:13 PM     Post Reply
A jury in Pennsylvania has convicted abortionist Kermit Gosnell of three counts of murder, one count of involuntary manslaughter, and several counts of performing illegal late-term abortions at his facility in West Philadelphia. Gosnell is eligible for the death sentence, an end that would be as close to justice as earthly powers can mete out in this episode. The English language does not contain a word sufficient for describing the crimes of Kermit Gosnell; “murder” will do, but only for legal purposes. Gosnell’s human abattoir is the logical endpoint of our morally fraudulent national approach to abortion,

The IRS and Big Government
National Review Online, by James Pethokoukis    Original Article
Posted By: tocsin- 5/13/2013 7:22:01 AM     Post Reply
The expanding Internal Revenue Service scandal could hardly be any more Drudgeriffic. Well, maybe if in addition to singling out groups with “tea party” or “patriot” in their names, the agency had purchased a few billions rounds of hollow-point ammo. Maybe then. But even as is, the scandal is looking pretty bad and getting worse. The Wall Street Journal is now reporting that the IRS also “scrutinized conservative groups for raising political concerns over government spending, debt and taxes or even for advocating making America a better place to live.” We’ll see where this eventually goes.

The Trials of Father MacRae
Wall Street Journal, by Dorothy Rabinowitz    Original Article
Posted By: tocsin- 5/11/2013 8:32:50 AM     Post Reply
Last Christmas Eve, his 18th behind bars, Catholic priest Gordon MacRae offered Mass in his cell at the New Hampshire state penitentiary. A quarter-ounce of unfermented wine and the host had been provided for the occasion, celebrated with the priest´s cellmate in attendance. Sentenced to 33½-67 years following his 1994 conviction for sexual assault against a teenage male, Father MacRae has just turned 60. The path that led inexorably to that conviction would have been familiar to witnesses of the manufactured sex-abuse prosecutions that swept the nation in the 1980s and early 1990s

The Crucifixion of Jason Richwine
Townhall.com, by Michelle Malkin    Original Article
Posted By: tocsin- 5/10/2013 10:59:47 AM     Post Reply
How low will supporters of the Gang of Eight immigration bill go to get their way? This low: They´ve shamelessly branded an accomplished Ivy League-trained quantitative analyst a "racist" and will stop at nothing to destroy his career as they pave their legislative path to another massive illegal alien benefits bonanza. Jason Richwine works for the conservative Heritage Foundation. He´s a Harvard University Ph.D. who co-authored a study that pegs the cost of the Ted Kennedy Memorial Open Borders Act 2.0 legislation at $6.3 trillion.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Edward Snowden Is In The
Process Of Destroying Any Support
And Sympathy He Has Built Up

47 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM     Post Reply
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information

Barbara Walters Defends Maher
Calling Trig Palin Retarded:
‘I Don´t Think He Intended
it to be Mean-Spirited’

45 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by John Nolte    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/17/2013 5:19:02 PM     Post Reply
As NewsBusters reported last week, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called out vulgarian comedian Bill Maher for referring to her Down Syndrome son Trig as "retarded." On ABC´s The View Monday, co-host Barbara Walters astonishingly defended Maher saying, "I don´t think he intended it to be mean-spirited" (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: At a recent standup show in Las Vegas, comedian Bill Maher apparently called Sarah Palin’s five-year-old developmentally-challenged son Trig retarded. And Sarah blasted him on Twitter as a bully. Is that, is it, is he a bully? Is he a bad, what is he?

Who is he? Obama keeps allies,
enemies guessing in second term

44 replie(s)
The Hill, by Justin Sink    Original Article
Posted By: ketchuplover- 6/17/2013 6:31:12 AM     Post Reply
Five months into his second term, allies and enemies are as confounded as ever about who President Obama really is. Is he the dyed-in-the-wool liberal that his biggest supporters and critics suggest? Or is he a pragmatic, even cynical, politician who cares more for his popularity than taking risks for his ideological goals or living up to his rhetoric? Even in the short period since his reelection, Obama has provided evidence to support conflicting interpretations. His efforts to pass immigration reform, the unsuccessful push for stricter gun controls and tax hikes on high earners buttress the case for Obama-as-ideologue.

Jeb Bush labels conservative
critics ‘the chirpers’

44 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Aaron Blake    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 1:22:30 PM     Post Reply
Jeb Bush says he’s not worried that his work toward comprehensive immigration reform and his ties to the GOP establishment will alienate conservatives and negatively impact a potential 2016 presidential campaign, referring to critics as “the chirpers.” “If I decide to run for office again, it will be based on what I believe, and it will be based on my record,” the former Florida governor said in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody. “And that record was one of solving problems completely from a conservative prospective.” Bush (R) pointed to his conservative

Rubio Aide: ‘There Are American
Workers Who, For Lack of a
Better Term, Can’t Cut It’

42 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Rich Lowry    Original Article
Posted By: trapper- 6/16/2013 11:18:45 PM     Post Reply
Politico’s Playbook has an excerpt from a new Ryan Lizza piece from the New Yorker that is not yet online. It contains a passage on the back-and-forth between labor and the Chamber that has a quote from a Rubio staffer that is going to raise eyebrows, to say the least: “There are American workers who, for lack of a better term, can’t cut it. There shouldn’t be a presumption that every American worker is a star performer. There are people who just can’t get it, can’t do it, don’t want to do it. And so you can’t obviously discuss that publicly.” Here is the entire context:

Iran to send 4,000 troops to
support President Assad in
Syria as British Armed Forces
play war games on border

38 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Suzannah Hills    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/16/2013 11:08:12 PM     Post Reply
Iran is preparing to send 4,000 troops in to Syria to support Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in the wake of America´s announcement it will be providing ´military aid´ to the country´s Muslim rebels. President Barack Obama made the pledge earlier this week after the U.S. claimed it found ´conclusive evidence´ Assad´s regime has used chemical weapons against the rebel forces--which includes the most extreme Sunni Islamists--and has called for Britain and France to back the move. While Britain hasn´t made a guarantee either way as yet, more than 350 Royal Marines are being sent to Jordan

Marco Rubio doesn´t
know if ´he´s getting
played´ by Democrats

37 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/17/2013 6:42:44 AM     Post Reply
Is Marco Rubio, R-Fla., getting played by Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.? During his interview with ABC’s Jonathan Karl this morning, Rubio didn’t even seem to understand what that meant. “Are you being played by the Democrats?” asked Karl. “Is Chuck Schumer playing you?” “I don’t — I quite frankly, I don’t even know what that means,” Rubio replied. “Is he using you?” Karl continued. “Is he using you to try to accomplish something that the Democrats want and is not — not a conservative bill?” Rubio responded that immigration reform was a bi-partisan issue that “all Americans


Post Reply   Close thread 719291





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~