A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Mark Sanford: I’m
Running for Congress
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Mark Sanford: I’m
Running for Congress

National Review, by Jim Geraghty

Original Article

Posted By:Judy W., 1/16/2013 12:14:29 PM

Mark Sanford, the three-term congressman and two-term South Carolina governor, is preparing his political comeback, running for the House in the district recently represented by Tim Scott. Sanford garnered national headlines in 2009 as the first governor to turn down President Obama’s stimulus funds — and then made even bigger headlines later in the year when it was revealed that he had departed the state to fly to Argentina to meet with his mistress. A messy divorce followed; a state legislative ad hoc committee voted to censure but not impeach him. He served out the remainder of his term,

Comments:
This is an interview, giving Sanford the room to justify his running and answer charges against him.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: zephyrgirl, 1/16/2013 12:22:20 PM     (No. 9120089)

This dude´s mid-life meltdown should disqualify him for any public office.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Ribicon, 1/16/2013 12:24:19 PM     (No. 9120097)

Agree with #1. Sanford showed so much promise, but threw his responsibilities and credibility aside to indulge his personal desires. Works for Democrats, not for us.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: TXknitter, 1/16/2013 12:27:19 PM     (No. 9120105)

He should be utterly ignored.


Reply 4 - Posted by: graniteman2009, 1/16/2013 12:53:17 PM     (No. 9120191)

Just go away...


Reply 5 - Posted by: Pros7767, 1/16/2013 12:59:09 PM     (No. 9120206)

Really? The Republican Party does not need this. Neither do "We the People".

Looks like he´s taking a page from Weiner.


Reply 6 - Posted by: msjena, 1/16/2013 1:03:10 PM     (No. 9120216)

RNC, please put up a challenger to this guy!


Reply 7 - Posted by: TheMom, 1/16/2013 1:06:54 PM     (No. 9120234)

Agree with above posters. Sanford, we don´t need or want you. Go live in Argentina, why don´t you?


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: rinohunter, 1/16/2013 1:09:05 PM     (No. 9120244)

From what galaxy is this fool arrive? I hope that the R´s DO NOT support this alien weirdo!
Say good night Mark.


Reply 9 - Posted by: JAN, 1/16/2013 1:18:59 PM     (No. 9120272)

Couldn´t find a job?


Reply 10 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 1/16/2013 2:06:35 PM     (No. 9120377)

Sleeze bag
Dirt bag
Trash bag
Scum
Adultress
Loser
Mental case
Narcissistic goon
Slime
Excrement

Stronger adjectives may follow.


Reply 11 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 1/16/2013 2:21:27 PM     (No. 9120407)

Seems like a guy who deserves a second chance. He married his mistress and the behavior of his scorned ex-wife has been instructive. Let he who is without sin...


Reply 12 - Posted by: judy, 1/16/2013 2:22:49 PM     (No. 9120411)

He´s creepy...my guess is Rove will support him


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: dman, 1/16/2013 2:32:03 PM     (No. 9120433)

Placing self above party and country.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Okie 52, 1/16/2013 2:35:38 PM     (No. 9120442)

Mark Sanford made a mistake. And, instead of dodging the issue, he admitted his mistake live on TV. This alone makes him qualified for a 2nd look, because no politician has ever, EVER confessed to a error in judgment like he did and stood up to the consequences.

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Manitouman, 1/16/2013 2:44:44 PM     (No. 9120460)

Forgiveness doesn´t mean you´re required to hang out with the guy. It just means he´s forgiven.

It doesn´t matter what the ex does, it only matters what you do.

Can´t the party do any better? It´s not as though he´s asking to stay in office. He´s asking to be endorsed for an office he´s never had.

Palin did nothing like this guy and can´t get a break from her own party.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Rubinski, 1/16/2013 2:51:47 PM     (No. 9120480)

I would consider voting for him if I lived in his state.


Reply 17 - Posted by: judy, 1/16/2013 2:58:35 PM     (No. 9120499)

His children are the ones I feel for...hope he changes parties..


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Attercliffe, 1/16/2013 2:59:23 PM     (No. 9120502)

#11, slight correction--Sanford and the lady are engaged, not yet married. I agree with #11 and #52.

Any parent who would shower all forms of media, including talk shows, with intimate details of her "victimization", when the possibility of the couple´s four sons watching, reading or hearing is close to 100%, is not what I would call a good mother or a rational person.

I believe it´s highly possible that Mrs. Sanford wanted to be First Lady and was furious when Sanford told her he did not want to run for president. If that is close to the truth, then one should not be surprised that Sanford sought comfort elsewhere.

He slashed our county real estate taxes and I like him very much if only for that reason.


Reply 19 - Posted by: glorybee, 1/16/2013 3:01:27 PM     (No. 9120512)

Not only did this piece of garbage abandon his wife and four boys,lie and make excuses about his actions for weeks, he abrogated every public responsibility to his state and constituents. I question the personal morals of anyone who would vote for this person to represent them in or out of Congress.


Reply 20 - Posted by: judy, 1/16/2013 3:10:40 PM     (No. 9120528)

Don´t ever trust a guy who cheats...once a cheater always a cheater...


Reply 21 - Posted by: wws, 1/16/2013 3:12:10 PM     (No. 9120529)

Forget about the infidelity or relations with his wife - this guy lied about where he was and what he was doing WHILE he was Governor. This was not just a "mistake", this is a fundamental disqualifier for him to EVER hold office again.

He has proved that whenever he faces a conflict between his personal wants and his public duty, his personal wants will win. And that he has NO PROBLEM repeatedly lying to the public about what he´s up to.

And THIS is a guy you think should be qualified for office? Let me guess, because you "believe" him when he claims he stands for "conservative values"???

Of course he only lies to the other women, never to you!!!


Reply 22 - Posted by: AltaD, 1/16/2013 3:27:42 PM     (No. 9120563)

What´s with this "he without out sin" nonsense? The voters have every right to judge him and if I lived in SC I would judge him unfit to represent me.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: No Representation in CA, 1/16/2013 5:12:05 PM     (No. 9120755)

Mistake? That´s B.S. Locking your keys in the car is a mistake. This guy is a cheating liar who ruined his marriage, his career, and his children´s lives.
Oh he´s running as a Democrat? Yes, he made a mistake and it´s only about sex and therefore nobody´s business.


Reply 24 - Posted by: msjena, 1/16/2013 5:19:28 PM     (No. 9120774)

Whether or not I can forgive Sanford personally has nothing to do with whether he should run on the Republican ticket. The party purports to stand for better moral values than the Democrats. It is bad enough when someone in already in office screws up. Why elect someone who lied to and cheated on his wife and who neglected his duties as governor (remember the "Appalachian trail" disappearance?) to pursue his love affair. No thanks.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Democracy First, 1/16/2013 6:22:55 PM     (No. 9120895)

Forgive him and tell him to go get a real job, or run as a Democrat, because they have no morals and love to let their pervs stay in office a la Billy joe bob Clinton , Ted Kennedy, Chris Dodd and Bonnie Fwank.


Reply 26 - Posted by: mominNoCA, 1/16/2013 6:26:40 PM     (No. 9120908)

The media tries hard enough to destroy Republicans as it is. We don´t need to give them an easy target. I hope he has a good challenger.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Coy860, 1/16/2013 6:28:18 PM     (No. 9120910)

He disappeared and even his closest aids didn´t know where he was.
I suggest he face East, and start running and not stop when he reaches the Atlantic.



Post Reply   Close thread 719266




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."



Obama´s most fiendish plot yet
Daily Caller, by Mickey Kaus    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/17/2013 8:55:18 AM     Post Reply
An idea so crazy it just might … Opponents and supporters of “comprehensive immigration reform” (i.e. amnesty) agree it doesn’t do well on the front burner of public debate. (Snip) Back in March, I didn’t see how the Obama team, however brilliant, was going to protect its amnesty bill from this threat of publicity, given that the mainstream press was “commmitted to overcovering this issue.” Now we know the answer! In its most fiendish strategem yet, Team Obama has launched a series of not-quite-devastating but press-obsessing scandals against itself! The confluence of the Internal Revenue Service, Benghazi and AP

In defense of Jason
Richwine and Charles Murray
Washington Examiner, by Michael Barone    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/16/2013 8:52:17 PM     Post Reply
My American Enterprise Institute colleague Charles Murray came to the defense of our former colleague Jason Richwine, who was fired by the Heritage Foundation amid protests about his Harvard Ph.D. thesis, on nationalreview.com. Charles was entirely accurate in stating that Richwine’s conclusion that Hispanics have lower-than-average IQs is accurate and, among specialists in this area, non-controversial. Richwine was careful to say that the average Hispanic IQ might rise over time, as has been observed of other groups’ average IQs. And the Heritage Foundation paper co-authored by Richwine estimating the fiscal cost of legalizing current illegal immigrants

Obamacare isn´t about health
care, it´s about power
Washington Examiner, by Jim DeMint    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/16/2013 8:27:29 AM     Post Reply
Members of the House of Representatives are scheduled to vote Thursday to repeal all of Obamacare. Given that the House voted to repeal the law last year, some commentators and observers have questioned the need for another repeal vote. However, the scandals coming to light over the last week perfectly make the case for why Congress must eradicate the law from the statute books. (Snip) While we don´t yet know all the details about these scandals, we do know that the IRS grossly abused its power at a time when Obamacare grants it massive new authority.

Even liberals are leaping
off bandwagon
Boston Herald, by Margery Eagan    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/16/2013 7:09:14 AM     Post Reply
You know the worm has turned when even MSNBC’s Chris Matthews and Rachel Maddow hold their noses at the stench from Barack Obama’s scandals — when so many stories from the so-called liberal press now describe the erstwhile Messiah as “aloof,” “arrogant” and “holier than thou.” (Snip) The same media types accused of covering Obama on bended knee — such as myself — are now turning our collective backs. And no wonder. What we’re learning about his administration has undermined our basic trust in government. Yet the president seems oblivious to how serious and unsettling these scandals are,

Quabbin Reservoir Tests
Normal After Trespassing
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/16/2013 6:08:11 AM     Post Reply
BELCHERTOWN, Mass. — Testing done on water samples from the Quabbin Reservoir showed no abnormalities after seven people were seen at a reservoir park entrance shortly after midnight, officials said Wednesday. The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority said water quality samples were analyzed at its lab Tuesday and all came back normal after the alleged trespassing incident. The central Massachusetts reservoir supplies drinking water to Boston. State police spokesman David Procopio said a trooper saw two cars parked at a reservoir park entrance at 12:30 a.m. Tuesday, then saw five young men and two young women

Soros Gave $6.1 Million to
Groups Linked to Pressure on IRS
to Target Conservative Nonprofits
Cybercast News Service, by Mike Ciandella    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/15/2013 1:12:08 PM     Post Reply
With Soros funding, anything is possible. The growing scandal where the IRS unfairly targeted politically-conservative groups can be traced back to a lobbying effort begun by George Soros-funded liberal groups in 2010, after the Supreme Court´s Citizens United ruling. The talking points of these groups then bounced around a carefully created progressive "echo chamber," until they eventually made their way into established media outlets. Key IRS policy changes about how it investigated conservative groups took place soon after it received three separate letters sent by Soros-funded liberal organizations.

True Grit
Townhall, by John Stossel    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/15/2013 7:55:58 AM     Post Reply
Are you a real man (or woman)? Do you have "grit"? Compare yourself to the man on the $20 bill: Andrew Jackson, our seventh president. During the Revolutionary War, Jackson volunteered to fight. He was just 13 years old at the time. The British captured him and made him a servant for British officers. (Snip) Jackson had grit. Do your kids have that much grit today? I doubt it. Parents now try to protect kids from all danger. In New York City, some won´t let teenagers go to school by themselves. Lenore Skenazy, author of Free-Range Kids, thinks that´s absurd.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

52 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

44 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.

43 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM     Post Reply
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

38 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.


Post Reply   Close thread 719266





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~