A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Ford Chose A Crazy Way To
Reveal ´The Future Of
Pickup Trucks´ In Detroit
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Ford Chose A Crazy Way To
Reveal ´The Future Of
Pickup Trucks´ In Detroit

Business Insider, by Julie Zeveloff

Original Article

Posted By:Pluperfect, 1/16/2013 5:49:34 AM

Ford unveiled its new vision for a pickup truck at the Detroit Auto Show today, and the auto maker went all out in its presentation. Instead of removing a sheet like most companies do, Ford actually lowered the truck from the ceiling of the Cobo Center in a dramatic reveal. Business Insider´s Alex Davies, who was on hand for the event, snapped the photos below. The truck, named the Ford Atlas, is still a concept, but it would be a good addition to Ford´s lineup of F-150s, the company´s best-selling vehicle. The enormous Atlas has Ford´s efficient

Comments:
Photos and a video.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Spidey, 1/16/2013 5:58:53 AM     (No. 9119247)

Fabulous looking truck but I can´t imagine the price tag.It´s funny how big vehicles are still the bread and butter of car/truck producers.

I´m sure there´s a warmer somewhere who thinks these designers should be beheaded.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Cherrybark, 1/16/2013 6:57:54 AM     (No. 9119302)

I´ve owned several F-150s and currently drive one. When I shop for a new pickup this summer the Toyota Tundra, assembled in Texas by non-union workers, will get serious consideration.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: StormCnter, 1/16/2013 8:12:20 AM     (No. 9119422)

In the rural Texas of my growing up years, farmers and ranchers drove Ford pickups. It took a brave man to purchase a Chevy and drive it around in public. He was the recipient of a lot of squinty-eyed glances.


Reply 4 - Posted by: neanderthal, 1/16/2013 8:22:04 AM     (No. 9119442)

My gosh! It´s not the Second Coming. It´s just another pickup. Good grief!


Reply 5 - Posted by: Alpha91c, 1/16/2013 8:53:41 AM     (No. 9119515)

PU trucks are very popular in Texas and in semi-rural and rural parts of the state, having one is almost a necessity. That being said, if I want a heavy duty PU, I would buy a Toyota Tundra. I don´t need a heavy duty large truck, so I drive a Toyota Tacoma. Ford makes a good PU. Toyota makes a better one, and uses non-union labor to produce it.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Mass Minority, 1/16/2013 9:02:42 AM     (No. 9119534)

The truck is obviously designed not to replace the F150 but the F250. This is a construction and farm work truck. The added charging outlets for cordless tools is a huge ples, as would be the extra tiedowns. The extended cab makes getting a crew to the jobsite a bit better.

So why in Gods name did they put a short bed on the dang thing? A work site truck is used because it hauls stuff. And the stuff it hauls is often 8 feet long and needs to lie flat. A short bed F250 wannabe is just a pretty statement for suburban wannabe cowboys.

I drive a Dodge RAm, I love this truck but it will be my last Dodge. When the time comes to pass this one on I will buy either the Toyota or the Ford. I cannot forgive what was done by the unions at GM during the "bailout". Or should I call it what it was, stealing the company from its rightful owners (stock and bond holders) and giving it to the unions as payback for Obamas election.


Reply 7 - Posted by: terry_tr6, 1/16/2013 9:49:33 AM     (No. 9119642)

you know, upchuck, if an owner has vehicle after vehicle that burns oil, maybe the owner needs to use the mirror to find the cause. i have had 4 fords(escort, ranger, 2 150´s ) since 1985 and none have burned oil, even after 225,000 miles. Of course, neither have any of my other vehicles (2 chrysler vans, a dodge dakota and a kia). Just saying....


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: gasmeterguy, 1/16/2013 9:53:32 AM     (No. 9119651)

After driving Ford´s for several decades, I bit the bullet in 2005 and bought a Tacoma. The Tacoma has yet to break down, my gas mileage is still good, and the paint job is holding up marvelously.

I am sticking with Toyota.


Reply 9 - Posted by: mickturn, 1/16/2013 10:17:29 AM     (No. 9119730)

Yes, it´s Atlas...but did it shrug?


Reply 10 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 1/16/2013 11:29:07 AM     (No. 9119945)

Good one, #10.

I agree w/ #6 - what´s with the dinky little bed in this Atlas? "Oh, look! We can put the picnic cooler in here!" And not much else.

Early in 2012, I drove the ´12 F150 EcoBoost. Nice truck, nice ride, with variable length beds available. Then I got the sticker price: $YIKE$!


Reply 11 - Posted by: cheeflo, 1/16/2013 2:01:11 PM     (No. 9120364)

What´s so crazy about the reveal?



Post Reply   Close thread 719200




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"



There’s no way Obama is
telling the truth about when
he learned of the IRS scandal
Daily Caller, by Jim Treacher    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/20/2013 11:17:14 AM     Post Reply
And yes, I realize that headline is eight words too long. Peter Nicholas at the WSJ: The White House’s chief lawyer learned weeks ago that an audit of the Internal Revenue Service likely would show that agency employees inappropriately targeted conservative groups, a senior White House official said Sunday. That disclosure has prompted a debate over whether the president should have been notified at that time. In the week of April 22, the Office of the White House Counsel and its head, Kathryn Ruemmler, were told by Treasury Department attorneys

Washington bureaucrats use
force to suffocate liberty
Washington Examiner, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/20/2013 5:50:08 AM     Post Reply
Remember Armand Armendariz, the Environmental Protection Agency regional administrator who resigned after regaling an audience of Big Green activists with a history lesson to illustrate his agency´s approach to critics of the EPA´s harshest policies? When the Romans conquered a new province, he said, they would "... find the first five guys they saw and they´d crucify them ..." to make the province "really easy to manage for the next few years." The EPA, he continued, also makes "examples of people who are not complying with the law, you make examples out of them,

Reactionaries in New York
Time, by Joe Klein    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 8:27:40 AM     Post Reply
The Democratic candidates for mayor in New York are campaigning to win the support of the teachers union. They threaten to return the city to the horrors of the David Dinkins era. Back at the turn of the 1990s, New York City was a mess. Crime was rampant. The schools were dreadful. Children in foster care were brutalized because–as the head of the Child Welfare Agency said–”oversight is racist.” The mayor was an incompetent. And, above all, the city was run for the benefit of its employees rather than its citizens. What followed was 20 years of governance

Immigration reform no sure bet
Politico, by Seung Min Kim & Jake Sherman    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 6:29:04 AM     Post Reply
After years of false starts, Washington finally appears to be on the path to rewriting the nation’s immigration laws. The Senate Gang of Eight bill is holding its own in committee and is expected to hit the Senate floor in June. And in the House this week, members of a bipartisan group agreed “in principle” on a big bill to be revealed in June. But in this case, looks are deceiving. There are still major hurdles before immigration reform can reach President Barack Obama’s desk. The biggest one is the GOP-controlled House. Right now, the Senate bill has no chance

At Cincinnati IRS office, surprise
over claims of partisan villainy
Washington Post, by Lisa Rein & Dan Zak    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 5:17:34 AM     Post Reply
CINCINNATI — The fog of scandal hangs over a boxy, modernist, 10-story building that looks like a monument to paperwork. Shrubs and chain smokers flank its front entrance here on Main Street, in the heart of downtown. Every day, 2,000 employees go to work at various federal agencies in this John F. Kennedy-era structure, whose chief tenant is the Internal Revenue Service — which is having just about the worst week an agency can have. Up on the fourth floor — with its gray linoleum, low ceilings and fluorescent lights, file carts heaped with manila envelopes, its keypad-coded doors labeled 4-022

   

 

  


 
The Smoking Gun Can Tell
the AP What a Federal Leak
Investigation Is Like
Atlantic, by Philip Bump    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/18/2013 5:22:57 AM     Post Reply
When, in 2006, the website The Smoking Gun released a secret CIA memo documenting prisoner organizing strategies at Guantanamo Bay, the FBI took notice. Now the site has posted details of the ensuing 44-month-long investigation, offering a timely glimpse into the black box of a Department of Justice leak prosecution. And The Smoking Gun got lucky. Over the course of the FBI´s hunt, code-named "Stubborn Ways," 43 different people were interviewed, in locations stretching from New Mexico to Boston to Saudi Arabia. After the investigation narrowed to one person who was then exonerated — a woman from Virginia

There Was No Surge in IRS
Tax-Exempt Applications in 2010
Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/18/2013 5:03:01 AM     Post Reply
A number of people have sought to explain the IRS targeting of Tea Party, patriot, and 9/12 group applications -- as well as those from other conservative groups -- for "specialist team" treatment (mainly delays and excessive and inappropriate questions) in 2010 by pointing to the Citizens United decision that year allowing for unlimited, undisclosed fundraising by such groups. That´s the explanation IRS official Lois Lerner gave a week ago when she first revealed that the agency had improperly handled a slew of applications -- the political shorthand was a mistaken attempt to deal with a surge in applications.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

59 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

59 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

   

 



 
Camelot Is Burning
47 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

43 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

   

Post Reply   Close thread 719200





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~