Nadler has so much adipose tissue to protect him it would take a 100 round drum clip to bring someone like him down.

Does Nadler have an armed guard?

Take solace in the fact that that´s the enemy we´ll be facing.

Someone needs to tell this fat tub-o-lard liberal that 5 Big Macs are enough at any one sitting

Next up: legislation banning obese stupid people. Nadler will be the first to become banned.

No, Jerry - we´re defending ourselves against TYRANTS LIKE YOU.

He Neeyou Yawk! I think you´re ready for the Barney Fife Law: you´re only allowed ONE bullet. In cases of self defense, just wait until the perp gets really close and make that one shot count.

The rule of thumb is that the last shot is the one that wins a gun fight. The clips for my Springfield XD-40SW only hold 12. The top drawer next to our bed holds our pistol and 3 loaded clips. Mr Nadler, I´m a good shot at the range when the target is a sheet of paper, if forced to use my weapon to defend my family, I don´t know how steady my hands will be. That is a situation I never want to be in. When I´m forced into that situation, I want to give myself a chance at that last shot.

The gun debate is such a freak show. The dems have no intention of passing anything regarding gun control because they know it hurts them politically. So they use the republicans righteous indignation, outrage and opposition (which they know will prevail) against them at the same time whipping up their leftist base with their "attempt" at passing gun control. Kabuki. And so NOT serious. Jokers. Have they EVER done anything worthwhile? Just askin´...

Nadler must really think very little of his family if he had to defend their lives with just 3 shots...jerk, you keep firing till the target stops moving! Make all the laws you want...I rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6 ...

Detachable magazines is not the problem with these high profile killings. They should instead focus on better background checks. Psychiatrists should be allowed to notify authorities if their patient is not sane enough to own guns. And if they really wanted to lower the murder rate in the U.S., put organized crime out of business by making drugs legal. You can´t do that of course because the entire idea is unpopular. (People actually believe the War on Drugs is working.) So, they dick around with magazine size, as if that will solve anything. Meanwhile, the murder rate will continue to grow as the gangs become more and more powerful by selling contraband.

Reminds me of this story...

http://abcnews.go.com/US/georgia-mom-hiding-kids-shoots-intruder/story?id=18164812

Georgia Mom Shoots Home Invader, Hiding With Her Children

She shot him FIVE TIMES.
He walked out of the house,
got in his car,
and drove off down the street.
His attorneys are no doubt,
at this very moment,
drooling on their briefs.

The awful reality is that
outside of Hollywoodland,
two to four shots is almost never enough!

Of course government law enforcement (cops) will still be allowed ooodles of shots to bring down their adversaries. Criminals or sometimes an innocent boob.

I believe this huge, wobbly, Humpty Dumpty like person lost weight a year or two ago. Good for him. I still can´t stand him. He comes home after neighbors call about four shots heard coming from his house. He runs upstairs (he can do that now) and sees blood on the carpet, no perp in sight. Rushes to open the closet to find all but one of his family alive. If only he had loaded the gun with one more bullet.

#11 and if there had been more than one criminal, the mom and her children would probably be dead.

The Second Amendment is not about hunting or self-defense. It secures the right of the people to defend against an out of control, tyrannical Federal Government. Looks like we´re going to need it.

We hear you #15. Molon Labe.

I have so had it with this stupid argument. The opinions of moronic leftist politicians do not change the Constitution. Enough already.

Yeah perhaps if you are up against a fat slob like Jerry Nadler. I am an expert pistol shot ,trained in Clost Quarter Battle by the LAPD SWAT Team and you need to plan on at least 3 shots for a kill.

If you really want to hurt Nadler, shoot his refridgerator.

I read elsewhere that some progressives want the gun laws to remain unchanged. They fear conservatives will gain power again someday & wthey´ll need to protect themselves.

Progressives are a minority... although they act like Kings in power, we out number them greatly.

Now now, he´s a Democrat and is therefor smarter and more enlightened than the rest of us. You should feel bad for mocking him.

I´m sure the Secret Service would step up to the plate and start carrying guns that only carried two bullets. Then we can get the caliber of those bullets down to a BB.

Yes, when the President shows some leadership on the issue I´ll begin to entertain the justifications of an idiot.

And who checks the number of rounds that the bad guys have? Boy, they could be in real trouble!

Jabba the Hut will still have his testosterone to fall back on when his "two to four" shots miss their mark. Women should not expect to fare as well.

Nadler is the perfect representative for the Democrat party: He´s a fat, sweating, pampered tub of lard with an insatiable appetite, and he´s out lecturing law abiding American citizens on what constitutes "enough."

How would Nadler know how many shots are needed for self-defense? He would cry like a baby if he ever had to defend himself or his family.

Tub-o´-goo (I don´t care if he supposedly lost weight) is a typical leftist tyrant. He doesn´t care if his comments are unrealistic. All he cares about is disarming the citizens like the rest of the leftists who want unlimited power.

Under Cuomo in NY, only criminals will be allowed to have high capacity shot magazines....the better to kill you with since you´ll only have a limited number. Great job Cuomo, you jackass.

I´m thinking I heard that single women are the largest new contingent of people applying for concealed carry permits.I guess mace and pepper spray aren´t cutting it.

The foolishness of these laws lies in the rarity of high profile shootings.Nobody would call for the grounding of aircraft if one crashed with kids aboard.
Bad things are simply going to happen in random selection in the way the world and nature works.

Liberals just love to pat themselves on the back for doing things that have no practical meaning. What they really want is the headline claiming they care.The left simultaneously cares about obese and starving kids at the same time.How about that for compassion when they never miss a meal themselves.

It´s actually been quite a while since Nadler got gastric bypass and it came with a free lobotomy.

Idiot. 2-4 is clearly "not enough" in many documented cases of police encounters with armed bad guys. Just do some research and see case after case where police fire and hit multiple times, sometimes as many as 17 hits before disabling someone who is able to return fire the entire time.

Here is one such example: 17 hits with .45 caliber before the fight was stopped...

http://www.policemag.com/channel/patrol/articles/2012/02/shots-fired-skokie-illinois-08-25-2008.aspx?force-desktop-view=1

I´m sure three rounds would have been plenty during the LA riots - idiot

Several years ago I went through the NRA Personal Protection program. At the firing range the lady next to me was using a Lady Smith 38 caliber 5-shot revolver. The first firing station was six feet from the target, which was basically shaped as a human torso with a head. She missed the entire target with all 5 shots.

In a real life situation, do you think she would agree that 4 - 6 rounds would be enough ?

Nadler, if you´re breaking in to my house and coming at me, I´m emptying my fifteen shot magazine.