A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: House Of Representatives
Approves Additional $33.7
Billion For Sandy Relief
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
House Of Representatives
Approves Additional $33.7
Billion For Sandy Relief

NY1 News, by Staff

Original Article

Posted By:JoniTx, 1/15/2013 7:27:28 PM

The House of Representatives has passed the rest of the bill offering financial relief to Sandy Victims. Members voted in favor of an amendment written by lawmakers from New York and New Jersey for $33.7 billion, which provides funding for long term mitigation efforts. They´d already approved a bare-bones measure for $17 billion. The bare-bones $17 billion bill that passed by a 327-91 vote bolsters FEMA´s Disaster Relief Fund and provides money to transit and housing recovery, as well as other immediate needs like certain Army Corp of Engineer projects.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: veritas, 1/15/2013 7:35:29 PM     (No. 9118772)

Fox News just reported a $51 billion measure was passed.

The usual suspects are posturing for the cameras. No doubt this mess is the usual DC vote-buyer, and lots and lots for wholly-unrelated spending.

I think we should buy 535 masks for these crooks to wear when voting. Thieves.


Reply 2 - Posted by: horacer, 1/15/2013 7:44:57 PM     (No. 9118786)

If you can´t afford it, don´t be ill at ease
spend it anyway, you´ve got voters to appease


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: retiree, 1/15/2013 7:50:04 PM     (No. 9118792)

Was any of the pork taken out? I would like to know who the people were that put all that pork in the Sandy relief bill and make them have to answer for it.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Pearson365, 1/15/2013 8:57:51 PM     (No. 9118876)

The $60 billion Sandy & Whatever Relief measures consume most if not all of the first year´s increased tax on the $400,000 earners passed in crisis mode just two weeks ago. But as a House member notes, no one really cares about cliffs::

"Yesterday the rules committee was presented with almost 100 amendments for inclusion in today´s bill. More than 40 of those 100 amendments proposed to cut, to hinder and to offset the aid that´s contained in today´s bill," said Rep. Louise Slaughter, a Democrat from New York State.


Reply 5 - Posted by: wordsmith82, 1/15/2013 8:58:14 PM     (No. 9118877)

Time to read Congressman David Crocket´s "Not Yours To Give" speech again.


Reply 6 - Posted by: 3XALADY, 1/15/2013 9:23:13 PM     (No. 9118904)

Those people make me sick.


Reply 7 - Posted by: M Stuart, 1/15/2013 9:44:43 PM     (No. 9118921)

Boehner needs to go! Nancy Pelosi has put him in the shade.

Get Paul Ryan or someone more charismatic and determined!

I shudder to think of Boehner leading the fight against the debt ceiling.



   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Trigger2, 1/16/2013 4:03:14 AM     (No. 9119215)

Tomorrow we´ll read stories about what the pork consists of. What? The country has no money? No problem.


Reply 9 - Posted by: tocsin, 1/16/2013 7:01:35 AM     (No. 9119310)

Ditto #5-Colonel Crockett´s speech should read every day, right after the opening prayer.
BTW what happened to Boehner´s ´´72 hour rule´´?


Reply 10 - Posted by: Starlady, 1/16/2013 7:07:47 AM     (No. 9119316)

I´d say 17 billion can provide a lot of cover for the homeless as it snows if the correct priorities are set.
The hurricane that devastated Florida only received 7 billion in aid to rebuild years ago and that looked a lot like Sandy.


Reply 11 - Posted by: OhMy, 1/16/2013 7:15:11 AM     (No. 9119320)

A question. Does all the pork get added to the baseline to be spent every year from now on? Probably as usual..


Reply 12 - Posted by: Gorzabozo, 1/16/2013 7:39:57 AM     (No. 9119352)

Persons suffering under the devastation of hurricane Sandy are soon to receive an education of how ineffective the Feds are. This aid money will take forever to disburse and will go to the most hare-brained nonsense imaginable. The money will not go where it is needed, but to the well-connected. Sadly, your problems will not be over until you solve them yourselves. Take it from one who´s been there, done that, and had that done to them.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Judith, 1/16/2013 7:46:14 AM     (No. 9119365)

I´m not glad that a bunch of politicians (yes, christie and king, I´m looking at you, among others)got their pork. Looks like the house republicans are just part of the obama/dems kabuki theater. Gutless cowards. Did they strip out ANY pork? Vote the bums out.


Reply 14 - Posted by: globalwarmer, 1/16/2013 8:10:53 AM     (No. 9119419)

Don´t have the money? Not to worry, our kids and grand kids will pay it off.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Coy860, 1/16/2013 8:18:07 AM     (No. 9119437)

Those that DID have flood insurance, those that paid the premiums for years..
should THEY be allowed to be paid on their legimate claims? FEMA took their premium money, where did IT go?
Well, then FEMA had to be formally funded..
all the rest should have been allocated one by one, slowly and carefully.


Reply 16 - Posted by: califedup, 1/16/2013 8:28:19 AM     (No. 9119462)

Finally the cold hard fact is there for anyone to see who cares to take off the blinders: With the passage of this pork laden travesty and with the passage of the "Fiscal Crap" bill which raised taxes on just about every working citizen, the Republican Party has finally come out and become the "center" wing of the democrat party. So now the communists and Dictator Obama have take over the democrat party, the Supreme Court (thanks Chief Injustice Roberts), and now the Republican Party. Freedom loving Americans now have absolutely no say at all at the Federal Level of government. The Republican Party needs to go the way of the Whig Party which precede it.

We live in a country with a one party system.


Reply 17 - Posted by: LZK, 1/16/2013 8:34:24 AM     (No. 9119480)

IF this mess doesn´t prove to the average American the uselessness of our goooooberment then I don´t know what will wake you people up....

This bill is full of "extras" to cover all the political cronies in DC.....

Washington DC can only "rule" if WE let them. Remove any power they have over US -- by being self/sufficient....

LZK


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Mr. Hanky, 1/16/2013 10:13:13 AM     (No. 9119712)

Pork, pork, pork, pork...

Congress as usual.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Mr. Hanky, 1/16/2013 10:15:01 AM     (No. 9119720)

The aid will take forever to disburse and go to a million things not even involved in the emergency. People will suffer all kinds of red tape before even beginning to repair their homes. FEMA as usual but not a hint of blame for President "I´m going to a taxpayer vacation" Obama.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Felixcat, 1/16/2013 10:48:30 AM     (No. 9119829)

What did people do in this country before FEMA and federal aid for disaster relief?

(rhetorical question)


Reply 21 - Posted by: larryp, 1/16/2013 11:49:42 AM     (No. 9120002)

I read that there are tens of millions of dollars going to HEAD START(!)in this bill. I guess it is fully funded forever.


Reply 22 - Posted by: dman, 1/16/2013 1:33:50 PM     (No. 9120306)

New party.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: larryp, 1/16/2013 7:09:35 PM     (No. 9121005)

I always wondered how these distributions work. Does the $31 billion go to a half-dozen banks? Is there an application process.Is there a deductible. OR are there govt officlas standing on street corners with bank-sacks yelling "curb-service"?
The whole thing seems chaotic and vague.
Isn´t possibe that some or a lot of the money is skimmed? No offence, but the huge amounts without a structure, makes one suspicious.
Also there is no budget so where is this coming from. If the USA follows double-entry bookeeping, then there should be debit and credit type entries.
Also there are all these rules for the borrowers on a mtg now, like no more than 43% of yr income goes to a mortgage.(which means a lot of people won´t get buy a house; THEY decide their finances). But where is the limit on the Governments´ borrowing?


Reply 24 - Posted by: lancer12, 1/16/2013 9:00:26 PM     (No. 9121207)

Look at the photos-homeless weeping and the destroyed "homes" with no foundations or stone structure. Like the 9/11 memorial taxpayer moey gng to crooks and back to politicians. Turn on the tears and rob them. Bad things happen to everyone and very bad things happen to some.



Post Reply   Close thread 719156




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"



´Do not waste a minute living
someone else´s dream´: First
Lady gives stirring speech
at Nashville high school which
thrives despite rats and leaky ceilings
Daily Mail (UK), by Katie Davies    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 8:17:10 PM     Post Reply
The First Lady Michelle Obama told graduates from Nashville´s Martin Luther King Jr High School to carve their own path, work hard and show grit and determination at her commencement speech today. But little did she know that teachers and students at the Tennessee school, have shown more grit than most in dealing with the school´s run-down conditions. The school was honored to host Mrs Obama in the only high school graduation speech she will give this year. But it was no surprise the event was held off campus given the state of the school buildings

Obama admits he’s a socialist
New York Post, by Kyle Smith    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:59:42 PM     Post Reply
You may be forgiven if you missed it during last week’s tsunami of scandals, but President Obama finally let slip that he is a socialist. Buried in the 17th paragraph of one of those mewling New York Times pieces on the woes of Obama — can we start calling him Woe-bama yet? — appeared these two words: “going Bulworth.” Obama himself, the Times explained, has been “longingly” telling his inner circle that what he’d really like to do is what Sen. Jay Bulworth, played by Warren Beatty in his 1998 movie “Bulworth,” did: to go public as

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

WH: Legality of IRS Action
Against Conservatives ´Irrelevant´
Breitbart Big Government, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:43:10 PM     Post Reply
Appearing on Sunday morning on ABC News’ This Week, White House Senior Adviser Dan Pfeiffer told a credulous George Stephanopoulos that the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups was “inexcusable,” and that the law with regard to the activity was “irrelevant.” “I can’t speak to the law here,” he said. “The law is irrelevant. The activity was outrageous and inexcusable, and it was stopped and it needs to be fixed so we ensure it never happens again.” When asked for clarification, Pfeiffer expounded: “What I mean is, whether it’s legal or illegal is not important to the fact

WH: ´Irrelevant´ Who
Edited Benghazi Talking Points
Breitbart Big Government, by William Bigelow    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:40:46 PM     Post Reply
Appearing on CBS’ Face the Nation, White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said that it was “largely irrelevant” who edited the talking points the Obama administration trotted out in the aftermath of the terrorist attack in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. Host Bob Schieffer asked, “That was just a PR plan, to send out somebody who didn’t know anything about what had happened. Why did you do that? Why didn’t the Secretary of State come and tell us what they knew, and if they knew nothing, say ‘We don’t know yet?’ …. Why are you here today?

WH: ´Irrelevant´ Where Obama
Was During Benghazi Attacks
Breitbart Big Government, by Ben Shapiro    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:37:54 PM     Post Reply
On Fox News Sunday this morning, White House spokesman Dan Pfeiffer was asked by Chris Wallace where in the White House President Obama was during the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi that killed four Americans. “Question,” asked Wallace. “What did the President do the rest of that night to pursue Benghazi?” Pfeiffer answered, “Look, the President was kept up to date on this as it was happening the entire night, from the moment it started until the very end …. I recognize that there’s a series of conspiracy theories Republicans have been spinning about it

Non-deportation rate
drops — to 99.2 percent
Washington Times [DC], by Stephen Dinan    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:28:53 PM     Post Reply
The Homeland Security Department has granted legal status to 99.2 percent of all illegal immigrants who have applied under President Obama’s new non-deportation policy for young adults, according to the latest numbers released Friday. That’s a slight drop from the 99.5 percent approval rate reported last month. The policy, known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, grants legal status to most illegal immigrants under the age of 31 who came to the U.S. before age 16 — usually brought by their parents. They are allowed to remain in the U.S. without fear of deportation, and are given work



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
73 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

56 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Camelot Is Burning
47 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

43 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part


Post Reply   Close thread 719156





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~