A 5-year-old girl abducted from a West Philadelphia elementary Monday was found early this morning barely dressed and crying in an Upper Darby playground, say police. Upper Darby Police Superintendent Michael Chitwood said that Nailla Robinson, taken by an unidentified woman in a black Muslim-style face covering from the Bryant Elementary School just across the border in Philadelphia, was found about 4:40 a.m. today. Authorities say they believe the child was targeted, but did not know the woman who abducted her.
Comments: * and Emily Babay and Mari Schaefer
Questions: The abductor wore a hijab or a burqa (not clear from article). Could she have been identified without some sort of removal of the face covering?
Second question: Why didn´t the person who oversaw the release not follow proper procedures? Did the administrator feel intimidated into not pressing for ID or other verification?
I´m not jumping to conclusions, but the questions need to be asked.
My first thought on seeing the video was how can the Phila school system let someone into the school dressed that way. To protect children we have got to stop being so P/C. The person could just as easily had a weapon. If people don´t want to identify themselves they shouldn´t be allowed to enter.
I don´t understand why they are waiting to question the child. As time goes by, her memory of the events will become less clear and may become embellished.
I wonder if they will now ban burkas and hajibs since this was an obvious disguise and I don´t think "Tiffany" is a traditional Muslim name. There is more to this story than is being related in the press. How did the woman know the child´s name?
I think they always take anyone, especially children, who have been abducted to be checked out medically first before questioning. And children are interviewed and questioned by a child psychologist who knows how to draw information out using drawings and age-specific questions.
No excuse for the school not to have followed procedures. We went to pick up my grandchildren at pre-school one time and my son had forgotten to tell them that morning that the grandparents would be coming for them. Everyone at the school knew us as we had picked them up many times before. No way would they give them to us this time until they had called my son at work to verify no matter how well they knew us. The school should have called the child´s mother even if this abductor did show ID. IDdoesn´t mean she had permission to take the child.
#7, I´ve seen some of the ´liberal´ responses you´ve left here, but even you must know that at YOUR grandkids school, there is something YOU have that allows them to be as specific as possible in adhereing to the rules. BUT because of liberalism, and it´s proponents like YOU, that child is just collateral damage in the war AGAINST ´discrimination´. Democrats DO NOT CARE ABOUT PEOPLE. They only care about ´groups´ from whom they can derive votes.
I don´t have a clue what #10 is talking about, does anyone? Children at ALL schools should be safe from being abducted by anyone. All schools should be as careful as my grandkids school was with all children. Of course the school was wrong.
Maybe I misread some of your responses, but regarding what you have that the other woman did not, I was speaking to your melannin content. The PC inherent in the left has allowed this to happen; God forbid someone there ask the woman to LIFT HER VEIL, but you and the Mrs.? Sit and wait while we contact the parents.
Oh, and #11? Very simple search function; look up his other repsonses. I guess gun control is a very conservative measure? Amongst other comments. I do not disagree at all with what he said TODAY, I had to write on a very teeny keypad. What I was saying was that HE will be held to each and every regulation regarding removing a child from school, but NOT a burka´d woman. That was all.
I and the MR. were more than happy to sit and wait while our grandchildren´s parents were contacted before we were allowed to take the kids home. If the school was this strict and thorough about following their security procedures, even though they knew us well and on a first name basis, it meant our grandchildren and all the children there were in a secure place with good administrators. None of us have any idea what happened in the Philadelphia school, so everything is mere speculation. If they didn´t require parental permission to take a child out they had no security to begin with.
#19, I agreed with you regarding the necessity for controls at schools; I laud your patience and wish society had a greater expectation of your behavior out of everyone. Sadly, we know that is not normal anymore. Poor behavior is the norm. I was trying to make the comment that #16 was regarding why you were made to adhere to the rules, and why the burka´d woman was not. I did not call you a liberal. I stated that I have read some of the ´liberal´ things you´ve written. Big difference, #11. I will say that to me, the equivocation I´ve seen in your comments(Tamron Hall a balanced reporter? Hillary Clinton DEFINITIVELY fell down and bumped her noggin, and all us conspiracy theorists are nuts?) leads me to believe that your sympathies lie somewhere in between.
Three years ago, New Jersey regulators suspended abortion provider Steven Brigham´s medical license for endangering and deceiving patients. During the suspension hearing, he testified that he was covered by medical malpractice insurance. Now, as Brigham, 57, tries to regain his license, New Jersey prosecutors have submitted evidence that his sworn statement was yet another lie. They allege that not only did he stop carrying required liability insurance around 2006, but last month produced a phony insurance policy when forced to back up the statement.
Yesterday, in an interview with NBC’s Chuck Todd, President Obama addressed the problems caused by his incessantly-repeated pledge to the American public that “if you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what.” As millions of Americans receive cancellation letters in the mail, however, that pledge looked increasingly strained. “I am sorry that they, you know, are finding themselves in this situation, based on assurances they got from me,” the President said last night. In the course of his interview, however, Mr. Obama made
A Pennsylvania father is steaming mad after the head of a local teacher’s union suggested he may be a “neo-Nazi” for questioning a school assignment. Josh Barry, of Camp Hill, Penn., expressed concern after his daughter brought home an assignment analyzing a New York Times article discussing the recent government shutdown. Examiner.com first reported the story. The assignment asked questions like, “Whom do you hold most responsible for the government shutdown?” and “Do you feel it is principled or irresponsible for politicians to threaten a shutdown?”
A pair of parents in Connecticut—who had apparently never seen an episode of any sitcom ever—went away for the weekend and had the genius idea to leave their daughters, 15 and 16 respectively, home alone for the weekend. This is where I´m supposed to use #YOLO, right? It is? #YOLO Seriously, though, the girls allegedly threw parties for 15-20 people* on Friday and Saturday, even though they aren´t of legal drinking age. And, just like in your favorite sitcom, the parents returned home from vacation early and caught their daughters in the act of throwing a third party on Sunday
The National Football League has implemented a new stadium policy that would ban off-duty police officers from carrying guns into games. Cleveland’s police union president worried the policy would stop officers from assisting if a dangerous situation arose. Off-duty police officers often will carry their weapons on them, according to the union president, because “when we walk through city streets, we’re police officers too” and “you never know what’s going to happen, or when it’s going to happen,” he said. The head of NFL security, on the other hand, said that “the likelihood there’s
On Sunday, Breitbart News Editor-at-Large Ben Shapiro discussed the launch of a new website that will seek to "change the nature of media" by exposing the donors and advertisers that enable the mainstream media to distort the truth and push their agendas with no accountability, especially when it comes to their bottom lines. Shapiro will lead TruthRevolt.org, which will launch on Monday to expose the mainstream media and “unmask leftists in the media for who they are, destroy their credibility with the American public, and devastate their funding bases."
The faculty at a middle school in Connecticut has just about had it up to *here* with all of those tired, forced references to the Geico "Hump Day" commercial that your dad loves so much. They´re so fed up with students quoting the camel commercial that they´ve banned all references to the spot, which is, apparently, a thing that seemed reasonable to them. "Everybody´s walking around in the hallways and saying it´s hump day in that weird voice," said Brooke Lewis, who is a student at Vernon Center Middle School.
I have never been much of a conspiracy theorist. For me it was always Oswald by himself from the Texas School Book Depository and nothing in the intervening fifty years has disabused me of this notion. For the most part, I’m an Occam’s Razor kind of guy — the most obvious explanation is likely to be true. (Snip) To put it bluntly, Occam’s Razor has moved. Things that were once possibilities now seem almost certainties to me. Principal among those is that Obama’s academic records are perpetually unavailable for a reason — and that reason is most likely that they reveal
One of President Obama´s chief political assets has been his ability to excite young people like almost no politician in history. But the days of America´s youth fawning over the president are over. A new Harvard University Institute of Politics poll released Wednesday confirms what other surveys have shown in recent months: Millennials have soured on Obama so much this year that their opinion of him largely mirrors the American public´s. Even though Obama does not ever have to face another election, he should be worried about the findings for a couple of reasons, which we will dive into momentarily.
President Obama will cast growing income inequality and a decline in economic mobility as a “fundamental threat to the American dream” during a speech Wednesday in Washington. The speech will serve as an early preview for next year’s State of the Union address, according to a White House official, who said Obama would focus much of his energy over the next three years on the issue. “The decisions we make over the next few years will determine whether or not our children will grow up in an America where, if you work hard, you can get ahead,” the official said.
Good stuff from Jonathan Turley at today’s House hearing on executive power, although I regret that I couldn’t find a more user-friendly format for you to watch. There’s no compilation clip; you’ll have to make do with the C-SPAN embed by fast-forwarding to the time cues I give you and being patient while the vid buffers (and buffers, and buffers).(Snip)That brings us to point two: Even if Congress can’t stop Obama, the courts can. The problem there, though, says Turley, is that O and the DOJ have argued successfully in many cases that no one has standing to sue him
During a presentation at the White House in which President Barack Obama touted the benefits of the Affordable Care Act, the president declared that his signature health care reform law was not going to be repealed. This assertion led his administration members, his staff, and audience members to rise from their seats and give the president a standing ovation. Obama said that ACA opponents’ alternative to the health care reform law is to champion repeal and going back to the health care delivery system status quo ante. He specifically cited Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) who he said was asked directly for
A woman has revealed how difficult it is to eat healthily and stay full when living off an average food stamp budget. Melinda Moulton, from Huntington, Vermont, was one of 200 people to take part in the 3Squares Challenge, which saw her living for a week on just $36 worth of food, or around $1.71 a meal. Opting to try and eat as healthily as possible, Ms Moulton resorted to cheap foods like yogurt for breakfast, two handfuls of peanuts for lunch and lentil stew for dinner, all of which left her unsatisfied.´I don´t know how people do it,´ said
[Video] President Obama on Wednesday declared that addressing income inequality would be the focus of “all” of the White House’s efforts “for the rest of my presidency.” In a sweeping address that touched on raising the minimum wage, investing in infrastructure and ending tax breaks for the wealthy, Obama warned that the American economy has become “profoundly unequal,” declaring economic mobility the “challenge of our time.” “The combined trends of increasing inequality and decreasing mobility pose a fundamental threat to the American dream, our way of life, and what we stand for around the globe,” he said in an hour-long