|
|
| |
Topic: New York Times Declares Victory in Feminism´s War on Love and Romance |
New York Times Declares Victory in Feminism´s War on Love and Romance
American Thinker, by Pamela Geller
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:magnante, 1/15/2013 11:22:58 AM
|
| The New York Times, the cultural beacon for the left´s war on American values, has declared that the "date" is dead.(snip)What did they expect? Why should men date? Why would they make any effort at all? The feminists turned all women into unpaid whores because it´s so, ya know, cool and liberating. Yeah, being a piece of meat is fabtastic. I am so glad I am not a young woman in America in 2013. If you are not a slut, any real social life is tough. Men expect serious and strange sex immediately.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
LudicrousSextus, 1/15/2013 11:35:10 AM (No. 9117682)
Liberalism has done *great* things for American´s sex lives! They´ve practically eliminated ´two parent households´, because...well, marriage is such a tedious anachronism...
And they´ve totally eliminated any ´responsibility´ for birth control - having decided that a baby is disposable up to the moment it´s born...
Not to worry tho´ - between pushing aberrant sex on children as ´normal and healthy´, thus condemning another 1000 children per month to the roles of the HIV infected...
And the CDC´s recent note that we now have *totally* drug resistant Gonorrhea in the US...
Their ´mandate to spread enlightenment´ just keeps getting better and better all the time.
It´s mildly surprising that young women are dense enough to buy into it all.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
HisHandmaiden, 1/15/2013 11:43:55 AM (No. 9117708)
And where were the fathers...
A scary, well written, Must Read.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
southron, 1/15/2013 11:44:32 AM (No. 9117712)
Thank you Gloria Steinheim !
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
philly_patriot, 1/15/2013 11:56:03 AM (No. 9117742)
Don´t forget Planned Parenthood´s slogan ....... ´being a slut is empowering´.
It´s not just Love and Romance that is kaput ....... it´s the end of Society as we know it.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Talk2, 1/15/2013 12:10:49 PM (No. 9117778)
The gulibility of women beginning in the late 60s and on to today is mind boggling. The movies show casual sex as a liberating experience making women just as ready to lay their bodies on the line as men are to take advantage of their gulibility. One wonders why so many "so-called" marriages end up broken. It doesn´t take a mental giant to understand men will always wonder how many men have gone before him when it took no effort for him to go there. Men have lost the confidence in their wives they once had when it comes to sexual exclusivity so arguments that should be settled turn into major battles with no good ending. The heroine in the book or movie flits from bed to bed and then Mr. Right comes along and she declares her undying fidelity to him. Yeah, right, and in the book or movie he takes the porkcupine at face value never to doubt she doesn´t compare him to every other stud who graced her bed. He will never be sure that a disagreement over anything isn´t connected to his place on the totem pole she has carved bed by bed. Feminists have worked very hard to convince women they are the same as men and little boys and little girls are the same until their environment places them in different boxes. Why seemingly intelligent young women bought that claptrap is a mystery to me, but buy it they did. What a travesty a few dedicated self and men haters wrought upon young women and hence society.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
jeffreyabigail, 1/15/2013 12:13:08 PM (No. 9117784)
Prior poster said it - A Must Read.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
MrYules, 1/15/2013 12:29:40 PM (No. 9117817)
Read "The Crisis of Our Age" by Pitirim Sorokin, who calls the current era the "dying sensate culture", a time of manipulative empty "relationships", lies, increasing violence on grander scales, and the serious decline of "moral" values. "Moral" emphasizing "a code of right conduct towards self and others". He surveyed historical periods since before the time of the Greeks and partitions "history" into three types of epochs: Ideational (truth, moral values, regard for self and others, and living modestly - both morally and economically); Idealistic (more rooted in the "world" with political/economic progress, but "great ideals and values"); and finally the Sensate Culture of decadent pleasure, live for today because tomorrow never comes (or we´re all dead anyway, with no Afterlife), and maximum violence/exploitation of fellow man. There is no limit to violence against others, who are seen as mere things to gratify oneself. Sorokin did his research between the World Wars, and "Crisis" came out just as WWII was getting into high gear. Reading Sorokin can give a sense of meaning to what is going on world-wide. It can only (and will) get worse before it gets better, if only because there are even more violent and disgusting things that "modern" people have not yet done against each other.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
graniteman2009, 1/15/2013 12:33:56 PM (No. 9117827)
I am a "Mad Man" in the age of Doonsbury..
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
realrep, 1/15/2013 12:45:13 PM (No. 9117853)
Thanks #6 You are a wonderful wordsmith!
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 1/15/2013 4:20:58 PM (No. 9118367)
To answer your question, No. 5, I don´t watch any of those shows. I pay for TV so I can see Downton Abbey, concerts such as Il Volvo Takes Flight, Fox News, old movies and music channels such as "Easy Listening".
I am badly shaken just from reading this article. One horrow after another.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"
|
Obama thinks liberals are stupid
|
|
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 5/14/2013 9:08:19 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Hey, liberals! Obama thinks you are stupid. Yeah, he really does. He knew Benghazi was terrorism before he didn´t know it was terrorism. Addressing a question about Benghazi in his press conference Monday, May 13, 2013, Obama´s "logic" really made an impression: "The Day after it happened I acknowledged that this was an act of terrorism." (snip) Leaving behind Obama´s initial certitude about Benghazi having been a terror attack, not only did he not know what had happened because it wasn´t clear
|
| |
|
Benghazi: Murder and Treachery Most Foul?
|
|
American Thinker, by Fay Voshell
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 5/14/2013 8:29:37 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What person ever says what he really knows at a funeral? Eulogies bearing little or no resemblance to the deceased or to the facts are trotted out by people who are often bad actors, who though they know better, lie anyway. It´s almost acceptable behavior. But any truth about the deaths of U.S. Ambassador Christ Stevens and three other Americans appears to have been put six feet under as far as our current administration is concerned. (snip)Did they love Chris Stevens the way Brutus loved Caesar?
|
Media discovering Obama doesn´t return the love
|
|
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 5/14/2013 8:23:22 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Somewhere, Andrew Breitbart is smiling. You can almost see the metaphorical light bulbs going on in bubbles over the heads of liberal media figures. Obama loyalists are expressing outrage at the subpoenaing of the phone records of 20 lines serving over a hundred AP reporters. The timing could not be better.(snip) the AP scandal´s significance entirely lies with its effect on the media´s mindset on Obama. They have been cheerleading for him for six years,
|
Murdered Thousands, Convicted for Three: The Kermit Gosnell Verdict
|
|
American Thinker, by Drew Belsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 5/14/2013 7:46:57 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Philadelphia abortionist Kermit Gosnell was convicted yesterday on three counts of first-degree murder, not to mention a slew of other charges, including involuntary manslaughter (for the death of 41-year-old Karnamaya Mongar), infanticide, and abortions past Pennsylvania´s legal limit. (snip)in a culture dominated by the 24-hour news cycle, it will be easy for Americans to consider the abortion issue closed with the Gosnell verdict. The pro-life movement´s challenge, as [Lila] Rose says, is to keep the American people focused on how common Gosnell-like practices are in the abortion industry, and on all the unsung victims abortion
|
|
Benghazi and Obama´s Legitimacy
|
|
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 5/13/2013 11:02:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Did Barack Obama in effect steal the election in 2012? It is impossible to know, of course, how matters would have played it if Americans had been told the truth about Benghazi. And what if the IRS had not hobbled conservative nonprofits (and therefore the movement) with extra scrutiny and consequent delay and expenses? But there can be no doubt that Obama helped himself by being able to claim that Al Qaeda was "on the run" and with an assist from Candy Crowley make Mitt Romney look bad on when he criticized Obama´s anti-terror policies.
|
Barack Obama and the End of an Era
|
|
American Thinker, by Steve McCann
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 5/13/2013 9:55:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The re-election of Barack Obama is the high water mark and the end of an era. The period 1960 to 2014 will go down in American history as the era of never-ending crusades leading to the decline and potential downfall of the United States. During this time frame America has been inundated with one cause after another. The essential civil rights movement and the tragically successful Viet Nam protests spawned numerous causes, among them: feminism, environmentalism, global warming, and gay rights. For each generation born after 1940 it has been a rite of passage
|
| |
|
The Bloody Hands of Barack Obama
|
|
American Thinker, by Stella Paul
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 5/13/2013 9:29:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Three Whistleblowers at the Benghazi hearing spoke softly, but with the emotional wallop of The Three Tenors. They told the truth, and it blasted like thunder through Obama´s tissue palace of lies. Listening to these strong, solemn men, I heard the sound of old America: a place of hardworking people who love their country and believe in something bigger than their own power. (snip) But today, their America is forced to serve a different god: a cold, smiling man with a hollow heart and hands that get bloodier by the day.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
| |
|
NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP Investigates Obama Scandals, ´The Voters Will Punish Them´
|
|
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
Obama 47 minutes late for his press conference; leaves reporters in the rain
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/16/2013 1:20:06 PM
Post Reply
|
|
“I look forward to taking some questions at tomorrow’s press conference,” President Obama said last night, after announcing the resignation of the acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller. The president scheduled a noon press conference today with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in honor of his visit. Reporters, however, found themselves waiting outside in the rain for Obama, who was 47 minutes late. Only New York Times reporter Mark Landler had an umbrella.
|
| | |
|
|