A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: I’m a dope fiend: Lance
’fesses in Oprah sit-down
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
I’m a dope fiend: Lance
’fesses in Oprah sit-down

New York Post*, by Dan Mangan & Chuck Bennett

Original Article

Posted By:Pluperfect, 1/15/2013 5:22:12 AM

Lance Armstrong cemented his place in the pantheon of history’s most notorious liars yesterday, when he finally admitted to doping his way to seven Tour de France titles. The disgraced cycling superstar came clean about his years-long campaign of deception in an interview with Oprah Winfrey that was taped yesterday and will air Thursday night, sources said. Armstrong’s long-overdue confession came three months after he was stripped of his treasured Tour titles and banned from cycling for life by anti-doping officials, who refused to cave in to his vicious demonization of anyone who suggested he took performance enhancers.

Comments:
* and Associated Press

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: ROLFnader, 1/15/2013 6:21:05 AM     (No. 9117087)

Oh well, he could always go to work in the next Clinton administration. He´d fit right in.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Sfacheem, 1/15/2013 6:28:20 AM     (No. 9117093)

If you would have told me 35 years ago that something like this could be a big story I would have laughed myself into a straight jacket.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: steveW, 1/15/2013 6:52:01 AM     (No. 9117114)

Please Oprah, invite Barack on and get him to confess he´s a Marxist. No eye will be dry as he proclaims his faith in the Worker´s Revolution and Socialist Internationale.


Reply 4 - Posted by: pineledger, 1/15/2013 6:54:42 AM     (No. 9117118)

I´m up to here with both of them.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Keekng, 1/15/2013 6:57:53 AM     (No. 9117122)

Two pathetic publicity hounds discussing a pathetic problem. Agreed, #2.


Reply 6 - Posted by: The Patriot Code, 1/15/2013 7:28:40 AM     (No. 9117146)

It would be much more interesting if Lance´s ex-girlfriend, Sheryl Crow, would admit to using more than two squares of toilet paper to, well, you know.


Reply 7 - Posted by: rustycfc, 1/15/2013 7:50:21 AM     (No. 9117183)

willy shakespier said it nicely, much ado about nothing


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: toodles3956, 1/15/2013 7:51:25 AM     (No. 9117184)

I´m sure everyone else was doping too so that put them all on the same playing field. To me, he still won.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Judith, 1/15/2013 8:00:52 AM     (No. 9117199)

I just can´t stand either of these people. However, I would be interested to know how oprah turns this conversation to talk about herself. She always does and if someone could tell me how she takes a story about a white male drug abuser, bike race winner, to be all about her, I´d like to know. Not enough to watch it though.


Reply 10 - Posted by: mrduc, 1/15/2013 8:09:34 AM     (No. 9117222)

#6 thanks for the bellylaugh to start my day. It must be so comforting for ´one-sheet Sheryl´ as she is known in our house, to know that all across America, we think of her when we, well, you know....


Reply 11 - Posted by: StormCnter, 1/15/2013 8:19:06 AM     (No. 9117237)

It´s not "much ado about nothing" if you consider the money the postal service paid over the years to sponsor this cheating team, which was contractually prohibited from using unapproved substances. Floyd Landis´s whistleblower suit may be joined by the US Justice Department. The deadline is Thursday, when Oprah airs. The whistleblower suit is aimed at clawing back that sponsorship money, plus at least one British paper is suing for the return of their libel settlement with Armstrong. Turns out he wasn´t libeled after all.


Reply 12 - Posted by: skedaddle, 1/15/2013 8:24:59 AM     (No. 9117248)

He was quite the vicious liar, wasn´t he? Hope those who´ve been wronged by him can get back a little. I´m still disappointed though that Oprah is back to doing interviews.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Donna M, 1/15/2013 8:27:42 AM     (No. 9117256)

1) Why does anyone care?
2) Why is he doing the confessional thing when he could leave the US, renounce citizenship and move to comfortable places which either do not have or don´t enforce extradition with the US, such as the Philippines, Croatia (may be too close to France), Cape Verde (ditto) or Argentina? He also would not be bothered in Bhutan.


Reply 14 - Posted by: cdunnrun, 1/15/2013 8:38:47 AM     (No. 9117284)

"All this pain just to ride a bike."

That is freakin´ flat out comedy gold! LOL!


Reply 15 - Posted by: cartcart, 1/15/2013 8:42:38 AM     (No. 9117292)

I never bought into the WWLD bracelet. I have another set of heroes that re not involved in any of this stuff.


Reply 16 - Posted by: globalwarmer, 1/15/2013 8:52:30 AM     (No. 9117311)

Just shut-up, Lance. Way too much information, OK?


Reply 17 - Posted by: Sunhan65, 1/15/2013 8:54:29 AM     (No. 9117315)

I had no dog in this fight, but those who defended Armstrong and attacked his critics on this site for so long were wrong.They should acknowledge that.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: SouthSanAntonio, 1/15/2013 9:00:24 AM     (No. 9117327)

I really hoped that Lance was going to tell Oprah that he had never used anything illegal, and that he just got tired of fighting.

But now that he has ´´confessed´´ -- complete with mandatory tears -- to Oprah, I´m sure NØbama will find a space for him in his 2nd term. Being a liar, cheat, and skumbag are pretty much requirements to serving in the NØbama administration after all...


Reply 19 - Posted by: Jethro bo, 1/15/2013 9:34:15 AM     (No. 9117401)

Somehow, my ´Give a Hoot in Hades´ meter isn´t budging.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Aegedius, 1/15/2013 9:34:32 AM     (No. 9117403)

Seriously, folks. Enough of this already. Can we get back to talking about the Kardashians? I hear one of them had corn flakes for breakfast this morning.


Reply 21 - Posted by: melman, 1/15/2013 9:35:51 AM     (No. 9117406)

I had never bought into this whole Lance Armstrong thing either, he made it much too troublesome to ride a Bicycle with all the thousands of dollars just to buy a bicycle and then all the clothing etc, etc, etc.. I could never understand how anyone could be comfortable with such a small saddle to rest ones rear on.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Avogadra, 1/15/2013 9:41:57 AM     (No. 9117418)

Oh no! Oh no! I´ll never watch the Tour de France again!

Wait...I never watched it in the first place. Never mind.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: olcap, 1/15/2013 10:02:19 AM     (No. 9117466)

Extremely hard to believe there´s STILL gullible people here attempting to whitewash it by saying he is still the winner because "everyone else was doing it", just forget about his bold face lying. Incredible!


Reply 24 - Posted by: montanabound, 1/15/2013 10:10:34 AM     (No. 9117485)

We call her Share-a-roll Crow. I probably got that name from an L-dotter.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Flipper3, 1/15/2013 10:59:12 AM     (No. 9117584)

Oprah is so 15 minutes ago, and so is Lance Armstrong.


Reply 26 - Posted by: tulunk, 1/15/2013 11:27:47 AM     (No. 9117660)

Maybe Oprah can organize a mass righteousness confessional rally. Pro athletes in baseball, football and tennis, Olympians, etc could all fess up that they, too, take performance-enhancing drugs. Nancy P, Hilary, Boehner could admit to Bo-tox binging, models and movie stars admit to plastic surgeries to appear younger and more bee-yootiful, Obama , bubba Clinton to serial lying. Hey, so many possibilities, so little time......


Reply 27 - Posted by: Roberto 22, 1/15/2013 12:02:32 PM     (No. 9117766)

I can´t even find Oprah´s channel...


Reply 28 - Posted by: tomanderson61, 1/15/2013 12:13:02 PM     (No. 9117783)

I disagree that this does not matter. It does.

This guy dishonored not only himself, but American sportsmanship. He´s a liar and a cheat. All those awards and flag waving. Brought to you by a drug user.

I am SO sick of people and their drugs, recreational, in sports, otherwise. Weak minded and cowardly. Kids looked up to this jerk and his raw determination, now to find out it was just because he was stoked up on drugs.

He didn´t have the guts or the courage to put it out there with his own body like many others didn´t. He cheated those other people out of awards and honors and accomplishments, and he blemished America in the process.

That´s not important? I think its damned important. Good lesson for our kids too.


Reply 29 - Posted by: zbogwan2, 1/15/2013 12:21:17 PM     (No. 9117799)

Lance Armstrong,criminals and all wrongdoers seem to confess their wrongs(after denying same vehemently until they´re caught Red Handed)saying: "I´ve made some poor/bad choices and I´m sorry for them." Then they are forgiven and bygones are bygones, so to speak?


Reply 30 - Posted by: BuckeyeRon, 1/15/2013 12:22:29 PM     (No. 9117801)

What #28 said...some still contend that the drugs he took were an integral part of cancer treatment, even in the face of Armstrong´s own admissions...guess DSK was set up too....


Reply 31 - Posted by: readitfirst, 1/15/2013 12:30:34 PM     (No. 9117818)

This man is confessing as the prelude to being a whistleblower. It´s all to buffer the punishment he so rightly deserves but is too much a coward to accept. Feel sorry for his children who now have to grow up with this shadow of shame. What a hero! /s


Reply 32 - Posted by: Geelabeela828, 1/15/2013 12:46:33 PM     (No. 9117858)

Lance and Oprah: two desperate, pompous people using each other to hang on to relevance.


Reply 33 - Posted by: jimboendaatl, 1/15/2013 12:49:39 PM     (No. 9117865)

So now he wants forgiveness after he´s made millions. Hey Lance, want forgiveness? Give all your money to charity.


Reply 34 - Posted by: goodbyedems, 1/15/2013 1:05:23 PM     (No. 9117901)

The whole world.....one BIG fat lie. With TV leading the parade. Any other media format closely behind. So basically, just turn it all off, tune it all out and believe in yourself. But test this first by looking in the mirror.

As for the magnitude of the lie, I suggest we use the Al Gore Global warming as a benchmark.


Reply 35 - Posted by: bldrrepub, 1/15/2013 1:22:24 PM     (No. 9117947)

Perhaps the biggest sporting fraud ever.

His net worth is/was over $125 Million. If the whistle blower/Qui Tam case goes forward, he could be on the hook for almost $100 Million.


Reply 36 - Posted by: Skyliner, 1/15/2013 1:22:59 PM     (No. 9117949)

Enquiring minds wanna know…

How many Obamabucks crossed the hand of Lance to make Oprah relevant, one more time?


Reply 37 - Posted by: suejeanne, 1/15/2013 2:06:03 PM     (No. 9118047)

#21 - maybe that´s why they always have their buttskies up in the air - they can´t really sit on that thing - always looked dreadfully uncomfortable to me, slightly masochistic even

This Lance Armstrong case makes me think of Tiger Woods, too and how it is so ridiculous to put so much stock in these people who do not deserve it - I remember hearing it on the radio on the way over to my Mom´s about Tiger´s car accident - wanting to break it to Mom before she turned on the news because I knew how upset she would be - we were so worried!


Reply 38 - Posted by: On fire, 1/15/2013 5:43:57 PM     (No. 9118566)

This small man destroyed other peoples lives, reputations & careers. Go away, mr. Armstrong.


Reply 39 - Posted by: franq, 1/15/2013 6:15:14 PM     (No. 9118617)

#27 gets it. Laissez Bon Temps Roule!


Reply 40 - Posted by: beveyscool1, 1/15/2013 6:42:52 PM     (No. 9118678)

His family must be sooooo proud.....


Reply 41 - Posted by: ArtieC, 1/15/2013 6:49:02 PM     (No. 9118690)

Ok. I´ll try this once more.
to wit: I tried real hard not to care about this but now that Oprah is involved I feel I just have to. /sarcasm.


Reply 42 - Posted by: Penney, 1/15/2013 6:52:53 PM     (No. 9118706)

This con artist got caught yet he still has no shame, no remorse over his lies & betrayals of trust, -only regret at FINALLY getting caught. Sadly, he remains a candidate for repeating simular, ´performances,´ and so will likely continue recycling his imaginative deceits. ...With those, ´credentials,´ perhaps he will become just another dem party candidate? 0prah sure know how to pick ´em, eh?!! s/


Reply 43 - Posted by: garyhope, 1/15/2013 8:44:39 PM     (No. 9118864)

I´m never, EVER going to shake hands with Sheryl Crow again. No thank you.

Thanks #6.


Reply 44 - Posted by: Talega, 1/15/2013 10:58:37 PM     (No. 9119028)

It just breaks my heart that LA grew up in Plano, settled in Austin, and flew across the finish line with the TX flag in tow. There´s a message in there somewhere.


Reply 45 - Posted by: anonymous, 1/15/2013 11:12:16 PM     (No. 9119054)

Why is Lance doing this via Oprah? It trivializes the whole thing and turns it into a marketing exercise. He should simply issue a statement and an apology. Oprah is exploiting this



Post Reply   Close thread 719037




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"



There’s no way Obama is
telling the truth about when
he learned of the IRS scandal
Daily Caller, by Jim Treacher    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/20/2013 11:17:14 AM     Post Reply
And yes, I realize that headline is eight words too long. Peter Nicholas at the WSJ: The White House’s chief lawyer learned weeks ago that an audit of the Internal Revenue Service likely would show that agency employees inappropriately targeted conservative groups, a senior White House official said Sunday. That disclosure has prompted a debate over whether the president should have been notified at that time. In the week of April 22, the Office of the White House Counsel and its head, Kathryn Ruemmler, were told by Treasury Department attorneys

Washington bureaucrats use
force to suffocate liberty
Washington Examiner, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/20/2013 5:50:08 AM     Post Reply
Remember Armand Armendariz, the Environmental Protection Agency regional administrator who resigned after regaling an audience of Big Green activists with a history lesson to illustrate his agency´s approach to critics of the EPA´s harshest policies? When the Romans conquered a new province, he said, they would "... find the first five guys they saw and they´d crucify them ..." to make the province "really easy to manage for the next few years." The EPA, he continued, also makes "examples of people who are not complying with the law, you make examples out of them,

Reactionaries in New York
Time, by Joe Klein    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 8:27:40 AM     Post Reply
The Democratic candidates for mayor in New York are campaigning to win the support of the teachers union. They threaten to return the city to the horrors of the David Dinkins era. Back at the turn of the 1990s, New York City was a mess. Crime was rampant. The schools were dreadful. Children in foster care were brutalized because–as the head of the Child Welfare Agency said–”oversight is racist.” The mayor was an incompetent. And, above all, the city was run for the benefit of its employees rather than its citizens. What followed was 20 years of governance

Immigration reform no sure bet
Politico, by Seung Min Kim & Jake Sherman    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 6:29:04 AM     Post Reply
After years of false starts, Washington finally appears to be on the path to rewriting the nation’s immigration laws. The Senate Gang of Eight bill is holding its own in committee and is expected to hit the Senate floor in June. And in the House this week, members of a bipartisan group agreed “in principle” on a big bill to be revealed in June. But in this case, looks are deceiving. There are still major hurdles before immigration reform can reach President Barack Obama’s desk. The biggest one is the GOP-controlled House. Right now, the Senate bill has no chance

At Cincinnati IRS office, surprise
over claims of partisan villainy
Washington Post, by Lisa Rein & Dan Zak    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 5:17:34 AM     Post Reply
CINCINNATI — The fog of scandal hangs over a boxy, modernist, 10-story building that looks like a monument to paperwork. Shrubs and chain smokers flank its front entrance here on Main Street, in the heart of downtown. Every day, 2,000 employees go to work at various federal agencies in this John F. Kennedy-era structure, whose chief tenant is the Internal Revenue Service — which is having just about the worst week an agency can have. Up on the fourth floor — with its gray linoleum, low ceilings and fluorescent lights, file carts heaped with manila envelopes, its keypad-coded doors labeled 4-022

The Smoking Gun Can Tell
the AP What a Federal Leak
Investigation Is Like
Atlantic, by Philip Bump    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/18/2013 5:22:57 AM     Post Reply
When, in 2006, the website The Smoking Gun released a secret CIA memo documenting prisoner organizing strategies at Guantanamo Bay, the FBI took notice. Now the site has posted details of the ensuing 44-month-long investigation, offering a timely glimpse into the black box of a Department of Justice leak prosecution. And The Smoking Gun got lucky. Over the course of the FBI´s hunt, code-named "Stubborn Ways," 43 different people were interviewed, in locations stretching from New Mexico to Boston to Saudi Arabia. After the investigation narrowed to one person who was then exonerated — a woman from Virginia

There Was No Surge in IRS
Tax-Exempt Applications in 2010
Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/18/2013 5:03:01 AM     Post Reply
A number of people have sought to explain the IRS targeting of Tea Party, patriot, and 9/12 group applications -- as well as those from other conservative groups -- for "specialist team" treatment (mainly delays and excessive and inappropriate questions) in 2010 by pointing to the Citizens United decision that year allowing for unlimited, undisclosed fundraising by such groups. That´s the explanation IRS official Lois Lerner gave a week ago when she first revealed that the agency had improperly handled a slew of applications -- the political shorthand was a mistaken attempt to deal with a surge in applications.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

59 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

59 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

Camelot Is Burning
47 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

43 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure


Post Reply   Close thread 719037





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~