A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Exclusive: Andy We Hardly Knew
Ye: Sullivan Unceremoniously
Dumped by Daily Beast
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Exclusive: Andy We Hardly Knew
Ye: Sullivan Unceremoniously
Dumped by Daily Beast

Breitbart´s Big Journalism, by John Nolte

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/14/2013 9:02:18 AM

According to a credible source with inside knowledge of the matter, the actual reason Andrew Sullivan and the Daily Beast are parting ways at the end of this month has nothing to do with some high-falutin´ "duty to try and see if we could help break some new ground" and "pioneer" a "solid future for web journalism." According to this source, who spoke exclusively with Breitbart News, the powers that be at the Daily Beast decided the traffic Sullivan´s Daily Dish delivered just wasn´t worth the price of holding on to him for another year.

Comments:
How unfortunate. s/o There are plenty of other twisted leftists who will pick him up. I´m sure Media Matters would love to have him.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: enuf8, 1/14/2013 9:23:50 AM     (No. 9115352)

OK, no job - time to deport him. I heard he is HIV positive, so how could he apply for US citizenship?


Reply 2 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 1/14/2013 9:24:21 AM     (No. 9115354)

Andrew Sullivan? Who´s that?


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: earlybird, 1/14/2013 9:25:41 AM     (No. 9115361)

Awwww.


Reply 4 - Posted by: StormCnter, 1/14/2013 9:30:23 AM     (No. 9115368)

There was a time when I was a fan of Andrew Sullivan and enjoyed his columns. That was back when he was a conservative Republican, of course.


Reply 5 - Posted by: mamafrog, 1/14/2013 9:44:58 AM     (No. 9115393)

A business making a business decision, happens all the time.


Reply 6 - Posted by: lakerman1, 1/14/2013 9:47:52 AM     (No. 9115404)

I agree with #4. Back in the 1990s, sullivan was a sensible, analytical writer. Then he went on a sodomy crusade (he supports it) and it seemed to control every thought he had.
He became boring. (no pun intended)


Reply 7 - Posted by: janjan, 1/14/2013 9:53:36 AM     (No. 9115416)

Agree with #4. Sullivan used to be a moderate fiscal conservative who had some interesting viewpoints. Now he is a slobbering in-your-face liberal who substitutes genuine intelligent commentary with snarky insulting remarks that make him look very small. Good luck Andrew getting people to pay to read your crap.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: FlyRight, 1/14/2013 10:03:44 AM     (No. 9115440)

Sullivan finally lost it when he went after Sarah Palin like a raving wino on a park bench. Something about her having a baby drove him absolutely crazy. He out and out lied about his new situation but when I found out he has FOUR assistants - not reporters - assistants that I just gave up and realized he´s nothing but a fake with a good vocabulary.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Susannah, 1/14/2013 10:25:50 AM     (No. 9115490)

I too liked him when he was a conservative. He was a good editor for the New Republic in the 1990s.


Reply 10 - Posted by: msjena, 1/14/2013 10:29:06 AM     (No. 9115495)

I think all the drugs went to Andy´s brain. Or maybe his "husband" is a liberal and demands the same from him. Or maybe he in love from afar with Barack Obama. Whatever. Andy has been fired from every job he has ever held--the New York Times, Time, the Daily Beast. The list goes on.


Reply 11 - Posted by: killerbee, 1/14/2013 10:43:04 AM     (No. 9115534)

Why would they dump him? He follows all the rules of over-the-top misogyny toward Republican women. He prints wild conspiracy theories about anyone on the right. Why in the world would they want someone who so enthusiastically puts forth their narrative to leave their site?

I´m actually serious about that. It doesn´t make sense. If they´re trying to become a serious news source, they kind of missed that very short train.


Reply 12 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 1/14/2013 11:41:25 AM     (No. 9115718)

Spoiled fruit.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: msjena, 1/14/2013 11:54:42 AM     (No. 9115750)

#11--I think it´s because Andy continually bites the hand that feeds him. The New York Times fired him after he criticized the editor. I don´t even want to imagine how egotistical and obnoxious Andy must be in real life.


Reply 14 - Posted by: tenncon231, 1/14/2013 6:39:17 PM     (No. 9116515)

To think I used to read him and respect his opinions--but I think that was about 10 yrs ago.

So the question is, who changed?



Post Reply   Close thread 718916




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Colorado sheriffs seek to
block new gun restrictions,
file lawsuit against state
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM     Post Reply
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations

´We could lose everything´: Tea
Party groups prepare to sue IRS
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.

   

 

  


 
First Lady Expands Anti-
Obesity Campaign to Museums
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community

Congressman: IRS asked pro-
life group about ´the content
of their prayers´
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM     Post Reply
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although

Treasury Knew of I.R.S.
Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,

HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t
Employees More Time for ´Planning
and Preparing Healthy Meals´
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM     Post Reply
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.

Will real villains in IRS
scandal ever be punished?
Fox News, by Juan Williams    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM     Post Reply
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.

   

 



 


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.

43 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM     Post Reply
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP
Investigates Obama Scandals,
´The Voters Will Punish Them´

36 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM     Post Reply
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.

When it rains, it pours: Ten
press conference take aways

35 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM     Post Reply
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,

Obama 47 minutes late for his press
conference; leaves reporters in the rain

34 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/16/2013 1:20:06 PM     Post Reply
“I look forward to taking some questions at tomorrow’s press conference,” President Obama said last night, after announcing the resignation of the acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller. The president scheduled a noon press conference today with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in honor of his visit. Reporters, however, found themselves waiting outside in the rain for Obama, who was 47 minutes late. Only New York Times reporter Mark Landler had an umbrella.

Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

32 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 718916





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~